Internet Explorer 7: The Good, The Bad, and The Future
Summary: The second in my live-blogging sessions here at the Webstock conference in Wellington, New Zealand. I'm live-blogging the presentation of Tony Chor, Group Program Manager of Microsoft's Internet Explorer team.
The second in my live-blogging sessions here at the Webstock conference in Wellington, New Zealand. I'm live-blogging the presentation of Tony Chor, Group Program Manager of Microsoft's Internet Explorer team. See also my first post from Webstock, of Ben Goodger from Firefox.
What has the IE team been doing for the last 5 years? After IE6 in Oct 2001, they fell "kinda silent" after that. "The truth is we wanted to really push things even further", says Tony. To do that, they focused their development efforts on contributing to the Vista product. But that has taken a long time - plus they also had security issues with IE that required attention over the past 5 years or so. About 2.5 years ago they "decided to get the band back together" and get back to product development on IE. So after all the security updates, they finally got back to actual development on IE7. "On behalf of Microsoft and the IE team, we messed up - and we're sorry" (laughter and clapping from the audience).
First thing they wanted to do with IE7 was "make everyday browsing easier [...] make the simple things better". They made the UI a lot simpler, to make the content more accessible. Mentions an "overdue" feature they've introduced in IE7, tabbed browsing. Mentions other new features, such as page zoom and more printer-friendly options. No new information here, but it all helps IE catch up to Firefox I suppose :-) Just after I wrote that, Tony makes a joke about Firefox copying IE's RSS feed preview feature. Nice show of humility by Tony.
Talks about the RSS feed store, which "literally took about a day" to get working. Newsgator wrote a little synchronizer, which watches the feed store. So users can use it to synchronize feeds across machines. This is pretty cool, I agree. Then mentions feed enclosures and how IE makes it more usable for e.g. families - "we're taking RSS [...] and bringing it out to a wider audience". People will be able to subscribe to feeds in Outlook and have them available in the feed store.
The secondary focus for IE7 was security and user protection. Two ways to think about security - if you think about browser as your house, you want to make the walls etc stronger. Says that security is a huge focus for Microsoft now - says it's been "the biggest cultural shift" in MS for years. So they had to re-write big parts of IE7 to make it more secure. They also have a new Vista feature called "protection mode", which they've taken even further in IE. So even if a hacker takes over the IE process, they're very limited as to what they can do. But not all the changes are architectural in nature - back to house metaphor, talks about gates and doors. Refers to phishing attacks, which has affected consumers greatly (he gave us stats from a report which showed 25% of people stopped buying online and 22% cut back - due to phishing). So this has become a big focus for the IE team, to make the browser safer from phishing attacks. They now have a "phishing filter" in IE and have been working with other vendors re security certificates.
Now talks about designing and developing for IE - "we know it can be a little frustrating" [little bit of frustrated-sounding laughter from the mainly designer and developer audience here]. Discusses CSS issues and shows that IE7 has fixed all but one of the 25 bugs they identified "that drive developers crazy". Shows Eric Meyer's website (he's a CSS guru), which renders great in IE7. "Hopefully you'll see that IE7 is a lot easier for you to code to".
On standards, he says he was relieved to hear Firefox is so big on standards - because they are too. MS will support "not only official standards, but defacto standards".
So what's next for IE? Today IE7 is available in beta form and will be released as a final product in "the second half of this year". Then they will go to the next version of IE. He promises they'll ship regularly - "if we go 18 months between releases we will have failed". Security and standards compliance will be an ongoing investment. They are working on enabling developers to install multiple versions of IE on the same machine [claps from audience]. Also the user experience will continued to be improved. Also promises to improve documentation - for Javascript development, etc.
Overall, I can't help but be impressed by Tony's vision for IE7. They obviously recognize the threat that Firefox has become, and the opportunity for IE to leverage Vista. Of course Microsoft has such a huge lead in the browser market that they can afford to be confident.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Puff piece on MS IE 7
Absolutely
Let's see, we should be "relieved" to hear that IE7 will be gracing its users with CSS compliance? Was it not MS that fought for CSS in the years of HTML3?
MS failed to keep up to date on the very "de facto standards" it once fought to establish. How much sense does that make? Meanwhile, it's the FF, Opera, and Safari browsers that kept themselves up to date, and actually worked consistently and reliably.
As if tabbed browsing will make me migrate back to IE !! HAHAHAHAHAHA
One thing we can know for sure: it was the recent success of Firefox that has prompted MS to update their browser; if IE6 still had 95+ market share, they would care less about compliance.
Whether FireFox existed or not...
All the features discussed are Microsoft-centric.
FireFox's accomplishment is making difficulties for Opera as the IE alternative. And Opera may be a better browser.
Microsoft would care about how developers feel about IE
Opera and then Firefox showed it the way.
I seem to remember that they were adamant that
there would be no updates to IE6 - cant make up
their minds, can they? I guess MS supporters
still have short memories
Public statements on IE plans
That plan has changed. And IE came back to life.
The person quoted made an oblique reference to the change in plans:
"The truth is we wanted to really push things even further", says Tony. To do that, they focused their development efforts on contributing to the Vista product.
Sometimes takes a long memory to understand what's going on.
Anton, start taking the pills again....
The IE team got back together [i]"about 2.5 years ago"[/i] which would be when Firefox started making an impact in its beta stages. Microsoft let its user base rot until there was a competitor. Opera, although it had been around for quite a while, never caught people's imagination like Firefox did. Opera was never the competitor for IE no matter how good it is.
Opera and Firefox have a lot more in common with each other then IE and either of them does a much better job of standards compliance than IE.
Overly critical
Did you expect a hard-hitting attack on IE from Microsoft?
What Anton said...
Also this wasn't just some employee at Microsoft, it was the head guy in the IE development team.
Good counterpunch
I'll edit for more clarity later...
IE7 still doesn't support all of the standards
Internet Explorer 7 - Very Bad
They're dragging an anchor
MS decided early in the browser wars that they'd compete by loading IE up with MS-specific features (CSS and language features like ActiveX), presumably in the hope that nobody else could afford to keep up and they'd gain a monopoly. They also (I believe) deliberately wove the browser code into the operating system to defeat the DoJ effort, again with monopoly in mind.
Trouble is, Microsoft didn't gain a monopoly and the different gambles are costing them hugely now. The world drifted in the other direction, towards simpler brower standards. Bolt-ins like Flash and extensions provide features to compete with those provided by MS. MS is left struggling with what had turned into with a huge target for attackers and a major maintenance nightmare.
And they can't just abandon this anchor. A large number of MS-only shops are using the gee-whiz features on largely internal corporate development.
I think that every time you see a new release of IE, there will be a slew of new attacks, a long period of fixes, and a lonnng time before the next release.