Tech Broiler

Jason Perlow and Scott Raymond

Samsung Galaxy Tab: iPad Rival or Handheld Computer?

By | November 11, 2010, 11:13pm PST

Summary: The Samsung Galaxy Tab is an impressive piece of technology, but it’s not really an iPad competitor.

The Samsung Galaxy Tab is an impressive piece of technology, but it’s not really an iPad competitor.

Yesterday, I decided to break down and purchase a Galaxy Tab, hoping it would finally fulfill the promises of being a general-purpose Android tablet that could fill the role that my iPad is currently performing today — a device which I could use to browse the Web, do some productivity tasks, use tablet-style applications, and also use as an e-Reader.

Also See: Samsung Galaxy Tab (Gallery)

Also See: Samsung Galaxy Tab (C|Net Reviews)

Also See: Samsung Galaxy Tab (Jason Hiner)

As I am a current Verizon customer and I am happy with the carrier’s overall 3G data coverage on my Motorola Droid, I decided to purchase the unit at my local Verizon Wireless store, in Paramus, New Jersey. It should be noted that unlike T-Mobile, which also just launched the device on their network, and can be purchased off-contract, that the Verizon model isn’t currently being sold without an additonal data plan.

You can buy a month-to-month, contract-free $20 1GB data plan, but there’s a $35 activation fee (unless you’re a corporate customer with special terms) for each time you re-activate service, should you decide to terminate the data plan and then turn it back on later.  For those of you who don’t want this device with 3G, a Wi-Fi only model is destined to hit the US shores shortly, and will be about $100 cheaper, so you should wait.

There are a number of comprehensive reviews of this device on the web already, most notably from our own C|Net sister site, The Wall Street Journal and the New York Times. If you’re looking for a super nuts and bolts drill-down into this thing, stop reading this article and look at those instead.

What you’re going to get here is not a review from someone who worked with Samsung PR to procure a review device and has had it in their possession for several days or longer who has been under non-disclosure until yesterday. This should be considered an off-the-street, first impression of someone who just laid down cold, hard cash for this thing yesterday morning.

So having plunked down $641.99 after taxes plus a $35.00 activation fee and a pro-rated $20 per month plan, I decided to give the Galaxy Tab a spin at my local coffee shop and on my home wireless network and see how the device performed in the real world.

First, a few observations about the hardware. I’m currently an iPad and a Motorola Droid user, so that’s my two frames of reference regarding the software stack(s) and expectations about build quality. The Samsung 7″ 1024×600 capacitive LCD touchscreen is absolutely gorgeous and extremely bright — it’s the first thing that jumps right at you. When compared with the iPad’s 9.7″ 1024×768 screen, it actually appears sharper, because of the higher pixel density. So no complaints there.

In terms of being able to use the device as an e-Reader, since the Galaxy Tab’s Android 2.2 currently supports both the Amazon Kindle and Barnes & Noble Nook apps at native resolution, it has the same practical limitations as the iPad — lousy outdoors in bright sunlight, but excellent indoors and during the evening. This is not a dig at backlit LCD technology, this simply is what it is.

Page 2: [Build Quality and User Experience]  »

Topics

Jason Perlow, Sr. Technology Editor at ZDNet, is a technologist with over two decades of experience integrating large heterogeneous multi-vendor computing environments in Fortune 500 companies.

Disclosure

Jason Perlow

My Full-Time Employer is IBM. I write as a freelancer for ZDNet.

Disclaimer: The postings and opinions on this blog are my own and don't necessarily represent IBM's positions, strategies or opinions.

I own no investments or direct financial instruments in the companies I write about.

Biography

Jason Perlow

Jason Perlow, Sr. Technology Editor at ZDNet is a technologist with over two decades of experience with integrating large heterogeneous multi-vendor computing environments in Fortune 500 companies. A long-time computer enthusiast starting the age of 13 with his first Apple ][ personal computer, he began his freelance writing career starting at ZD Sm@rt Reseller in 1996 and has since authored numerous guest columns for ZDNet Enterprise and Ziff-Davis Internet. Jason was previously Senior Technology Editor for Linux Magazine, where he wrote about Open Source issues from 1999 to 2008.

In his spare time, Jason is an avid amateur chef and food writer, where his work reviewing New Jersey restaurants has appeared in The New York Times. He is also the founder of the popular food web site eGullet and blogs about restaurants and cooking at OffTheBroiler.com.

89
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Samsung Galaxy Tab: iPad Rival or Handheld Computer?
bbnetworking 4th Aug
When i switch my Tab to silent, is there any way to stop it vibrating after every keystroke in apps such as quickoffice? it is getting quite annoying when trying to type notes in a quiet lecture hall. Also posted on http://www.mygalaxytab.net but no luck.

Thanks for any help.
Thanks for a honest in-depth review, we will definitely have a lot of cool android tablets soon enough
@godzhesas I think where android based tablets are concerned, based on the smart phone market over the past few years, HTC are the manufacturer to watch. I hope they make an android tab, because what they have done with their android phones and sense UI has been so far beyond the Galaxy S mobile or any other android handset.
That is a refreshing internet user's review. As a 1.0 first attempt it points the way forward and the next tab should get better once those kinks/shortcomings you mentioned are sorted out. Yes, I shall wait eagerly for the sequel !
0 Votes
+ -
iPad came first I believe.
A Grain of Salt 12th Nov 2010
"...the iPad?s iOS, which was originally derided for being just a big iPod Touch or a giant iPhone, and is actually more optimized to the target device despite originating as a smartphone operating system."

In fact the iPad came first. Steve Jobs, in his All Things Digital interview, said that Apple was desiging a tablet around 2002 then saw what the software engineer had done with inertial scrolling. He then shelved the tablet idea and continued development for a phone. So iOS was originally slated (pun intended) for a tablet device.

Great review though. I'm living in Korea and Samsung are hammering the Tab for all it's worth, even though it has only just been released here. No official sign of the iPad yet except those of us who ordered one from another country. It will be interesting to see how the two devices will be compared over here.
@A Grain of Salt

Well as the owner of an ipad I would say they are not worth the money. Too much of the web is unable to reach due to Jobs refusing flash to be ported to the ipad. I have an andriod phone with flash. I can not wait to get an android based Pad
@rparker009
You should sell it. I now know four folks who have them and they love them. Sorry that you misjudged the purchase or underestimated how important Flash-using web-sites were to you; no need to to suffer any further.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Samsung Galaxy Tab: iPad Rival or Handheld Computer?
spikedstrider Updated - 13th Nov 2010
@rparker009 I have an iPad and actually the no flash was the selling point for me. I actually researched the product instead of doing an impulse buy. I did not get it day one, but it was worth the wait and every penny spent. I also am used to Apple's better safe than sorry attitude and agree with it. My only real dislike is some of the aps that they allow in the apstore. I don't like it when things quite. 4.2 ios is coming and I am hoping Safari runs smoother. I agree with DannyO you should sell it as I know people that love using mine that would not mind getting one. I hope the Android performs beyond your expectations. I know the iPad has for me.
0 Votes
+ -
@rparker009 The no flash support was a selling point for me too. As others said, no need to suffer anymore. If you're into this kind of device you may take a look at other Android tablets like the Notion-Ink Adam, or even BB... I may be wrong, but I hardly see how these devices can make a good use of the high level Flash framework anyway, seems too resource intensive to be handled by this architecture, at least for now... And as soon as videos are concerned, sites like YouTube have theirs standardized [mp4] and handled by the hardware acceleration chip right away; and games are available for free or 80 cents as optimized native apps, so why bother...
0 Votes
+ -
Having used Android with Flash
Bruizer 18th Nov 2010
@rparker009

Not having Flash was a great selling point. I find Android web browsing almost unusable with Flash enabled and still eats resources when on demand. Perhaps RIM will make it work. Google failed.
@rparker009 The Flash you have on your Android phone is not the full fledge version of it.
0 Votes
+ -
Heat
Economister 12th Nov 2010
I think your heat analysis may be a bit off. Aluminum is a much better conductor than plastic. What you are probably experiencing is the heat from the iPad being spread and dissipated over a larger surface area and therefore does not need to be as warm to dissipate the heat. The Galaxy on the other hand, having a lower conductivity case, needs a higher surface temperature in a smaller area to dissipate the heat generated.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@Economister Fascinating.
0 Votes
+ -
@Economister
That was exactly what I was going to say. Plus, with the plastic case, the Tab is actually insulating the heat inside... it might affect the performance in the long run.
0 Votes
+ -
Very possible
Economister 12th Nov 2010
@MikeyTheUnderdog

You may need a higher temperature inside the case to reach a steady state heat balance. With no fan, an aluminum case is probably a better design, everything else being equal.
0 Votes
+ -
@Economister Alluminum is great for keeping a device cool. Plastic prevents the heat from leaving the device. I believe what he was saying aluminum is the better choice for the same price. Instead of bouncing the heat back the device, the iPad distributes the heat to help keep it cool.
0 Votes
+ -
So the Tab runs hotter.
Bruizer 18th Nov 2010
@Economister

Pretty simple. The iPad has a better heat sink. Sounds like a huge plus to me.
0 Votes
+ -
@CFWhittman
Bruizer Updated - 19th Nov 2010
Slightly more flexible but substantially harder. It goes along way to why I still think of Android as a geek OS. Moving media to a Droid is a PITA. Flexible, yes. Easy? Not at all.
0 Votes
+ -
Dolphin
Dietrich T. Schmitz, ~ Your Linux Advocate 12th Nov 2010
Jason have you tried Dolphin?
:/
@Dietrich T. Schmitz, Your Linux Advocate: He said he tried opera mobile (I hope he means mobile and not mini) in my experience the newly release opera mobile (beta) is better than dolphin in speed and rendering. Certainly the overall experience in opera mobile is in a different league to the build in android browser.
0 Votes
+ -
Not first
Tim Patterson 12th Nov 2010
This is getting old.
Because a large company like Apple comes out with the iPad they were "first".

WRONG!

My Nokia N800 TABLET predates iPad by years. My Archos 5 running Android was out months before the iPad.

The iPad was nowhere the first tablet device.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@Tim Patterson Whether they are first or not doesn't matter. They are the established leader in the space.
0 Votes
+ -
Not addressing leader status
Tim Patterson 12th Nov 2010
@jperlow I was referring to those who claim that Apple was first with the tablet device in the form of the iPad. They weren't.
0 Votes
+ -
True, let's rephrase
frgough Updated - 12th Nov 2010
Apple was the first to make a tablet that didn't suck. Apparently, they are still the only one making a tablet that doesn't suck, considering every review including this one basically says the variations of the following: inferior screen technology (TN vs IPS) cramped screen size, sluggish behavior, especially when flash is enabled (well, what do you know, Jobs was right), half the screen real-estate and half the battery life. The only difference is the conclusion: The Samsung sucks, and is not a serious iPad competitor, and the Samsung sucks, but is a legitimate iPad competitor.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@frgough I already went back to the iPad.
0 Votes
+ -
@jason
frgough 12th Nov 2010
yeah, my bad. Moral: get your cup of coffee BEFORE reading the article so the text isn't quite so blurry.
0 Votes
+ -
Not Quite Right
Stoshie 12th Nov 2010
@frgough, I agree with some of what you said, except about screen size. The iPad is too big to handle comfortably in one hand for any length of time, and the screen does not have very good resolution. The Samsung wins hands down in screen size and quality.

Also, considering how often you used the word "suck", you come across like a fanboy, not someone with an objective opinion worth giving much consideration.
0 Votes
+ -
@Tim Patterson: Apple developed Newton since 1987 and the released version was actually the smallest of all three variants.

That is, if you can call 1.7 pound Newton from 1993 a "small" device.
@Tim Patterson Unfortunately, I don't remember these tablets to be references to follow
0 Votes
+ -
And the Newton came before them...
webmaster@... 13th Nov 2010
@Tim Patterson Pointless logical fallacy...
@Tim Patterson

Apple is rarely first with their products. But, you don't hear about people lining up to buy Nokia N800's or Archos 5's. Apple will only introduce a product when they can achieve a reasonable degree of usability within the constraints of current technology. They sometimes fail, but that does not seem to have happened for a while.
@Tim Patterson I think the author was referring to the "first" tablet computer that a significant number of people actually wanted to buy. HP has had a tablet Windows machine since 2002. Apple had the Newton in 1993. Until the iPad, none of them sold in serious quantities.
0 Votes
+ -
@Robert Hahn
Um, the Newton sold quite well, actually.
0 Votes
+ -
@Tim Patterson

Getting old? Who here claimed that?
0 Votes
+ -
Nice review Jason.
Couple of things from my perspective:
- Only have tried the Tab at my local Verizon store. As I am looking for wifi only I am waiting.
- I was not impressed with the case - even for resin it could have been better
- I absolutely love the extra ports!!!! YES!!!!
- IMHO the iPad is and acts like an iTouch - hopefully 4.2 adds a bit of non-iTouch feeling and functionality to it - yes I have a wifi version
- One aspect I really liked on the Tab was the weight.
- Just a personal opinion, as I am not a fan at all of the Safari type browser on the iPad I like the Tabs version better
- Last, as I also use exchange server mail clients, at first glance, the function and layout of the Android email is far superior

All said, I find there are things I like better and worse than the iPad about the Tab. WIll I get one? Likely. I am a tech junky.... chuckle.

Thanks!!!
@zenwalker

Hypothetical question. If (and that's a big IF), Apple introduces Intel's Light Peak serial port technology on its iPad future models, would that be sufficient for your tablet needs? (Assume believable tech upgrades to the iPad for future models.)
@kenosha7777
For me, no. Not as long as it is tethered to a real computer the way it is. Android devices NEVER have to plug into a computer EVER, nor does the owner have to own a separate computer with the buggy bloatware iTunes installed on it.
0 Votes
+ -
how does android handle backups?
doctorSpoc 12th Nov 2010
@ Droid101.. seriously don't know.. i know you have lots of stuff in the cloud on android.. but what about stuff you have on the device.. movies, photo's you've taken and edited etc.. documents you've created etc.. apps etc.. all your OS tweaks and settings..

anything happens to my iPhone or iPad.. lose it, drop it in the toilet etc.. i can just connect another iOS device (doesn't even have to be the same type of device) to iTunes and in a few minutes i get a all my stuff, apps and my settings etc back... if you're never connecting your android device to anything how do you handle backups when something goes wrong?
@doctorSpoc
Clearly it's quite possible to back up all your date from an Android device. You can attach a USB storage device or use an SD card. You can copy the data to a computer if you want. It seems like a more flexible approach to me.
Now that you have had "hands on" experience with both products and their web browsers, do you feel Jobs and Apple were justified in their criticism of mobile Flash technology? I'll leave it go at that even though Adobe's current CTO Kevin Lynch has made recent statements indicating that the knock against Mobile Flash as a battery power drainer is unfounded (or words to that effect).

Just as a sidebar, one other issue against Flash technology is its lack of robustness against malware attacks. I wonder if it was a mere coincidence that Apple's latest Snow Leopard update included security software patches in which 42 percent of them were related to Flash software code updates.
0 Votes
+ -
Flash
Dietrich T. Schmitz, ~ Your Linux Advocate Updated - 12th Nov 2010
@kenosha7777

I have the latest Hummingbird A8 Cortex 1GHz ARM processor in my Samsung Galaxy S Captivate.

The flash playback is so good, I may as well be using my Desktop in terms of content experience.

No latency, unless you are on an EDGE connection. No perceptable issue over 3G or WiFi.

I removed Skyfire from my captivate now that I am running Froyo 2.2, which supports and is running Adobe's Flash 10.1 player.

Between the stock browser and Dolphin, I think Dolphin is the winner.
@Dietrich T. Schmitz, Your Linux Advocate

How is your battery life?
0 Votes
+ -
Battery life: not ideal
Dietrich T. Schmitz, ~ Your Linux Advocate 12th Nov 2010
@kenosha7777

I've ordered a Mugen 3200 MAh extended battery with battery cover.
@Dietrich T. Schmitz, Your Linux Advocate

"I've ordered a Mugen 3200 MAh extended battery with battery cover."

In other words, it sucked the battery.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@kenosha7777 I think that given Flash's current usage profile for the web sites that use it and current level of platform optimization on ARM (or lack thereof) Apple made a good decision at the time not to use it in iOS. I'm curious to see what work Adobe is putting into Flash on the RIM Playbook, since that device is 100 percent Flash dependent for all of its applications.
@jperlow
Good points. If RIM's PlayBook and Chrome OS based netbooks are able to provide acceptable battery life and flash performance, Apple may have to rethink their stand on Flash. However, those are big "ifs".
0 Votes
+ -
Flash as the API might work
Bruizer Updated - 19th Nov 2010
@jperlow

If Flash is deeply embedded as the first class citizen at the OS level like Objective-C on iOS and Java on Android, the performance might be pretty good. I am interested to see how RIM pulls this off.
@kenosha7777
Flash works fine. I don't know what sites these people are going to, but if you have Flash set to "touch to enable Flash" then you avoid the ads (which might slow page loads) and get the content you want.
@Droid101 Flash is also a resource hog on a good PC, some people want to ignore this fact.
0 Votes
+ -
@Droid101

Yep. What is even cooler is if you remove Flash, you still get almost all the content.
0 Votes
+ -
jerky scrolling
Samic Updated - 12th Nov 2010
For the most part Android's web browser isn't hardware accelerated... You can try typing "about:debug" in the address bar and then goto menu>more>setting, and "Enable Light Touch" then it will be a bit smoother.

I think the reason why it wasn't enable by default because accelerated different manufactures may use different GPU parts that some of them might not support GPU acceleration...
When i switch my Tab to silent, is there any way to stop it vibrating after every keystroke in apps such as quickoffice? it is getting quite annoying when trying to type notes in a quiet lecture hall. Also posted on http://www.mygalaxytab.net but no luck.

Thanks for any help.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix