LulzSec, Anonymous and hacktivism: Crappy security has caught up with us
Summary: We're pawns in this new game of Internet attack one-upmanship. You know it won't end well. But we watch anyway as we realize that our security procedures have been a joke for years.
What happens when the CIA, Senate, various gaming sites, Citibank and a bevy of others are hacked on a regular basis by various groups with one-liners on Twitter and no formal organization? You lose confidence in the Internet and the data passing through it.
My confidence in Internet security---not that there was much in the first place---is looking like a wall made of Swiss cheese. We've known for years that our collective security policies---personal, enterprise, consumer and otherwise---were lax. Nearly every piece of software we use has some vector to exploit. Every site that touches a server is vulnerable. Even those fancy security fobs from RSA can be had. And don't get us started on passwords.
We can write about hacks, patches, vulnerabilities and attacks until our fingers fall off. In the end, we're all pawns as groups like LulzSec bring down sites for giggles. And LulzSec can be quite entertaining. I'd be a liar if I didn't note that the group has made me chuckle a few times. Now we're in this vicious cycle. LulzSec brings down the CIA site and says:
Tango down---cia.gov---for the lulz.
Media attention ensues in bunches. LulzSec rinses your shabby security procedures and repeats. LulzSec even starts a hotline.
It's all good fun. Until it isn't. Simply put, we're pawns in this new game of Internet attack one-upmanship. You know it won't end well. But we watch anyway.
The not-so-amusing thing is that all this attention will lead to more legislative and regulator scrutiny and probably break a few good---yet security clueless---brands. As noted previously, the European Union stepped up its sentences for folks caught attacking critical infrastructure. That's a tough-sounding step that's totally fruitless. How exactly is the EU going to catch these attackers?
LulzSec is a spin-off of Anonymous, which has pulled off more than its share of attacks. Anonymous is a spin off from 4chan users. Good luck tracking those folks down. And you thought China hackers poking around various U.S. sites was worrisome. At least we can find China on a map.
Rest assured, legislators in the U.S. will follow the EU's lead. There will be tougher sentences and Congressional hearings about these attacks. With any luck, the Senate can keep its site running long enough to Webcast the proceedings.
In the end, the only thing that'll fend off attacks is better security---something that hasn't been built into the Internet or anything attached to it. When it comes to security, our infrastructure is the mother of all fixer-uppers. Enterprises are increasingly looking into cyberattack insurance as a defense. That's a nice fallback, but shouldn't the first line of defense revolve around buttoning down the various holes in your Swiss cheese infrastructure?
Related:
- Lulz Security hackers launch telephone request line
- United States Senate has been hacked by Lulz Security
- 26,000 email addresses and passwords leaked. Check this list to see if you’re included.
- Anonymous hackers target Spanish police website
- Infamous hacker group Anonymous pays the Indian cyberworld a visit
- Nintendo becomes latest server hack victim of Lulz Security
- Sony hacked again, another 1m passwords exposed
- Mitnick: Lulzsec ‘quite bold’
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback
I think you're dead wrong on almost all fronts...
The only thing that will really stop it is taking the fight to them. Vigorous enforcement and prosecution are one thing, but clandestine operations are another. Hold other countries and their ISPs accountable. If necessary, cut the cord.
Your view basically accept the attacks and places an obscene "security tax" on companies and organizations who happen to be targeted. We're basically allowing those targeting us to impose zero-value-added costs on US businesses that much of the rest of the world does not incur.
My gut says we're on a fast track to a "parallel internet" - a secure, business-oriented internet with a rigorous process for gaining access and low tolerance for abuse.
You missed the whole *barn* dude.
RE: LulzSec, Anonymous and hacktivism: Crappy security has caught up with us
RE: LulzSec, Anonymous and hacktivism: Crappy security has caught up with us
hanged, not hung :-)
Violent agreement on some points...
RE: LulzSec, Anonymous and hacktivism: Crappy security has caught up with us
Business use of the current internet is where you have the least anonymity because of all the tracking cookies and other "spyware" crap on commercial sites.
Do not confuse the CIA with Sony.
point 6. This is an external network portal, and not the CIA's internal network. Unless the article left something out . . . So basically it is chicken little claiming the sky is falling all over again. Where, *maybe* someone dropped a grain of sand.
It is not hard to hack a web server at all. It happens all the time, and companies like AOL have had their WHOIS record "hacked" for years. Does that mean they've been penetrated ? No.
Is it smart to hack a CIA web portal ? Probably not.
RE: LulzSec, Anonymous and hacktivism: Crappy security has caught up with us
Actually...no it isn't. We live in a world where people still store their passwords in text files on their desktops. Security is a human problem. There is no software patch for human stupidity.
RE: LulzSec, Anonymous and hacktivism: Crappy security has caught up with us
The recent big security breaches wasn't from users storing their passwords in plain text... The hacked companies stored them in plain text and let someone steal them. Shame on them, too.
Good Points...and what about sentencing?
We should also include judges in the Circle of Blame. Even including that Dmitriy Guzner's cyber attacks on religious Web site were obvious hate-crimes (which usually augments sentences), Guzner received one in year prison, then two years probation.
To a 19-year-old hacker with another 60 years of criminal destruction to wreak, that's not punishment. That's bragging rights and high-fives.
Per news dates, Guzner has been on the street for seven months.
No.
True
Fault shared.
When I review team members' code the top things I look for is how and whether they use prepared statements and whether they sanitize inputs correctly (XSS and datatype for weakly typed languages). It's a part of how our code review process works and it's something everyone should do. I'm of the opinion that if you're a multinational corporation accepting credit cards and asking for people's trust in order to store credit cards there should be some liability for negligence.
RE: LulzSec, Anonymous and hacktivism: Crappy security has caught up with us
Regarding prosecution, there are a lot of individuals in countries that don't have any sense of urgency about prosecuting individuals who are breaking into foreign computers. For example:
http://www.wired.com/magazine/2011/01/ff_hackerville_romania/
Keep in mind in the bigger picture, some cases will be state sponsored.
<br><br>-M
you say that as if it's all outsiders running these attacks...
You seem to act as if most of the attackers are all in other countries. Most of the new hacking groups are not national in affiliation. Anonymous and LulzSec are transnational, for instance. Sony? was not JUST attacked in the US. Heck, it's not even an American company, it's INTERNATIONAL.
...this is not like conventional warfare, it's more guerilla warfare. The "enemy" are few, hidden in the crowd, able to hit the guys standing around, in uniform.
RE: LulzSec, Anonymous and hacktivism: Crappy security has caught up with us
Yep.
RE: LulzSec, Anonymous and hacktivism: Crappy security has caught up with us
RE: LulzSec, Anonymous and hacktivism: Crappy security has caught up with us
I for one would welcome a return to the days when you had to "know someone" to get internet access and the threat of being cut off for bad behavior kept it to a minimum.
Once it opened to anyone with a little money, the current situation always seemed inevitable to me. Actually it took a bit longer than I expected.
Because of this, I'm a total Luddite when it comes to anything "important" and the internet.
RE: LulzSec, Anonymous and hacktivism: Crappy security has caught up with us
Also, these lulz pirates are using DDoS so security is not necessarily at stake nor the denial is easily avoided even with proper setups.
All this comes down always from the same bullcrap: crime has gone international since the last 40 years, while politicians and similar filth battle hard to keep the world divided, police forces impotent and so on.
We are working hard in order to keep the world in a sad state. The hackers just use that sad state at their advantage.