Difference of v0.2: How Microsoft shot its mobile foot off
Summary: Mobile OS version numbers illustrate the difference between Apple's understanding of consumer desires versus Microsoft's techie mentality in announcing Windows Phone 7.8.
On Jun. 20, Microsoft announced details about Windows Phone 8 and simultaneously told all three of us (okay, Mary Jo Foley reports 3.5 million) who held Windows Phone 7 devices that our phones just became obsolete.
Mobile phones are special; they're personal and our reliance on them make the phone a cherished object. It is digital assistant, playmate, and friend connector all-in-one. We want to feel good about our phones, we want to think they're going to be with us for a while. We don't want to be told that our phone is on its deathbed.
Apple gets this; Microsoft doesn't...on the marketing side.
Kudos has to be given for the Windows Phone feature designers and engineers. They created a phone that makes you feel more connected to your friends and family. The Live Tile updates are a small thing but make a huge difference for gleaning information.
All that work has been undone by the way Microsoft announced Windows Phone 8.
What's in a version number? It's an arbitrary designation that denotes a set of features, hopefully improved over the previous version. It's a snapshot of the product in that moment.
In short, it's whatever the company wants it to be.
The fact that Windows Phone 8 is coming makes a consumer have mixed feelings. "Oh, I have an older device but it's good to know that I bought a system that will keep improving...and maybe my device will be upgraded with new features!"
So it's great the WP7 devices will receive the biggest noticeable change--the new Start screen. Yet Microsoft has decided to tell everyone that the current generation of Windows Phones will not be running Windows Phone 8 and will get an upgrade to Windows Phone 7.8 instead.
As a techie, I know Windows Phone 8 is a big change at its core. It's running on the same kernel as Windows 8, adds more storage options, multi-core processor support, NFC support, etc. Great! All those features need the appropriate hardware to support it.
Many are features that the average consumer won't care about because it's behind-the-scenes, or (like NFC) not widely used yet. A Windows Phone 7 consumer is used to the Live Tiles on the Start screen, and that's where they will see the biggest UI (user interface) indicator that it's a new operating system.
So why, why, why did Microsoft's Joe Belfiore announce Windows Phone 8 like this:
Windows Phone…7.8!
The new Start screen is so useful and emblematic of what Windows Phone is about that we want everybody to enjoy it. So we'll be delivering it to existing phones as a software update sometime after Window Phone 8 is released. Let me repeat: If you currently own a Windows Phone 7.5 handset, Microsoft is planning to release an update with the new Windows Phone 8 Start screen. We're calling it "Windows Phone 7.8.”
Some of you have been wondering, "Will we also get Windows Phone 8 as an update?" The answer, unfortunately, is no.
To an engineer this is straightforward information. As defined by Microsoft, Windows Phone 8 encompasses improvements that require better hardware, so old devices will not receive Windows Phone 8. Instead they will get the features compatible with their device and it will be called Windows Phone 7.8. Or as I like to say, 0.2 away from 8.
An engineer would appreciate the transparency. A general consumer will be disappointed.
How does Apple announce new platform upgrades?
"iOS 5 is compatible with iPhone 3GS, iPhone 4, iPod Touch 3rd generation..."
Guess what, not every feature in iOS 5 runs on the older devices, but Apple still calls it iOS 5 and users are happy that their device is running the latest OS.
It is the exact same scenario, but communicated differently. That is a significant gap illustrating how Apple knows how to present itself to the consumer compared to Microsoft.
So what is the difference between 0.2? Alienating the supporters of Windows Phone 7 instead of cementing their loyalty for Windows Phone 8.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
This isn't just some 'arbitrary designation' of a number
When Apple announce the iPhone 5, we all know it is going to come with a new dock connector and it will be longer. This will make a number a hardware accessories obsolete ... Apple may provide an adapter but all of this will mean that any accessory that depends upon the vertical length of an iPhone will be obsolete. Of course there will be a number of dissatisfied customers who have forked out for expensive, and yet then practically useless, pieces of kit. It will be a long run decision for Apple ... they know it will annoy some people but they have to make a break for the better.
The same is true of WebOS ... although that didn't turn out too well for Palm, it annoyed a number of enterprise managers at my work because their Palm hardware would become old news.
The difference isn't 0.2, it's that 7.x and 8 are completely different pieces of software. Supporting old devices would hold MS back, so, as a user of a Lumia 800 for work, I am happy to see a good interface move on from the technical constraints of CE.
Are you kidding me?
As a Windows Phone 7 user...
Typing stutters and things that used to happen instantly, when the device was new, take several seconds now. It still works, but it was a much more enjoyable experience, before iOS 5 came along.
Also, the reader of sites like this are a different type of consumer to the great unwashed. For a majority of the smartphone users I know, as long as the phone works, they don't care what version it is running. The more advanced users want it to have a Facebook app, but they really don't care what software version is running on the device.
If a new looking iPhone comes out, they will want to upgrade, because theirs is now "outdated", but they often won't bother putting software updates on the device.
As a for instance, I got 3 iPhone 3GS back from people leaving the company recently. One was on iOS 4.1 another mid 4.n and the third one was on 5.0. They were company phones, they could read their emails and make calls, they didn't care about anything else, they hadn't even signed up for an Apple account and downloaded any apps.
Good point
Yes, the reader of sites like ZDNet are definitely much more tech-savvy than the average smartphone user. That's what I was addressing though... us tech-knowledgeable folks will be forgiving and understand why Microsoft says existing devices aren't upgradable to Windows Phone 8, but phones are meant for a mass market, and their perception is significantly different.
But my point was...
They don't know, or care, what version they currently have, or what version is coming up, as long as the device works reliably.
Also...
Since WP8 will support WP7 applications, why wouldn't I develop for WP7 for a while? Developers aren't stupid people. They know if they want to make money, they need to develop for WP7 for a while.
More reason
get over your self
For anyone to buy a phone and expect the next greatest thing to be compatible is at the least naïve. Even Apple doesn't give everything to the next phone, they just market a bit differently.
You hit the nail on the head
You are completely out of order
There is nothing new here. In the past, when I bought Windows Mobile, I did not expect to be able to update from Windows Mobile 2003 to Windows Mobile 5.0 (nor could I without xdadevelopers) and that is perfectly acceptable. I bought Windows Mobile 2003, I liked it - I am NOT entitled automatically to the newest version. When I bought Windows 98, I was not entitled to Windows XP as a free upgrade was I?
Your complaint is nonsense.
COMPARE!!
WP8 wont be out until october and wont have many apps specifically for it until mid 2013
So far Ive had my wp7 previous to that, and Ive gone from 7, to 7.?, to 7.5 and will go to 7.8
This is better than IOS and much better than any android phone where usually you only are able to go up 1 upgrade and then get stranded and need another phone to go for any other upgrade.
I think YOU might not have checked out the history of the competition and are complaining about this with no merit - the same with the author of this ridiculous article.
DO COMPARISONS... ALL OF YOU!! AND THEN STFU AND MOVE ON !!
SFT...?
Not exactly
As for Android, yeah, that's a mess.
The main point I was trying to get at was how Apple knows how to manipulate customer perception while Microsoft doesn't. You could say that's a little "evil" of Apple to do, but the reality is that consumers aren't necessarily practical. Phones are emotional devices.
Having specific apps for Windows Phone 8 unavailable until mid-2013 would be even more reason for Microsoft to have just said that all WP7 phones were upgrading to WP8 instead of creating WP 7.8.
it's how the news is being communicated
The number is separated from what it is is
I was trying to talk more about consumer perception, especially for the average non-technical guy that just bought a Lumia 900. So I guess the question is could Microsoft have "framed" the change in different terms?
The Average non-technical Guy
I know a lot of users of different platforms, most don't care what version they are using, as long as it works. They don't follow the tech press, they don't worry about "being left behind". As long as no newer, smarter looking version exists, most won't even worry about upgrading.
Possibly
Majority of consumers don't bother.
It's all in the communication
shot in the foot