'Open SOA' launched -- no surprise, no Microsoft

'Open SOA' launched -- no surprise, no Microsoft

Summary: Does Open SOA have too much Java for Microsoft to swallow?

SHARE:
TOPICS: Software
1

Call it deja vu all over again. Ten years ago, Microsoft wanted nothing to do with a vendor alliance formed to promote Java 2 Platform, Enterprise Edition. Instead, Microsoft followed the beat of its own .NET drummer. Now it looks like they'll have nothing to do with the Open SOA initiative that was just announced the other week, either -- an alliance involving the same players as J2EE.

OSOA's specifications lack interoperability with .NET, say analysts

In a report in Application Development Trends, Steve Swoyer observes that Big Red's absence from the OSOA announcement is noticeable. Other heavyweights, such as  BEA, IBM, Oracle, SAP, Sun, Tibco, Progress, and Software AG, have signed on to the advocacy group, which is spearheading two proposed SOA specifications—Service Component Architecture (SCA) and Service Data Objects (SDO)—and make the specs available to others in the industry on a “royalty free” licensing basis.  SCA and SDO promise to provide a language-independent programming model for SOA.

Steve cites a Gartner analysis of OSOA, noting that “The biggest gap in the specifications—lack of interoperation with Microsoft's .NET—has not yet been addressed, although many vendors plan to support Microsoft technology. Addressing .NET is vital to the effort's success, as almost all organizations will have to integrate .NET applications in their SOA."

SCA is not exclusively about Java, but Steve notes that Open SOA's programming model will initially rely on Web services, the Java Messaging Service, and the J2EE Connector Architecture. Is there still too much Java here for Microsoft to swallow?

Topic: Software

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

1 comment
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • M$ speak with forked tongue

    With the current issues of M$ and their Windoze Live (stuck in park), does M$ REALLY want to do SOA? Or maybe M$ wants to FREEZE the market with a bunch of announcements that talk up their contributions to SOA - all while working like crazy to make it work. But they AREN'T working like crazy according to Richard MacManus' article.

    M$ is floundering like a beached whale while all of its competitors hone their "shark attack" skills. This doesn't bode well for Redmond's biggest tax payer . . .
    Roger Ramjet