ie8 fix
madison

Zero Day

Ryan Naraine, Emil Protalinski and Dancho Danchev

Copyright violation alert ransomware in the wild

By | April 12, 2010, 7:02am PDT

Summary: A currently ongoing ransomware campaign is using a novel approach to extort money from end users whose PCs have been locked down - it attempts to extorts $400 from users which would otherwise face a copyright violation suit.

UPDATED: Wednesday, April 28, 2010: How to remove the ICPP Copyright Violation Alert ransomware

A currently ongoing ransomware campaign is using a novel approach to extort money from end users whose PCs have been locked down.

By pretending to be the fake ICPP Foundation (icpp-online.com), the ransomware locks down the user’s desktop issuing a “Copyright violation: copyrighted content detected” message, which lists torrent files found on the infected PC, and forces the user to pay $400 for the copyright holder’s fine, emphasizing on the fact that “the maximum penalties can be five years in prison and up to $250,000 in fines.

More details on the campaign:

Upon execution the ransomware will change the Desktop’s wallpaper to the “Warning! Piracy detected!” background.

It will then make sure the warnings appear every time the end user restarts PCs. In between, it will lock down the end user’s Desktop, featuring the “Copyright violation: copyrighted content detected” window:

The window attempts to trick the end user into believing that:

  • Windows has detected that you are using content that was downloaded in violation of the copyright of its respective owners. Please read the following bulletin and try solving the problem in one of the recommended ways. During the system scan Antipiracy foundation scanner has detected copyright issues. Please take a look at the list and choose an action: pass the case to a court or settle it in pre-trial order by paying a fine.

Attempts to get rid of it result in the following message:

  • Performing this action is construed as refusal to cooperate with the copyright holder and unwillingness to consider pre-trial settlement. If you continue, all the data gathered will be passes to copyright protection organizations and to the court. We recommend cancelling this action and choosing the option “pre-trial settlement”.

Gullible end users who fall victim to the scam, will then be asked to pay $399.85 for a “Legal license purchase“, “Copyright holder fine“, a “Copyright protection organization fee for the use of software tracking illegal file downloads” and a “Traffic fee“.

Basically, you’ve got a profit margin driven ransomware business model, that’s ironically charging you a fee for the development of ransomware “software” itself. The cybercriminals behind the campaign are also aware of the concept of localization. The ransomware will adapt to each user’s PC, and issue the same messages in 10 different languages - Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, French, German, Italian, Portuguese, Slovak and Spanish.

Although the ransomware tactic of using copyright infringement themes is novel, the tactic is fundamentally flawed due to a simple reason - the amount of money the ransomware is requesting is supposed to trigger a “vigilance alert” in the mind of the affected user.

The ransomware is currently detected as Win32/Adware.Antipiracy and Rogue:W32/DotTorrent.A.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Dancho Danchev is an independent security consultant and cyber threats analyst, with extensive experience in open source intelligence gathering, malware and cybercrime incident response.

Disclosure

Dancho Danchev

More details on Dancho Danchev's current and past professional affiliations, can be found in his LinkedIn profile.

Biography

Dancho Danchev

Dancho Danchev is an independent security consultant and cyber threats analyst, with extensive experience in open source intelligence gathering, and cybercrime incident response. He's been an active security blogger since 2007, and maintains a popular security blog sharing real-time threats intelligence data with the rest of the community on a daily basis. More details on Dancho Danchev's current and past professional affiliations, can be found in his LinkedIn profile. You can also follow him on Twitter
137
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Copyright violation alert ransomware in the wild
wuboyblue 4th May 2011
There is nothing more expensive than free....
0 Votes
+ -
Terrible. Worse you don't offer critical info users need to know
Dietrich T. Schmitz, Linux Advocate Updated - 12th Apr 2010
o This only effects the Microsoft Windows platform
o You don't mention which version(s) of Windows are affected
o You don't detail the mode of infection
o You don't give any remedy

Folks, this type of article serves no purpose other than to sensationalize an issue with no solution.

Bells and whistles should be going off inside your head because this is emblematic of the trouble with Microsoft Windows: defective by design and exploitable to the worst extent possible.

This kind of situation can NEVER happen with Ubuntu Linux running AppArmor Linux Security Module.

NEVER.

Make time to review the alternatives to Windows, and include Ubuntu Linux on your list.

http://www.ubuntu.com

Ubuntu Linux: The safest operating system on the planet.

I stake my reputation on it.

Dietrich T. Schmitz
Linux Advocate
0 Votes
+ -
seriously, these endless posts touting the virtues of AppArmor are growing tiresome.

I like Linux in general, and use it now and then. But these posts do nothing to help further its spread.

Please, please, stop them. They're only half-true anyhow, which has been demonstrated to you several times.

You're doing more harm than good. (And this comes from a Linux user, on and off since about 1996 or so.)

Sorry.
0 Votes
+ -
My willingness to raise awareness knows no limits. Sorry you are annoyed.
Dietrich T. Schmitz, Linux Advocate Updated - 12th Apr 2010
Redirect your annoyance to where it really belongs or
Change the channel.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
information that is of value to a very limited audience, one that's tech-savvy enough to make use of it. Even there, its usefulness is in question.

I feel no obligation to "change the channel" whatsover.
0 Votes
+ -
how raising and reputation?
dwight-watt@... 12th Apr 2010
You are really not raisning awarness, just irritating people. Most people have no real choice in OS, rather company policy or need for specific applications and sorry but Linux is not there for many for those reasons. And to claim Linux is completely safe is misleading, any unused highway is not subject to head on collisions as no other cars on it, but does not mean road is safer than another if it is used. Likewise if Linux becomes extremely popular people will start writing lots of viruses for it and finding ways around.

And what is your reputation? I have never heard of you and you give no credentials.

I have worked with Unix since the 80s and Linux since the late 90s and with windows since 2.0

This article would be a lot more helpful to say waht to do to preveent and clean. Sorta like reporting tsumami is on way but giving no indication what to do

Dwight , EdD, CCP, MCSE, A+, Server+, MCT, MCDST, Network+ and others
0 Votes
+ -
appreciate this
corporatelab 14th Apr 2010
Dwight-watt,

Very impressed with your use of analogies. You are a good teacher. Thank you.

Good luck.
0 Votes
+ -
The article has its merits in raising the alert to unsuspecting users, even if it does not indicate how to remove the malware.

Your efforts would be more appreciated if you used your willingness to raise awareness of the threats that are out there, including those that exist for Linux.

I am not exactly an MS fan, and I've handled by now almost any OS that has come out since I started perforating tape & punch cards 30+ years ago, but I also get tired of zealots that instead of contributing to the general knowledge simply do MS-bashing...
0 Votes
+ -
Ugh...
donniesito 12th Apr 2010
I also use Ubuntu occasionally. Frankly I like Linux for many reasons... I also like Windows for many reasons... Indeed I like OS X for many reasons.

The truth is that each platform has its' strength and weaknesses, but touting Linux as the end-all-be-all OS is absurd:

Windows is so popular for one reason: Options. I can *always* buy Applications/Games/Utilities for windows, take them home, pop the disc in and it just works. For 99% of home users, this is what matters; nothing else.

Let's be honest: I've been using Linux on and off since 1999 and I love tinkering with it, but the truth is that everyone who has used linux has at one time or another downloaded a software package and couldn't get it to work without using complicated terminal commands, etc. etc. In most cases I could figure out the problem and get the program to work... But that's because I've been using computers for 30 years.. People who don't have a lot of computer knowledge/experience won't be able to figure it out.. And most of the time people don't WANT to figure anything out, they just want the thing to work.

This is why Linux isn't ready to become THE Desktop OS.. Not to mention, Linux simply doesn't have the software base to compete with Windows or OS X.. Don't give me the tired argument that there are "thousands and thousands of free software titles available.. blah blah" The real truth is that (with only a FEW exceptions) the free software simply isn't as good as it's commercial counterpart.

That's my two cents.
0 Votes
+ -
amen to that
KrazdKiller 12th Apr 2010
amen to that
0 Votes
+ -
Packages? forget that...
Ceridan 12th Apr 2010
I cannot get my network cards to work on my laptop after an install without doing console commands...

However, AppArmor is better then Protected mode since it also protect aggainst reads... But in the case of this ransomware, protected mode would suffice.
0 Votes
+ -
2 Cents? Comment is worth $2
monsterdog 12th Apr 2010
Perfectly reasoned & reasonable response.

Used Ubuntu for 3 months and it is GONE from my machine.

I have 30 years in IT as well. Could I put it my parent's computers? Nope.

It is a bad OS, of course not. But your average user is not going to spend the time to go to the terminal to install a new repository. Not all drivers & apps work that well either - if I had a big document to print I had to do it in Windows because my laser printer didn't resume printing after running out of paper mid-way through, that is not acceptable in a production environment.

But it is fun to use, good to know, and it is coming along.

And the Mac OS is nice too. Windows 7 is very nice, convinced me to start to migrate away from XP.

Nothing is perfect folks, which is why these malware writers will always find a way into a box...
0 Votes
+ -
no better then the shoe spammers.

I seriouslly doubt that was the type of awareness you were trying to impart, but it looks as though that's what defines you now.

Nice job.
0 Votes
+ -
Only he's right
klumper Updated - 12th Apr 2010
o This only effects the Microsoft Windows platform
o You don't mention which version(s) of Windows are affected
o You don't detail the mode of infection
o You don't give any remedy


I complained about this very thing to Ryan some years back in Talkbacks, and he seemed to act on that feedback from that time forth. Perhaps Dancho could consider doing the same.

There's no point in posting articles relating to computer security if you're not going to suggest - at a minimum - remedial actions. If there happen to be no known remedies or workarounds at the time the article is posted (rare as that would be), state it.

As for DS's aggressive advocacy of alternative approaches to the Windows juggernaut, well I'll leave any resultant hair pulling to others (those that still have any, after extended tethering to MS platforms).
0 Votes
+ -
Wait a second guys,
Louis Ross Focke 12th Apr 2010
He said what the infection was detected as:
"The ransomware is currently detected as Win32/Adware.Antipiracy and Rogue:W32/DotTorrent.A."

So, I would think the first thing you would have to do is go to a restore point that was created before the infection and run a full scan with your malware remover of choice and get rid of it. If this is not possible for one reason or another (did you set up backup/restore?) or you can't even boot to safe mode, then use a rescue live CD. Should be simple enough for anyone knowledgeable in these things.
lrfocke
0 Votes
+ -
Should be simple enough for anyone knowledgeable in these things.

They count too, and certainly make up a reasonable percentage of the readership at this site.

Ideally from wherever the authors are getting their source material, they should be getting the official word on remedies and counter-measures. If not, they're just throwing out loose knit scare scenarios to no end. Besides, it's the basis of their expertise in this field to do more than merely cite threats, is it not?
0 Votes
+ -
Sorry I did not mean to be condescending
Louis Ross Focke 12th Apr 2010
I could have worded that better. I was just trying to point out to people that might not know how, a way that they could possibly achieve what the author missed writing about. I feel these forums should be for answers to a problem raised. So even though I rarely use Windows, I do have win7 on my system, I still like to try and be helpful in looking for a solution to a problem.

lrfocke
0 Votes
+ -
You weren't Louis
klumper 12th Apr 2010
I still like to try and be helpful in looking for a solution to a problem.

That says enough. wink

chops
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
RE: Only he's right
ddanchev 12th Apr 2010
The process of preventing this ransomware infection from happening, is no different that the process of protecting against malware, or perhaps even scareware in general.

Zero Day readers -- wishful thinking I know -- are supposed to be ahead of game here.

Hence, the reason whey the link to the "The ultimate guide to scareware protection" was featured in the article.
http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=4297

Basically, it explains how scareware/ransomware and malware in general is pushed to the average end user, and what can be done to prevent this from happening.

Prevention tips for Windows users:

01. Use least privilege accounts
http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=5964

02. Think beyond "Patch Tuesday". Enforce a basic software patch management process, by using Secunia's PSI.
http://secunia.com/vulnerability_scanning/personal/

03. Browse the Web in a sandboxed environment.
http://www.sandboxie.com/

04. Firefox users, spend some time going through NoScript's documentation, and configure it securely.
http://noscript.net/

05. Scan suspicious files through VirusTotal before running them.
http://virustotal.com
0 Votes
+ -
May I suggest you update the article with this info? Thanks
Dietrich T. Schmitz, Linux Advocate 12th Apr 2010
nt
0 Votes
+ -
Well said
Chris Z 12th Apr 2010
"Zero Day readers -- wishful thinking I know -- are supposed to be ahead of game here."

Your thought is completely valid. If you were writing for your hometown newspaper then sure, include the basic security stuff.

If the critics want an article written a certain way then they should come up with their own material, instead of trying to hijack someone else's.
0 Votes
+ -
Dancho one caveat
klumper 12th Apr 2010
Zero Day readers -- wishful thinking I know -- are supposed to be ahead of game here.

They are for the most part, but some of the readership are novice, or even intermediate (as I stated before). And just as DS stated, would it not make sense to add at least something - even if you reference generic measures or a link or two like you just did - instead of nothing?

It's also been a long time since I have seen Ryan omit remedial actions in his posts when such things are being presented. And since you're partners in crime, well... love

Ah well, it's your column.
0 Votes
+ -
The problem with Windows XP is that even with limited access to the hard drive you still have full read/write access to the user's profile in the C:\Documents and Settings\ folder. I am in charge of the AD and group policy at the college I work at, and the students have NO access to write to the hard drive, view the hard drive or even write to the desktop or My Documents folder, yet the malware still gets installed into the user profile. Fortunately it's easy to just delete that profile and let it get rebuilt on the next log in.

The problem is that you shouldn't have to keep doing that if the user doesn't have write access to the HDD. But, I can't prevent them from having that access because Windows doesn't prevent it.

I am a Windows user, 99% of the time, and I won't run anything else because it does what I need it to do and I get it cheap. Still, it would be nice if I could lock down my school's computers the way I want to.
0 Votes
+ -
04
blueskip 12th Apr 2010
I have a problem with your number four there. You insinuate that Firefox is somehow less secure than IE with this wording. That is not only insanely wrong but complete negligence to even spread that sort of nonsense. I've never configured anything of the kind, peruse through some horrid sites and have NEVER had a problem using Firefox. I find it to be complete paranoia to install something that disables 90% of the functionality of the browser.
0 Votes
+ -
Which Windows systems are currently supported by Microsoft? I'm no IT pro, but even I can figure out that the targets will be the most used MS OS's. Ransomware - malware in general - depends upon casting the widest net possible to snare the segment of computers users that will fall for this crap.

What more 'details' could you need?!? The infection hijacks the users computer and acts in the manner we have come to expect from malware.

He DID detail the mode of infection - users download this malware thinking that a non-existant problem exists.

Removal techniques will be the same as for any other hijacker. It's swole advantage is that it is new. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
0 Votes
+ -
Dude read what I wrote
klumper 12th Apr 2010
I do this crap for a living, not a hobby. And probably for longer than 95% of the posters here. I personally follow certain security blogs as a head's up first and foremost, not for explicit answers or hand holding.

Some of us ask things beyond our own noses, capiche? I'm speaking for those peeps too, you know, the ones who keep me and folks like Dancho and Ryan in business. I have no shortage of business as it pertains to malware eradication, with no end in sight. Thus I feel no need to squirrel away my acorns.

The more helpful and complete the column, the better. For one and all. Is that so hard to understand?
0 Votes
+ -
Remedial Actions
PsyBeats 12th Apr 2010
I think this article is Great! It points out
the creativity of scareware/ransomware these
days. If you are stupid enough to go about the
nether regions of the internet without adequate
protection, then you deserve everything that
comes to you.

Would you head into a known crime area where
you are guaranteed to get mugged, raped,
murdered, etc without adequate protection. No?
Well take a cue from that!
Most of this stuff gets automatically installed by browsing a legitimate website like
ZDNet with IE, and having a malicious ad show up exploiting the latest unpatched
vulnerability, or attachments/links in emails forged to appear as though they come
from your bank/insurance company/etc, not nasty places like MySpace or 4chan.
Have you ever taken a look at the *BSDs?
Sorry about that hole in your reputation.

Also, anything is theoretically possible. For example, if someone has
local access to your computer, and you give them the root password,
they could install something like this on it without your permission,
even with AppArmor running. There are some times you can say "never"
(like, "time will never stop"), but this isn't one of them.


edit: fixed typo. I wish I never made typos. silly
0 Votes
+ -
Not much use...
ShadowGIATL 12th Apr 2010
While I agree that never is a strong word to be using... especially after Apple claimed for so long that they were malware free and got hit by a bot net, you will never convince that ubuntu employee to stop his monotinous rants.

He has been here under hundreds of different names for many years, and he refuses to accept that more people hate Linux and the Linux community now because of him.
0 Votes
+ -
And your point? (nt)
fairportfan 13th Apr 2010
nt
0 Votes
+ -
See...
ShadowGIATL 13th Apr 2010
it really does work on both sides of the isle...
0 Votes
+ -
Information Given
cyberscan 12th Apr 2010
What this article details is that this form of extortion is different than the extortion sanctioned by government and that it carries no force of courts. Instead of people thinking that they face sanctions by the government, they know that they are infected by scareware.
0 Votes
+ -
And they should know it's scareware.
jimr10@... 12th Apr 2010
There was a senator some time back who advocated sending some kind of signal to burn the users PC out if he had pirated software, so I figure the government would do something like this if they could.
However, and even with their bragging about being on top of online terrorism, if they can't even track where the money goes when these con victims send it, I don't see the government extorting anybody.
0 Votes
+ -
reputation
KrazdKiller 12th Apr 2010
the shame of it is that you have no reputation other than the one you gave yourself.
0 Votes
+ -
Show us yours
Great Kahuna 12th Apr 2010
Cause I'm lookin at you and I can't see any.
0 Votes
+ -
what reputation?
abear4562 12th Apr 2010
What reputation are you staking? No one has ever heard of you.
0 Votes
+ -
You can't see it because you're too close to the mirror
Great Kahuna Updated - 12th Apr 2010
Move away from it and you may see some.
0 Votes
+ -
Oh I can see his alright
Cylon Centurion 12th Apr 2010
Constantly spamming boards, and annoying the hell out of the ZDNet Mods. Other than that, his "reputation" is null.
0 Votes
+ -
Dietrich T. Schmitz Linux Advocate
Franciscus101 12th Apr 2010
Damn linux advocates believe their OS is safe. Its a bunch of crap if you believe that, and you know it. Linux, and especially Unbuntu CAN be and HAS been compromised, and will be again. Go preach yhour crap elsewhere.
0 Votes
+ -
Opinion is free but facts are sacred.
Great Kahuna Updated - 12th Apr 2010
And fact is: LINUX IS SAFE!!!

Period.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
So is...
ShadowGIATL 12th Apr 2010
a rock. But how useful is it really? :P
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
It can come very handy...
Great Kahuna 12th Apr 2010
Just ask David (or Microsoft Goliath)
0 Votes
+ -
Yep...
ShadowGIATL 13th Apr 2010
but once you start modifying that rock to do things other than its original purpose of sitting on the ground, new issues emerge.

Everything affects everything in this world. But you can't blame the rock.

Back on point... never say never, because if man created it, it can be broken.

Just ask David (or Microsoft Goliath)

The trouble with that whitty comment is, Microsoft (Goliath) is still going strong. What does that say for the David going against him and his pet rock?

Again, I'm pretty neutral, and frankly could care less which OS was most popular, but the fact remains Windows is the one right now. Until something else replaces it properly, I'm afraid I'm not jumping ship.

People can wine and complain about big corps being money hungry all they want, but giving away software and services doesn't put food on my table. The end.
0 Votes
+ -
nt
0 Votes
+ -
And then...
ShadowGIATL 14th Apr 2010
you have to add useability... and there is where the problems begin. Enter user... the one thing known to screw up anything.
As well as the most powerful man-made particle accelerator, and the International Space Station.


None of these things really matter though, apparently.

And of course the million or so normal people using it directly on their desktops don't count.

Nor do the billions of people using it indirectly (e.g. services provided by it, such as ZDNet).
0 Votes
+ -
What are you talking about?
ShadowGIATL 15th Apr 2010
Last time I checked, rocks don't run information systems.

If your trying to make an argument that Linux is useful, I never said it wasn't.

You have confused me with someone else again I'm afraid.

I was simply stating that nothing useable is perfect. If you say otherwise, you are living in a dream world. It's that simple.
Ergo trying to compare Linux to a rock is wrong.

Windows, though... hmm. silly
There is nothing more expensive than free....

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix