ie8 fix

It’s time to get real, folks: Twitter and Facebook aren’t fads and here’s why

By | June 10, 2011, 5:01am PDT

Summary: Are Twitter and Facebook just a fad? That’s like asking if peanut butter and jelly are a fad! They aren’t, and here’s why.

Problem?

Problem?

Check out this short but to-the-point comment left on a recent post of mine about why Nintendo should learn to utilize social media for real-time communication:

“The more companies that resist fads like Facebook/Twitter, the better.”

(Link to comment here)

Really, now? I severely beg to differ, and the fact that this person feels like they do just goes to show me that there are others out there who share similar sentiments. First, let’s begin with the definition of “fad:”

Fad: A temporary fashion, notion, manner of conduct, etc., especially one followed enthusiastically by a group. (Source)

Now that we know what constitutes a fad, the next question pertains to the duration of time and/or the number of people who must be involved for something to be considered a fad. Though those particular facets are subjective, there’s a point at which it becomes reasonable to consider when something is no longer a fad. As for Twitter and Facebook, I can think of a number of reasons why both have long outgrown a fad status:

  • Twitter: First introduced to the public in 2006, Twitter boasts some 175 million users (or so they claim). Even if their claimed numbers can be disputed, the service continues to flourish to this day, 5 years later. I mean, if companies out there are willing to pay the current $125,000 per-day price tag just to have a promoted trend, then what does that — along with the combination of all of the aforementioned — say about Twitter being a fad? That it’s NOT, that’s what!
  • Facebook: First introduced in 2004, Facebook began as a specialized platform that eventually had the public practically begging to be let in. Since then, Facebook has amassed over half a billion followers. Families and friends keep in touch, companies keep customers informed, bands keep fans updated, and so on and so forth — all via Facebook. Oh, and I suppose the tiiiiiiiiny fact that AN ENTIRE FREAKING MOVIE has been made about Facebook just *might* have something to say for Facebook not being a fad. What more do you need!?

Now, I realize that the amount of money spent on a service ($125,000 per-day) or the fanfare that exists around a venue (Facebook’s movie) in and of themselves are non-sequiturs when saying something isn’t a fad, so it’s a combination of those points in conjunction with how long Twitter and Facebook have been around that I base my points on.

Also, let me be clear that my points above have nothing to do with the potential decline of either company. Yes, I realize MySpace was a social site that once sat on top of the world, but even with its demise, MySpace certainly existed long enough to outgrow a fad status as well. People simply chose to flock to new services/sites that allowed them to be social in more approachable/enjoyable ways.

So, to say that Twitter and Facebook are a fad is to have a very narrow and skewed perception of how the Internet has evolved up until now. While there are a multitude of reasons that Twitter or Facebook could one day face the same fate as MySpace, there is just one major reason that will not be the contributing factor to bring that about: the fact that human beings are social creatures, and whether it’s on MySpace or Twitter or Facebook or Reddit or Quora or any number of other broad/specialized social platforms, the innate passion we share as humans to be social will *never* be a fad.

Personally, you may not be very social; you may absolutely loathe social media platforms/networks, and I’m sure you have your reasons for that, but don’t let that skew your perception to the point where you consider Facebook and Twitter to be fads. As the commenter “Aerowind” put it in response to the individual who prompted this post, that’s just “silly.”

If you haven’t yet, it’s time to learn to embrace social media — or at least accept it and see it for what it really is, because it’s not going anywhere. Ever.

-Stephen Chapman
SEO Whistleblower

Related Stories:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Stephen is a freelance writer based in Charlotte, NC.

Disclosure

Stephen Chapman

Stephen Chapman is a freelance writer and content strategist. All work that Stephen does for ZDNet is on a contractual basis.

It is left to Stephen's discretion whether or not to accept assignments from prospective clients who discover him through ZDNet. Such endeavors have no association with ZDNet and, unless otherwise agreed upon, are kept separate and private in the interest of all parties involved. You may freely contact him for consulting, training, and/or public speaking inquiries.

While Stephen may accept complimentary passes, waived fees, payment, and/or covered travel costs to industry-related events (conferences, expos, etc.) as an attendee or a speaker, acceptance of such offers is not considered payment for, or exclusive guarantee of, any particular blog coverage of the event attended.

Biography

Stephen Chapman

Stephen is a freelance writer based in Charlotte, NC.
61
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

udbbrky 19 tqn
bmakrekwe64-24378982177453783887923692373819 27th Nov
kyytoi,mjafngxi53, kkflx.
You need a looser definition of fad. Any fad needs a social element, else it wont be "enthusiastically followed by a group" but at one time CB radios and blogging also had its wide adherents. Any arguing for the permanence of now is just the usual bubble talk we hear every 5-10 years.
@ALISON SMOCK CB radios and Blogging STILL have wide adherents so I'm not sure where you are going with your point.
0 Votes
+ -
Proves the point.
ALISON SMOCK 10th Jun
@athynz That actually proves the point. Just because something sticks around does not mean it was not a fad. There was a time when many suburban houses had CB radios. That time passed pretty rapidly. Same for blogs. Remember IRC and ICQ?
0 Votes
+ -
Social Networking itself is not a fad.
Pete "athynz" Athens 10th Jun
@ALISON SMOCK Ahh I see the issue now... Facebook itself may wind up being a fad by anyone's definition social networking itself is not a fad by any means. We've been doing it since the beginning of mankind... from gatherings around the fireplace after a day of hunting and gathering to leaning against a fence post jawing for a spell to sending letters via snail mail to CB radio checks to emails to text messages to instant messages to facebook and twitter to the next big thing... it's ALL social networking. I'd have to say that something that has endured for thousands of years is by no means a fad. The tools used however might sometimes are.
0 Votes
+ -
Yep
Bit-Smacker 13th Jun
@athynz

I agree. I use CB and HAM radios when I'm out 4x4'ing and have no other wireless communication capability. He must be a city-dweller.
@ALISON SMOCK
You : "Just because something sticks around does not mean it was not a fad"

World English Dictionary's definition of fad: "an intense but short-lived fashion; craze".

Your definition of fad is way too loose.

As for CB radios... you're comparing an electronic device- which will always become outdated- to social networking (which, as athynz stated, has been around forever). The IDEA itself behind the CB is bigger than ever: the ability to communicate wirelessly and on the go. CB radios simply morphed into cell phones.

I doubt that Facebook is going anywhere soon; it has now become the standard social networking site and so many people are entrenched in it with their hundreds/thousands of friends and tagged photos, it would be a nightmare to move everybody over to a new site. Why would anyone want to go through all the work?

I don't see that the ability to share news with all your friends and family at once- with a few clicks- is going out of style. Ever.
0 Votes
+ -
Read and Think.
Crotinger 24th Jun
@ddferrari

You: As for CB radios... you're comparing an electronic device- which will always become outdated- to social networking (which, as athynz stated, has been around forever). The IDEA itself behind the CB is bigger than ever: the ability to communicate wirelessly and on the go. CB radios simply morphed into cell phones

Another Example of this would be bell bottoms vs jeans

Although its impossible to define jeans as a fad I would call bell bottoms a fad.

I agree with you on certain points but my opinion is that the post is being misread/misunderstood in general. Correct me if I'am wrong. Alison Smock

I can not find a point in either the article nor any of the above posts where the idea of "Social Networking" was described as a fad. However the current popular medium being used to satisfy peoples need to be social was in fact the target of the discussion. Do I see Facebook Twitter sticking around? That all depends on the companies manage them and how they respond to the needs of there clients. Which in facts adds more facets to debate the fad vs non fad idea. for example how can you even try to define something as a fad that is always changing. If Facebook made no improvements to their product would it have been as popular or would it have been become the next Myspace which I would consider a FAD.
Cryptic messages written in the sky over lower Manhattan that turned out to be part of a kooky art project mystified and unnerved New Yorkers Sunday afternoon. MTS Converter
Just after 4 p.m. a plane wrote the words "Last Chance" in the air. The message was preceded by"Lost Our Lease" and followed by "Now Open." MTS Converter Mac
0 Votes
+ -
Hardly fads
Pete "athynz" Athens 10th Jun
So you took a comment left by one of the most notorious drive by trolls on ZDNet and posted an article to prove him wrong... nice!

You did leave out the fact that many devices also have Facebook and Twitter apps built into their software - not just smartphones and tablets (which were also called a fad) but televisions as well now have dedicated apps for both social services.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Indeed!
StephenChapman 10th Jun
@athynz Well, yes; I was indeed motivated by said drive-by troll, but the post is more for the benefit of others like him... if they even care, that is. lol. There is certainly a greater point to the post, at least! happy

Great point with the apps as well. I'm so used to taking things like that for granted now!

-Stephen
0 Votes
+ -
@athynz

Not everybody likes Facebook. Not everybody likes Twitter. Just because you've become an unabashed fanboy of both doesn't mean everybody else out there has to.

It wasn't too long ago MySpace was the hottest thing out there and I think that's where ALISON SMOCK up above, was coming from.
There will be a new social king to come sooner than you think. Facebook has lost some of its shine with some people. It keeps getting more users but a lot of them are business pages. We are just looking for the perfect new social site to bump Facebook off! Who will make it?
0 Votes
+ -
I agree
Shinsengumi 11th Jun
@imsimsj I discovered the FB trend fairly early, and when the site was fresh & new, it was a good site. It had that, hmmm, je ne sais quoi about it? The site layout, design, colour scheme, was lite and fresh and interesting. It was also easy to get around and there were a few logical inconsitencies but it had a good vibe.

I haven't been a facebook regular now for over a year, around 9 months ago I did a huge cull, un-tagging a lot of photos, deleting a lot more and pruning my FB presence right back. I logged on yesterday to rsvp to an event invitation, and the site's been butchered. I was trying for around a minute to figure out how to get access to my photos.

Long story short, I just noticed how cluttered, junky, old and tired Facebook looked. It looked thrashed. It was tiring to wade through, and it had none of the exciting feel it used to. It's not cool anymore, but, there's no other alternative yet.

I reckon we'll see Facebook's successor in the next 1-2 years, and in 5-7 Facebook will still be massive, but definitely not 'cool' or 'fresh'.
MySpace felt it wasn't a fad either.
0 Votes
+ -
Both were big at one time. Both are now footnotes in the history of the internet.

A fad by any other name is still a fad.
It's so much easier to be stupid and ignorant than at least trying to be smart and informed. Just look around You. Two out of every three people around You are more stupid than You. Even if it is a statistical impossibility.
happy
@Dukhalion pretty sure the odds higher for the folks who thought the world was flat. The masses are rarely on right side.
Do not have an account with them and never will.
@rdw551

That proves it then. Chapman, consider yourself rebuffed.
0 Votes
+ -
Very smart
sissy sue 10th Jun
@rdw551
I had enough loved ones clammering that I join them on Facebook, so I caved in and joined. Stupid me.

Facebook sucks.
@sissy sue Facebook doesn't suck. Your loved ones do.
@rdw551
I'm with ya, there.

Beware of the social network addicts who inhabit these boards. They're angry that you aren't pwned like they are.
Include in the list of famous last words: MySpace
0 Votes
+ -
@Rod@...
@sackbut Walkman was not a fad. It was a fine product that became obsolete when better replacements were developed. We still use portable music players.
The blogger doth protest too much, methinks.
@david.lombard2@... We already have one annoying Diane Chambers (Shelley Long), we don't need another. Stop talking like that.
0 Votes
+ -
Still a fad.
roncemer 10th Jun
Altavista (any one remember them?) was #1 in search for longer than facebook or twitter have even been around. Google came on the scene, and within a year, you were hard-pressed to find anyone who still used Altavista at all.

Less than a handful of years back, Myspace was all the rage. Now very few people even that anymore.

Nearly everything about the Internet is a fad. If you have a new website which does things a new way (or the old way, but just "looks" new) and you can get enough users to jump ship and join up with you, you can dethrone the current leader -- as long as your stuff actually works, is simple/easy to use, handles the load, and doesn't go down very often or for very long.

Social networking is likely not a fad. But facebook and twitter could lose the majority of their audience overnight. In fact, twitter is already losing its luster. None of my facebook friends -- ZERO -- post anything on twitter. It appears as if twitter has become just another way to "push" updates out to the masses -- typically fans of a performer or politician or other celebrity will "follow" them on twitter, and that's about it. That's not social networking; it's advertising by subscription.

Facebook and twitter are the current reigning kings of social networking/push advertising, but for how long? Who knows.
0 Votes
+ -
Movie argument
xrayban 10th Jun
There was also a movie made about breakdancing (and a sequel!)
0 Votes
+ -
Sure the social web is here to stay, and FB & Tw show no signs of losing the plot. But sooner or later, some other guy will come up with a development that will make the Next Step; probably combining the best of those two, and then some. Google has made it a total priority, as I suspect M$ has too. But it's equally likely that it'll be a new kid on the block.

Never forget Alta Vista, MySpace, AOL, Blue Suede Shoes.

Sure the troll who rattled your cage was wrong too - he seriously believes the social web is a fad. But he can't help being wrong - you should know better.
@Heenan73 you are correct but the point of the blog was FB and TW WERE NOT fads.
0 Votes
+ -
Life Expectancy & Volume
Dr_Zinj 10th Jun
It's not a fad if at the end of 10 years it still had more than 10% of the customers it had during it's peak.
Movies are made about fads all the time Valley Girl, Annette Funachello flicks, Saturday Night Fever(disco was not a fad it is still hugely influential but white suits, gold chains open button look was) etc etc
I don't think it matters if Facebook is a fad, or whether it lasts beyond whatever time period one designates for a fad. What matters is whether people actually let time sitting in front of a computer, or poking at the screen of a mobile device, take the place of actual interaction with real people.

Fortunately I'm anti-social so I don't have to choose either of those. Once somebody comes up with GetOutOfMyFaceBook, though, all bets are off.
0 Votes
+ -
This Reminds Me Of....
brucegil@... 10th Jun
the cartoon where the grandfather watched his grandson texting on a phone. When the boy explained what he was doing, the grandfather said, "Well, they finally perfected the telegraph."

People are going to communicate. They will just use newer and "easier" (?) methods. Handwritten notes and letters are not dominant as they were a generation ago, but they have not ceased to exist. Maybe they are the "fad" now.
0 Votes
+ -
Twitter hmmm
ggibson1 10th Jun
I have seen three polls at CNN that asked if you use twitter. All three ended up where about 93% said NO. Seems twitter has a long way to go.

There are plenty of RSS feeds out there after all these years and that is what Twitter is... an RSS feed. So I guess anything can hang around forever with a small number of people.

Facebook ... without a major educational and cultural enlightened revolution happening I cannot see the average person giving up on being self center narcissists any time soon.. so Facebook (or something like it) is probably here to stay.
0 Votes
+ -
Narcissists? Where
online@... 10th Jun
@ggibson1 Maybe I run in a different crowd than you do, but I don't have any FB friends who are narcissists. Sure, people talk about what is going on in their lives, but most people do that off of FB as well. And most FB "friends" are interested in hearing about what their friends are up to. How does that constitute narcissism?
People PUBLISHING their lives is alot different than sitting around shooting the breeze.
0 Votes
+ -
Narcissists...
Pete "athynz" Athens 10th Jun
@online@... That's what the FB haters like to call FB users. What they do not seem to realize is to some degree we ALL are narcissistic...
0 Votes
+ -
"Facebook haters"?
ScorpioBlue 12th Jun
@athynz

Aren't you taking this a bit too personally?

Get over yourself.
Wow what a waste of breath! Boring argument. First of all the scope is all that determines a fad, if you are talking about fads in the last year then yes facebook and twitter are not fads, but if you talk about it like fads during your lifetime, then facebook and twitter surely would be fads.
I agree, they both outgrew fad status on day one....they stepped right in to the area of being the shopping mall for sexual predators, stalkers and ID thieves....A virtual gold mine. And while your at looking up definitions check out the first entry for the word "Twit" (as in Twitter)
Mac
0 Votes
+ -
Thank Goodness for Facebook and Twaater!
PercySludge Updated - 10th Jun
Now thatall the bozos have moved off of email. literacy is slowly returning.
NEW RULE: If you use facebook, you must never be allowed to go back to regular e-mail! Let the Chemtrails, Holistic holey spiritual-spammers and 9-11 conspiracy nutjobs stay forever on Facebook!
Facebook and Twitter don't suck. Every tool is whatever you make it out to be. Some people like the aspects of social media that others of us think are stupid. Yet there's nothing wrong with creating a Facebook or Twitter account and locking it down so that you are only interacting with a small group of personal friends or family.

MySpace died because it became viewed as dangerous, just like the infamous AOL chat rooms. It was also hard to navigate, and the freedom to design your page made every page look like it was designed by a 9 year old. Facebook has learned from those mistakes. I don't love it, but it's obviously become important enough that it is used by multinational corporations and federal and state governments to connect with people.

In fact, I don't use the term social networking at all anymore. There's as much business networking happening on Facebook as there is on LinkedIn, and I think it's more successful on Facebook. Facebook is not too large to fail, but it is the 900 pound gorilla that is going to take a long time to fall down.
0 Votes
+ -
The next big thing
mike21b@... 11th Jun
Surely there must be people out there who don't really care what I ate for breakfast.
I don't know if it'll go anywhere, ever, but ... a LOT of people find it a "fad"! New computer users, neophytes moving into the intermediate arena and many others like them are today just discoverinig them and to them they may well be a "fad", since their experience and knowledge starts "today".
FAD was the wrong word to base this on. A FAD is determined in this case by who uses it and sticks with it. Many tr it and abandon it, but that's OK since the social nets still get the personal info they want from people.
Some are worse than others, but all are in one way or another "evil", a word so many people like to use. It isn't FB st al that determines whether they are a FAD or not; it's the public, and for many, it is a FAD as they try it, see what it is, and dump it as a "fad" they aren't iinterested in.

IMO FAD was an incorrect reference basis; the article said little of value though I kept reading, expecting there to be a redeeming value to it.
0 Votes
+ -
Ya, leave the morons to twatter and facebook... Email is used for th ellliteriate...

wink
0 Votes
+ -
Sorry to say, it is true those are not fads
darije.djokic@... 13th Jun
The author is right about the social need behind the F&T success. And although the two can be useful in certain situations, unfortunately we are talking here about surrogate social networks - the real ones are only those where the contact is face-to-face. Hence the great adoption among those that are impaired in social communication or with undeveloped social skills (the young) - it is much easier to have a direct contact with an object representing a person than with a living being. Thus such virtual (meaning fake) networks are here to stay, but it is certain those will create as much problems in the human society adopting them widely as they will solve.
0 Votes
+ -
It's ALL a fad, folks
erapka@... 15th Jun
Everything in computer-dom is a fad, I've got a closetful of legacy equipment including floppy drives, ZipDisks, JazzDisks, Syquests, 1x CD & DVD burners and Amiga consoles, at least one Sinclair, and God only knows what else since I last inventoried it all. It seems every year the stuff I just managed to afford has become obsolete.
Now it's netbook, ibook, iphone, ipod, ipad, and probably a forthcoming ipoop (for reading your email during your morning toilet - or should we call it the ican?)
Get real. The scene is Vance Packard's "Planned Obsolescence" all over again.

EAR
0 Votes
+ -
Both are fads, and almost over
el1jones 29th Jun
Twitter is already on the way down. I can't think of anyone who posts there anymore, except businesses doing "social marketing". It might as well be Myspace. Facebook is still going strong, but it's hit it's peak. You can see that by how the investors are trying to both cash out, and raise money to keep pushing ahead, via pushing and IPO. Social networking is here to stay, but these companies have to update or fade away.
0 Votes
+ -
udbbrky 19 tqn
bmakrekwe64-24378982177453783887923692373819 27th Nov
kyytoi,mjafngxi53, kkflx.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix