Can the cloud avoid government?

Can the cloud avoid government?

Summary: Like it or not, cloud providers have to engage with public policy makers, especially if they want to operate across national borders. The US has it easy compared to Europe, where effective dialog is essential to ensure the growth and uptake of Internet-based services.


Government should leave the tech industry well alone, ranted Mike Arrington earlier this week. But it isn't so easy to avoid government if you're a cloud computing provider with global ambitions. The cloud operates over the World-Wide Web, which as the name suggests, inevitably crosses national borders and touches many different legal regimes. Cloud-enabled globalization also challenges many of the protections that governments have put in place at the behest of established industries and interest groups that are adept at lobbying lawmakers.

For these reasons, the cloud industry can't afford to ignore government. The minimum response should be to stay aware of what government is up to and how its actions may affect cloud providers. Many in the industry will probably side with Arrington in demanding less regulation and interference rather than more. But since government isn't going away, it's better to actively engage and make the case for the cloud industry — if nothing else to ensure that if there are negative impacts (such as those exposed in the UK's recent Digital Economy legislation), they are at least purposeful rather than incidental.

With that in mind, cloud and SaaS providers in Europe will be gathering in Luxembourg later this month to discuss the challenges facing the industry and what role government and other public policy influencers can play in helping or hindering its success. Taking place on Monday 21st June, EuroCloud Congress is the first pan-European member meeting of the EuroCloud industry network that first launched last October [disclosure: of which I am an unpaid vice-president and conference organizer]. The meeting will bring together members from across Europe, along with public policymakers and influencers from national government and the European Commission.

In Europe, one of the first challenges for cloud providers is to unravel and make sense of the legislation that already exists. US businesses should consider themselves lucky that at least their huge domestic market is relatively free of legal pitfalls. In Europe, government and regulation is a fact of life for anyone looking beyond the confines of their own national borders — which is pretty much a given for those in the Internet, cloud and SaaS sectors. Each country has its own laws and practices on matters such as data privacy, business contracts and taxation. The scale of this challenge is difficult to explain to Americans, who can generally assume a common legal framework with occasional variations in individual states. Europeans, by contrast, rarely find exceptions when European harmonization has actually worked (the most shining example, in those countries that have adopted it, is the single currency, itself apparently now undermined by hidden inconsistencies between countries).

The industry thus has no choice but to ask government to interfere, in the hope of at least removing some of the inadvertent barriers to cloud services that have sprung up because of differences in national legislation. I'm told it's possible to find examples where obeying privacy laws in one country will force a provider to break the prevailing laws in another country if its customers happen to be based there. No one intended such a result, but it's up to the industry to show where such anomalies exist and why it's urgent to resolve them.

At least the industry should find a willing ear from Europe's commissioner for the Digital Agenda, Neelie Kroes, whose mandate includes the establishment of "an integrated single market for the delivery of electronic services," and who will be represented at the Congress.

The agenda will examine the state of play in a number of different topic areas to establish where further action is most needed, whether by policy makers or by action within the industry. Experts contributing to the debate will include speakers from the European Commission and the Luxembourg government, academics and market researchers, and a cross-section of industry contributors, ranging from start-ups like SLA specialist Sensible Cloud to established players such as RightNow Technologies and Microsoft. There are six main topic headings under discussion:

  • Security and certification
  • Internationalisation within Europe and beyond
  • Service levels and customer experience
  • The legal framework for cloud and SaaS provision
  • Fostering and recognising innovation
  • Industry alliances and partnership

If Europe's cloud providers can't rapidly surmount some of the unintended regulatory barriers they face, then the continent's small and mid-size enterprises will suffer competitively, as they'll be less able to benefit from the responsiveness and cost savings that flow from using cloud services. No wonder the dominant cloud utility providers today are US companies such as Amazon, Google and Microsoft. European policy makers need to make sure their actions don't hold back the emergence of the next generation of cloud-enabled businesses in the region. EuroCloud's members will be hoping their Congress in Luxembourg marks an important milestone on the journey towards a building a strong cloud industry in Europe.

Topics: CXO, Government, Government US

Phil Wainewright

About Phil Wainewright

Since 1998, Phil Wainewright has been a thought leader in cloud computing as a blogger, analyst and consultant.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • I am not sure I want it to avoid the government

    I have been holding out for free market solutions to some of the main hurdles that I see for cloud adoption. So far, nada. It is almost like the cloud is some sinister shark just waiting to steal my data.
    If I can't have free market solutions to privacy, data ownership, and data use longevity I guess I will have to settle for the government stepping in. I still doubt I will get what I want but so far cloud corporations are acting just as intrusive and badly as a government is and I can't vote the CEOs out of office in the corporations.
    Basically, for me, my choices so far are to suck it in and give up rights to my data, privacy and long term data usability or not go into the cloud. So far I am not to far in the cloud.
  • THEY MUST!!! That's why the government exists, dude.

    We paid 40% of our salary for them to control and monitor what we can't do by ourselves.<br><br>You can't just let those greedy guys on Silicon Valley and WallStreets control the cloud all by themselves because eventually they will just do anything just to make profit.
    • The twin towers of suckola

      [i]We paid 40% of our salary for them to control and monitor what we can't do by ourselves.[/i]

      Only to watch them fail ten times as bad, at ten times the cost, while bending over backward for all the wrong people. Modern democratic/republic government as we know it 101. But why?

      [i]You can't just let those greedy guys on Silicon Valley and WallStreets control the cloud all by themselves because eventually they will just do anything just to make profit. [/i]

      Only to watch them rake in ten times as much as they need, at ten times the cost to others (in more need), and for ten times the wrong reasons -- self aggrandizement and petty greed. Modern corporate life in the penthouse suites and boardrooms as we know it 101 (where high powered bankers, lawyers and other assorted cretins and shysters tend to coalesce). But why?

      Oh yeah, cuz too many homo sapiens suck when power and privilege goes to their heads. Uh, 101 again. :(
  • As in so many other aspects of life, sadly no.

    Succinct and well laid out overview Phil, but aye yea yea what a mess to sort. I wish you well.