How does Apple get away with this badware behavior?
Summary: As part of my work testing exploits for the recent Safari "carpet-bombing" issue -- and the combo-threat to Windows users -- I installed Apple's flagship browser on a brand-new Windows XP machine.The installation came with Apple's automatic software updater, a very valuable tool to automate patch management for end users.
As part of my work testing exploits for the recent Safari "carpet-bombing" issue -- and the combo-threat to Windows users -- I installed Apple's flagship browser on a brand-new Windows XP machine.
The installation came with Apple's automatic software updater, a very valuable tool to automate patch management for end users. I knew Apple was using the tool to ship Safari as a new product download if iTunes/QuickTime (and the updater) was already on the system but it still came as a big surprise to me when I fired up the updater this morning and ran into this:
That's 95 MBs, pre-checked by default, bundled into a security patch and ready to hose my machine.
This is clearly badware behavior and it's shocking to me that Apple gets away with it. I understand the economics of Apple being aggressive to establish a presence on the Windows ecosystem but this is really unacceptable.
The StopBadware.org guidelines are very clear on what constitutes badware and, to my mind, it's a no-brainer that Apple is being deceptive and irresponsible, even if the bundling is separated under the "new software" tab.
We've spent the last few years recommending -- even demanding -- that software vendors ship Internet-facing products with automatic software updaters because of the importance of keeping products patched but, when those updaters become a business tool, there's a big problem.
Where are the StopBadware guys when you need them?
[poll id=7]
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Because Apple users don't demand better
Apple has its consumers in mind with everything it does. Apple would be a better corporate citizen if its consumers demanded it but they don't. So does Apple get away with this because it is different than any other company? Of course not, Apple is just like every other company. It is Apple consumers who are different and it is Apple's fiduciary duty to only react to consumer complaints that could affect its bottom line (and ignore all other complaints).
So to answer the question: Apple gets away with this badware behavior because Apple consumers simply don't demand better.
Sadly, you're right...
_ryan
Badware
the default behavior for these kinds of installs. Apple did
the wrong thing in this case and they should be held
accountable.
What I'm not clear on, is how this is an indictment of Apple
users? Isn't this issue specific to the PC? Are Apple's users
responsible for a platform they don't use?
Apple users
_r
And apparently
non-issue.
re: non-issue
non-issue.[/i]
I would venture a guess that quite a few had no idea what happened.
Correct
_r
Apple Customers
purchased a PC, is lax at exactly the point at which they
are an Apple user/customer?
Are you presuming to describe the fabled reality distortion
field, or is this a simple case in which a larger measure of
trust is afforded Apple based on that user's record with
Apple products?
Bear in mind I still disagree with what they did. I just need
clarification. Do you endorse the characterization of an
iTunes user as an Apple user for purposes of this thread?
you're not the only one
I have no problem with you criticizing Apple, but to smear Apple customers as naive fanbois is something that isn't deserved. There are fanbois on every platform; mature computer users on any platform recognize that every platform has its drawbacks and strengths, and recognize that in general, public corporations aren't moral entities unless forced to by law.
I agree
IIRC, I updated it the other day & it wanted to install stuff unrelated to security updates.
I concede the fact it was optional, BUT security updates should NOT include ANYTHING unrelated to the updates main purpose, SECURITY.
Depends
But what if you didn't? I assume that the Mac ships with both of those apps. if the user went to the trouble of uninstalling them, I think it's inappropriate to assume that I want them.
I'd say the same thing (and so would you), if MS defaulted Silverlight to download (it's optional, but you ahve to select it).
PS, I only think the d/l of iTunes/Quicktime should default to yes if they contain security updates. If it's a feature upgrade or non security related bug fix, they should default to opt-out, though it'd be fine to have an option to change the default behaviour.
Demanding Better...
How would i use my consumer power to demand better behaviour from apple? As far as i'm aware my only option is to "vote with my feet" and boycott apple products.
I would love to refuse to use apple software on windows but with the current ipod/itunes lock-in i'm stuck unless ipod support is added to wmp.
I won't give up my ipod (in NZ the alternatives are limited), and i won't use an alternate third party plug-in, application or OS.
I guess i [i]choose[/i] to be [i]forced[/i] into supporting apple's software push
iPod support
Where's the iPod support
I'm sick of iTunes. Every single day I start it, iTunes reports my iTunes library is damaged, and creates a new one.
I'll just bet it was that last update of iTunes :)
You said it yourself
give up your iPod. Are you seriously telling me that NZ isn't
swimming in different mp3 and other format music players?
In the US we have literally hundreds of choices from dozens
of companies. If you're as fond as you appear of Microsoft
products are you saying they don't ship Zunes to NZ?
I block ALL Apple apps from my systems, at work too
not pure evil...
I have a similar problem with software that wants to pre-load parts of itself at boot-up so it seems to load a bit faster when you need it. It really doesn't do anything but waste your time and ram if you don't use that software fairly soon after boot-up. Microsoft, Adobe, Apple and a few others are all guilty of this. I run msconfig all the time just to stop these routines after updating software packages from the aforementioned. It keeps my boot-up times much shorter and I only need to wait just a few fractions of a second when I actually need Adobe Reader or Quicktime codecs.
As for pure evil, that's a bit of hyperbole. Let's not get emotional about this.
Pure Evil
I'm not excusing Apple's opt-out style of software updates,
though. They should not check anything other than the
security update by default, and make it clear that any other
software is separate, and totally unrelated.
As an Apple user, I know that this reflects poorly on Apple. I
hope that they do change their approach to getting into the
Windows ecosystem; perhaps they could make a product so
good that people would download it without being 'tricked.'
Here's to hoping.
I wouldn't call it pure evil
Compared to this same subject 3 month ago...
(see screenshot in article) rather than 'hidden two-or-
three windows back' as claimed in that previous blog.
Nearly every corporate web page you go to that asks
you to sign up for software registration or other
purpose usually has their
newsletter/advertising/whatever pre-clicked for opt-
in, and if you don't select "Opt-out" or manually
uncheck every item, you are suddenly flooded with
tons of unwanted email and other materials.
How is Apple's making that option obvious "evil" in any
way?