ie8 fix
madison

Zero Day

Ryan Naraine, Emil Protalinski and Dancho Danchev

Microsoft quietly finding, reporting security holes in Apple, Google products

By | August 26, 2011, 12:35pm PDT

Summary: Since July 2010, Microsoft’s vulnerability research team has identified and responsibly disclosed 109 different software vulnerabilities affecting a total of 38 vendors.

Researchers at Microsoft have been quietly finding — and helping to fix — security defects in products made by third-party vendors, including Apple and Google.

This month alone, the MSVR (Microsoft Security Vulnerability Research) team released advisories to document vulnerabilities in WordPress and Apple’s Safari browser and in July, software flaws were found and fixed in Google Picasa and Facebook.

The MSVR program, launched two three years ago, gives Microsoft researchers freedom to audit the code of third-party software and work in a collaborative way with the affected vendor to get those issues fixed before they are publicly compromised.

[ SEE: Microsoft says Google Chrome Frame doubles IE attack surface ]

follow Ryan Naraine on twitterThe team’s work gained prominence in 2009 when a dangerous security hole in Google Chrome Frame was found and fixed but it’s not very well known that the team has spent the last year disclosing hundreds of security defects in third-party software.

Since July 2010, Microsoft said the MSVR team identified and responsibly disclosed 109 different software vulnerabilities affecting a total of 38 vendors.

More than 93 percent of the third-party vulnerabilities found through MSVR since July 2010 were rated as Critical or Important, the company explained.

“Vendors have responded and have coordinated on 97 percent of all reported vulnerabilities; 29 percent of third-party vulnerabilities found since July 2010 have already been resolved, and none of the vulnerabilities without updates have been observed in any attacks,” Microsoft said.

This week’s discoveries:

  • A vulnerability exists in the way Safari handles certain content types. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause Safari to execute script content and disclose potentially sensitive information. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability would gain sensitive information that could be used in further attacks.
  • A vulnerability exists in the way that WordPress previously implemented protection against cross site scripting and content-type validation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to achieve script execution.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Ryan Naraine is a journalist and social media enthusiast specializing in Internet and computer security issues.

Disclosure

Ryan Naraine

The most important disclosure is of my employment with Kaspersky Lab as a member of the global research and analysis team. Kaspersky Lab is a global company specializing in anti-malware and secure content management technologies. I do not own stocks or other investments in any technology company.

Biography

Ryan Naraine

Ryan Naraine is a journalist and social media enthusiast specializing in Internet and computer security issues. He is currently security evangelist at Kaspersky Lab, an anti-malware company with operations around the globe. He is taking a leadership role in developing the company's online community initiative around secure content management technologies.

Prior to joining Kaspersky Lab, Ryan was Editor-at-Large/Security at eWEEK, leading the magazine's and Web site's coverage of Internet and computer security issues and managing the popular SecurityWatch blog, covering the daily threats, vulnerabilities and IT security technologies. He also covered IT security, hacker attacks and secure content management topics for Jupiter Media's internetnetnews.com.

Ryan can be reached at naraine SHIFT 2 gmail.com. For daily updates on Ryan's activities, follow him on Twitter.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
101
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

���
mingtian 21st Sep
Thank you so much for sharing 3 bulgari watches
snagging, thanks ! replica breitling watch
downloading =) d & g watches
And yet, people insist that Microsoft is evil.
@Aerowind no longer evil. the evil one is apple now.
@tatiGmail

... and Google.
@tatiGmail
You just have no idea. Microsoft has almost 100% market penetration - virtually a monopoly on the desktop, has killed Symbian and MeeGo, now trying to take down Android, over the decades legally dubious business practices in maintaining their monopoly, so much more people and businesses are locked in to Microsoft products, etc ,too much to list here. And, on visiting a local large electronic retailers, have gotten rid all Logitech hardware, so now there are Microsoft left, and the hundreds of PC with, you guessed it Microsoft - there is no choice just Microsoft hardware and OS. Maybe you weren't around when for over 10 years there was hardly no PC innovation because of Microsoft's collusion with OEM's, Intel and retailers.
@root12 - wth? Microsoft killed Symbian and Meego??? How, precisely did they do that?

It's time to get over Microsoft's prior business practices. The were found out, fined, forced to change their business practices and spent 7 years operating under DOJ oversight.

As has been amply demonstrated over the last 10 years, there is ample competition in the market where customers want alternatives (e.g. Mobile), but the fact is that most customers do NOT want alternative desktop/laptop OS' which is why they continue to primarily buy Windows.
0 Votes
+ -
Message has been deleted.
zato_3@... Updated - 29th Aug
  • Flagged
@zato_3@...
Evil is CNet/ZDNet who continue to be a propaganda agent for Microsoft.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
Message has been deleted.
Rama.NET Updated - 29th Aug
  • Flagged
@root12

When did Microsoft start making it's own computer hardware?
What innovation did you expect to happen in the last 10 years that we are missing on PC's?
@root12 You're FOS. Logitech is alive and well, and I'm mousing and typing with Logitech at this very moment.

What is "virtually a monopoly"? It is or it ain't. In this case, there's Apple's OS, Linux, BSD, Chrome. There's 2 very popular FREE office suites besides MS Office. There's a multitude of media management/player software. 4 major web browers, plus lots of others to choose from.

Where is this monopoly. People have a choice, so if the biggest percentage choose MS it's not due to monopoly, it's because whether you like it or not, some of us out here like Microsoft products. If you don't, then use something else, but don't use it to spew the kind of crap you did in this post.
@Aerowind

Microsoft learned their lessons though the DOJ and EU.

Apple has yet to experience the consequences of their anti-competitive behavior...

~~~~~~~~~~
Fools say they learn through experience. I prefer to learn through other people's experiences.
~ Bismarck

The only constant is change.
~ Confucius

The words of truth are always paradoxical.
~ Lao Tzu

Hegel was right when he said that we learn from history that man can never learn anything from history.
~ George Bernard Shaw
@WinTard
I do not like Apple's ways, and so I don't buy their products. This is not a slam on Apple, but they are basically a toy maker -- very, very compelling and much loved toys. They do not hold dominant market positions in any area in which they compete -- not even in digital music -- and make no "basic" products like steel, food, or transportation. Thus, while I agree that they are bad news, they are also easy to stay away from. If you don't like Apple, just don't use their stuff. You won't miss it.
0 Votes
+ -
Message has been deleted.
anono Updated - 29th Aug
  • Flagged
@WinTard "Change is the only constant" - Buddha long before Confucius was ever born
jdakula,

"They do not hold dominant market positions in any area in which they compete -- not even in digital music"

That just isn't true, they hold more than 70% of the market for online music, and about 80% of the market for Mp3 players, this is not simply 'dominant' it is overwhelming.


But market share is ultimately beside the point. The issue is whether or not a company practices anti-competitive behavior, and a company does not need to have 90% market share or more to be anti-competitive.

And Apple has a lot of anti-competitive practices, for example they require music labels to agree not to offer songs at a lower price somewhere else if they are available from the iTunes store, that's anti-competitive.
@Doctor Demento,

"And Apple has a lot of anti-competitive practices, for example they require music labels to agree not to offer songs at a lower price somewhere else if they are available from the iTunes store, that's anti-competitive."

That is called a negotiation. Apple must be offering something pretty special to the music labels for them to agree to these conditions n'est pas?
@ YaBaby
yes they are offering the largest market place of buyers. Doctor Demento example is probably a small portion of the market place. What Apple does it tells you what you can get for a profit.

If you invent a new hammer are you going to sell it only at Ace hardware making $2 when Lowes and Home Depot won't give you your price. No. you have to agree to making $1.50 because that what the major players demand.
@WinTard
What Microsoft learned was that they have the money to BEAT the DOJ and the EU.

They stalled the DOJ until they got a conservative and business friendly president in office at which point the whole thing was dropped with no significant Microsoft concessions.

Right now they are violating the EU's edicts and stalling them in court.

Neither changed how Microsoft does business in any significant way.
@Aerowind
MS was a predatory monopolist. The older among us remember watching great company after great company fall to an often inferior MS offering.

However they got called on it. Now, like a convict, they have done their time and do seem to be truly rehabilitated. Hopefully unlike the typical convict, there will be no recidivism. Google, having themselves become a truly dangerous, monopolistic and dare I say "evil" company, are about to go through this wringer themselves (at least I hope so).

Apple is a toy maker who sells portable consoles. I have no *need* for anything they make, so I am happy to avoid them. I actually say, "let them be" for now. For those who are comfortable operating within their rules, let them do so. Obviously, many millions are.
@jdakula Apple is a toy maker who sells portable consoles. I have no *need* for anything they make, so I am happy to avoid them.

I totally agree with that sentiment.

I actually say, "let them be" for now. For those who are comfortable operating within their rules, let them do so.

I totally disagree with that sentiment. Apple's not some little company doing its own thing on the sidelines anymore. They're a very wealthy company that is beginning to take advantage of a broken patent system, their vast cash reserves and court systems around the world to enforce patents they never should have been awarded in the first place. You don't let those kinds of companies be, because one morning you're going to wake up and find that they're suddenly able to claim patent infringement on anything you just dreamed up or have seen before in a scifi flick.
0 Votes
+ -
Your opinion
toddybottom Updated - 26th Aug
@jdakula
"The older among us remember watching great company after great company fall to an often inferior MS offering."

And you are entitled to it. In my opinion and in the opinion of 90%+ of the entire world, Windows was always and continues to be the very best OS to use on the desktop. If you didn't want Windows, no one ever stopped you from building your own or buying a computer from Sun or Apple.

Likewise, if you didn't want to use IE, there have always been alternatives. MS has never stopped anyone from using an alternate browser. Ever.

Likewise, if you didn't want to use WMP, there have always been alternatives. MS has never stopped anyone from using an alternate media player. Ever.

To quote your previous post:
"If you don't like Apple, just don't use their stuff."

Likewise with Microsoft. You've never been forced to use their stuff. Ever.
@toddybottom
You fail to see the bigger picture. I may want Mac OSX on my computer, but if I want $500 hardware. Then I have to choose between spending an extra $500 to get hardware that will support a OSX or just living with windows.

With Apple, because there are always many apple competitors in their price range. Not only that, Microsoft's monopoly means a lot of software is developed only for their OS so if you happen to need one of those software then you are stuck using Windows.
@eMJayy "They're a very wealthy company that is beginning to take advantage of a broken patent system"

Exactly this! If it's not bad enough that they lock you directly in to itunes and store if you want their hardware, as soon as someone actually competes with them in any arena, they sue over some frivolous miniscule patent. "Well our tablets are square and have a power button on the top left/right, and we patented that, so you can't do it without paying us first". Pfft.. I don't see them chasing after any of the manufacturers who aren't doing well, just the 1 or 2 that actually gain popularity with a decent Android tablet. It's bogus as all hell.
@waterhzrd
Everyone is taking advantage of a broken system. Not sure why you are singling out Apple. Microsoft is suing android manufacturers over patents they won't even reveal to the public. Oracle suing Google over APIs.

The fact is these are corporations and they are legally obliged to use every opportunity to make money. That's why they all take advantage of the patent system.
0 Votes
+ -
@Toddybottom
baggins_z 26th Aug
Wrong. 90% of IT departments think Windows is the best thing to MANDATE to employees, regardless of what said employees would prefer to use. Mostly because IT departments have their precious MSCE diplomas they need to justify.
@waterhzrd is Apple the only one doing this? I just recently read that Microsoft was seeking to get all Motorola Mobility products banned in the United States. Why? Because they contain a battery and signal strength meter! So Microsoft is just as guilty, as you claim Apple to be. So why give Microsoft a pass and complain about Apple? If you scream about Apple suing Samsung and HTC then you should also scream about Microsoft suing Motorola and HTC.
@jdakula [Apple is a toy maker who sells portable consoles. I have no *need* for anything they make, so I am happy to avoid them. ] So if it is something you do not like, suddenly it is a toy? [sarcasm] I only wish I was as wise, and powerful as you are. [/sarcasm] Personally I think many of the cheap OEM computers are nothing more than disposable junk. So if I choose not to buy cheap junk, then I am only left with a toy console? Maybe you should stop with the biased load of Bull and get a life.
@jdakula What ARE you smoking?

Lotus failed because 123 missed the move to Windows. Microsoft produced the first good Windows spreadsheet and Lotus is history.

Wordperfect failed because it too missed the move to Windows. Microsoft produced a better WYSIWYG word processor and Wordperfect (and AmiPro, et. Are history.

Same for Netware, notes, domino, QuattroPro, Watcom/Zortec/Borland, and MANY, MANY other products that simply failed to compete.

Just because Microsoft won a battle doesn't automatically mean they did so illegally. In FACT, they usually won through hard work and persistence.
@baggins_z

"Wrong. 90% of IT departments think Windows is the best thing to MANDATE to employees, regardless of what said employees would prefer to use. Mostly because IT departments have their precious MSCE diplomas they need to justify."

-------

You are speaking from a position where you do not know what you are talking about. In general, a Microsoft-based infrastructure is relatively inexpensive and efficient to support. Not to mention that most line-of-business software only runs on Windows or is only feature-complete on Windows. It just makes sense in most cases to run Windows in an enterprise.

The idea of letting the employee choose the software they run is a ridiculous concept. Among other things such as interoperability concerns, it complicates centralized administration. Reductions in the efficiency of centralized administration can become incredibly costly (more time spent researching and/or in training, more time spent with support, a higher number of technical employees and hence much higher salary costs, lower chance of bulk discounts, etc.). This stuff adds up very fast.

Just because your MacBook works fine for you at home does not mean it would play nice in an enterprise network. In fact, I speak from experience and assure you that it does not.
@anono
"You fail to see the bigger picture. I may want Mac OSX on my computer, but if I want $500 hardware. Then I have to choose between spending an extra $500 to get hardware that will support a OSX or just living with windows."

That's Apple's fault, not Microsoft. Microsoft says, "If you want our OS, that's fine, just make sure your hardware meets these minimum standards, & as long as the hardware works, we'll warranty our product [the OS]". Apple says, "You want to run OS X? Then you buy *our* hardware. No alternate hardware for you!" That's like blaming Microsoft because HP doesn't have a Windows 7 driver for your old HP LaserJet 5; Microsoft didn't manufacture the printer (HP did), & Microsoft didn't write the original driver for Windows 98/NT for it (HP's support division did), so it's not Microsoft's fault if HP doesn't update their hardware support.
@jdakula
Just because some of these companies failed doesn't mean their failure was directly due to the direct and intentional actions of Microsoft. You also say that many had superior products and you use that to make your point. Unfortunatly that also has nothing to do with it. Companies fail for a plethora of reasons...fantastic products or not, the best product/technology frequently doesn't win marketshare. Betamax/VHS is the classic example...there are tons of others.
@Aerowind common users are not computer illiterate any more, they have realized who is evil (Apple of course)
@AdnanPirota
Apple is so evil that even though it's obvious who's evil you had to point it out in brackets. They are also so evil that they make most of their money from consumers choosing their product than from pre-established monpolies.
@AdnanPirota And Microsofts greatest trick was, to fool you into thinking that they are Saintly. Microsoft is not Saintly, nor Evil. The same can be said for Apple, and Google. You choose to believe that corporations are Saintly, or Evil is due to being fed Press Releases and believing them is more a reflection of your own personal beliefs. From my personal experience; the people that buy cheap stuff, thinking they are smarter than anyone that spends more, are usually fools. THere is nothing wrong with bargain shopping, but do not expect everyone else to follow your lead
@Aerowind

Evil, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder happy
@Aerowind
I used to. I don't any more.

But, let's see how aggressively in 2012-2015, Microsoft applies its desktop dominance and partnering with (if not, by then, ownership of) Facebook and Nokia to go after Apple and Google in the mobile space.
@Aerowind
No company is evil or good. They are just out to make money. If you think Microsoft has been offering this service out of good will to its competitors you are mistaken. They did so one they can put a good PR spin on it (ie today).
0 Votes
+ -
Of course they are.....
linux for me 27th Aug
@Aerowind
They can't even fix their crappy software, but they think they can find errors in the software of others.

Sheesh! What a joke!
@linux for me - really? What Microsoft software requires major fixes. If Microsoft can help vendors offering products that run on Windows find and fix secuirity issues in their products so that Windows users as a whole enjoy a safer, more reliable experience, how is this a bad thing.
@linux for me
Any time anything goes wrong on a Windows PC, ignoramuses like yourself immediately blame Windows and by extension Microsoft.

Hence, MS has an interest in making sure 3rd party software is as good as it can possibly be,
@Aerowind

This is like the locomotive calling the kettle black. wink
0 Votes
+ -
A History of Malpractice
Chipesh Updated - 28th Aug
@bitcrazed

They used the Operating System monopoly (withholding APIs etc) to make competing products non competitive. Not just Wordperfect but Netscape and others.


"I have decided that we should not publish these [Windows 95 user interface] extensions. We should wait until we have a way to do a high level of integration that will be harder for likes of Notes, WordPerfect to achieve, and which will give Office a real advantage.... We can't compete with Lotus and WordPerfect/Novell without this."

Bill Gates, Microsoft founder and then-CEO

The history won't change by people like yourself closing your eyes to, or being ignorant of it.

Competition isn't a challenge to Microsoft, a reason to improve, it's something to eliminate.
@Aerowind Takes one to know one! wink
Oh, yes that is a troll statement, yet it makes good business sense for MS to find as many holes in 3rd party, and other, products, to help deflect criticism from themselves (warranted or not).
@Aerowind

Any attack on a Windows system via a third party app is still an attack on a Windows system.

It is in Microsoft's best interest to prevent attacks on Windows systems.
0 Votes
+ -
���
mingtian 21st Sep
Thank you so much for sharing 3 bulgari watches
snagging, thanks ! replica breitling watch
downloading =) d & g watches

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix