Tech Broiler

Jason Perlow and Scott Raymond

Windows Server 8: The Ultimate Cloud OS?

By | September 14, 2011, 3:40am PDT

Summary: While Windows Client is getting all of the attention at Microsoft’s BUILD conference, a powerful Cloud enabled operating system waits patiently in the wings with Server 8.

Since last Thursday, I was ordered under strict nondisclosure to keep my mouth shut. And that was really hard for me to do because I could barely contain my enthusiasm for what is probably the most significant server operating system release that Microsoft has ever planned to roll out.

Nothing from Microsoft, and I mean literally nothing has ever been this ambitious or has tried to achieve so much in a single server product release since Windows 2000, when Active Directory was first introduced.

Last week, a group of about 30 computer journalists were invited to Microsoft’s headquarters in Redmond to get an exclusive two-day preview of what is tentatively being referred to as “Windows Server 8″.

So much was covered over the course of those two days that the caffeine-fueled and sleep-deprived audience was sucking feature and functionality improvements through a proverbial fire-hose.

We weren’t given any PowerPoints or code to take home — that material will be reserved for after the BUILD conference taking place in Anaheim this week, and I promise to get you galleries and demos of the technology as soon as I can.

[UPDATE: I now have the PowerPoints, and I'll be updating the content of this article to reflect the comprehensive feature list.]

Still, I did take enough notes to give you a brief albeit nowhere near complete overview of the Server OS that is likely to ship from Microsoft within the next year. And it will definitely make huge waves in the enterprise space, I guarantee.

It’s not fully known if “Windows Server 8″ is just a working title or if it is the actual product name, but what was shown to us in the form of numerous demos and about 20 hours of PowerPoints will be the Server OS that will replace Windows Server 2008 R2.

Server 8 will unleash a massive tsunami of new features specifically targeted at building and managing infrastructure for large multi-tenant Clouds, drastically increased scalability and reliability features in the areas of Virtualization, Networking, Clustering and Storage, as well as significant security improvements and enhancements.

Frankly, I am amazed by the amount of features — numbering in the hundreds — that have been added to this product, and how many are actually working right now given the Alpha-level code we were shown. In all the demos, very few glitches occurred, and much of the underlying code and functionality appears to be very mature.

It’s my perception based on the maturity off the code that we were demoed that we were shown features that have been under development for several years, possibly going back as far as the Windows Vista release timeframe, which leads me to believe that a great deal of stuff was dropped on the cutting room floor in the Server 2008 and Server 2008 R2 releases and was left out by Microsoft’s top brass at the Server group until it was truly ready for prime time.

We did see some new UI improvements — namely the new Server Manager, which has been designed to replace a lot of the MMC drill-down and associated snap-ins and is targeted towards sysadmins that need to manage multiple views of a large amount of systems simultaneously, based on actual services and roles running on the managed systems, using a “Scenario-Driven” user interface.

However, a lot of what we saw in terms of actual look-and feel was just standard old-school Windows UI, and a lot of PowerShell.

In fact, I would say that Microsoft is pushing PowerShell really hard to sysadmins because you can actually get some very sophisticated tasks done in only a single command, such as migrating one or multiple virtual machines to another host, or altering storage quotas.

Thousands of “Commandlets” for PowerShell have already been written, so as to take advantage of the scripting functionality and heavy automation that will be required for large scale Windows Server 8 and Cloud deployments.

This is not to say Windows 8 Server will be going all command-line Linux-y. There will be new significant UI peices, but Microsoft appears to have done their software development in reverse this time around — build the API layers and underlying engines first, and then write the UI layers to interface with it afterwards.

They’ve got a year now to polish the UI elements, a number of which we were told had some commonality with the “Metro” UI shown at BUILD for the WIndows 8 client. As I said, we didn’t get to see them at the special Reviewers Workshop, but I’ll show them to you as soon as I am able.

Microsoft also stressed that many of the APIs for various new features, including their entire management API will be opened for third party vendors to integrate with and so they could write their own UIs.

One of the ways they are going to do this is by releasing a completely portable, brand-new Web-based Enterprise Management (WBEM) CIM server called NanoWBEM for Linux, written by one of the main developers of of OpenPegasus, which has been designed to work Windows Server 8’s new management APIs, so that various vendors can build in the functionality into their products via a common provider interface.

While not strictly Open Source per se, NanoWBEM will be readily licensable to other companies, which is a big step for Microsoft in opening up interfaces into Windows managment.

Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI) has also been enhanced considerably, as it now is capable of talking to WSMAN or DCOM directly. This makes it much easier for developers to write new WMI providers.

As to be expected of a Cloud-optimized Windows Server release, many enhancements are going to come in the form of improvements to Hyper-V. And boy are they big ones.

For starters, Hyper-V will now support up to 32 processors and 512GB of RAM per VM. In order to accomodate larger virtual disks, a new virtual file format, .VHDX, will be introduced and will allow for virtual disk files greater than 2 terabytes.

Not impressed? How about 63-node Hyper-V clusters that can run up to 4000 concurrent VMs simultaneously? No, I’m not joking. They actually showed it to us, for real, and it was working flawlessly.

Live Migration in Hyper-V has also been greatly enhanced — to the point where clustered storage isn’t even required to do a VM migration anymore.

Microsoft demonstrated the ability to literally “beam” — a la Star Trek — a virtual machine between two Hyper-V hosts with only an IP connection.

A VM on a developer’s laptop hard disk running on Hyper-V was sent over Wi-Fi to another Hyper-V server without any downtime — all we saw was a single dropped PING packet. We also observed the ability of Hyper-V to do live migrations across different subnets, with multiple live migrations being queued up and transferring simultaneously.

Microsoft told us that the limit to the amount of VM and storage migrations that could run simultaneously across a Hyper-V cluster was governed only by the amount of bandwidth that you actually have. No limits to the number of concurrent live migrations in the OS itself. None.

It should also be added that with the new SMB 2.2 support, Hyper-V virtual machines can now live on CIFS/SMB network shares.

Another notable improvements to Hyper-V will include “Hyper-V Replica” which is roughly analogous to the asynchronous/consistent replication functionality sold with Novell’s Platespin’s Protect 10 virtualization disaster recovery product. This of course will be a built-in feature of the OS and will not require additional licensing whatsoever.

The list of Hyper-V features goes on and on. A new Open Extensible Virtual Switch will allow 3rd-parties to plug into Hyper-V’s switch architecture. SR-IOV for privileged access to PCI devices has now been implemented as well as CPU metering and resource pools, which should be a welcome addition to anyone currently using them in existing VMWare environments to portion out virtual infrastructure.

VDI… Did I mention the VDI improvements? Windows Server 8’s Remote Desktop Session Host, or RDSH (what used to be called Terminal Server) now fully supports RemoteFX and is enabled by default out of the box.

What’s the upside to this? Well now you can put GPU cards in your VDI server so that your remote clients, be it terminals or tablets or Windows desktops that have the new RemoteFX-enabled RDP client software  can run multi-media rich applications remotely with virtually no performance degradation.

As in, completely smooth video playback on remote desktops, as well as the ability to experience full-blown hardware-accelerated Windows 7 Aero and Windows 8 Metro UIs with full DirectX10 and OpenGL 1.1 support on virtualized desktops.

This will work with full remote desktop UIs as well as “Published” applications, a la Citrix. And no, you won’t need Citrix XenApp in order to support load balanced remote desktop sessions anymore. It’s all built-in.

RemoteFX and the new RDSH is killer, but you know what’s really significant? You can template virtual desktops from a single gold master image stored on disk and instantiated in memory as a single VM and then customize individual sessions to have roaming profiles with customized desktops and apps and personal storage using system policy. That conserves a heck of a lot of disk space and memory on the VDI server.

And in Server 8, RDP is also now much more WAN optimized than in previous incarnations.

Can you say hasta la vista, Citrix? I knew that you could.

[Editor's Note: This is my personal opinion. As far as Microsoft is concerned, Citrix is still one of their most valued partners, and in has no way indicated to us that this new RDSH functionality is intended to replace XenApp.]

One of the demos we saw using this technology was a 10-finger multitouch display running RDP and RemoteFX, with the Microsoft “Surface” interface virtualized over the network. It was truly stunning to see.

A number of network improvments have also been implemented that improve Hyper-V as well as all services and roles running on the Server 8 stack, which includes full network virtualization and network isolation for multi-tenancy environments.

This includes Port ACLs that can block by source and destination VM, implementations of Private VLANs (PVLAN), network resource pools and open network QoS as well as packet-level IP re-write with GRE encapsulation and consistent device naming.

Multi-Path I/O (MPIO) drivers (such as EMC’s PowerPath and IBM’s SDDPCM) when combined with Microsoft’s virtual HBA provider can also now be installed as virtualized fiber channel host bus adapters (HBA) within virtual machines, in order to take better advantage of the performance of enterprise SAN hardware and for VMs to have direct access to SAN LUNs.

Windows Server 8 will also include improved Offloaded Data Transfer, so that when you drag and drop files between two server windows, the server OS knows to transfer data directly from one system to another, rather than passing it through your workstation or through another server.

“Branch Caching” performance has also been improved and reduces the need for expensive WAN optimization appliances. Microsoft has also implemented a type of Bitorrent-like technology for the enterprise in branch offices that enables client systems to find the files they need locally on other client systems and servers instead of going across the WAN

The NFS server and client code within Server 8 has also been completely re-written from the ground up and is now much faster, which should be a big help when needing to inter-operate with Linux and UNIX systems.

Server 8 will also include built-in NIC teaming, a “feature” that has always been a part of Windows Server but has been provided in the past by 3rd-party vendors. With the new NIC teaming feature, network interface boards from different vendors can be mixed into bonded teams of trunked interfaces which will provide performance improvements as well as redundancy.

No more need for 3rd-party utilities and driver kits to do this.

Storage in Server 8 has also been greatly enhanced, most importantly the introduction of data de-duplication as part of the OS. Based on two years of work at Microsoft for just the algorithm alone, de-duplication uses commonality factoring to hugely compress the amount of data stored on a volume, with no significant performance implications.

Naturally, this also allows the backup window for a server with a de-duplicated file system to be reduced dramatically.

Oh and chkdsk? Huge storage volumes can be checked and fixed in an on-line state in a mere fraction of a time that it took before. Like, in ten percent of the time it used to.

Server 8 will have built in support for JBODs, as well as new support for SMB storage using RDMA (Remote Direct Memory Access) networks, allowing for large storage pools to be built with commodity 10 gigabit ethernet networks rather than much more expensive fiber-channel SAN technology. Microsoft also demonstrated the capability for Server 8 to “Thin Provision” storage on JBODs as well.

Clustered disks can now be fully encrypted using BitLocker technology and the new Clustered Shared Volume 2.0 implementation fully supports storage integration for built-in replication as well as hardware snapshotting.

And we saw a bunch of new storage virtualization stuff too. I didn’t take good notes that day, sorry.

I’m sure I’m leaving out a large number of other important things, including an all-new IP address managment UI (appropriately named IPAM) as well as some new schema extensions to Active Directory that greatly improves file security when using native Windows 8 servers. And all of the new stuff that’s been added to IIS and Windows’s networking stack in order to accomodate large multi-tenant environments and hybrid clouds.

By the end of the second day at the Windows Server 8 Reviewer’s Workshop I was literally ready to pass out from the sheer amount of stuff being shown to us, and my brain had turned to mush, but all of this should whet your appetites for Server 8 when I finally have some code running and can actually demonstrate some of this stuff.

While Microsoft has certainly gotten its act together with its last two Server releases in terms of basic stability, has brought it’s core OS up to date with Windows 7 and has made a good college try at virtualization with early releases of Hyper-V, I haven’t been truly excited about a Windows Server release in a long time.

Call me excited.

In my opinion, Server 8 changes everything, particularly from a complete virtualization and storage value proposition. CIOs are going to be very hard pressed to resist the product simply from all the stuff that you get built-in that you would otherwise have to spend an utter fortune on with 3rd-party products.

Are these new features worth the wait? Should Microsoft’s cloud and virtualization software competitors be worried? Talk Back and Let Me Know.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Jason Perlow, Sr. Technology Editor at ZDNet, is a technologist with over two decades of experience integrating large heterogeneous multi-vendor computing environments in Fortune 500 companies.

Disclosure

Jason Perlow

My Full-Time Employer is IBM. I write as a freelancer for ZDNet.

Disclaimer: The postings and opinions on this blog are my own and don't necessarily represent IBM's positions, strategies or opinions.

I own no investments or direct financial instruments in the companies I write about.

Biography

Jason Perlow

Jason Perlow, Sr. Technology Editor at ZDNet is a technologist with over two decades of experience with integrating large heterogeneous multi-vendor computing environments in Fortune 500 companies. A long-time computer enthusiast starting the age of 13 with his first Apple ][ personal computer, he began his freelance writing career starting at ZD Sm@rt Reseller in 1996 and has since authored numerous guest columns for ZDNet Enterprise and Ziff-Davis Internet. Jason was previously Senior Technology Editor for Linux Magazine, where he wrote about Open Source issues from 1999 to 2008.

In his spare time, Jason is an avid amateur chef and food writer, where his work reviewing New Jersey restaurants has appeared in The New York Times. He is also the founder of the popular food web site eGullet and blogs about restaurants and cooking at OffTheBroiler.com.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
125
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Cloud (in this instance) does not mean net
evilsushi 22nd Apr
Cloud in this instance is mearly pooling or clustering a lot of servers and managing them as one machine vs. many single machines.
Great article. Thanks
@frhamid: in the article, you named only DirectX11 for VM.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@DeRSSS As I said, I need to go through the PowerPoint decks to see about what -exactly- is in the feature set as opposed to what is in my notes.
0 Votes
+ -
Linux days are #ed.
LBiege 14th Sep
The ultimate cloud OS says so.
0 Votes
+ -
@LBiege
Keep dreaming. Better sell this MSFT.
BTW, Linux is not all command line and this has been the case for many years now. When did you last try Linux?
0 Votes
+ -
@LBiege
dream on. M$ merely cathes on with Red hat.
0 Votes
+ -
Comprehensive
frabjous 14th Sep
@frhamid ---article, but nonsensical headline--in this industry. How can any software be labeled as "the ultimate" when there is almost certainly a "newer and improved" version already under development from that company and their competitors? And just about everyone knows it.

Yes, I realize it is a snappier headline than, "Very likely the ultimate Cloud OS for mid-2012 if they make that date--and some nimbler competitor doesn't beat them to market." And, yes, I realize that snappier is more likely to generate clicks and responses than something more reasonable, and is therefore more valued in this medium. I just think words have specific meanings and should be used accordingly.
0 Votes
+ -
@frabjous carefully read this specific valued meaning:
shut up
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
Nice write, but......
linux for me 15th Sep
@frhamid
The ultimate cloud OS has already been running for years. Just check out Amazon, Google, IBM, various stock exchanges, among others. All running linux. Heck, even a number of Microsoft servers are running linux!

No...just Microsoft playing catch-up and still has a long way to go. And just wait to you see the licensing for being able to use Win 8 server. That ought to be an eye opener.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Windows Server 8: The Ultimate Cloud OS?
The Linux Geek Updated - 15th Sep
@frhamid
why would you buy this dog and pony show?
0 Votes
+ -
I'm amazed we havent had an Apple fanboy on here telling us that Lion Server beats Windows server hands down and that it is far more innovative...

There is time yet though.
@daniejam10

LOL i dont think Lion has half the features that Windows server is gonna have and 4k virtual machines at the same time i want!
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Windows Server 8: The Ultimate Cloud OS?
shellcodes_coder Updated - 14th Sep
@Knix96
Windows server will never beat Linux servers that's why Linux servers are ruling and Windows servers are slowly being phased out
  • Flagged
@shellcodes_coder
>>that's why Linux servers are ruling and Windows servers are slowly being phased out
Can you back it up with genuine links? Otherwise we can safely consider you are one of the official trolls here.
  • Flagged
@Knix96
Mac os Server is never meant to compete with Windows Server. It just exists because Macs exist and a Mac environment should be adequately supported. Lion Server doesn't compete with Windows Server 2003, let alone Windows 8 Server
0 Votes
+ -
@shellcodes_coder - OMG - here we go...
0 Votes
+ -
@shellcodes_coder

Lets se, oh yeah "75% of new server sales were Windows based" was the line I read in an article just recently.

Why would that be if it's being phased out?

You're not making any sense.
0 Votes
+ -
@Rama.NET
Check Windows server marketshare in supercomputers:
http://www.top500.org/
Check web servers:
http://w3techs.com/technologies/details/os-unix/all/all
https://secure1.securityspace.com/s_survey/data/man.200907/apacheos.html
Now, how fast can you say I am sorry?
0 Votes
+ -
@kirovs@

Where do I begin...
"Check web servers:
http://w3techs.com/technologies/details/os-unix/all/all
https://secure1.securityspace.com/s_survey/data/man.200907/apacheos.html"

Not sure if you're aware, but public facing web servers do not account for the total installed based of all server types globally. I work for a very large software company (who will remain nameless) with + 30k servers worldwide. Our ratio is 70% Windows servers vs. 30% of all *nix platforms combined (where Linux is but a small part of several flavors of Unix as well). So, in the case of my company, your statistics don't mean a thing.
0 Votes
+ -
@???, @smtp4me@
Where did Rama's post go?
Anyhow, in my company Win runs only AD/Sharepoint/Exchange. So the ratio is quite the opposite. But I was specifically talking about web servers and supercomputers where stats are in the open. You do not dispute that, do you?
0 Votes
+ -
Nope, fortunately
LiquidLearner 14th Sep
@daniejam10

We have trolls like you to go ahead and insult Apple users for no apparent reason. This is an article about a server OS. Lion doesn't really enter the mix here at all, good thing you were here to go ahead and mention Apple when it wasn't necessary.

And IE10 has built in spell check. No f'in way! About time, now it will certainly be my full time browser.
@daniejam10

Why would they bother? Not a focus market for them. They are successful because they have chosen not to be a MS me too and are kicking butt in the spaces they own/created. I ran Windows 3 - XP and now run OS X on the desktop, but not on servers.

Not sure why you have so much Apple envy dud wink

Oh and Windows Server 8 looks totally awesome. I'll be interested to see how it all plays out with XenApp, etc.
@eric@...

OS X desktops, but not on servers? Why not run MAC on the servers as well? MAC/Apple has no viable corporate server OS or solution. The same ole story.

So it sounds like your company is going out of its way to run OS X on desktops; I'm sure there's never a boring day at your I.T. shop.
@daniejam10 Well . . . OS X Server is largely a BSD Unix server with a few extra programs and a friendly GUI. I'd say that pre-Powershell, any Unix server was better than Windows server, because of the strength of Unix shells. These days, the gap has shrunk - it's not IIS/Windows vs Apache/Unix anymore either.
0 Votes
+ -
OK
facebook@... 14th Sep
I have underestimated the potential of Hyper-V. I always thought Hyper-V was a second-tier player like KVM. But 4,000 VMs!! Live Migrations over the wire!! I can't wait to install the developer edition this week.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Windows Server 8: The Ultimate Cloud OS?
LinuxUser&XPGamerGraphic 14th Sep
@facebook@...
There is no Windows Server 8 download AFAIK, only the client Windows 8, not the server.
0 Votes
+ -
It should be forthcoming, though
honeymonster Updated - 14th Sep
@LinuxUser&XPGamerGraphic
Along with out Samsung Tablet we received an USB key with both Windows 8 preview and Server 8 preview. The server 8 preview should be available to the general public in a few days.

Mind you, it *is* a developer preview and it is still pretty rough around the edges.

The foundations seems to be mostly in place, though. The APIs seems full-featured and robust. The Windows 8 "Metro" UI not so much. As for the Server parts - I really haven't tried those yet.
@facebook@... The devils in the details. We know nothing of the 4000 vm configuration. We also don't know the details about the Live Migratio performance.

History tells us that Microsoft's virtualization platform is well suited for small, mom/pop sites or firms strapped for cash and cannot afford tier1 virtualization solutions. Enterprises that place a premium on performance and availability, choose VmWare. Everyone else is a distant second.
0 Votes
+ -
Good to See Microsoft Innovation
Andrew Sheppard Updated - 14th Sep
As an "Apple Fanboy" I find it refreshing to hear a technical commentator talking their own language and conveying genuine enthusiasm for a product and its potential.

This is so much more genuine than when such commentators talk about consumers or products from Apple.

"I'm amazed we havent had an Apple fanboy on here telling us that Lion Server beats Windows server hands down and that it is far more innovative..."

If daniejam10 knows enough about Lion Server to think it is even comparable, I would love to hear more.

Otherwise, I suspect that they are not competing products. If the Windows Server 8 is as good as Jason suggests, then well done and good luck to Microsoft.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Windows Server 8: The Ultimate Cloud OS?
Rama.NET Updated - 14th Sep
@Andrew Sheppard
They couldn't do it all these years because of DoJ baggage on their shoulders, and now they are free from DoJ baggage, and you will see good tools from them again.
@Rama.NET Although many fault Microsoft for a lack of innovation; a free market, unencumbered by excessive government regulation and melding, is the best hope for economic prosperity, job creation and an environment where creativity, innovation and opportunity will flourish!
  • Flagged
@John Westra:

Although many fault Microsoft for a lack of innovation; a free market, unencumbered by excessive government regulation and melding, is the best hope for economic prosperity, job creation and an environment where creativity, innovation and opportunity will flourish!

Ahh yes.. that same old line.. probably a 1st year business student, aren't you? Didn't your economics professor ever teach you the second half of that rule? Put forth by the "Father of Capitalism himself? If you haven't I'll put it right here for you, because it can be summed up in one sentence:

This is only true in markets where there is sufficient competition. Without competition, the opposite is true, and society as a whole is worse off.
0 Votes
+ -
@John Westra
Yes, let's all sing kumbaya in the unencumbered from government free market utopia of yours. There used to be that free market world... when 8-year old kids were working in the coal mines.
0 Votes
+ -
@daftkey. In the server space are you conceding that Windows server is the predominant server OS?

Fact is, there is PLENTY of competition in the server (and, frankly, the desktop) OS m??rkets.
0 Votes
+ -
I can't wait
LiquidLearner 14th Sep
It really sounds like they're pulling out all the stops for the next server release. Sounds awesome. It sounds like Microsoft is going to update a lot of software developers, especially VMware and Citrix. I find it especially amusing since VMware was basically telling everyone that the desktop OS was dead thanks to virtualization and MS releases a server product that is every bit as good as ESX server, at least from what you wrote, for a very small fraction of the cost.

And a Linux based management solution? Color me surprised on that one!
0 Votes
+ -
@LiquidLearner, You obviously don't know VmWare at all. VmWare virtualizes many OSes, so I don't see how they would assert that the desktop OS is dead.

Furthermore, You are banking on a marketing release, concluding that the information MS proclaims, suddenly makes their virtualization platform as good as VmWare? Please pick up a VmWare book and start reading.

VmWare dominates the virtulization market, with stiffer competition from non-Microsoft entities.

As you learn about VmWare, your eyes will be forever opened.
0 Votes
+ -
That title's a joke. Linux is the future of servers and when time comes it will take over on the desktops too. It's already ruling the mobile market
@shellcodes_coder And when will that time come ? When you and me both will not be here to witness it ? The Linux Geek has already lost his mind. Have you taken over from him ?
0 Votes
+ -
@1773
Hey, I'm mainstream!
M$ shills are the fringe.
0 Votes
+ -
@The Linux Geek,

lol
0 Votes
+ -
@shellcodes_coder - You sound nervous a weeee bit jealous there little boy... and from what I see - for good reason.
@shellcodes_coder
even though Linux web servers may be more plentiful, its been shown that the rest of company usualy is run on a couple of Windows servers.

Sorry, you lose again.
0 Votes
+ -
@William Farrell
Come again? Not couple and certainly not Windows.
0 Votes
+ -
Yes, Windows Servers
William Farrell 15th Sep
@William Farrell
with all the places I deal with I have yet to see Linux servers beyond the web server. Everything else in the racks are Windows, and sometimes an Apple server in the schools.
0 Votes
+ -
@William Farrell
It is nice to see you answering to yourself.
But seriously-"Everything else in the racks are Windows..."
You are either a liar or clueless.
I can't say I have not seen Windows servers, but overwhelmingly it is Linux all over the place. Every Oracle instance runs off a Linux box. It is not coincidence Oracle now have their own Linux distro. All R&D high throughput analysis run off Linux. We are talking hundreds of multiprocessor (most have 16+cores) machines.
@shellcodes_coder, Until a flavor of Linux comes out that can be managed by centralized tools for the enterprise, I don't see Linux overtaking MS in the corporate desktop arena.
0 Votes
+ -
W8 - RTM/RTC#/Beta
GoldBishop 14th Sep
Maybe its my age but i remember getting the pre-release versions of the updated O/S from microsoft as far back as 98 (First Release) and what was touted through the pre-release and what came to us "off the shelf" were two totally different releases.

I will NOT be holding my breath, cause undoubtedly, when you start layering on the Security features and management controls for a network the O/S tends to get slower and slower, much like the US Congress voting on a Bill. It goes in clean and pure but comes out muddy and dirty after everyone puts their 2cents in.

I am a MS IT Pro, and have been dealing with Windows as far back as Win 2.0 and this could potentially rival the NT4 and 95 release if its as good as your article states.
0 Votes
+ -
@GoldBishop There is no additional layering of security to be added - Windows' security model is already built into every aspect of the PC from the kernel up. You can't compare th pre-Sinofsky delivery model with how the Windows team delivers today: As amply demonstrated by Win7, Microsoft only shows what it feels pretty confident that it'll be able to ship.
Excellent article, Thank you. It will take some time to digest all the details in the article.
Excellent article, thank you.
0 Votes
+ -
Cloud in this instance is mearly pooling or clustering a lot of servers and managing them as one machine vs. many single machines.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix