Tech Broiler

Jason Perlow and Scott Raymond

iPad 2 vs. BlackBerry PlayBook: Of course you realize, this means war.

By | March 1, 2011, 7:48pm PST

Summary: On the eve of the iPad 2 launch, RIM previewed a feature-complete version of the PlayBook tablet to the press, and it looks smart and extremely powerful. But will their efforts be enough?

On the eve of the iPad 2 launch, RIM previewed a feature-complete version of the PlayBook tablet to the press, and it looks smart and extremely powerful. But will their efforts be nearly enough?

It was certainly an odd and auspicious evening. On the eve of Apple launching their iPad 2 to the fawning masses, Research In Motion invited a group of select journalists to have a up close and personal look at a near-feature complete version of the BlackBerry PlayBook, their 7″ tablet that is sure to be the subject of a great deal of comparison with Apple’s latest offering in the coming year.

Indeed, it was a weird scene. RIM held its press event at a club lounge named “Provocateur” in downtown Chelsea in New York City, which is only a block away from Apple’s 14th street retail location and Google’s East Coast offices. It was if all the energy in the tablet world was being concentrated in one place, at one time.

The tension was so thick you could cut it with a knife.

Unlike other events where the PlayBook was closely guarded and we were only allowed to see guided demos (such as a developer preview I attended a few months earlier) we were actually allowed to handle and play with the device for extended periods of time. And this time, the PlayBook was sporting its brand new Webkit-based browser, which was previously missing from earlier versions of the PlayBook SDK.

There’s no doubt that the PlayBook is one very smart device. It’s light, very well constructed, with a solid and well-engineered feel to it. It’s extremely fast — and I’d even say it’s considerably faster than the current generation iPad and even the Motorola XOOM. And at seven inches, it fits quite nicely in a jacket pocket or a ladies’ small pocketbook — something that the iPad can’t do.

Additionally, I’d have to say I actually prefer the PlayBook UI to both iOS 4.2.x and Android Honeycomb — it has this really slick, high-performance feel about the whole thing that’s difficult for me to quantify. You really have to experience it to believe it.

Much of this I think can be attributed to QNX’s breeding as a Real-Time OS with a highly-efficient microkernel that runs extremely fast on the metal, with nearly 30 years of development behind the OS core itself.

While I think RIM may have gambled a great deal on QNX versus going with an established mobile OS with a large developer ecosystem such as Google’s Android, I certainly understand their choices. QNX is a thoroughbred, built for high performance and reliability, which has proven itself in the field with extremely demanding applications since 1982. Yep, you got that right — QNX has been around even longer than Linux.

In terms of raw OS performance, I believe iOS 4.x and Android 3 have met their match, and then some with PlayBook’s implementation of QNX.

The multitasking in the PlayBook UI is extremely impressive — it’s very easy and quick to navigate between running tasks, and you can see everything running in the background as you move between running apps. HP has made recent allegations that the PlayBook’s QNX user interface resembles their own WebOS which runs on their 10″ TouchPad device, which is due to launch sometime this summer.

I’m not sure I agree with HP that PlayBook’s UI is an “imitation”, but I can see where they might get that impression. Like WebOS, PlayBook’s UI uses a similar “card” paradigm, which allows you to change context between apps by using flipping gestures across the device’s 7″ 1024×600 capacitive touchscreen, which uses the same ultra-strong Gorilla Glass made by Corning used on the iPad.

The browser engineering team that RIM acquired out of the Torch Mobile purchase has done a real phenomenal job with the PlayBook’s browser. It’s fast, renders pages beautifully and responds in a fluid fashion to multi-touch gestures.

Like Apple’s own Mobile Safari browser on the iPad, the PlayBook also uses a Webkit-based system and it is compatible with modern HTML5 standards, including HTML5 video and the latest features of CSS3. Fonts resize and render very sharply, and the experience using the browser is extremely pleasurable.

In terms of actual apps, I was able to observe the performance of Adobe Air as well as native QNX C++ applications, all of which ran extremely smoothly and very fast on the device. The PlayBook uses a variant of Texas Instruments’ dual-core OMAP 4430 ARM Cortex A9 SoC running at 1Ghz, with 1GB of onboard RAM and an integrated POWERVR SGX540 GPU that can render fast 3D OpenGL graphics and decode full 1080p HD video, and I saw a few movies play on the brilliant color screen. It works as well as you could possibly expect.

And yes, it has dual HD video cameras, with 3MP on the front and 5MP the back, with an HDMI port for video output, just like its high-end Android tablet cousins.

Nobody is going to be disappointed with the performance or the overall build quality of the PlayBook. That much is without question.

So what’s not to like?

[Next: The devil is in the details]»

Topics

Jason Perlow, Sr. Technology Editor at ZDNet, is a technologist with over two decades of experience integrating large heterogeneous multi-vendor computing environments in Fortune 500 companies.

Disclosure

Jason Perlow

My Full-Time Employer is IBM. I write as a freelancer for ZDNet.

Disclaimer: The postings and opinions on this blog are my own and don't necessarily represent IBM's positions, strategies or opinions.

I own no investments or direct financial instruments in the companies I write about.

Biography

Jason Perlow

Jason Perlow, Sr. Technology Editor at ZDNet is a technologist with over two decades of experience with integrating large heterogeneous multi-vendor computing environments in Fortune 500 companies. A long-time computer enthusiast starting the age of 13 with his first Apple ][ personal computer, he began his freelance writing career starting at ZD Sm@rt Reseller in 1996 and has since authored numerous guest columns for ZDNet Enterprise and Ziff-Davis Internet. Jason was previously Senior Technology Editor for Linux Magazine, where he wrote about Open Source issues from 1999 to 2008.

In his spare time, Jason is an avid amateur chef and food writer, where his work reviewing New Jersey restaurants has appeared in The New York Times. He is also the founder of the popular food web site eGullet and blogs about restaurants and cooking at OffTheBroiler.com.

127
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

attent
Firat31 15th Aug
sohbet odalari sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari sohbet odalari sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari sohbet odalari sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari sohbet odalari sohbet odalari sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari sohbet odalari sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari sohbet odalari sohbet odalari sohbet odalari sohbet odalari sohbet odalari sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari sohbet odalari sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari sohbet odalari sohbet odalari sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet kanallari ? radyo dinle ? radyo dinle ?
mirc ? cet ? dul sohbet ? chat odalari ? chat odalari ?
sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? cet ? cet
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari turk chat - turk chat - cet
odalari islami sohbet
dini sohbet
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
Beni takip edenin gotune koyim =)9
I think the applications that are available on both tablets will be a deciding factor for a lot of people. For businesses I think that the Playbook will be very well received immediately, particularly if they already use Blackberry phones.
I am extremely interested in the Playbook and will be excited to see what the iPad2 has to fight the Blackberry tablet.
Interesting, ipad2 needs to fight playbook? It isn't even real yet. Last time I checked, even their first generation isn't available yet, while apple is already going to generation 2, and sold over 14 million tablets. I used to be a blackberry user, but after the iPhone, I never looked back. The answer us useability and ease of use and lots of applications that work and have no viruses.
0 Votes
+ -
iPad2 isn't even real yet, either.
ALISON SMOCK 1st Mar 2011
@Nononsense2011 iPad2 isn't even real yet, either. It might turn out to be nothing like the rumors floating around on the Apple fanboy websites.
@Nononsense2011: it is zero product for now, while iPad is real.
0 Votes
+ -
@Nononsense2011 ... to penetrate the enterprise. It's only serious competition in the enterprise is the RIM PlayBook. That's why there is so much interest in this device - even though it is not yet ready for prime time.
@Nononsense2011
Yup ipad is playing catch up as the ipad wa released either too soon or for some reason as a very lacking device. The ipad 2 is now trying to come out basically an ipad 1 with the missing featured it should have had in the first release so as apple releases its second version the specs are still a bit lacking compared to all the others first gen slates coming out so unless apple can match then exceed the basics the other slates have they will be playing catch up from here on out. The playbook seems better then the ipad but it is stim from RIM and is only a 7 inch unit which are the 2 biggest negatives against it.
@Nononsense2011
Just stop the Nonsense and relax.....
Breath in Breath out......
0 Votes
+ -
The visual difference is stunning... Visually we are talking about the difference of a 50" screen versus a 35" screen... That is a big difference.

It will fit in your pocket??? OOOOOOHHHHHH How quaint... So you will have a playbook in one pocket and a crackberry in the other??? And then you still have to tether them together if you want to see your email on a 7" screen??? How compelling.

I can see the attraction for enterprise to jump all over those playbooks... No.. I mean literally jump all over them, up and down, stomping, until they break... LOL

The playbook is only going to war with itself. The heat you mentioned is not good and can't be good for the battery. The pricing is going to be a joke and no way they hit the market by May.

Oh.. and Jason... Modern QNX has had 4 or 5 Kernel revisions and the modern version does not have "nearly 30 years of development behind the OS core itself." It has about 7 years behinf the current kernel. (unless Rim rewrote it again, in wich case it has less than a year).
@Fletchguy - Crack kills! Get off the pipe dude.
0 Votes
+ -
Need to fight & no viruses??
jc@... 2nd Mar 2011
@Nononsense2011 - Apple didn't consider the Android-based devices much of a threat to the iPhone, either; until the last half of 2010 played out. Let's face it, consumers are a fickle bunch. We raise the flag and cheer our hero manufacturers until their arrogance (or stupidity) keeps them from being competitive. Once we feel like that guy sitting next to us on the plane has a better toy, we start looking to two-time our loyalties. I think the PlayBook (and others) sound interesting enough to watch evolve. Time will tell if they fall on their own swords.

As for Apple viruses, there are now a handful of Mac viruses being written/released each day (Sophos). Granted, it is a drop in the bucket compared with the one every .9 seconds for the Windows world, but noteworthy in any case. The problem is that many users of Apple products believe they are immune to virus and malware threats. As a result, they don't take measures to protect themselves. How long before iPads become primary targets? Are they now? Oh yeah, users don't know because they don't look. Security, ostrich style. happy
@Nononsense2011
Indeed true! Until anybody can actually buy one of these toys they should be called the CrackBerry VaporBook. By then of course iPad2 will be old hat and iPad3 will come out not too long after that. Apple isn't sitting still and neither other thousands of developers, busy as bees writing software for sale in the iOS app store
@Nononsense2011 and i8thecat Its a pity you can't open your mind and see the benefits to the enterprise and folk like me who choose not to use an ipad because of its size, and the fact the enterprise is fashioned as a secure app. That might not mean much to you; but to us folk that need to enter a complex password EVERY time we choose to do flip between ipad and secure app... its HASSLE and not worth the effort to me.

And 7" means portability in the office, in the car. You're both not getting the picture because you only have your rose-tinted ipad blinkers on. Open your mind and see where it benefits others.

My ipad went back in a few days, my iphone lies in my bag without a SIM and is only looked at when someone has a problem and asks for help. BB Torch for me (lasts twice as long on battery as my iphone by the way), and I look forward to the playbook and seeing what it can do for me next.
"Apple didn't consider the Android-based devices much of a threat to the iPhone, either; until the last half of 2010 played out. Let's face it, consumers are a fickle bunch."

Well, you have to remember that Apple has been playing against a seriously stacked deck in phones. In order to break into the phone market at all they had to sign extended exclusivity deals that gave potential competitors up to a four year window where they could possibly sell cross-carrier and Apple could not.

Remember, in the largest smartphone market there is Apple was unable to sell on anything but the 2nd-tier carrier until only about a month ago. Do you know anyone who bought a Droid because they couldn't get a Verizon iPhone? I'm sure you do. I know quite a few.

This same situation was true in several other major markets as well, and with contracts being what they are the handicap will continue for upwards of two years.

We have some idea of how Apple does when not confronted with such market distortions. The iPod touch, for instance, is demolishing all comers (not that there have been many, really just the Zune) and did a number on portable gaming systems while it was at it. I hear there are going to be Android versions out sometime soon but it is incredibly unlikely that anyone can match the price. If you can't do that, it's just game over.

Everyone (well, almost everyone, some people remembered the lesson of the iPod) expected a horde of cheap Android tablets to come in and grab the market, but so far we haven't seen even one that even looks like it *might* be successful at this. They aren't cheaper, at least not without debilitating hardware concessions, and they have to be both cheaper *and* better to win. That might be possible in another year. It certainly won't happen in 2011, and meanwhile Apple is going to sell forty or fifty million more iPads according to most industry observers.

I do not believe we're going to see the phone scenario play out here. Android may well win long-term, but it is far from guaranteed and it has a hell of a hill to climb and no market distortions to help this time around.

As for the Playbook, I would be surprised if it sold well at all, even to businesses. Businesses have already latched onto the iPad pretty strongly. It is cheap, flexible, durable, has tons of applications support, terrific connectivity, and incredible applications and connectivity support. The Playbook may have most or all of that eventually but we already know much of that will be missing out-the-door. I bet it will take 12-18 months to even begin to truly mature, just like Android tablets.

By the time it's a really robust product and with a reasonable app ecosystem it'll be fighting almost a hundred million installed iPads. To say that it is unlikely to do well against that, no matter how good the product actually is, is an understatement. They would have had a chance a year ago. Today? Nope.

It's going to be Android or iOS, and while I'm not counting a potential Android win out the deck is well and truly stacked against it. There's a very good chance it will stay a relatively niche item unless really strong competitors to the iPad show up very soon. The Playbook and WebOS devices? Thanks for playing, guys.
@allison smock Guess what? iPad start selling a week from the announcement; playbook many months after announcement someday later this year if ever, sorry GAME OVER!
@GeoffQ "I think the applications that are available on both tablets will be a deciding factor for a lot of people."

I belive that eco-systems are more important than individual devices. Those who use a Blackberry will most logically suit the PlayBook, and that basically means businesses.

If a person has an iMac, iPhone and iPod, why would they then chose a PlayBook rather than an iPad, only to have to re-purchase apps and music etc? Same for those with a PC and Zune and possibly a WP7 phone.

This is just my opinion. I look-forward to seeing what actually happens.
0 Votes
+ -
Smart post.
Bruizer 2nd Mar 2011
@ptorning

Each of the devices are hired to do different things. Each pulls on an eco-system that exists outside of the device. This is the weak spot of Android when compared to iOS, RIM and WP7. With Android the only ecosystem is huge device selection and some Apps.

With the exception of iOS (that has limited device selection but a huge selection of Apps), Android's competitors have the same advantages.

RIM has their messaging; iOS has their iTMS and iPod Dock; WP7 has the Zune MarketPlace, Office and XBox Live.

Over and over, I have been trying to point out that personal choice comes into a phone purchase more than it does on a desktop/computer purchase. As a result, this is not a zero sum game and the market is large enough to support multiple platforms. I suspect between 3 to 5 platforms.

Android (not counting the incompatible OMS/Tapas variants that are unique platforms) might end up with the lion's share (30-40%) of the low end but monetization will behind every other platform.
0 Votes
+ -
ecosystems
tomkar 4th Mar 2011
@ptorning I agree in general, but I have an iMac and an iPhone and my wife has a Gen1 iPad and an iPhone. I need flash, so I will not get an iPad until that is solved. So I would consider a Playbook. However, if the Playbook needs a BB for connectivity, then it is out. I need 3G. I guess time will tell.
@ptorning Couldn't agree more. While my limited experience with Android hasn't been all that good I would have given Android based devices a much closer look before my recent upgrade if I didn't have my current investment/experience in/with iOS and it's ecosystem.
@GeoffQ Absolutely. It's about the apps. It looks appealing, but without apps it's just a portable web browser (although that has merit too).
0 Votes
+ -
Competition is good
wackoae 1st Mar 2011
RIM needs a hit in order to survive. After they gave away to demands from the middle east, the claim of security is no longer applicable.
0 Votes
+ -
They need a hit ...
mwagner@... 2nd Mar 2011
@wackoae ... to COMPETE in the tablet market but they will SURVIVE even if the PlayBook stumbles, if only because BES (the BlacBerry neterprise Server). If RIM had a BES app for the iPad, that would paint a completely different picture but, as of now, they don't.
0 Votes
+ -
That's not true.
the.moog 2nd Mar 2011
@wackoae They didn't just give up the goat overseas. It's more complex than that. Also, it's a great time for consumers no matter how you look at it. All of these consumer electronics companies fighting for your money and allegiance.
Just imagine...what if Play book gets the black berry well renowned services?
There is nothing special in IPad except the UI. If PlayBook is going to deliver that. It will be a hard hit!
@imraza2@... "There is nothing special in IPad ..." except:

It exists with 14 millions sold
The app store ecosystem
The iBook store
9.7" screen
Low price
10 hour battery life
Media companies are embracing it
Apple is already working on version 3
Touchscreen shortage and higher prices for the competition

Other than these minor details, yeah, the PlayBook is way ahead...
@prof123

The v3 iPad is currently more or less a rumor carried around by Apple fanboy sites. It's mere vaporware at this time....

Also, the iBook store is special? Kindle store blows it away in every respect, without the high fees that Apple charges...

The touchscreen shortage is a special feature of the iPad? More like a failure on the part of manufacturers to keep up.
@prof123 Nice to compare a product that is out versus one that isn't. Comparing OS X Leopard vs Lion yet?
@prof123
peter021
I have a Kindle app on my iPad...

Seriously, it will be a "horses for courses" situation. For my needs, an iPad is fine. For business users, certainly a Black Berry seems to have advantages. For someone looking for a "compact laptop" type slate, a XOOM would seem to be the one. As to which market is the largest, possibly the iPad's, as a non-specialist type slate, but time and the consumer will tell, not fanboys wearing blinkers.
@imraza2@...
In spite of "nothing special" they have sold over 14 million in 9 months - version 1, mind you!
We'll see how many of these Playbooks (curious name given so many here claim it is a device targeting the enterprise market) sell by the end of this year.
It doesn't matter who you are rooting for, Apple is selling iPhones and iPads as fast as they can make them.
and they are switching to Android & iOS. It also hurts RIM's ecosystem, whatever it is now. AppWorld have around 16k apps, but none will work on PB! WOW!

If RIM really allows Android apps (or kind of Dalvik VM) to run in PB, then why they are wasting time on QNX/Adobe AIR SDK, etc.? Why do I need to use Adobe AIR, if my droid codebase works for PB?

And finally, they are demoing PB for the last 3 months and on the eve of iPad 2 launch they're saying "we're not done"! I think they are short of resources. I wonder when & IF they will RTMed it!

From tomorrow we'd talk about iPad 2/iOS 5 vs Xoom/other Android 3.0 devices, etc. etc. and nobody would care for PB.
Apple is not about specs, but delivering a well engineered fully integrated device with a great user experience. And oh, they are also innovative and not just copy cats. Before the iPad, most so-called "technology experts" were convinced that nobody needed a tablet device, just like they said no one would use a touch screen based keyboard. Well, the rest is history by now happy
@Nononsense2011 Apple is not about specs, but delivering a well engineered fully integrated device with a great user experience.

Is that like the standard reply to anything from Apple fanatics? I swear I've heard just about exactly that same promo material dozens of times before.
@Nononsense2011 I guess... since the same apps seem to proliferate across all platforms quickly these days I'm not sure how long that user experience will last really. It strikes me that the same thing will happen with tablets as did the netbooks, turn into a low cost commodity item fairly quickly.
@paulj_edm Having the same apps across different platforms does not mean you get the same user experience.
@Nononsense2011
Not about specs? How do you have a well engineered fully integrated device with a great user experience without being concerned about the specs? It's kinda like having a user name that promotes one thing but write in a way that is the total opposite. the 2 don't jive
@Turd Furgeson

"Not about specs? How do you have a well engineered fully integrated device with a great user experience without being concerned about the specs?"

I think his choice of words was poor. There's a difference between being driven by specs and being concerned about them. A lot of the new tablet vendors are throwing spec sheets at you because they don't have any choice. The software on all of the other tablets has been very immature, and there is very little aftermarket software for anything but the iPad.

When it comes down to it specs start to matter when too little stops you from using the thing for what you want to use it for. The iPad1 works really well given surprisingly limited hardware. It's fast and I can't point to any application I use and say, "That doesn't work because I don't have enough memory."

Obviously as applications grow it's going to need more of just about everything, but Moore's Law has a habit of taking care of that. The iPad2 is not hurting for core specs, you might notice; it's right there in the mix. And therein lies an important observation you might keep in mind: Most of the difference between the iPad1 and the Xoom, pretty much what is driving a lot of these "Apple's specs suck" arguments, is not so much Apple not paying attention or trying to rip the user off or whatever but rather Apple having put out the product almost a year earlier than the other guys ... before some of those really nifty new hardware bits were available to anyone.

But about that integration: Apple has done a pretty good job with integration, too ... although I would say that it looks as good as it does because the other guys really don't have anything.

iTunes/App Store integration was there right from the start -- and it's hard to overstate how important those are. Streaming is there, though still half-baked in 4.2. 4.3 looks like it'll improve things markedly here. Integrated remote printing, albeit with rather poor print target support right now unless you use the MacOS AirPrint hack. Caveats all through there, but when you compare to the competition it is clear Apple is head and shoulders above the pack.

They get knocked a lot for the walled garden of the store, and for sure I've been irritated at what they don't allow or later yank, but seriously -- there are something like 70,000 iPad-specific apps. There aren't that many categories that don't have applications to support them, and usually a whole bunch of choices. (Just today I set up RDP through an SSH tunnel; I've had VNC working for more than six months. What a wonderful lightweight travel solution.) For the tinkerer the locked up environment sucks, but how long did it take them to jailbreak the iPad? A week? Two? Almost all of the tinkerers I know are using jailbroken devices.

In my mind Apple does need to do more to the interface, and in particular they need to fix notifications and dramatically improve multitasking. One-at-a-time didn't hurt so much on the phone, but it's a pain in the neck on a tool I use for real work. As we've seen with jailbroken iOS devices this is something they can do with just software updates and I think you'd have to be nuts to believe that we won't see some big changes in one or both respects this year (June would be a really good bet). It's just not that hard a problem.

The other thing that I see crippling the iPad for a lot of uses is the inability to share documents between applications. A shared directory and integrated iDisk access would wipe this problem out. It is such an obvious problem (even if you're using Apple's own productivity apps) that I will be quite surprised if we don't see that fixed in either iOS5 or in a point release towards the end of the year (much like the way they added AirPrint in 4.2).

So, really, the question isn't "does Apple pay attention to specs" as it is "does Apple pay attention to performance?" They clearly do, usually doing much better than the competition even on noticeably worse hardware. That is a strength, to me, although likely short-lived as the competition matures.

jim frost
jimf@frostbytes.com
@Nononsense2011
They are not innovative. There have been plenty of tablets 5-7" variety since before there was even an iphone and they work perfectly fine. What apple has is PR money to make you believe they are the first and you are eating it up. History is always rewritten by those who win wars.

Apple has been successful in our modern birtney spears culture. Lots of glitz and little substance.
@rengek Marketing only gets you so far and then it's the quality and user experience that keeps them coming back. That's something that so many can't seem to grasp yet it's such a simple concept. If it's all about marketing then the Xoom should be killing the iPad on sales right now since I see 3 ads for it for every one I see for the iPad.
@Nononsense2011
I would agree on the integrated as they are a closed system. You are also correct in the fact that they created a whole niche market when they created the iPad. You did overstep when you say Apple are "not just copy cats." They have on many occasions borrowed other companies ideas and presented them as their own and while their designs are aesthetically pleasing, they are not always well engineered.
@Nononsense2011 : Don't forget the huge profit Apple is getting at the expense ofd the fanbois and fangurls and those seeking to be a status symbols.
@Gis Bun The fact that tens of millions of people are so happy with their Apple devices that they upgrade to the next version really chaps your a$$ doesn't it?
@Nononsense2011 before the iPad... there were over a dozen touch screen tablets shown off at CES 2010. Yes, some of these were canned or repurposed as a result of the iPad announcement three weeks later, but the touch screen tablet was very obvious. Particularly after years of touch screen phones. The only real kicker .. no finger-touch device would be Windows based.

And, just to be complete, before the iPad, Archos was showing off their fourth generation ARM-based tablet computers (your choice of 5", 7", or 10" screens). Apple does innovate, but hardly in a vacuum.
Did they demo the rumoured ability to run Android apps?
0 Votes
+ -
@GLComputing

The PlayBook running Android Apps would be a blunder. With AppWorld already the second place (by revenue) app market behind iOS, why would RIM further put the screw their developers? Android Revenue is even below the Nokia Ovi store. Dude, Android App development is a loosing proposition.

RIM is in a stronger position than most people give credit. The have a great OS in QnX. Simply great. The PlayBook was, IMO, far better than the joke that was Honeycomb showed at CES. The Xoom was laughably unstable while the PlayBook was solid as a rock.

The only downside to the PlayBook is the 7" screen. Beyond that, it looks like s sweet design.
@Bruizer B.s. Show us exactly where the Xoom was unstable. I looked at the CES demo and the Xoom crusied through each demo. Your post reads more bias and less about facts.
@Bruizer
That wouldn't be screwing their developers, nor a blunder. You aren't thinking strategically.

I'm not the only consumer virtually dismissing the PlayBook for two reasons:
1) iOS and Android have huge app markets. The perception is - RIM, not so much.
2) Perception that some PlayBook features might require a Blackberry.

Being a non-Blackberry owner seeking a tablet that enables me to do the most I can (ie. highest "bang for the buck"), I might dismiss the Playbook entirely, if for no other reason than I know I have a better selection of apps on iPad or Android... and there's the unknown/stigma of Blackberry collapsing as an entity, yet requiring one of those increasingly-obsolete little Blackberry devices to use the PlayBook to it's full potential.

As a consumer, I might actually consider a PlayBook in my short list, if it also runs Android apps. That addresses at least one consumer concern, and does erode away a bit at the fundamental Blackberry-obsolescence concern as well.

What would be screwing developers, then?

Releasing a tablet that people perceive to be locked to the shrinking world of BlackBerry, and therefore sells in disappointingly small numbers.
That's what enabling the PlayBook to run Android apps would help avoid.

And once purchased - hey! Check it out, what do you know? There's a whole BlackBerry app world also, that's not half bad...
@dove-7 While I am sure there are some good ones out there every review I have seen apart from the CES demo reviews have talked about how unstable it is. I have not touched one so can't say from personal experience but there are a lot of reviews making this claim.
@GLComputing No, and they wouldn't comment on it "at this time".
i think im going to get one instead of ipad 2. i mean i already have an iphone which is the same thing. whats the point of buying an ipad which is basically a copycat of iphone just a bigger screen? anything done on an ipad can be done with the same ease as on an iphone. this at least is something different.
@rocketboy5114 Do you even realize just how worn out that argument is?
@rocketboy5114 Being an iPhone user for 3 1/2 years and having used my wife's iPad I can say there are certainly things I would rather use the iPad for versus the iPhone.
0 Votes
+ -
attent
Firat31 15th Aug
sohbet odalari sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari sohbet odalari sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari sohbet odalari sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari sohbet odalari sohbet odalari sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari sohbet odalari sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari sohbet odalari sohbet odalari sohbet odalari sohbet odalari sohbet odalari sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari sohbet odalari sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari sohbet odalari sohbet odalari sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet kanallari ? radyo dinle ? radyo dinle ?
mirc ? cet ? dul sohbet ? chat odalari ? chat odalari ?
sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? cet ? cet
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari turk chat - turk chat - cet
odalari islami sohbet
dini sohbet
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
Beni takip edenin gotune koyim =)9

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix