Holographic storage bites the dust

By | February 18, 2010, 8:07pm PST

After 9 years and $100,000,000, holographic storage pioneer InPhase Technologies has shut down without ever shipping a product. Their office building was also seized for non-payment of back taxes.

Then marketing VP Liz Murphy assured me that the product would ship in May, 2008. It didn’t.

The company struggled to find new investors. Reportedly many employees took pay cuts - or no pay at all - to help keep the company going.

It is a sad and ignominious end to a brave technology experiment. And a warning to anyone trying to replace disk drives as random access storage.

How does it work?
Holograms use 2 coherent laser beams - a reference beam and an illumination beam - to create an interference pattern that is recorded on photo sensitive media. Shine a laser on the recorded interference pattern and the original image is reconstructed in glorious 3D. As the laser moves around - or you do - you see the image from different perspectives.

Holographic storage has some neat properties.

  • A small fragment of a hologram can reconstruct the entire data image. The fragment won’t let you move as far around the image, but for 2D images, like a photograph, it means a scratch isn’t fatal.
  • Data density is theoretically unlimited. By varying the angle between the reference and illumination beams - or the angle of the media - hundreds of holograms can be stored in the same physical area.
  • Another factor: photographic media has the longest proven lifespan - over a century - of any modern media. Since there’s no physical contact you can read the media millions of times with no degradation.

What was the problem?
At a 40% annual capacity growth rate hard drives are difficult to catch. When InPhase started showing their initial prototype, 300 GB wasn’t much less than hard drives. But 3 years later 300 GB is less than 1/6th the capacity.

Nor was it very speedy: 20 MB/sec. You can do almost as well with a USB thumb drive.

InPhase planned to take the drives to 1.6 TB and 120 MB/sec. If they could ship that today, they’d have a competitive product.

In the meantime, cheap hard drives and cheaper hard drive docks make it easy to use bare drives for backup and data transfer. The market for 300 GB removable drives withered before it had a chance to grow.

The Storage Bits take
The disk industry spends over $1B a year improving hard drives. Thousands of PhD scientists and engineers are busy researching drive problems.

That kind of momentum is hard for a startup to overcome. NAND flash did so only because it built a large business in mobile applications where disk drives couldn’t compete.

For a startup to succeed with holographic storage they’ll need to either

  • a) build a multi-billion dollar business where disks and now flash don’t compete, or
  • b) start with a product that is 10x - 5 years - ahead of current disk drive capacity.

As I wrote in my other blog, StorageMojo, 4 years ago:

I love holographic technology and wish InPhase the best, but I don’t believe they have a viable business with their technology – yet. The problem: 3.5″ disk drives will reach 750GB by the end of this year with much faster transfer rates. InPhase’s 20 Mbps is only 2.5 million bytes per second or only 9GB per hour. It will take over 30 hours just to fill one disk! I predict that hard drives will still be more convenient and fairly cost-competitive than this promising new technology.

But keep at it guys. Lightning will strike if your investors are patient enough.

With the InPhase demise we may never see holographic storage commercialized. Especially if disk vendors start building archive-quality disks.

Comments welcome, of course. I was rooting for InPhase’s success, to no avail.
Update: I added the quote from 4 years ago that I’d forgotten. End update.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Robin Harris has been messing with computers for over 30 years and selling and marketing data storage for over 20 in companies large and small.

Disclosure

Robin Harris

Robin Harris is a president of TechnoQWAN, a consulting and analyst firm in northern Arizona. He also writes StorageMojo.com, a blog which accepts advertising from companies in the storage industry, and has a 25 year history with IT vendors. He has many industry contacts, many of whom are friends and all of whom he has opinions about. Robin has relationships with many companies in the technology industry. Every company he writes about may have sought to influence his opinion through carefully-crafted marketing messages and self-serving white papers, gifts ranging from desk calendars, t-shirts, lunches and trips as well as analyst or consulting assignments. He also invests in some technology companies. He may accept payment for services in stock as well. Robin discloses financial investments in or client relationships with companies named in Storage Bits. To help readers sort out the gold from the dross in his writings, Robin tries to communicate his reasons as clearly as he can. If you agree, you are intelligent and discerning. If you disagree, well, you disagree. In all cases, Robin encourages readers to subject everything they read, see or hear on the internet or from politicians to some simple questions: * What assumptions are implicit in the world view and judgments of the author? * What, if any, is the factual basis for the opinions the author expresses? * Is it reasonable, logical and clear? Your critical faculties: use ‘em or lose ‘em!

Biography

Robin Harris

Harris has been messing with computers for over 30 years and selling and marketing data storage for over 20 in companies large and small. He introduced a couple of multi-billion dollar storage products (DLT, the first Fibre Channel array) to market, as well as a many smaller ones. Earlier he spent 10 years marketing servers and networks. After leaving corporate life he founded TechnoQWAN, a consulting and analyst firm. He also developed StorageMojo into one of the top storage industry blogs.

Robin writes, consults, coaches and lives among the mountains of northern Arizona.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
43
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Holographic storage bites the dust
FAULKNE 13th Oct
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.
0 Votes
+ -
I was hoping for success as well.
CobraA1 19th Feb 2010
I was hoping for success as well.

I think another issue was that they weren't setting their sights high enough - the Wikipedia article claims that "As of 2002, planned holographic products did not aim to compete head to head with hard drives, but instead to find a market niche based on virtues such as speed of access."

I think that may have been a mistake. I don't think a niche market would have been as profitable as a larger, more general purpose market.

In any case, I suppose we'll have to start hitting some physical limits with current technologies before we start considering holographic technology again.
0 Votes
+ -
Bummer.
Bruizer 19th Feb 2010
I don't think we have seen the end of holographic storage
but we won't see it come back in the next 10-15 years.

The concept of a storage device that could hold PB worth of
highly encrypted data is alluring.
0 Votes
+ -
If the original company couldn't make the product work, may be HP or Dell could buy the rights to the tech and perfect it.

I like the data longevity of holo-drives. That is a key element that is missing in archiving data. Especially personal data. Trying to keep even one persons data growth under 20 Gigs a year is tough if they are movie buffs and take lots of pictures. Moving the data content from drive to drive is tough for individuals. I would image it is even more difficult for companies and institutions.

I do agree that the drives need to be designed to far exceed current disk drive capabilities if you want to see wide adoption.

Also some real marketing for a device that can theoretically house your data for a human life time would make things like digital movies, songs, and books more attractive to people who would like to buy once and watch, listen , and read for their lifetime with out buying physical media.

I would not give up my hardcover books but I would switch over my DVD collection and music collection on a storage device that allowed me to keep my media for my lifetime.
0 Votes
+ -
Obviously it's not profitable.
HypnoToad72 19th Feb 2010
Even willing slaves (those who opt not to take pay) couldn't get the work done.

I reckon somebody will buy the patents and wait for someone else to perfect the technology...
0 Votes
+ -
Will any tech beat hard drives?
No_Ax_to_Grind 19th Feb 2010
Honestly, the speed at which hard drive tech improves makes it almost impossible to compete in the PC world. (Low cost world.)
0 Votes
+ -
No.
civikminded 19th Feb 2010
I'd even extend that to enterprise storage. Disks are cheap to produce, reliable and fast.

Newer solid state devices don't really solve any of the problems of current hard disks. They still can fail, they aren't that much faster, and they are more expensive.

In all honesty someday some incarnation of solid state storage will overtake spindles, but I don't see anything that even remotely looks like a 'killer app' in today's market.
0 Votes
+ -
They have a significant performance increase and are already being used in the enterprise. They use slightly less power and I believe run cooler and can take less space.

In the consumer market the advantages are clearer. They are smaller, resistant to shock, cooler and provide a greater performance increase. For most consumers capacity is not that big a deal.

Granted the gap isn't that huge but I believe that will change over time.
0 Votes
+ -
agreed
shadfurman 19th Feb 2010
every technology has an end-of-life, usually it extends well beyond whats expected of it... combustion engines, toilets, lightbulbs DRASTICALLY longer life than magnetic HDD, and if you'd asked somebody in the 50's they probably would have told you we'd be flying in hover crafts, no longer need to eat (or excrete) and all light permeates from apparently nowhere. While wired telephones are all but gone and turned into mini computer, camera, music/movie, handheld game, IMing devices. Magnetic HDD will find their end, probably in less than a few decades (in my guess) Flash is getting faster and CPUs are getting cheaper and smaller. MIDs are becoming more popular, fewer moving parts and more efficient power consumption are going to become the driving forces.
0 Votes
+ -
Disagree
jahcriado 19th Feb 2010
Its true something will have to replace HDD sometime, & it maybe be a form of SSD, but this current iteration is not it. Its great for certain jobs that need its ruggedness or for people who need its seek time, but for the vast majority of computer users it makes no sense. For less than $150 you can get a 2TB HDD, in that price range on the SSD side is around 64GB. And the price isn't rocketing down.

I'm not sure what your thinking of when you say "consumer market". If you talking about your average family/single who wants a machine to do work/homework on, store pics, video, movies on, record HD TV onto, play games & maybe edit HD video on (there really isn't an SD video camera market anymore) they will look @ the price/size comparisons of the 2 & currently, & probably for the next few years, HDD wins out, hands down.

Trust me, I really want a new format that is much better in long term reliability but compares in price & storage capabilities as HDD. I was pulling for holograph or something similar. But right now, SSD does not look to be it.
0 Votes
+ -
Ah, but you are forgetting
Lerianis10 20th Feb 2010
That the 'niche' of SSD is for ARCHIVAL purposes mainly. I see a 128GB flash drive for 300 dollars and say "Well, yeah.... it's 4 times as expensive as a hard drive of the same capacity BUT it never degrades, you can keep stuff on it FOREVER, etc. etc. etc."

So, for archival purposes, SSD is great.... it's also good for computers in the future where you won't be writing to the drive often or AT ALL, but will keep everything in memory until it needs to be archived.
0 Votes
+ -
Is the gap closing or opening?
CobraA1 20th Feb 2010
Problem is - as much as SSDs are improving, so are the magnetics. It's not as if magnetic technology has stood still through all of this.
0 Votes
+ -
Closing.
Bruizer 20th Feb 2010
As Tablets and smaller form factors take shape in mobile computing,
HDD will start to be relegated to smaller and very centralized storage.
Peoples primary day to day storage is quickly becoming SSDs.
0 Votes
+ -
Based on what evidence?
civikminded Updated - 20th Feb 2010
You can say it but that doesn't mean its true. This literally took me 30 seconds to find on Google:

SSD application can be briefly divided into two categories: ?PC? and ?non-PC?. As for penetration rate in PC market, the ratio of SSDs used inside notebooks and SSDs utilize inside low-cost PCs has kept declining and resulted in the sloppy overall SSD shipments. An SSD costs over 4 times higher than HDD in terms of the cost per gigabyte while software and storage compatibility still remain the concern for PC vendors.

http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/storage/display/20090625222922_SSD_Penetration_Rate_in_Notebooks_to_Reach_1_5_in_2009__Analysts.html

According to this article the SSD market is declining -- not 'quickly becoming our primary day to day storage'
0 Votes
+ -
If they have any viable technology,
Economister 19th Feb 2010
someone will pick up the pieces. If not, it will die, as it probably should.

A 300GB optical disc sounds fabulous, but I would need about 3 of them. Duplicate archiving would make that 6. The cost of the drive and the 6 disks would probably set me back many times more than the equivalent duplicate capacity in HDD space. Two terabyte drives cost about $150. And they can be reused for other purposes. I can even stick a drive in my safety deposit box.

What I really need is the price of 25-50GB optical technology to come down, especially the disks. I could buy a drive and a 50 disc spindle, and my archiving needs would be taken care of, but even that is more expensive than two terabyte drives. The cheapest solution is a DVD recorder and two hundred disk spindles, which would set me back under $100, but the burning and indexing would be a pain in the you know where.

The whole optical disc technology sector is in a bit of a no man's land right now.
I'm sure someone wants to ensure their data will last for centuries without decay.

This may just be a case of tech being developed before it's time. Hopefully all the work they did will not be lost.
0 Votes
+ -
Holographic storage will appear
frgough 19th Feb 2010
when it makes economic sense. Well, that's assuming that we
remain a market-driven society, but who knows how long that
will last with more and more people actually thinking that
government is benevolent and competent.
0 Votes
+ -
They have got to get their money back somehow so watch the market place for very cheap holographic storage drives working but sold "as is" very soon. somebody will have a use for them at the right price...
0 Votes
+ -
Bummer!
Narg 19th Feb 2010
This means we are stuck with that pathetic Blu-Ray, doesn't it? That really stinks.
0 Votes
+ -
If HDD can achieve the same effect of Holographic storage, what is the point of them. Just for looks? Don't loose sleep over that one.
0 Votes
+ -
10 & 14TB HDD
Gradius2 19th Feb 2010
Well, Hitachi and other (forgot the name), already announced they have tecnology for 10 and 14TB on a single HDD. So isn't a surprise at all.

Both HDDs will coming out before 2020.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Holographic storage bites the dust
richard233 19th Feb 2010
If you can prove that you have a storage medium with
effectively zero degradation, you will have at least
a niche market as there will always be a need to store
critical backups.

If you really can have "unlimited" storage, then you probably garner interest as a media server for a house. I'm sure if you could get speedy enough to
stream 3 movies at the same time it would be more
than sufficient for most households. You could
always have some speedy flash memory to act as a
buffer. It could be the cable box of the future.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Holographic storage bites the dust
davis287@... 19th Feb 2010
Who gave them $100,000,000 ??

I wonder how many of those people are Multi Millionairs now ??

Nice life if you are smart enough to get away with that Trick !
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Holographic storage bites the dust
BKBrunelle74 19th Feb 2010
It's a shame. I can visualize a nano sized storage system that has 100 times the storage capacity of a single RAM bit based on this tech. Maybe that should have been the target technology to compete with instead of hard drives.
0 Votes
+ -
Mark my words here. On this day I predicted that in 10 years or less we WILL see this technology resurface...
As the next TVs!
Oh man I can see this turning into the next NBC, ABC, CBS, CNN, etc. ultra high-end video. Like HDTV and 1080p are today. Even with the slow data transfer rate (which could be overcome easily) and a few protocols to control the illumination beams, and presto! 3DTV is born!!! Could you imagine watching the Superbowl in your living room from behind the QB? Having these big guys run right over you or watching the Tight-end catch the winning TD pass from the perspective of the tight-end?!?! And limitless storage = limitless channels....? You may never watch the same channel twice in your whole life!
Ok, my imagination is running wild here.
This tech may have missed the mark it was aiming for, but maybe they weren't aiming at the right target...? I think this isn't over yet. It's just needs time to grow the ideas. This would be bigger than IMAX Films. In fact, HEY IMAX, this is MY concept, my idea. I thought of it first, I called it! Seriously, this is my idea. The first group or person to make it happen had better include me or I'll take it all away. Really I would. This is going to be the next big thing. Medical Research, Entertainment, how about space exploration without launching any people into space? I can see no end to the uses it could be adapted to.
Anyone want to join me on the Holo-Deck for some REAL First Person Shooter action? Or how about we get raid party together and head in to the WoW world? Nifty!!!

I could also see this as being the technology that brings our worst tech-nightmares to life. A.I. You know, Skynet...! Or at least it could be the end-all be-all storage system for the yet-to-fail Cloud Computing. One storage system to hold ALL the worlds data and never run out of free space. Even the "right-now" version would work at the university level and it would be improved upon with each passing day. The impossible is possible when you have some of the brightest minds working to make it happen.
Mark my words on this day. I know I'm right about this. Soon we'll have 3DHDTVs and a video call will feel like being there. Conference calls will never be the same again because you really are THERE. Your boss can see you and not just hear you like in the bad-ol'-days of conference calls!!!

But still, my idea.

LOL!
0 Votes
+ -
It's happening
mrdelurk@... 19th Feb 2010
I have been keeping an eye holography for the past 20 years, exactly for
this 3D TV-projection like ability. There seems to be quite a bunch of
holographic TV or projector solutions already right now, all it takes is a
Google search to find them.

Of course, rare & expensive technophile solutions notwithstanding, the
real change will happen when the $299 holographic TVs Made In China
begin to hit the K-Mart shelves. Man, we'll have government bull in 3
dimensions, then. What a prospect. All they need to add is smell. happy
0 Votes
+ -
Touche
proudgeek 20th Feb 2010
LOL @ "Government Bull in 3D"
0 Votes
+ -
The problem
SMparky Updated - 19th Feb 2010
The biggest problem with holographic storage are the safety protocols. If you turn the safety protocols off, the holographic images can hurt or even kill you if they happen to contain evil holograms (they are almost always evil). They can threaten to take over your ship or hold you hostage. That's never a good thing. I did hear of interesting research about holograms in the medical field but that's likely years off before we see anything.

Live long and prosper.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Holographic storage bites the dust
BaltimoreBarry 19th Feb 2010
How about when Video, Streaming,Entertainment, Gaming, is "always on, all the time" and holographic rendering is the accepted everyday usage?
How about Collaborative Conferencing with Holographic Imaging? When your VR heads up needs holographic capability for best effect?
Holy Star Trek, Batman!
Will the Transporter work then?
0 Votes
+ -
Transporter already in existance
FlyingsCool Updated - 20th Feb 2010
Check out Dr. Lene Hau's work at Harvard where she and her associates at Harvard University have successfully transferred a qubit from light to a matter wave and back into light using Bose?Einstein condensates. Details of the experiment are discussed in the February 8, 2007 publication of the journal Nature (and elsewhere).

Or, in other words, Dr. Hau and her co-researchers, Dr. Naomi S. Ginsberg and Dr. Sean R. Garner, stopped and extinguished a light pulse in a tiny, supercooled sodium cloud called a Bose Einstein Condensate, and then brought the light pulse back into existence in another atom cloud in a separate location. The process is completely reversible.

See http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2002/27mar_stoplight.htm
0 Votes
+ -
How Sad
proudgeek 20th Feb 2010
So no holodecks anytime soon?
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Holographic storage bites the dust
Uncle Stoat 21st Feb 2010
Damn...... While it can't compete with discs, holographic storage had (and has) a lot of promise competing with tape formats such as LTO.
Current SSDs have much higher capacity than previous generations but with every capacity increase they've become slower, less reliable and have fewer rewrite cycles. This applies to MLC and SLC variants.

What's the point of having 2Tb flash drives if they're slower and have a shorter lifespan than mechanical media?
0 Votes
+ -
with claims like these...
frylock 21st Feb 2010
So the company was around for 9 years, yet the technology has a "proven lifespan [of] over a century". That's almost as good as "unlimited data density".

Funny
0 Votes
+ -
For now ...
darije.djokic@... 23rd Feb 2010
It will rise again when magnetic disc drives reach their storage
limit dictated by the laws of physics: theoretically light storage
allows for more data to be packed than mag ones.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Holographic storage bites the dust
yarinsiz Updated - 16th Apr 2011
Well done! Thank you very much for professional templates and community edition
sesli sohbet sesli chat
0 Votes
+ -
I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate! nccma cooler
0 Votes
+ -
I used to be more than happy to seek out this internet-site.I wanted to thanks in your time for this glorious read!! I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you weblog post. this thread is amazing i like your work and i appreciate you that you have share a useful stuff thanks for sharing the i shop abatwa
0 Votes
+ -
I used to be more than happy to seek out this internet-site.I wanted to thanks in your time for this glorious read!! I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you weblog post.Bookmarking now thanks please consider a follow up post. power sa shop
0 Votes
+ -
I think the representation of this article is actually superb one. This is my first visit to your site. Thanks a lot and keep sharing the information. Keep updating the information for all of us. Thanks ZDNet Government was launched as the brand's first industry vertical, with a mission to cater to IT professionals in the public secto I agree with your post. However, do you have any sources I can cite for my paper wheel car com bury
0 Votes
+ -
Well welcome, hopefully you can become a vital member of the community and really help to push far ahead of google. Which Im sure the development team would love. This will of course earn you alot points too and get you on the leaders board. z d n e t t h a n k Im not sure i come to an agreement with you on every level, howevor it absolutely was a good posting, many thanks for taking the time to put up your ideas.
0 Votes
+ -
Thanks nice info z d n e t I really liked your current article write more..let me add you to its favorite The articles you have on zdnet s i t e are always so enjoyable to read. Good work and I bookmarked it.
0 Votes
+ -
Fantastic news about the new release.I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you b o o k m a r k e d to check out new stuff you weblog post.Im not sure i come to an agreement with you on every level, howevor it absolutely was a good posting, many thanks for taking the time to put up your ideas
0 Votes
+ -
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix