#Egypt Blocked in China: Is Internet Access A Human Right?

By | January 31, 2011, 8:28pm PST

Summary: China has blocked searches for #Egypt on its State-approved, State-controlled version of Twitter. Searches for #Egypt on Sina (with over 50 million users) returns the message, “According to relevant laws, regulations and policies, the search results are not shown.” As we all know, to the shock and surprise of millions around the world, on January 27 Egypt [...]

China has blocked searches for #Egypt on its State-approved, State-controlled version of Twitter.

Searches for #Egypt on Sina (with over 50 million users) returns the message, “According to relevant laws, regulations and policies, the search results are not shown.”

As we all know, to the shock and surprise of millions around the world, on January 27 Egypt pulled the plug on its citizens Internet access. Egypt is a very big place, a lot of people were effectively cut off from the outside world.

This is a frightening thing. But I don’t think may people realized just how much it would terrify them on a personal level.

Not in the I’m-afraid-I-won’t-get-my-Twitter-distraction-fix kind of way. Far from it.

We Identify With Egypt

The online sentiment is that what Egypt has done, is wrong. More and more, we want the Egyptian people to have their rights - to the Internet - back.

It is scary to think about a government denying its citizens access to the outside world. Basic access to information. Access, if needed, to cry for help and expose exploitation - remember Haiti after the earthquake?

The people of Haiti needed water, medical help, and security: they needed their basic human rights. Seeing it on the Internet, outside cable news channels in media messages powered by people, no one could deny this.

Never before have ordinary citizens with little to no means been able to show what they are seeing, and in some cases, to expose horror and abandonment by a government that fails its citizens when needed most.

Remember what happened when people defied the police state in New Orleans and brought back Internet access?

We don’t need to reflect on Internet history to know that abuse, torture, murder, and mass genocide happens when there is a communication blackout.

When Egypt shut off the Internet, people have gone wild looking for images of Egypt - what is happening there they don’t want us to see?

The obsession with how they did it became a fixation. The technical aspects were explained, but that didn’t settle the nagging feeling growing in all of us with free and unrestricted Internet access.

Which is why the hunger for understanding how to get around an Egyptian-style block is unsated.

Make a list of ways to defy an Internet blackout, and you’ve got our attention. It’s like a zombie survival handbook: we think it can’t possibly happen, but we still need to know how to survive.

We want to make sure this never happens to us.

That China is attempting an embargo on information about Egypt is not surprising to anyone. Countries that traffic and trade in human rights abuses are studying Egypt right now like it’s time to get an MBA in communication.

They are blocking #Egypt because they are scared. They should be terrified.

The top three countries that censor the Internet are North Korea (#1), China (#2) and Burma (#3). On January 14, Barney Warf, professor of geography at the University of Kansas, published a definitive study of the geography of Internet censorship. Warf cited Myanmar, Iran and North Korea as among the most severe cases of governments that censor people’s access to the Web.

In 2010 a BBC poll found that 4 out of 5 people globally believe that Internet access is a fundamental right.

Anyone want to bet we’re at 5 out of 5 now?

[Image: from The Women of Egypt Facebook Album.]

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Violet Blue is a Forbes Web Celeb, SF Appeal contributor, a high-profile tech personality and one of Wired's Faces of Innovation.

Disclosure

Violet Blue

I am currently freelancing part-time (only) for ReadWriteWeb for their general news blog and their Start (startup tools) channel; this was made in agreement that I would not write about anything that might conflict subjects in my blog (no sex content). I'm under contract to publisher Cleis Press for editing three more books (only) with the topics of women's/couples' erotica. I have been writing and editing books for Cleis Press for ten years on the subjects of erotica and human sexuality (guidebooks). I'm not under exclusive contract anywhere/to anyone/to anything, I have no investments.

Biography

Violet Blue

Violet Blue (tinynibbles.com, @violetblue) is a Forbes Web Celeb, SF Appeal contributor, a high-profile tech personality and one of Wired's Faces of Innovation. She is regarded as the foremost expert in the field of sex and technology, a sex-positive pundit in mainstream media (MacLife, Forbes.com, The Oprah Winfrey Show, others) and is regularly interviewed, quoted and featured prominently by major media outlets (from ABC News to the Wall Street Journal). A published feature writer and columnist, Violet also has many award-winning, best-selling books; her books are featured on Oprah's website. She was the notorious sex columnist for the San Francisco Chronicle. She headlines at conferences ranging from ETech, LeWeb and SXSW: Interactive, to Google Tech Talks at Google, Inc. The London Times named Blue one of the 40 bloggers who really count.
156
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: #Egypt Blocked in China: Is Internet Access A Human Right?
Cayble 7th Nov
@happyharry_z

No No No. Boy do you have it wrong.

You say " Me knowing about what is going on in Egypt does not help the person on the street there"

Maybe on a strictly personal level, meaning you yourself will not help the people on the street in Egypt if you know whats going on with them, but I am at least hoping that you fully realize that we don't care if YOU are prepared to help but are speaking in the more broad sense of how is anyone knowing whats going on in Egypt going to help the people on the street.

I would suggest that knowing whats going on in a country is just about the only way to solicit help in many cases and can certainly provide for badly needed information for family and friends who do not live in Egypt who would help and would like to know whats going on and how they can help.

You outlook is severely shortsighted and while food on the table is certainly a more important immediate need of many families then internet access, shrugging ones shoulders at the internet being cut off simply because people may also be going hungry, is hardly a helpful reaction for helping on any level with any need.

And what does someones need to know vs. someone else's need to live create some kind of conflict as you seem to be implying? The reason so many now say access to the internet should be a right is because it creates a new pipeline of real time information to the whole world, and that can easily be of help in the right circumstances.

It helps to keep things from being hidden from the world as was the so popular methodology of tyrannical governments of the past. It provides quick easy information to all those who care to look, and that would obviously include those who DO want to help.

How is it that this just seemed to fly right over your head?
yeah, it's human right (:- It's food on the table and can cure all diseases (:-
@spockv You're a simpleton.
0 Votes
+ -
Why?
happyharry_z Updated - 1st Feb 2011
@nicholas22 Because he thinks there are more basic needs that are being neglected as the technoratti muse about technology? Your need to know does not outweigh their need to live (free). Me knowing about what is going on in Egypt does not help the person on the street there. There is this silly idea that we, by watching what's going on, are in someway helping. So, nicholas22, why don't you do something more than nothing and go help these people. Or is that too simple an idea for you?
@happyharry

It's not -our- need to know... it's Egyptians right to freely communicate. But we can rank our needs if you want to... air, water, food... then, uh, hmmm...
I don't think air/water/food are unavailable there, but could be, if their govt represses hard enough.
If you can't communicate that you need humanitarian aid... well, who needs freedom if you have air/water/food.
0 Votes
+ -
Freely communicate?
AllKnowingAllSeeing 1st Feb 2011
@RDrrr, how did they do so before the Internet?

No one's taking that away, though I am of the opinion that if these people are paying for their Internet service, then they should have a right to use it without government turning it off.

Though I'm sure that the governments view the Internet as they do water and electricity, they get to control your use of it, for the greater good (during drought conditions, ect) regardless how much you pay each month.
@nicholas22
Yeah his a simpleton, because you are overfed and you have no idea what is lack of access to basic food and dying from starvation.
A real genocide is happening in Africa and the WEST is worrying about their Internet Access Human Right.
please get some education before you blindly judge people.
@happyharry_z

No No No. Boy do you have it wrong.

You say " Me knowing about what is going on in Egypt does not help the person on the street there"

Maybe on a strictly personal level, meaning you yourself will not help the people on the street in Egypt if you know whats going on with them, but I am at least hoping that you fully realize that we don't care if YOU are prepared to help but are speaking in the more broad sense of how is anyone knowing whats going on in Egypt going to help the people on the street.

I would suggest that knowing whats going on in a country is just about the only way to solicit help in many cases and can certainly provide for badly needed information for family and friends who do not live in Egypt who would help and would like to know whats going on and how they can help.

You outlook is severely shortsighted and while food on the table is certainly a more important immediate need of many families then internet access, shrugging ones shoulders at the internet being cut off simply because people may also be going hungry, is hardly a helpful reaction for helping on any level with any need.

And what does someones need to know vs. someone else's need to live create some kind of conflict as you seem to be implying? The reason so many now say access to the internet should be a right is because it creates a new pipeline of real time information to the whole world, and that can easily be of help in the right circumstances.

It helps to keep things from being hidden from the world as was the so popular methodology of tyrannical governments of the past. It provides quick easy information to all those who care to look, and that would obviously include those who DO want to help.

How is it that this just seemed to fly right over your head?
spockv --

This is important because it illustrates the perils of large, repressive government. Giving the state control over the information you can access (or the vehicle you drive, or the food you eat, etc.) is the fast track to losing ALL of your freedoms.

Socialist/communist governments are disastrous for anyone who values individual rights and self-determination.
@Churlish
And don't forget OBam Bam has asked for the same powers the Egyptian government has shown. He wants to to be able to turn off our internet and don't believe it will stop there.
@Churlish
Egypt is effectively a dictatorship. The legal form there is capitalism, just like in the US. They call it a semi-presidential republic. The president is both head of state and head of government.
@Churlish
man, There was no single country on the Earth which lived under communist ideas (it was an utopia idea never understood, or tried right), but many claimed there were, or are (China, N. Korea, etc) Those mentioned are mere dictatorship countries ruled with rude, primitive capitalism approaches published and masked by the communism face (really wolves under sheep skin). Someone done a good job brainwashing you what is what, and made you scared of the sound. Most of Western countries are not democratic by definition what is a democracy (those who rule do not present the interests of majority, but their own profits. Look how they make you eat GMO products without even letting you know what you eat (GMO labelling prohibited)), look how easy the USA stepped to mandatory vaccination, and barely escaped it. Yet many European counties are not afraid to call themselves as socialist, and socialist parties are leading there in much extent.
Will you say that Europeans are suppressed in their rights?
All --

I recognize that dictatorships are not necessarily restricted to communist/socialist states, and that Egypt hews more closely to a non-socialist dictatorship. I recognize also that even the United States is not free of socialistic institutions; we're certainly a mixed economy (with mixed success, to say the least).

Still, surrendering one's (supposedly) inalienable rights to the government -- and subjugating the individual to the needs of the state -- are hallmarks of communism and socialism.

And, while some taxation is necessary to fund the APPROPRIATE responsibilities of government (national defense, enforcement of laws, etc.), surrendering 40%, 50%, or more of one's earnings to fund nanny-state entitlement programs is a strong disincentive to achievement and personal responsibility. Depriving workers of their rightful earnings via excessive taxation is just one of many ways to restrict their freedom.
@will_mike@...You're an apologist who (unbelievably) can, with a straight face, still claim that a bad idea is really a good idea. Communism, even in its truest untried form, still sounds like a very oppressive, unfulfilled life. Greece is a prime example of how socialism fails and how most of Europe is skipping down that very same path. America has never been a democracy, but a constitutional republic. Before you start teaching you need to finish school.
@kehoffman
And don't forget OBam Bam has asked for the same powers the Egyptian government has shown. He wants to to be able to turn off our internet and don't believe it will stop there.

Actually, Obama has not asked for it - check your facts about who's idea this is exactly.
Sure, Obama should take a stand against the idea, but he did not ask for it anyway.
@Churlish
You go on to say more about socialism etc and the "nanny-state", do you realise your government provides more social welfare to the corporate sector than anything else? Tax advantages, outright funding, saving them from their own stupidity etc. What happened to the free market? Failing companies should fail; none should get tax benefits or interest free loans etc. The Free Market does not exist! Socialism does not require people to surrender rights. Dictators and capitalists do. Your Capitalist Democracy is a far cry from a real democracy. A true Democracy is at war with Capitalism. Communism and Capitalism have a lot in common. You Americans are fed a lot of bad propaganda from birth and fail to see the benefits available as you stand up for your rights to loose all your rights in the name of anti-democratic capitalism. Go figure!
0 Votes
+ -
@spockv Add it to all the others and you can see the shortfall in their system of government. It can't be transparent and work. The chinese have to use encrypted random proxies in the US in order to freely surf the net.
@spockv Is that the current requirement for something to be a human right?
@spockv
I more than agree with you.
And the downloaded BITS and BYTES go right to the cells to feed it. We should drop a couple of TERABYTES on the starving and dying african people.
(you understand that I am sarcastic).
We should focus of the most basic human right: THE RIGHT TO EAT.
All this ******** is diversion from what is happening in the 3rd world.
An attempt to kept Chinese folks from doing the same thing.
@daikon
Bingo. Someone has to get the word out to Chinese citizens. Their armies couldn't stop them if they banded together.
0 Votes
+ -
by force and will use force again to stop any insurrection.

In the name of "the greater good", and since communism has been their form of government, the Chinese have murdered over 40 million people (some estimates are over 60 million people). With a population of 1 1/4 billion people, to the communists, 40 or 60 million people eliminated for the greater good is just a drop in the bucket. And, the use of force is meant as a lesson to any prospective revolutionary that, they'll meet the same fate or that they can disappear never to be heard from again.

China continues to exist with our help, and we continue to help the tyrants in China with suppression of the people. China depends upon the U.S. and a lot of other countries for its recent economic triumphs, and somewhere between 200 and 300 million of the people there have benefited from the introduction of a "government controlled capitalism", but the vast majority of the people remain in desperate poverty. The money coming in to the Chinese government goes mostly for government and military buildup, and that only serves as the weapons that keep the people suppressed. The people can rise and protest and attempt a revolution, but, if they're unarmed, they'll be easily suppressed, like happened in Tiananmen Square in 1989. Iran did the equivalent in 2009. An unarmed citizenry is helpless against a tyranny which is heavily armed and unafraid to use any kind of force to stop insurrections.

We can try to voice opposition to tyrannies such as China and Iran, but, we can't meddle directly to help any opposition groups.

The Chinese people are very likely already aware of the Egypt and other middle-east upheavals, but, those people are just helpless against a heavily armed government that is willing to "sacrifice" a few million people for "the greater good".

That is not to say that we shouldn't try to help the Chinese in any way we can, but what the U.S. and other countries are doing right now is helping the dictatorial and oppressive government there.
@daikon
Yes, the Chinese and Tibetan people shouldn't see how national uprising works in Egypt to prevent their inspiration. The Chinese government has good reasons to be afraid of such ideas.
0 Votes
+ -
Internet Access a human right?
james347 1st Feb 2011
We will get to that answer after Hunger, Disease, Health Care are all tackled first. Those seem to be a little more important.

But I guess you people with jobs and health care already don't worry about that stuff.
@james347 You mean Canadians?

''But I guess you people with jobs and health care already don't worry about that stuff.''

Those are definitively not Americans. lol
@Tommy S. Are Canadians guaranteed jobs?
0 Votes
+ -
Re: Internet Access a human right?
kaninelupus Updated - 2nd Feb 2011
@Tommy S.

You forget that for many the internet represents a basic means of communicating with the outside world, as well as accessing assistance in times of calamity and disaster (for example, here in Queensland during the flood crisis). How about we sever all telecommunication and radio/television access around your way... and throw in either a natural or man-made crisis for you to deal with, all without means of reaching out to civilisation?? How long till you start crying out about your civil rights??
@james347
You miss the point.
What if the government blocked all phone calls, postal, tv, radio, etc.....
The internet is the new version of these - social.

Internet - its not just for searching anymore wink
The Iran government censor the internet too.
0 Votes
+ -
Once again VB you've set a tempting table for discourse! (You have a knack) While we may think this is just an intellectual exercise in Nor. Am. look what's happening in Canada. Their CRTC has approved download limits on broadband. Bell Inc. has won the right to charge large fees for going over the limits while claiming 85% increase in profits. The highest paid users who have an 80GB limit, will pay an additional $1.50 per GB over. In addition, by next year they will have fiber to the home customer at 60 MB/s. At that speed users will reach their cap in less than 4 hours. Great foresight on their part: and great potential for profit. US providers are looking at this deal and salivating.

So, pretty soon in North America the "Right" for decent internet will only go to those who can afford it. How is this much different than Egypt or China? (I now have my flame-resistant suit on - AND a further BTW, open channels of communication/information ARE linked to the availability of proper nutrition, housing, health-care - but I guess it's just business is business right?)
@Nerill
You are right to a point. What you are suggesting is similar to what occurred in the industrial revolution here in America. Food, housing and money were around, but most people didn't have the means to get enough of them to survive well. In a manner of speaking, what you are stating is the same, a form of human right's violation. The difference here is that the right to get whatever content we desire is not blocked directly. I can still search #Egypt on twitter, or look at what happend in tieneman square in China, whether I have a GB cap or not. Essentially what will occur if the scenario you suggest happens, (or what should occur), is that people become outraged, smaller ISPs show up and don't place the block, and the big guns loose money and either change their ways or falter. Either this, or the US Government will do what they did with Ma Bell and force restrictions on the companies.

The internet is a tough thing to quantify as a necessity, although most of the country uses it in everyday use. Information can still be had by traditional channels, radio, TV, newspapers. Phones are still around so connectivity is still there. I think a shift would occur if something like the internet was banned and cell phones were shut down. You would see an increase in LAN lines, radios, Amature radio, newspapers, etc. Plus a riot from citizens who use the internet regularly.
@KBot

Thanks for the thoughtful and interesting reply. It's great to read views from mature and intelligent people.

WRT to your response, I really hope you are right, that management of information dissemination is truly in the hands of the people.
A couple of notes though. The cap on bandwidth in Canada also applies to small ISP's who, of course, only LEASE bandwidth from the big guys (i.e. the only ones who can afford to lay the lines). THAT was one of the major points the big guys fought for. WRT to the U.S. Govt forcing restrictions on business to protect the public, that seems rather remote given the turn "Right" as seen in the new House Republican control. The big guys have political clout - people seem to be buying it.

Sure, there may be other options: Packet Radio over SW (but THEY are licensed, so Govt knows where they are), phone lines (like the ISP providers in Egypt there are only a few, so they can be easily controlled), TV, radio, newspaper are becoming pale to the type of open connectivity necessary for the true equality the U.S. preaches: as Egypt, Iran, China etc are well aware.

My point is that we shouldn't assume that the businesses who control this new media, have OUR best interests at heart. So, perhaps yes, WE THE PEOPLE, need to be in control - that should mean the People's Govt follow OUR control and not Corporations.
@Nerrill

"WE THE PEOPLE, need to be in control - that should mean the People's Govt follow OUR control and not Corporations. "

The long lasting argument for a free country. This struggle will never cease, as free means needing the ability to make corporations, but these corporations cause the will of the people to mean little as they controll a large quantity of political clout.
0 Votes
+ -
Phones are still there for now
gardoglee 1st Feb 2011
@KBot The Egyptian governmnet could also shut down the landline phones. THey have chosen so far not to do so. However, the precendent has been set.They have also shut down news media, even their own. And they have imposed a curfew at night. That can be extended to the day. Shut off the phones, and lock people in their house with the threat to shoot anyone caught ouside. It has been done before. And interestingly, people always found a way to communicate, but not without great risk of life and limb.
0 Votes
+ -
WRT to the U.S. Govt forcing restrictions on business to protect the public, that seems rather remote given the turn "Right" as seen in the new House Republican control.



You seem to believe that a "right turn" in the congress is a bad thing for the internet, but, since you don't really what you're talking about, let me clue you in.

It's the republicans who are trying to stop any control of the internet by government. It's the republicans that want to stop government from suppressing any of our rights. We republicans or conservatives don't believe that it's government's role to dictate "winners and losers" by interfering with what happens on the internet or anywhere else in the private sector. The fact is that, the less government intervention there is in anything, the more the people retain their guaranteed rights. Big government can only exist by suppression of individual rights, and government in the U.S. has continued to grow through the years, and with each increase, more and more of our rights and liberties have either been curtailed or have become "managed" by the government.

We republicans are the ones fighting to keep the internet free and out of government control. With any kind of control that is won through legislation, the doors are opened for more control. That is always the path that big government takes: it's the slippery slope argument, and the "camel's nose under the tent". So, the best way to prevent any type of government control over the internet or over any of our "rights", is to stop government in the initial steps.

Think beyond the simple and current obvious, and extend your thinking to future consequences. Every action by government usually leads to more government actions and more government control. If we're not careful, inch by inch, the government in the U.S. can become a less free society.

Basically, the demons in your perceptions and statements, are the good guys in this fight against government. But, from the sound of it, you're far from understanding the politics of the situation.
@Admore

Interesting response, however the insulting "clueless" tag you have attributed to KBot is in error, perhaps you might wish to take TommyS' advice and "read carefully." Nevertheless, I will not stoop to calling YOU names - but only say it was me who used the "Turn Right" term.

In response, (hopefully you're not just trolling), I can only suggest you consider under which party, with it's hands-off business agenda, that the world's economy collapsed. And which party, somehow, now wishes to blame the current leadership for that collapse: perhaps some hope memories are conveniently short.

In any event, KBot is far from "Clueless" and in a better world I would hope an apology is in order: Vent your wrath at me if you must.
0 Votes
+ -
nerill: You too sound clueless and ignorant...
adornoe@... Updated - 2nd Feb 2011
Look, clueless and ignorant are not words of insult. They're words that describe the lack of knowledge on the part of someone. And, you, just like the guy you defended, sound clueless and ignorant. Ignorance can be overcome with knowledge or learning.

And, hey, it's okay to go ahead and call be a "troll". but, it won't fit. I've been in this forum for many years, and I've debunked the lies and "lack of knowledge" every time I've encountered them, and I've also debunked the spin.

I can only suggest you consider under which party, with it's hands-off business agenda, that the world's economy collapsed.

That's a very ignorant statement.

Look, the time when an event occurs is not indicative of who or what caused the event. An event can be many years in the making. Is that too difficult for you to understand?

And which party, somehow, now wishes to blame the current leadership for that collapse: perhaps some hope memories are conveniently short.

Like I said, the party in control is not necessarily the party that created the problems.

For example, the problems with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which were instrumental in the economic collapse, were protected by the democrats, and Bush was prevented by the democrats from reigning in their mortgage and financial corrupted practices. The mortgage crisis was a long-time in the making, starting out in the late 1970s with the CRA (Jimmy Carter) and that law (CRA) getting reinforced by Clinton by giving the law judicial teeth with the threats of punishment against any bank or financial institution that didn't comply with the government mandates for easy lending. So, with the CRA and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, you had the makings of a major economic collapse; the only question was, when would it finally happen?

Read here about how the democrats, Barney Frank, Nancy Pelosi and most of the democratic leadership prevented Bush from taking any action to prevent the oncoming mortgage and financial crisis:

http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/547134/201009131900/The-Democrats-Fannie-Is-Showing.htm

In any event, KBot is far from "Clueless" and in a better world I would hope an apology is in order: Vent your wrath at me if you must.

If I quoted the wrong person, then I apologize. But, you are still clueless. Hopefully, you'll get better informed for the future.


(BTW, my ID is not "Admore").
@KBot @KBot "smaller ISPs show up and don't place the block, and the big guns loose money and either change their ways or falter. "

I wished i could believe that. Altell provider was the smaller one and Verizon(larger) bought it out along with many other smaller ISP's and upped their prices and limited service.
@Nerill There is nothing new in what you said, In Canada it was like that for years. The CRTC just confirmed it was legal... Read more carefully next time.
@Tommy S.

Hi Tommy, thanks for the note. As a University Graduate (fairly literate), an IT professional AND a Canadian I DID read carefully. Yes, it was sort of in place in Canada. Rogers cable HAD a cap already on it's bandwidth - they applied that a couple of years ago (after luring people with a life time no-cap offer). Bell Inc. (with no cap) the lead in this (with Rogers support), had this cap law apply to the wholesale market (i.e. the little guy ISP), so THEY could also apply a cap to their customers safe in the knowledge that their wholesale customers would also have a cap. Bell Inc has seethed with indignation since the Mar 2008 CRTC ruling that they MUST provide backbone access to third party ISPs. So, now they have a law to control this commercial internet freedom. So much for a free and open market/internet.

Again, thank you Tommy S. for the opportunity to clarify my position.
@Nerill Ya business is business. They are the ones that invested millions in their networks, and payback will be just that. Its only fair that high bandwidth users pay more.
@btek & @AllKnowing... Hi btek and AllKnowing, your point is completely valid & I apologize for the confusion as English is my first language. It is clear I didn't make MY point clearer. Perhaps I shall endeavor to be less subtle in the future. Thank you for your thoughts.
0 Votes
+ -
Nerill, why is that such an issue?
AllKnowingAllSeeing 1st Feb 2011
Do you agree that those that use more water should pay more? Do you agree that those that use more electricity pay more?
Then why should I pay the same amount as my neighbors for downloading email and some simple web surfing, while they're streaming movies to 15 computers, purchasing music, ect?
You use more, you should pay more. The water and electric companies don't bill me on what I could use, only on what i do use.
0 Votes
+ -
Canadian Change (is Egypt to blame?)
Nerill Updated - 2nd Feb 2011
@Me

As a final bookend to my original post, it seems the reigning Canadian Govt. AND ity's other main opposition parties are now in agreement that the latest CRTC decision giving the big ISP's monopoly-like control is wrong. It looks like they are now going to unite to get that decision reversed. In some small way perhaps, the popular uprising in Egypt may have shaken OUR govt. Hopefully they have learned a small lesson: don't P1$$ off the Internet! :-P
@Adomoe

I read the article from Investors.com. So, the world's financial meltdown was all the Democrats fault! Those bastards!
This article is almost offensive.
Internet is used by about 1% os the world population or less.

Most people on the world do not have water, food, access do doctors, housing, clothing, education.

Internet is not a human right, internet is not important. A great majority of the worlds population ha never seen a computer, or has electricity available

Regards
@ivantexa3

I understand where you are coming from, but what you have to realize is that poverty is relative. I am not suggesting that loss of internet is more important than food or clean water. What I am suggesting is that something like access to uncensored information is a human right. I and all other people have a right to know what's going on with my fellow man, anywhere in the world. To flat out block this is an offense to human kind, but in a different way than causing poverty, sickness and lack of necessary resources.
@ivantexa3 1%? are you high or just really really bad at math? The number of people that have an Internet access is between 1.5billion and 2 billion. 1.75/6.5= 26.9%.

Im not sure but 26% seems higher than 1%...
0 Votes
+ -
OK, the richest 26% have internet access
HollywoodDog 1st Feb 2011
@Tommy S. ... that means 75% do not.

From the Telegraph: "The report also found that internet use had doubled since 2002, with almost a quarter of the world?s population connected now connected to the web, compared to 11 per cent seven years ago.

But internet access in developing nations remains poor, with only one in 20 people in Africa able to surf the web. Problems with network infrastructure also means that just 20 per cent of internet connections in developed nations are fixed broadband connections, with that figure falling to five per cent in developing countries."

Odd to say that it's a human right for Egyptians to have their internet access, but most Ugandans are just forgotten.
@ivantexa3
Where do you get 1%? (curious)
Basic rites/needs are defined by the culture you live in.
For tribe in the Mato Grosso internet likely means very little.
For most technologically developed countries, it neans a lot.
It is a matter of scale and the tools used in the society.

Quit trying to lump everything into one bucket.
wink
0 Votes
+ -
Is having a driver's license a right?
Dietrich T. Schmitz, ~ Your Linux Advocate Updated - 1st Feb 2011
Answer:No
It's a privilege.
Is it easy to manage your life without one?
In most cases no, unless you rely on Mass Transit, Taxis and Buses.

It's doable but very inconvenient.

Having a Driver's License comes with a code of conduct and 'rules of the road'. It comes with a unique id that follows your driver's history at the MVD database.

Should we have an 'equivalent' on the internet?
Good question. And I am leaning toward the answer being yes.

The pros and cons can be left for another Tech Broiler story.

But in terms of our 'conduct' on the Internet, having your actions tracked tends to keep people on their best behavior, kind of like cameras do, yes?

Most of the bad behavior I see comes from Trolls who surface in the blogs using an anonymous id, why, because they feel they are not accountable for their behavior if they hide their true identity.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix