Upgrade your home network by downgrading it

Summary: Want to upgrade your server? Try downgrading to something smaller.

Last year I wrote about the merits of downgrading your computer. At the time, I had swapped out the CPU and GPU from my workstation as I shifted it to server duty.

Since I was no longer using it for games, I didn't see any reason to have it running 24 hours a day and needlessly draining electricity.

Also See:

The end result of that downgrade was a $20 reduction in my monthly electric bill. Of course, I still had a big beast of a tower case full of fans and hard drives.

Last month I finally decided to streamline my home server configuration. I was running Ubuntu workstation on the old tower system, and it also doubled as network storage for backups of our various laptops and tablets. I decided to split up the server and storage.

For the server, I chose the lowest cost HP slimline s5t desktop. The one I purchased was on a time-limited special, and I ended up spending less than $300 on it. I added a Crucial 64GB SSD drive for a more reliable boot drive that drew less power, was quiet, and super fast.

For storage the old system used to have 6 250GB SATA drives, attached to a 3ware RAID controller in a RAID6 configuration. Large storage drives are a lot cheaper now, so I chose to get a QNAP Turbo NAS TS-219P+, and populated it with a pair of Western Digital Caviar Black 1.5TB hard drives in a RAID1 mirror configuration.

The two devices drain considerably less power than the old tower system, and are an order of magnitude quieter. I haven't had a chance to gauge the difference in power usage at home yet, but I suspect there will be a substantial savings with the next utility bill.

The QNAP is an interesting device. Aside from providing network-accessible storage, it runs Linux underneath the hood and comes with a slew of useful features.

For one thing, it can be mounted on another machine as an iSCSI device. It has a built-in web server, as well as streaming media capabilities. It has the ability to function as an Apple Time Machine backup server, which I have already put to use by backing up my MacBook Air.

If it wasn't for my need to have the server also operate as a workstation, and provide more enhanced capabilities, I could very easily have used just the QNAP device on my network and gotten rid of the server altogether.

Down the road, if I ever need to expand the storage, I can simply remove one of the mirrored drives, add a newer, larger-capacity one, and let the mirror rebuild. Once done, I could swap the other old drive and repeat the process.

When I wrote the original article, the intent was to show that if you didn't need an excessive amount of computing power, you could save money on both hardware and electric bills by downgrading to something that meets your needs instead of exceeding them.

These days, you don't necessarily have to give up computing power to reduce your carbon footprint and save money. PCs are pretty inexpensive these days, as is storage. You can build out your network now with components that are much cheaper than they were 5 years ago, without sacrificing performance. My new setup is even faster than the old one, and will result in a substantial savings over time.

Topics: Servers, CXO, Hardware, Networking, Storage

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

18 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • RE: Upgrade your home network by downgrading it

    Well, I recently consolidated 3x 250 GB drives into a single 1 TB drive. Should use less electricity and generate less heat.
    CobraA1
    • That's like asking a Texan to give up the pickup....

      @CobraA1
      ...to save on gas! Makes economic sense, but dang! It puts a but dent in your pride! lol
      ;-)
      kd5auq
  • Whither Dimdows Home Server?

    Looks like the potential market for Windows Home Server has been totally and completely snarfed by these low-power, cheap, Linux-based NAS appliances. Poor Microsoft never stood a chance.
    ldo17
  • RE: Upgrade your home network by downgrading it

    We went a similar way. When my wife's old computer died we decided to consolidate and downgrade some computers. We Guesstimated (using a Kill-A-Watts) a savings of 43 dollars a month. So far the savings have been almost right on the money. One example, we used an e350 for HTPC/Home Server instead of two separate computers running 24/7, plus less hard drives but bigger and all 5900rpm. I've got to say it was fun for me!
    rdiablo
  • RE: Upgrade your home network by downgrading it

    One thinkg you might want to upgrade is the PSU. Bizzare as it sounds a bigger PSU may well draw less power simply because its newer, more efficent and greener than an old one.
    Get a couple of power monitors and just see how much power you use. Interesting figures.
    gary@...
    • psu efficiency

      even though newer psu's are more efficient (and are rated bronze/silver/gold etc) they only achieve best efficiency when output is high. If you need 300W and you buy a 500w supply running at 75% efficiency it draws 400w.
      If you buy a 800w supply and ask it for 300w and at those levels it has 60% efficiency then you'll be drawing 500w, which is wasting electricity, (plus it costs more to purchase).
      To sum up, everything you said was ok apart from the word "bigger", which was absolutely wrong.
      Mytheroo
  • No power is cheaper than low power

    I shut down my home system when I'm not using it. My life doesn't depend on having 100% access to my files when I'm not at home. Shutting the home system down has two benefits: (1) It uses no power and (2) it's immune to hackers, viruses, etc.
    JohnOfStony
  • A good starting point to think about

    HP also has very nice line of HP ProLiant Ultra Micro Tower MicroServer Systems that cost almost same as the desktop that you bought. They have bootable internal USB and are compliant with ESXi.
    Tomas M.
    • RE: Upgrade your home network by downgrading it

      @Tomas M. I took a look at those, and the HP I purchased was on sale for $279 at the time. 3GB RAM, Intel Core2Duo 2.6GHz, 750GB Seagate drive. Overall I ended up with a more powerful server for less money.
      Scott Raymond
  • Also: QNAP vs DROBO?

    Could anyone give any idea which one is better?
    Tomas M.
    • RE: Upgrade your home network by downgrading it

      @Tomas M. For the end-user, I would go with the QNAP. I've used both in the enterprise, and I feel that the QNAP is ultimately more comprehensive and easier to use from a consumer standpoint.
      Scott Raymond
    • RE: Upgrade your home network by downgrading it

      @Tomas M. I would definitely recommend QNAP. I've used a few of Drobo in the past and bought a QNAP a few months ago for my office. The QNAP (using iSCSI) gets a better interface and performs much better.
      sf_168
  • I use an old half-broken notebook

    I have 3 network connected security cameras watching the exterior of my home (all petty vandalism stopped). Originally the software managing all this was on my desktop workstation running 24X7. I acquired an older Sony ultralight with a missing LCD panel running XP Pro. It took over this job and uses a fraction of the power. It sits out of the way on top of a bookshelf and I use Remote Desktop to manage the computer. Other than this notebook, the cameras and my network, all my other computing devices are COMPLETELY powered off when not in use.
    Jim Johnson
  • RE: Upgrade your home network by downgrading it

    Could anyone give any idea which one is better : <a href="http://www.akinyapi.net/">mutfak dekorasyon</a>
    tadilat
  • reasonable power

    I recently built a stock trading station with 4 monitor capability (could be raised to 6 or 8 easily). I was shocked at how much pressure I was subjected to in the process of purchasing the components best suited to my application. At every step of the way tech people and sales people wanted to sell me gamer stuff, whereas for stock trading, little power is really necessary, the processor load is light with just a data stream coming in to update charts and such, not live images and sounds. I chose an Asus board ( I run only Asus these days), which was a low end gaming board, and had two express slots, for my two video cards, which were also the extreme low end of two output video cards, and a processor from the lower end of the spectrum for that board, (AMD), which I ...you guessed it "underclocked". The result is a rock stable system that doesn't consume a great deal of power. My money went into 5 27" monitors (Samsung) at 50W each, a 1000XL battery backup system with auxiliary battery pack (obsoleted but wonderful unit), and a pair of deep cycle marine batteries which altogether will run both of my computer systems for about 4 hours during a power outage (common occurrence here and typically 4 hours or more). If I shut some monitors off, and one computer, I can last far longer.
    Overkill seems to be the order of the day. My systems have always been built at home, and always been from well behind the bleeding edge, and they are rock stable, and long life systems.
    **owly**
  • RE: Upgrade your home network by downgrading it

    Isn't electricity cheap and abundant? Who cares if you leave your PC on 24/7. Just kidding. I'm thinking about doing the same thing with my server. Dual power supplies, 10 fans and 12 Hard Drives running all the time draws a huge amount of power. I'll probably take my motherboard and put it in a smaller case with 2 or 3 large drives. I can probably save a few hundred dollars a year.
    loooney2ns
  • RE: Upgrade your home network by downgrading it

    Best home servers right now are the little HP Proliant Micro-Servers, about $300 on Amazon, bump to 8G memory and throw in some drives. Runs Linux, BSD, Windows whatever floats your boat. Mine runs Ubuntu server and is the back up and file sharing server. MiniDLNA serves up video and music around the house. Very small, quiet and low power use.
    txscott
  • iibfmdb 04 ntg

    yqqnna,jhjizpnb44, iegvq.
    cmakrekdw52-24379031780859278557350245107593