How was Comcast.net hijacked?
Summary: It's official, even a pothead can social engineer Network Solutions.
It's official, even a pothead can social engineer Network Solutions. In an in-depth interview with the hijackers, featuring
some screenshots showing they had access to the complete portfolio of over 200 domain names controlled by Comcast, the details of how they did it, and why they did it are now coming straight from the source of the attack :
The hackers say the attack began Tuesday, when the pair used a combination of social engineering and a technical hack to get into Comcast's domain management console at Network Solutions. They declined to detail their technique, but said it relied on a flaw at the Virginia-based domain registrar. Network Solutions spokeswoman Susan Wade disputes the hackers' account. "We now know that it was nothing on our end," she says. "There was no breach in our system or social engineering situation on our end."
However they got in, the intrusion gave the pair control of over 200 domain names owned by Comcast. They changed the contact information for one of them, Comcast.net, to Defiant's e-mail address; for the street address, they used the "Dildo Room" at "69 Dick Tard Lane." Comcast, they said, noticed the administrative transfer and wrested back control, forcing the hackers to repeat the exploit to regain ownership of the domain. Then, they say, they contacted Comcast's original technical contact at his home number to tell him what they'd done.
Following ICANN's recently released advisory on preventing the very same impersonation attacks, it appears that even a first-tier domain registrar is still susceptible to registrant impersonation attacks. Makes you wonder on the state of understanding, detecting, and preventing social engineering attacks on the rest of the domain registrars.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
I saw the date 2010
RE: How was Comcast.net hijacked?
Master Joe Says...
--Master Joe
RE: How was Comcast.net hijacked?
However I disagree with Master Joe considering these people "morons". These people are very intelligent people that are that have no proper outlet for their creative work. Remember that these "kids" contacted Comcast and Comcast shun them thinking they were fooling around. After many years in many countries I discovered many intelligent people some may call "morons" but if you allow them to properly vent creative ideas and properly channel them then you can use it to for good and if we properly pay them for talent then you will have something good to come out of this. Master Joe is correct that these people should vent their intelligence on good but most company and people shun them so they have "no choice" but to do "bad" to show good they are. Companies today are too greedy to know something good in front of them and we are losing much from that type of thinking.
Here is my quote:
Bored dumb people with technology don't harm many people, it is the bored intelligent people that do.