'Critical' Windows Media flaws put millions at risk
Summary: Pay special attention to MS12-004, a "critical" bulletin that provides fixes for two serious flaws in the way Windows Media handles certain media files.
Microsoft has dropped its first batch of security bulletins for 2012: Seven bulletins with cover for at least eight vulnerabilities affecting all versions of the Windows operating system.
The company is urging Windows users to pay special attention to MS12-004, a "critical" bulletin that provides fixes for two serious flaws in the way Windows Media handles certain media files.
The first issue can be exploited if a hacker used a specially crafted MIDI file, Microsoft warned. The successful attacker could gain remote code execution against a target running the ubiquitous Windows Media Player.
The second critical vulnerability is caused when when filters in DirectShow do not properly handle specially crafted media files. DirectShow is a part of Microsoft DirectX, a Windows feature used for streaming media on Windows operating systems to enable graphics and sound when playing games or watching video.
Microsoft expects to see reliable exploit code against these vulnerabilities within 30 days so it's important that Windows users treat MS12-004 with the utmost priority.
Here's a quick look at the other issues in this January patch batch:
- MS12-001: Vulnerability in Windows Kernel Could Allow Security Feature Bypass
This security update resolves a privately reported vulnerability in Microsoft Windows. The vulnerability could allow an attacker to bypass the SafeSEH security feature in a software application. An attacker could then use other vulnerabilities to leverage the structured exception handler to run arbitrary code. Only software applications that were compiled using Microsoft Visual C++ .NET 2003 can be used to exploit this vulnerability.
- MS12-002: Vulnerability in Windows Object Packager Could Allow Remote Code Execution
This security update resolves a privately reported vulnerability in Microsoft Windows. The vulnerability could allow remote code execution if a user opens a legitimate file with an embedded packaged object that is located in the same network directory as a specially crafted executable file. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the logged-on user.
- MS12-003: Vulnerability in Windows Client/Server Run-time Subsystem Could Allow Elevation of Privilege
This security update resolves one privately reported vulnerability in Microsoft Windows. This security update is rated Important for all supported editions of Windows XP, Windows Server 2003, Windows Vista, and Windows Server 2008. All supported editions of Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2 are not affected by this vulnerability. This could allow elevation of privilege if an attacker logs on to an affected system and runs a specially crafted application.
- MS12-005: Vulnerability in Microsoft Windows Could Allow Remote Code Execution
This security update resolves a privately reported vulnerability in Microsoft Windows. The vulnerability could allow remote code execution if a user opens a specially crafted Microsoft Office file containing a malicious embedded ClickOnce application. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the local user.
- MS12-006 Vulnerability in SSL/TLS Could Allow Information Disclosure
This security update resolves a publicly disclosed vulnerability in SSL 3.0 and TLS 1.0. This vulnerability affects the protocol itself and is not specific to the Windows operating system. The vulnerability could allow information disclosure if an attacker intercepts encrypted web traffic served from an affected system. TLS 1.1, TLS 1.2, and all cipher suites that do not use CBC mode are not affected.
- MS12-007: Vulnerability in AntiXSS Library Could Allow Information Disclosure
This security update resolves one privately reported vulnerability in the Microsoft Anti-Cross Site Scripting (AntiXSS) Library. The vulnerability could allow information disclosure if a an attacker passes a malicious script to a website using the sanitization function of the AntiXSS Library. The consequences of the disclosure of that information depend on the nature of the information itself. Note that this vulnerability would not allow an attacker to execute code or to elevate the attacker's user rights directly, but it could be used to produce information that could be used to try to further compromise the affected system. Only sites that use the sanitization module of the AntiXSS Library are affected by this vulnerability.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback
No problem. I enable Automatic Updates, so this doesn't affect me.
RE: 'Critical' Windows Media flaws put millions at risk
That says a lot about you, lack of concern for anyone else.
Oh, that's just my response to the typical
(at least for here)Linux user "it doesn't affect me 'cause I use Linux" not really needed response they always seem to post.
Just getting a jump on them ;)
How ZDNet works.
I agree with Mr. Farrel on his post
Your FUD laced post is yet another example of someone wanting to comment negativelly on a Microsoft related article, only to find that the issue has been rectified.
Like Rick_Kl, you came with th ehope that they were unpatched vulnerabilities, only to find that not the case, giving you nothing to comment negativelly on.
So you posted some FUD in an effort to "save face" as you call it.
I am actually surprised that you believe people have fallen for your ruse.
It appears that the readers here are fall more intelligent then you have given them credit for.
The logical course of action would be to refrain from posting on these boards, as it is now shown to be a waste of your time, time that could be better spent elsewhere.
:|
I've been here 6 years, I know exactly who the shills are.
1/17/2012 ... Reply to Mr. Spock.
I don't write for the shill population here.
@Mister Spock ... Next you may argue that ZDNet is not a Microsoft propaganda outlet disguised as a non-biased technical forum. If you want to spew Microsoft spam, use your real name, and go to a dedicated site that just discusses Microsoft.
Being here, under these circumstances, makes you a shill spewing Microsoft propaganda in a supposedly neutral environment in order to defend Microsoft abuses and deficiencies and garner additional users. It's strictly a commercial endeavor and a fraud, only for the monetary gain of Microsoft and certainly not for the empirical benefit of the readers.
I would assume shills don't get paid in cash, rather they get incentives and free products instead from their Microsoft reps. Remember Mike Cox?
RE: 'Critical' Windows Media flaws put millions at risk
Did @daikon say anything about Linux?
FAIL
RE: 'Critical' Windows Media flaws put millions at risk
No problem. I enable Automatic Updates, so this doesn't affect me.
RE: 'Critical' Windows Media flaws put millions at risk
RE: 'Critical' Windows Media flaws put millions at risk
The very malware that Microsoft tries to patch against can and frequently does shut off the Automatic Updates service. In many cases (like TDL4, TRSS, etc.) it also disables your antivirus and uses a package of its own to stop common viruses in order to not draw attention to itself.
You're not the IT manager responsible for 1,000+ workstations
That guy definitely does not have automatic updates turned on. If he did, he'd be out of a job sooner or later. He has to closely review each and every update to see what is affected. He might well have to contact third party software vendors to see if an update is going to affect their applications. He might also have to talk to internal developers to see if an update is going to affect internally developed code. At a minimum, he's going to want to roll out the update or updates to a testbed to make sure it isn't going to break anything. Even then, he's likely to wait a few days just to make sure there aren't reports of problems caused by the update on the wire. The enterprise IT motto is simple...never be the first on the block to try something new, and that includes security updates.
RE: 'Critical' Windows Media flaws put millions at risk
Actually, we do have automatic updates turned on for the 2000+ machines on our MAN. However, they update from a local WSUS server. That server does not get any update gets approved until our internal testing shows they will not cause issues for the end user. If testing shows any issues, we sit on the update until a fix for the update available.
RE: 'Critical' Windows Media flaws put millions at risk
RE: 'Critical' Windows Media flaws put millions at risk
RE: 'Critical' Windows Media flaws put millions at risk
most secure os ever!
RE: 'Critical' Windows Media flaws put millions at risk
RE: 'Critical' Windows Media flaws put millions at risk
RE: 'Critical' Windows Media flaws put millions at risk
Yeah, they should have written billions instead of millions at risk. It is the OS with the largest market share, after all. :p And anyway, 'wimmins and childrens' occasionally need a wake up call to alert them that this is a serious vulnerability and to get patchin.'