Researcher: 50 percent of Mac OS X users still running outdated Java versions
Summary: According to a tweet posted by Aleks Gostev, 50% of the visitors to their newly launched Flashback information site, are still running outdated versions of Java.
According to a tweet posted by Aleks Gostev, Chief Security Expert, Global Research and Analysis Team at Kaspersky Lab, 50% of the visitors to their newly launched Flashback information site, are still running outdated versions of Java, potentially exposing themselves to numerous exploitation attempts courtesy of malicious attackers.
The cybercriminals behind the Flashback Mac OS X malware are exploiting CVE-2011-3544 and CVE-2012-0507 vulnerabilities in Java, and that's just for starters.
According to Zscaler, hundreds of thousands of enterprise users remain exposed to malicious attacks, due to the fact that they're running outdated versions of their third-party software.
Here's the summary of their findings affecting, both, Mac OS X users and Windows users:
- Adobe Acrobat - 62.54% of out-dated plugins
- Adobe Shockwave - 35.69% of out-dated plugins
- Microsoft Outlook - 7.26% of out-dated plugins
- Java - 5.88% of out-dated plugins
- Adobe Flash - 4.37% of out-dated plugins
- Microsoft SilverLight - 1.73% of out-dated plugins
- QuickTime - 1.71% of out-dated plugins
- Windows Media - 1.25% of out-dated plugins
- RealPlayer - 0.23& of out-dated plugins
A malicious attacker targeting the Mac OS X platform, doesn't need to take advantage of zero day vulnerabilities, due to the fact that end users continue failing to patch their third-party applications and browser plugins. What's particularly interesting in the Flashback Mac OS X malware attack, is the fact that the cybercriminals behind it took advantage of the delayed patch for Java under Apple's OS. Taking into consideration the percentages of end users still using the Web with outdated third-party applications and browser plugins, multiple Flashback related campaigns could be launched relying on this fact.
Apple users, with a patch for the Java vulnerabilities currently available, there's no excuse to avoid patching as soon as possible.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Talkback
This what led to all the major Windows worms of the early 2000s
RE: This what led to all the major Windows worms of the early 2000s
I thought that the absense of a software firewall also contributed to these worms. Thus, the introduction of the Windows Firewall (enabled by default) in Windows XP Service Pack 2.
Speaking of which, OS X ships with a number of services enabled as well as a firewall that is disabled by default.
You're both correct.
is that not unexpected?
That sort of logical analysis is going to cut
Huh?
Ouch......
I don't have to do anything to patch. Just set it once and forget it...
Adobe Flash and ReaderX auto updates.
Google Chrome auto updates
Java auto updates
Hm, come to think of it, virtually everything already auto-updates!
Notepad++, Firefox, SVN Tortoise, CCleaner, Defraggler, Speccy, Internet Download Manager, AnyDVD, WinMerge, WinSCP, VLC, PowerDVD-BD, cygwin, just to mention a few.
For what doesn't, Secunia's PSI is a great tool, sniffing out what needs to be patched, then carries it out for you, automatically!
The thoughest part was to click 'yes' to the auto-updates.
Now what's different about other ecosystems? Lack of real apps? Just crippled apps (Crapps)?
[i]~~~~~~~~~~
Build a system that even a fool can use, and only a fool will want to use it.
~ Shaw's Principle
It is impossible to make anything foolproof, because fools are so ingenious
~ Anonymous
In the vain laughter of folly wisdom hears half its applause.
~ George Eliot[/i]
Hmmm
Add IE [eventually] for updating. You are Reader X auto-updates? It checks. PowerDVD doesn't auto-update. I've never had a request in v11. Also use CCleaner and WinSCP. Never got an auto-update. Configuration setting?
But there's a big fly in the auto patching ointment
User accesses work from home. Corp using Citrix remote access setup that requires Java. Turns out Java with fixes is incompatible with Corp Citrix setup. Corp knows there is a fix but doesn't yet have a time table to implement it. So auto updating their home systems means this work from home option vanishes without warning. Ugh.
And working from home is a really big deal in this situation. Really big.
Now I get to show them how to turn Java on and off as needed. And I'm sure they will be diligent about doing this. Yeah. Right.
Errr
just upgrade to Linux
No patch for Leopard.
Good news: this website (http://lnk.co/ILTHN ) we has been updated and add
abandoned their increases are welcome to visit our website. Accept cash or
credit card payments, free transport. You can try oh, will make you satisfied.
http://lnk.co/ILTHN
http://lnk.co/ILTHN
http://lnk.co/ILTHN
sagfserdger
Hmmmm.
Problem with Macs is that Java is generally updated by the OS and not by Sun/Oracle directly. So you could blame Apple for crawling to release an update when one was available since February for Windows and other OSs.
On top of that, with Apple's limited support policy, those at 1.5.x and older probably won't get patched. Soon, 10.6 will join the ranks.