DataStax CEO: Open source databases onslaught for Oracle

DataStax CEO: Open source databases onslaught for Oracle

Summary: Netflix, Openwave Messaging and Ooyala have migrated from Oracle to an enterprise edition of Apache Cassandra. DataStax CEO Billy Bosworth argues more companies and developers will follow.


Enterprises are increasingly moving to open source database to cut their dependence on Oracle, Apache Cassandra has a strong community resistant to fracturing and business leaders are calling the tech shots at first over CIOs.


Those are some of the key takeaways from my chat with DataStax CEO Billy Bosworth. Bosworth, a former Oracle database admin and executive at Quest Software, has been pushing an enterprise version of the Apache Cassandra NoSQL database platform. Like other NoSQL flavors and PostgreSQL, open source databases are beginning to be seen as Oracle replacements to some degree. These open source databases are being melded with Hadoop and big data projects.

To drive the enterprise migration point home, DataStax outlined in a press release that Netflix, Openwave Messaging and Ooyala have migrated from Oracle's relational database to its distribution of Apache Cassandra NoSQL.

Bosworth said that those three customers came out with their migration tales to outline case studies as well as encourage Oracle database developers to look at Cassandra. Netflix said it moved to Cassandra because Oracle created a single point of failure and didn't work as well in the cloud and distributed data models. Overall, Netflix now stores 95 percent of its data in Cassandra.

As for Openwave Messaging, Cassandra gave the company's messaging software more availability and disaster recovery after Japan's earthquake and tsunami in 2011. Ooyala started with MySQL from Oracle and migrated to DataStacks' Cassandra database to scale better.

Bosworth said the Cassandra use cases are notable because migrating from Oracle can be awkward for customers. "Customers don't want to badmouth Oracle, but the migrations are becoming real," said Bosworth. "Relational databases are not designed for speed and the new interactions with customers. And Oracle's price tag isn't going away."

Related: Salesforce's Oracle database dependence: Can it open source its way out? | PostgreSQL: Enterprise traction, challenges ahead

DataStax has more than 300 customers and 20 of the Fortune 100. DataStax integrates Cassandra, Apache Hadoop and Solr in an enterprise package. Other key items from my chat with Bosworth:

  • The company is expanding in Europe. What's the adoption curve there? Bosworth said that Europe is typically 12 months to 18 months behind the U.S. in technology adoption. For Cassandra, Europe "is just a couple of months behind."
  • What apps are going Cassandra? Bosworth said online apps and anything that has to have high availability and scalability are looking at Cassandra and NoSQL.
  • Who is making the Cassandra call? Bosworth said that DataStax is increasingly talking to lines of business leaders. "The lines of businesses are developing new app and in many cases Oracle can't do it cost effectively," said Bosworth. CIOs are brought into the Cassandra conversation later since they have to support the database and NoSQL infrastructure. DataStax typically starts talking about Cassandra with general managers for a business and then C-level execs come into the conversation. "The business and CIO come to the conclusion that the move makes sense," said Bosworth. "If the business can't do it, the CIO can’t do it and the financial side needs an escape hatch."
  • Can Cassandra be fractured? In my chat with Bosworth, I asked him whether Oracle could do its own distribution. After all, Hadoop distributions have proliferated. Bosworth said that Cassandra "is a well run community" and hasn't shown any worrisome signs of fracturing.
  • Will CQL (Cassandra Query Language) attract developers? DataStacks and the Cassandra community are pushing CQL, a programming language designed to make it easy for developers to hop from SQL. "We want the Oracle developer audience to know that CQL isn't scary," said Bosworth.
  • Is Cassandra enterprise ready? Bosworth acknowledged that Cassandra had some gaps that needed to be addressed. Those needs such as authentication and encryption have been addressed and released to Apache. More enterprise friendly updates are being rolled into the DataStax distribution.
  • Can Cassandra, noSQL and open source really make a big dent in Oracle's database business? Bosworth said he thinks that Oracle has a classic innovator's dilemma with its database business. On the app and cloud side of the equation, Oracle can acquire into those markets. Databases and open source are different animals. "Database to Oracle is what Windows is to Microsoft," said Bosworth. "Oracle has an onslaught of change ahead."

Topics: CXO, Data Management, Enterprise Software, Oracle

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Oracle will be around for a long time...

    Obviously Bosworth is going to talk up open source and Cassandra, DataStax needs to make money from services.

    However Oracle is a very powerful, feature rich, enterprise grade database which is replied upon by many organizations. Data is important and so is performance, if you get it wrong then heads will roll, companies will pay for that level of product. However does every project need to use Oracle is another question.

    From your article Bosworth does not convince me that he knows who about database technology to back up his statements.
    • Yea, a salesman strutting his stuff

      What else can be expected from Bosworth. Nothing wrong with Open Source or Cassandra, just the concern of CIOs. Nobody got fired for buying IBM used to be the saying, which has now expanded to Oracle, Microsoft, SAP too. I really doubt many customers replacing their mission critical databases. These can be used from some sideshows but certainly not the core. I really doubt if any CIO will take this risk. Also, what you save in software, you spend on consulting. Ask the Red Hat customers on their net savings & you can figure out why Windows Server is leading in spite of free Linux or Oracle is leading inspite of free MySQL/ MariaDB....
  • All The Most Innovative Companies Are Using Open Source

    What DBMS does Facebook use to manage its active community of a billion users and their never-ending stream of postings and updates?

    MySQL. Plus memcached and a bunch of other well-known open-source packages. Not only is Open Source robust, powerful and flexible, it also plays well in a team. That team strength is making the proprietary packages look more and more isolated.
    • Yeah right

      Open source is about people not wanting to pay in otherwords a free lunch.

      MySQL is not in the same league as Oracle, Postgres is a better product than MySQL.
      • Partially agree

        If you think open source is only about wanting to not pay, you are definitely missing the boat and need to do a bit of research.

        I certainly agree with you that MySQL is not in the same league as Oracle, but a good choice for a database nonetheless depending on one's requirements. That said, I also prefer PostgreSQL to MySQL.
      • Re: MySQL is not in the same league as Oracle

        Guess which DBMS Facebook uses to handle a billion users making hundreds, thousands of postings a second?

        That's right: MySQL.

        Can Oracle boast any comparable application?
  • Decided trends away from the usual MS

    The recent trends in very large companies moving a significant proportion of their data to NoSQL and traditional SQL/semi-object databases like PostgreSQL would indicate by simple math that Microsoft is not playing any pertinent role in these developments, especially since "most" companies replacing Oracle11 and/or MySQL for these alternatives are not Microsoft Windows Sever or SQL Server centric - at least according to Oracle, the NoSQL teams, ISP/Web Hosting firms, Google, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn and much of the Fortune 1000.

    This type story probably has no value or significance to the many Microsoft trolls on ZDNet who cling to the Windows "desktop" dream, especially hoping it will reverse the rapid move to non-Windows mobile devices and platform agnostic Cloud Computing.