Canonical answers Ubuntu phone critics
Summary: Not everyone thinks Canonical can create a unified Ubuntu for PCs, smartphones, tablets and TVs. But Mark Shuttleworth has an answer for them.
Most Linux fans like Canonical's plans for a unified Ubuntu for PCs, smartphones, TVs, and tablets. Some, however, such as Aaron Seigo, a leading KDE developer, have doubts about this claim.

Seigo, while thinking that the "Ubuntu Phone [is] a great thing to see, worries that Canonical can't deliver the universal Ubuntu goods. On Google+, Seigo wrote, "Canonical's claim is a hollow one.... Unity [Ubuntu's default interface] currently does not use QML at all; Ubuntu Phone is pure QML. So, no, it is not the same code, it is not the sort of seamless cross-device technology bridge that they are purporting."
Seigo continued, "Making unfounded claims in this manner is, IMHO, ethically weak. But what is really disappointing here is that the Free software community is being told a fairy tale in hopes that they will believe it and as a result support Canonical.... under what amounts to false pretenses." And, thus those who support it, Seigo said, are "being duped."
Needless to say, arguments quickly developed about how "real" Ubuntu's attempts to develop a common Linux distribution were. Seigo maintained that Canonical is in the wrong because, "Right now Canonical is stating things which they are currently not able to provide."
I asked Canonical for their take and Mark Shuttleworth, Canonical and Ubuntu's founder, replied, "By the time the work is complete, one Ubuntu codebase will deliver all four experiences: the desktop, the phone, the tablet and the TV. And one application binary will be able to do the same. It's not complicated; there's no point in splitting hairs over the semantics"
Jono Bacon, Ubuntu's community manager, added, "I agree with Mark; I think the vision is pretty clear, and I am not sure getting into a he-said-she-said debate on G+ is the best step forward. I would instead invite Aaron's participation in our development community to discuss the implementation of this vision."
Me? I always assumed that Canonical was proposing a goal and not claiming that they'd already reached their destination, or even that they were almost there. Let's just see how well Ubuntu can keep its promises. After all, the Ubuntu smartphone developer preview arrives soon and then we can start deciding who, if anyone, Canonical is "duping."
Related Stories:
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Time will tell - Time will tell - Time will tell
Agree
Canonical answers Ubuntu phone critics
Shhhhhh - Shhhhhh Loverock-Davidson back under your bridge
being told a fairy tale in hopes that ........
Herp-a-derp
Please don't use linux, we don't want your kind in our community
I am certain
I hope not
Yeah, at first I have my doubts about Unity
Forced?
Look, choice!!!
This isn't Windows 8...
It's an interesting concept
Sure it's kinda cool to have a full linux experience on a phone and then use it as a desktop, but that's their only unique feature. Why choose Ubuntu over Android or iPhone? There's no really good reason.
If BB and MS are having troubles, then Ubuntu has an even longer shot of succeeding. (Success being defined as being number 3 in smartphone marketshare.)
Open Source Projects have inertia
If they pull it off, we could see a third player in the smartphone market
If the Ubuntu phone has a pretty open platform for developers then it could really take off and we could have a three way race.
What I like is the approach Conical
Tablets with Ubuntu also
For your entertainment folks, the comedy team of Shuttleworth and Bacon.
Not just the FOSS community, but Wall Street and any other of the larger base of general population--via the media--who REALLY don't know that they're having sand shovelled up their butts by Shuttleworth's technobabble, and are not aware of Shuttleworth's non-existent track record of delivering on his promises.
"Jono Bacon, Ubuntu's community manager, added, "I agree with Mark; I think the vision is pretty clear..."
Well, DUUHHH! Really?! Well sir, now I feel aallll better. Gee, thanks!
And by the way, Bacon, don't look now, but your duplicity is showing: no one has ever had any doubts about THE VISION. It's your record of DELIVERING and making grandiose claims that are the problems.
I heard about THE UBUNTU TV for about a solid year. Can't find it on the shelves. Hmmmm...
Where's your help?
They have a solid record on the desktop, give them time
Re: "For your entertainment...
After all, the crowd here loves MS despite all the fairy-tales and bad ethics.
I'm not exactly an Ubuntu fan, but going by their track records -- if Microsoft gets a pass, then sure as heck, Canonical should *more* than deserve one, too.
The only reason I keep either Windows (XP, Windows 7) or Ubuntu (10.04, 12.04) on any of my boxes, is to help me support my friends. And though admittedly Windows 7 isn't nearly as much hassle as previous versions were, I find Ubuntu is still definitely the more reliable OS.
So I'm willing to wait and see. I figure the odds for Canonical roadmaps are better than the odds for typical Microsoft vaporware.
It warms the cockles of my heart