Cleaning up Microsoft’s Metro mess
Summary: Microsoft's explanation that Metro was a "code name" is laughably bad spin. The company's sudden decision to throw the term down the memory hole is strange, and developers deserve a full, honest explanation of the reasons behind the change.
Microsoft has been talking about the Metro design style and Windows 8 in the same breath since it formally unveiled the new OS at its BUILD conference last September.
Now it wants to throw the word Metro down the memory hole.

And the company’s flacks want you to think there’s nothing out of the ordinary here. A spokesperson told my ZDNet colleague Mary Jo Foley:
We have used Metro style as a code name during the product development cycle across many of our product lines. As we get closer to launch and transition from industry dialog to a broad consumer dialog we will use our commercial names.
Ha ha ha ha ... wait, they're serious?
I’ve seen laughably bad spin before, but this attempt deserves some sort of medal. No, Metro was not a “code name.” The term appears 81 times in the BUILD keynote address where Microsoft introduced Windows 8 last September (usually, but not exclusively, the term appears in the preferred construction “Metro style apps”).
At this year’s CES, I heard Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer open his remarks by referring to “our featured attraction tonight, our new Metro user interface.” You’ll find the word Metro used 27 times in that keynote presentation.
I cannot find a single public reference to Metro as a code name—not in those keynote transcripts, not in presentations or blog posts or developer documentation or interviews—nothing, anywhere. I have seen Microsoft managers talk about Metro’s history and refer to the term as one they’ve used internally for a long time. But it became official long ago:
- Until this week Microsoft had been encouraging developers to write Metro style apps.
- You can find 20 White papers for Metro style apps at MSDN.
- Microsoft sponsored a Windows Metro Style App Challenge for students.
- The App Developer Agreement, which was last updated on July 9, includes seven references to “Metro style apps.” Every app developer who is now scurrying to finish a Windows 8 app for the imminent public release of Windows 8 has to sign that agreement.
- In a post published just today on the Public Sector Developer Weblog, Microsoft announced a series of sessions it's presenting next week in Tampa, virtually all of which have "Metro style apps" in the name or description. (hat tip to Mary Jo Foley for catching this one)
So please cut the crap, Microsoft. Until very recently, "Metro style app" was the commercial name you were planning to use with Windows 8. And then you decided not to.
A decision like this, made at the same time that Windows 8 is released to manufacturing, is terribly late. I just checked the Windows Store in the Release Preview (I don’t have RTM code yet). A quick search turns up 40 apps, or just under 10% of the store’s current contents, that include Metro in their name or description.
Microsoft, you owe a more detailed explanation to those developers who have been working with you for nearly a year now. Lame public statements that are transparently untrue make the problem worse, not better. It's especially awkward coming on the heels of the terrible communication about Silverlight and its role in the Windows development ecosystem.
Yes, there’s plenty of time to scrub Windows 8 of any references to Metro. As far as I can tell, those are few and far between. But a decision like this, clearly made in haste at the last minute, risks undoing whatever confidence and goodwill Microsoft has earned for Windows 8 and pushing away developers who might be on the fence.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
What's the Point
RE: "Who Cares"
And people care because it's just so clearly a lie. Metro was never a code term. It was the proper name, and we all know it. So when Microsoft pumps out this baloney, they're doing two things:
1. They're showing their lack of confidence in their own product - a very, very bad thing to do right before its release.
2. They're lying, quite openly, to their customers, their business partners and to the entire tech industry. Only a fool would believe this PR stunt, and thus Microsoft is betting that we're all stupid enough to believe it.
As a tablet interface, there's nothing inherently wrong with Metro. It's sleek, relatively good looking, and easy to use. But the problem, as many people have said, is that Metro is a tablet interface which is being forced onto a desktop experience.
The answer is so blindly simple - simply present the user an option to turn Metro ON/OFF. Make it a simple control panel option, and let us determine the user interface that we want to use.
What's so hard about that?
Confidence in the Product
Funny you say that
And as proof, Jumpin Jack Flash offers this story
Wait. What?
Contrast this "lack of respect" with Apple where their defense for stealing patents is:
"Well, we couldn't agree on a price so we just went ahead and used it without paying."
or
"We bought the rights to the name 'iPad' in other parts of the world so we just went ahead and used the name in China, even after the rightful owner asked us not to."
or
"Hey, how dare Samsung steals the smartphone designs from us that we stole from Sony?"
And finally, I offer you the money quote:
"We have always been shameless about stealing great ideas." - Steve Jobs, ex CEO of Apple
hmmmm....
Funny you say that
Just look at their attitude on the name iPhone, which someone else had copywrited -
"We're Apple, and you don't matter as much as we do".
Thanks for the nonsequitur
Mrosoft Screwed the pooch
Microsoft Screw up
Plenty of things named Metro in the world
Metro, a department store chain based in Singapore
Metro, a Greek supermarket chain
MetroCentre, largest indoor shopping mall in the European Union
METRO Foods Trading, retailer in Cyprus
Metro Inc., a Canadian supermarket chain
Metro Recordings, the UK music label
Metro Broadcast Corporation in Hong Kong
Metro TV in Indonesia
Metro FM radio in South Africa
Metro Radio in the UK
Metro Newspapers Co. in Calif.
Metro International media company in Sweden
Metro newspaper of Belgium
Metro newspaper of the UK
Metro newspaper of Zimbabwe
Metro the Mexican wrestler
Metro F.C. of New Zealand
Other examples of companies that haven't freaked out:
Delta Airlines
Delta pen manufacturer
Delta Cafés, a Portuguese coffee roasting and coffee packaging company
Delta Electricity, an Australian power generation company
Delta Electronics, a power supplies and brushless fans manufacturer
Delta Faucet Company, a plumbing fixtures company
Delta Galil Industries, an Israeli textile company
Delta Holding, a Serbian import-export, banking, insurance and retail corporation
Delta Hotels, a Canadian hotel chain
Delta Machinery, a stationary power tools and equipment company
Delta Motor Corporation, a South African car manufacturer owned by General Motors
Target is a big retailer in the U.S. There's also a big retail company in Australia called Target and a big retail company in Canada called Target and none are related.
Not buying the Fraidy Cat Trademark defense.
Depends on the usage of it
None of those are the same as the other. No one will confuse Delta Airlines with Delta faucets.
You notice their isn't 2 Delta Faucets, or a Dell-ta Faucet?
But if there is a metro interface someplace else that is copywrited, then there will be confusion for sure.
Who is going to mix up pixels with a retail store?
Who is going to mix up pixels with a retail store?
Keep in mind that THOSE particular illiterate nitwits were the legal department at Lexus' parent company Toyota.
You don't know what you're talking about
Next thing you'll be saying is that Best Buy in Canada isn't the same as Best Buy in the US.... (well, it isn't doing as badly as in the US, so that's only partially true, but they are the same company)
Same company but different
Parent Companies
Different countries , differenet laws
Yeah I dont think anyone could claim Metro as a brand name
The only thing different from other Metro companies in that list is