US Congress Ready to Act on Human Rights Crisis in Tech Industry Supply Chains

Summary: Following on from yesterday's riff on traceability technology for Vietnamese fisheries, it turns out Silicon Valley may yet be its own best customer. Despite common knowledge of serious human rights abuses relating to the mining of cassiterite in the Democratic Republic of Congo the industry has not gone far enough to guarantee ethical sourcing to satisfy increasingly concerned stakeholders.

Following on from yesterday's riff on traceability technology for Vietnamese fisheries, it turns out Silicon Valley may yet be its own best customer. Despite common knowledge of serious human rights abuses relating to the mining of cassiterite in the Democratic Republic of Congo the industry has not gone far enough to guarantee ethical sourcing to satisfy increasingly concerned stakeholders. (see my post on this from March 08). As a result US Congress is now prepared to intervene with the introduction of the Brownback Durbin Feingold Congo Conflict Minerals Act.

Sen Brownback said:

Metals derived from inhumanely mined minerals go into electronic products used by millions of Americans. In the Democratic Republic of Congo, many people - especially women and children - are victimized by armed groups who are trying to make a profit from mining 'conflict minerals.' The legislation introduced today brings accountability and transparency to the supply chain of minerals used in the manufacturing of many electronic devices. I hope the legislation will help save lives.

Sen Durbin said:

Without knowing it, tens of millions of people in the United States may be putting money in the pockets of some of the worst human rights violators in the world, simply by using a cell phone or laptop computer. We ought to do all we can to make sure that the products we use and the minerals we import, in no way support those who violate human rights abroad.

Sen Feingold said:

When I traveled to eastern Congo, I saw firsthand the grave suffering of people who have lived through a decade of conflict and humanitarian crisis. This conflict, which has killed more than five million people, is fueled in part by the exploitation and unregulated trade of certain minerals used in cell phones, PDAs and other electronic devices Americans use every day. Profits from these minerals have been used to finance illegal armed groups that commit horrific human rights abuses. By passing this bill, we can shine a light on the mining and trading of these minerals, and help companies that produce these everyday devices to take responsibility for their suppliers. Just like the diamond trade, we must work toward a conflict-free mining economy.

According to Brownback's press release:

Under the legislation, U.S.-registered companies selling products using columbite-tantalite, cassiterite, or wolframite, or derivatives of these minerals, would be required to annually disclose to the Securities and Exchange Commission the country of origin of those minerals. If the country is DR Congo or neighboring countries, the company would need to disclose the mine of origin.

Back in February a coalition of NGO's wrote to Nokia, Samsung, Motorola, Sony, LG Electronics, RIM, Apple, Dell, HP, Acer, Lenovo, Toshiba, IBM, Philips, Sandisk, Microsoft, Nintendo, Canon, Sharp, Intel & Panasonic. The coalition asked these companies to pledge the following:

  • Trace the supply chain for all tin, tantalum, tungsten, or gold in their products to verify their mines of origin; and
  • Conduct independently verifiable supply chain audits to document the routes taken, intermediaries involved, and transactions made from mine of origin to final product.

Pledges so far: null. Interestingly the Electronic Industry Corporate Citizenship Initiative (formerly known as the Electronic Industry Code of Conduct) which was essentially set up to deal with such issues is oddly silent on this on their website.

Here is a short video on the situation at the mine face in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Though it is 2 years old it would appear nothing much has changed either in DRC or Silicon Valley.

Part 1

Part 2

Topics: Emerging Tech, Enterprise Software

James Farrar

About James Farrar

James has more than 15 years of experience working on corporate sustainability issues from both the corporate and NGO campaigning perspective.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

6 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Good news

    And you don't get enough talkbacks.

    I can think of a number of reasons why people might oppose such a thing, though, starting with the possibility that it could be considered undue interference with free trade.

    Lots of bills are introduced into Congress and get nowhere, so make sure you keep us updated on its progress.
    John L. Ries
    • Re: Good News

      Thanks John. You are right people may indeed oppose due to free enterprise ideology. But the issue has become such a serious reputation threat to the tech industry many manufacturers might actually prefer the certainty of regulation at this stage. If there is no regulation then certainly the entire industry will have to work harder to protect their reputations from the problems of their supply chains.
      jamesfarrar.1@...
  • RE: US Congress Ready to Act on Human Rights Crisis in Tech Industry Supply Chains

    Good first step, I grew up in Northeast Congo and I can tell you the road is filled with good intentions which have failed everytime. We as Americans need to see the potential Congo holds for us, but we need to stop the exploitation. If you want a truly beautiful location to vacation go to eastern Congo and visit. Hawaii doesn't even compare to the beauty of eastern Congo.
    stephenlee62@...
    • stephenlee62

      Indeed there is a long history of neglect of central Africa on the part of the international community. The siuation in DRC is truly a hidden war and the scale & proportion is barely understood.

      I wonder though what the tourism infrastructure and industry prospects are like for DRC. They country certainly has the natural assets. Graham Baxter at the International Business Leaders Forum ( www.iblf.org ) in London I know has been working on DRC post conflict reconstruction and economic development initiatives. Maybe he knows more. What is your understanding?
      jamesfarrar.1@...
  • RE: US Congress Ready to Act on Human Rights Crisis in Tech Industry Supply Chains

    There is also the question of effectiveness. A current review of the Kimberley Process is showing that it has not been effective as currently implemented.

    Have you taken a look at Resource Consulting Services' research on the mining industry in Congo. They have a report entitled Trading Conflict www.resourceglobal.co.uk

    I have no affiliation with Resource Consulting Services.

    Lorraine
    LorraineMarie
    • Kimberly

      Lorraine

      Yes I agree there are limitations w Kimberly. See my latest blog post http://blogs.zdnet.com/sustainability/?p=793 where I have written about how original founder has walked away. I am aware of Resource Consulting Services -- they have published one of my blog posts as a white paper.

      The question though is what are we to do? Surely it cannot be pemissible to source conflict materials and ignore the local consequences. I thiunk we have to work to strengthen these processes.


      jamesfarrar.1@...