madison

The Down-Market Fallacy: Why Big Vendors Fail in Mid-Market Capture Attempts

By | July 8, 2010, 12:35pm PDT

Summary: Going down market and getting down market technology customers are two very different things. Technology vendors may do well to heed the cautions in this post before moving into a new sales space.

(My colleague Dr. Katherine Jones penned this - I hope you enjoy it).

Here is something research analysts have heard a thousand times: “We have a new ERP sales initiative: selling to the middle market.” ERP solution providers and companies that have provided other business applications (such as talent management) to large enterprises are repeatedly flummoxed by the myth of the mid-market – making assumptions about those companies with revenues between approximately $50 million up to $1 billion that are patently in error. What goes wrong? Let’s look at some of those assumptions.

1. There is one giant segment called the mid-market. There isn’t. Small and mid-sized companies (SMBs) come in all the shapes and colors as large companies, and far more closely identify to other businesses in their verticals than to other same-sized companies. So there is no “middle-market;” there is instead many vertical businesses that happen to be smaller than the enterprises that vendors are used to targeting.

2. Mid-market companies will be impressed with our brand, name recognition, and our experience with big companies. They won’t. Penetration into the Global 2000 is not particularly impressive to a SMB customer – it is more likely to reinforce the belief that your company fails to understand the business requirements of smaller enterprises.

3. Mid-market companies buy just like big ones. They don’t. They are more risk adverse, likely to spend less, require tangible ROI in no more than 12 months, and require references of the same size and in the same verticals as themselves. They are more likely to buy technology to fix an existing problem then to move them into the future – unless the company is launching a new initiative for which it has no technology.

4. Mid-market companies face the same IT challenges as large companies, and address them much the same way. Same challenges, yes—same resources to address them – no. For example, if your solution requires a data base administrator in addition to trained IT management staff, make sure your prospect actually has one. Otherwise you can plan on submitting a proposal that adds up to $150,000 a year for a skilled Oracle or DB2 administrator to the cost of the contract.

5. If we can sell big, we can sell mid-sized. Bounding into mid-market sales without realizing the ROI model can lead to disaster. Consider:

a. Cost of sales can exceed that for enterprise sales in that the time invested may not be recouped in the revenue gleaned.
b. The sales team that can address the large enterprise may not be successful in “wow-ing” the mid-market CEO or CTO.
c. We can use the same incentive compensation schemes for comping our mid-market sales team as we do for the enterprise sales.
d. The most common competitor—and often the winner—in an SMB sale is the status quo – doing nothing.
e. The recurring support contract will retain the SMB as our customer. Nope. This prospect is less likely to get the support you may deem adequate initially, dump support after the solution reaches steady state, and show no interest in upgrades at all.
f. The concept of “local” may matter more to a mid-sized company. Doug Burgham, then CEO of Great Plains, once defined the mid-market as “Any company who will buy from a VAR.” Why? Local contacts, local support, and small enough to understand the SMBs business problems.

Many post-recession SMBs are in need of technology upgrades, having postponed acquisitions for several years. From discussions with many of these companies, we see their buying outlook remains “how do I cut costs” rather than “how do I increase revenue.” Vendors wanting to increase market footprint by going down-market have to articulate solutions that very specifically address this all-important point. This is where the SaaS (software as a service) solution as opposed to on-premise makes sense and makes the sale easier. When the solution proposed can avoid new hardware costs, prolonged implementations, and escalating long-term service contracts, the chance for success is far greater.

We’ve been briefed by many companies recently which have articulated or reaffirmed their dedication to mid-market sales. Recently, Kenexa, for one, seeks to add a focus on the SMB for its talent management solutions which have been very successful in the enterprise arena. Like some solution providers, the company has created different editions of its solutions that will specifically address the SMB buying segment. Generally, we see a fair amount of thought that goes into these solutions and in the SaaS space. We are seeing vendors price, support and even limit functionality for mid-market and small business customers. And, those adjustments are often on the mark with these changes. However, some of the vendors we see make us wonder whether if they will remember the success points listed above.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Brian is currently CEO of TechVentive, a strategy consultancy serving technology providers and other firms. He is also a research analyst with Vital Analysis.

Disclosure

Brian Sommer

I am co-owner of TechVentive, Inc. The company has been engaged on numerous consulting engagements, often for technology firms, service firms and litigators. As a general rule, I do not write about current clients of TechVentive. Should that occur, I will note this in blogs. Readers should assume that I have had client relationships with many ERP and other technology providers. Some of these relationships may be quite small and short-lived while others more significant. One of TechVentive's business units publishes research reports about technology providers. As a result, this business receives small amounts of revenues from a wide variety of software firms, software buyers and others when they purchase copies of reports. Some firms do secure reprint rights to these reports. None of these purchases, individually, represents a significant amount of total revenue for me and the nature of it is hard to predict where it will come from. I also provide some marketing strategy and/or market segmentation work for software firms as I have developed a unique database that segments the largest 4000+ technology buyers in the world. Many technology firms periodically engage me for unique views into this database for future marketing campaigns. I do not blog about these efforts and do not blog about client firms while they are active clients unless some pressing news story erupts. If that event occurs, I will indicate any perceived or real conflict of interest. Occasionally, I will develop unique intellectual property pieces for technology or service providers. If I should blog about a vendor with whom I have recently developed a special information product, I will note this in a blog to avoid any appearance, real or unintended, of bias. For the most part, I have no investments in technology firms. While I've been offered friends and family stock and other inducements in the past, I have steadfastly refused these. I used to be a partner with Andersen Consulting and had no ownership stake in the firm for many years. I frequently refer to this in my blogs and do not hide my prior association with the company. I did purchase a few shares of Accenture and Cognizant stock in late - 2008. I have sold some of those positions in late 2009. Readers should assume that most software conferences that I write about involved some measure of fees waived and/or travel reimbursement. I do not charge vendors to attend these events nor will I accept payment for same. I do get reimbursed for many speaking engagements. I generally note at the end of blogs whether the vendor reimbursed me for travel expenses. Generally, this includes airfare and hotel. I do not request, receive nor accept travel perks such as first class airfare.

Biography

Brian Sommer

Brian is in a unique position to diagnosis the winners and the losers in technology and services. He was the longest running (10 years) and most senior director of Andersen Consulting's (now Accenture's) global Software Intelligence unit - a position that required him to pick the best possible software solutions for hundreds of clients globally. He advised the firm on ERP software market forecasts and helped establish manpower planning estimates by vendor for deployment globally.

Brian continues to remain close to technology buyers and sellers. When he left Andersen Consulting, he co-created a dot-com with blogger and former arch-enemy at Price Waterhouse, Vinnie Mirchandani. That firm helped broker efficient services contracts between software buyers and systems integrators. Since then, he's created TechVentive, Inc. - a company that helps technology firms better understand their markets - and Vital Analysis - the research and publishing arm of TechVentive.

Brian still travels the world and publishes an impressive number of articles, research reports and blog posts annually to help software and services buyers make better business decisions. He can be reached at: brian @ vitalanalysis.com

Talkback Most Recent of 8 Talkback(s)

  • 6. Shorter Time Tables
    SMBs have to be more fleet of foot in their management and priorities, coming from large clients to smaller ones means adopting a "get it done now" mind set.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    No_Ax_to_Grind
    8th Jul 2010
  • RE: The Down-Market Fallacy: Why Big Vendors Fail in Mid-Market Capture Attempts
    I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate! nccma cooler
    ZDNet Gravatar
    MACKENZI
    10th Sep
  • RE: The Down-Market Fallacy: Why Big Vendors Fail in Mid-Market Capture Attempts
    I used to be more than happy to seek out this internet-site.I wanted to thanks in your time for this glorious read!! I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you weblog post. this thread is amazing i like your work and i appreciate you that you have share a useful stuff thanks for sharing the i shop abatwa
    ZDNet Gravatar
    MARAGARET
    11th Sep
  • RE: The Down-Market Fallacy: Why Big Vendors Fail in Mid-Market Capture Attempts
    I used to be more than happy to seek out this internet-site.I wanted to thanks in your time for this glorious read!! I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you weblog post.Bookmarking now thanks please consider a follow up post. power sa shop
    ZDNet Gravatar
    RHIANNONA
    13th Sep
  • RE: The Down-Market Fallacy: Why Big Vendors Fail in Mid-Market Capture Attempts
    I think the representation of this article is actually superb one. This is my first visit to your site. Thanks a lot and keep sharing the information. Keep updating the information for all of us. Thanks ZDNet Government was launched as the brand's first industry vertical, with a mission to cater to IT professionals in the public secto I agree with your post. However, do you have any sources I can cite for my paper wheel car com bury
    ZDNet Gravatar
    SATURNINA
    13th Sep
  • RE: The Down-Market Fallacy: Why Big Vendors Fail in Mid-Market Capture Attempts
    Well welcome, hopefully you can become a vital member of the community and really help to push far ahead of google. Which Im sure the development team would love. This will of course earn you alot points too and get you on the leaders board. z d n e t t h a n k Im not sure i come to an agreement with you on every level, howevor it absolutely was a good posting, many thanks for taking the time to put up your ideas.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    TOCCAR
    25th Sep
  • RE: The Down-Market Fallacy: Why Big Vendors Fail in Mid-Market Capture Attempts
    Fantastic news about the new release.I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you b o o k m a r k e d to check out new stuff you weblog post.Im not sure i come to an agreement with you on every level, howevor it absolutely was a good posting, many thanks for taking the time to put up your ideas
    ZDNet Gravatar
    MEJIAHA
    30th Sep
  • RE: The Down-Market Fallacy: Why Big Vendors Fail in Mid-Market Capture Attempts
    Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    FAULKNE
    13th Oct

Talkback - Tell Us What You Think

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
Click Here

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources