Delaying Office for iOS until 2014 gives Microsoft Surface, Windows 8 vital breathing space
Summary: By holding off on Office for iOS until next year, Microsoft is giving Windows 8 and its Surface hardware a fighting chance
There's been endless discussion of whether — and, more recently, when — Microsoft would release a version of Office for iOS.
It's now possible that an iPad-friendly version of Office will not appear until autumn of next year, according to a roadmap shared with my ZDNet colleague Mary Jo Foley.
Autumn 2014 is a lot later release date than many expected, but it perhaps reflects the complicated balancing act Microsoft has to do here: any decisions around Office for iOS still have to be aligned with its wider ambitions.
On the face of it, Office for iPad could be a big cash generator for Microsoft. However, Microsoft is unlikely to go down route of selling it through Apple's app store, as Ed Bott points out, due to the hefty cut Apple takes from sales. Instead, it's more likely to follow a freemium model - offering iPad users a cut down version for gratis in the hope they'll upgrade to a paid-for version later on.
However it's sold, there's a risk for Microsoft that Office for iOS could frustrate its wider aims elsewhere. Microsoft wants to keep supporting Windows to ensure it remains the de facto enterprise desktop platform, yet delivering a version of Office – the staple of business software– on iOS will undermine just that, cutting the ties that bind enterprise customers to Windows.
After all, one of the reasons that keeps businesses from buying more iPads and fewer PCs is that there is no version of Office for iOS. And right now Microsoft doesn't want to give businesses any more reasons to stop buying PCs, not with the dire figures that came out from IDC and Gartner this week that show the steepest drop in PC sales for a generation.
Holding off on releasing a version of Office for iOS for another year could also give a much needed fillip to Surface, Microsoft's ambitious laptop-tablet hybrid, which has only been on sale for a few months.
Surface needs time to win businesses' hearts and minds, especially as cautious corporates are apt to start any Surface rollout with a small trial first with bigger deployments to follow – if they like it, of course. Offering Office on the iPad right now would make any such Surface trials irrelevant.
Pushing Office for iOS to 2014 also gives Windows 8 a chance to bed down after a rather bumpy reception. Microsoft will want enterprise customers locked into Windows 8 and bought into Surface long before offering them the option of Office on an iPad.
Microsoft has hinted before that it would be adding to the Surface line, and the Wall Street Journal claims there is a seven-inch tablet in the works for later this year, which absolutely fits with the strategy.
Delaying Office for iOS out to 2014 means that Microsoft has given Surface a two-year window to prove itself, and gives all of Microsoft's hardware partners a chance to deliver Windows-powered hardware that can compete with the iPad.
Time is – at least for now – on Microsoft's side, as few enterprises show much inclination to ditch Office for any of the other productivity suites out there. Granted Google Apps is gaining traction, but Office is still the 800-pound gorilla.
Yet if Microsoft doesn't pull off satisfying the needs of Office users who want iPad support as well as Microsoft's need to keep them tied to Windows, there's a question of how long that status quo can continue. If Microsoft really can't manage to figure out how to pull it off by late 2014, four-and-a-half years after the iPad was launched, what hope does it have?
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Well put
Delaying Office for iOS until 2014 gives Surface, Windows 8 vital breathing
Wait 'till more UEFI lawsuits roll in. Then things will get exciting.
:D
If MS is a dinosaur...
Apple has very little presence in the overall PC market. While you may see a Mac from time to time, they're still very much niche products.
They fulfill only the mid-end specifications, lacking any sort of competitive edge within the high-end and low-end markets.
... does that make Apple a fossil?
With all the bottom feeding junk from Dell and HP, who knows what tomorrow brings...
;)
Lest you mention...
A sense of time
What about today? Life is short...
Forget today
Acer, ASUS, and Lenovo...
They already do!
iPad and Android is a significant market.
The facts are that Microsoft no longer has the monopolistic hold on the greater PC Market, and they are trying to take a reactionary defensive posture, rather than innovating in the new market.
Owllll1net Well put
Here is what is happening I will use a metaphor to confound you:
The devil is pinned in the corner like a snake. Greed is what caused
this.
The problem for the snake is that iOS and Android are more powerful,
tantamount to a hand grenade that can be safely thrown from a distance reducing
the snake's fangs and venom into dust. The snake is too limited in its power.
Aw Shucks! The snake loses!
In other words MicroKlunk aka Mafiasoft is damned if they do and
damned if they don't.
Hey Microsoft: Sheer brilliance! Hoisted by One’s Own Petard!
Greed?
Highest profit margin of any, yet still the Apple crowd defend them!
Apple
Any proofs to offer? Anyone else selling Personal Computer (the hardware, software and the services) any cheaper? I know, you will point out the Surface experiment by Microsoft. It's not cheaper, sorry. Nor is it any better or competitive at all. Just an experiment.
To give you some perspective, Apple is in the business of making personal computers since 1976. Microsoft's first experiment to build/sell a personal computer dates from last 2012.
Those are not common descriptors.
The use of "Hoisted by One's own Petard" should be segregated to it's actual meaning, and not used with such lack of understanding or forethought. It regards one's own act of defiance being not only being negated, but causing harm to the perpetrator. In your case, you start with Owllllnet being the perpetrator, but somehow conclude Microsoft becomes the 'harmed'.
You seem to have a semblance of understanding the basics of such a semantic reparte', but fall short within your own usage, at least against anyone but yourself. One might say, without doubt, then, you have been 'hoisted by one's own petard'.
Indeed
OwlXYZ, do we need to fill a petition somewhere for this to happen?
Microsoft is in the business of making money
How on earth can anyone convince themselves that this is a sane business plan?
Exactly.
Dangerous to put both cash cows at risk on a longshot move to save one.
Right on
windows 8 and office
Microsoft, let's not forget started life as an application software developer for all personal computers. This is what they are good at. Not at "Operating Systems" as someone imagined at one point.
But, the company is theirs, they can do whatever they please with it, including sink it. It is not Microsoft's fault, that many do not see anything besides Windows.
SShh, don't tell them that.