First Results - SightSpeed

First Results - SightSpeed

Summary: After several days of testing, I am ready to report some results and opinions on SightSpeed. It has been interesting, enlightening, occasionally frustrating and so far very useful.


After several days of testing, I am ready to report some results and opinions on SightSpeed. It has been interesting, enlightening, occasionally frustrating and so far very useful.

As I said in my previous post about SightSpeed, the installation was quick and easy. I installed it on my partner's computer, a rather underpowered Dell with a Celeron CPU and an integrated Intel display adapter, and the "fish tank" test call worked just fine. In fact, if anything, it seemed noticeably better than on my laptop. (Hmmm. This could be troubling, more investigation on this below.) Next, I contacted my brother, on the other side of the world, and suggested that he try installing SightSpeed. The next day I got a SightSpeed video call from him - further proof that installation, setup and use are easy, even if you aren't a seasoned "Video IM" user!

SightSpeed seems to take a rather conservative approach to system configuration, especially in the audio and video devices. First, during the initial setup, it noticed that my webcam (I had a Philips SPC900NC connected at the time) was not one of the "tested and approved" models. The message was pretty clear, though, it basically just said that they didn't know if my webcam would work with SightSpeed or not, but I could go ahead and try. I assume that this is just their way of being conservative, or "covering their rear end", because I tried five different webcams with SightSpeed, none of which were their "approved models", and they all worked just fine. Second, when you start SightSpeed it will notice if your camera or audio devices have changed since the last time it ran, and if so it will ask if you want to run the "setup wizard" or just exit SightSpeed. Hmmm. Those are the only two choices; I would prefer to have a choice that says "yes, I know that it has changed, but it doesn't matter to you so just carry on and be quiet" (or perhaps "Continue" if that is too much text for one button). But again, this is probably just them being conservative and trying to avoid surprising the user. It is fairly common for users to have USB-connected headsets, and if SightSpeed has been set up to use that, and then when it starts the headset is no longer there, what are they supposed to do? The only options are for them to ask the user what to do (i.e. "run the wizard"), or take a wild guess at whatever other audio devices might be present.

Setting up a contact and making a call (either audio or video) is quite easy. The buttons next to the contact names are large and clear, and even have floating "tips" that tell you what they are for if you stop on them with the mouse for a few seconds. Both audio and video quality were good, with the exception of the audio problem on my laptop, explained below. I thought the video choices were sort of at the two extremes, either a rather small window, with good quality, or full screen, with more jaggy lines than I have seen since I last used a Commodore 64! It would be nice to have the choice of a medium sized window with reasonably good video. The default video is 320x240 resolution and 30 frames per second, which is pretty typical of Video chat programs today; if there is limited bandwidth, camera resolution or processing power, they will fall back to 160x120. They will also go up to 640x480 resolution if you have at least 1.5 Mb of bandwidth on both ends of the connection, but I think that kind of bandwidth is still fairly rare today.

Ok, so much for the "good stuff" - I think it's pretty obvious that I am quite pleased with SightSpeed. But it hasn't all been a bed of roses, I ran into a couple of problems. The first, and the biggest, which I mentioned above, was that SightSpeed audio on my main laptop was very choppy. I first thought that this was a general problem with SightSpeed, or perhaps with connecting from far away little Switzerland. But then I realized that my partner's system didn't have this problem, and it is a considerably less powerful system and it uses the same internet connection that mine does. I sent in a support request with all the details, then while waiting for a response I spent some time perusing the SightSpeed User Forums, and when I didn't find anything directly helpful, I posted a request for help there. I am very pleased to say that I got quick and competent responses from both places, within a couple of hours. What a refreshing change from Skype "Technical Support" where you must wait a minimum of four days before even getting an acknowledgment of your query, and then it is generally accompanied my some totally irrelevant or inane suggestions. Unfortunately it appears that the problem is something to do with my laptop, so we haven't been able to resolve it, but the advice and troubleshooting tips I have gotten has been very good.

So, there you have it, the first few days with SightSpeed in a nutshell. They had told me that they wanted to hear the "good, bad and ugly". Well, the good is that I like it, it installs easily, works well and looks good. The bad is that I ran into an audio problem, which apparently is something wrong with my laptop but doesn't appear with Skype or ooVoo, and there seems to be a bit more potential for problems with firewalls that with the other programs. I'm pleased to report that I have not found any "ugly" at all.

For those who are interested, I will follow up with more technical detail in the near future.

jw 21/11/2007

Topic: Linux

J.A. Watson

About J.A. Watson

I started working with what we called "analog computers" in aircraft maintenance with the United States Air Force in 1970. After finishing military service and returning to university, I was introduced to microprocessors and machine language programming on Intel 4040 processors. After that I also worked on, operated and programmed Digital Equipment Corporation PDP-8, PDP-11 (/45 and /70) and VAX minicomputers. I was involved with the first wave of Unix-based microcomputers, in the early '80s. I have been working in software development, operation, installation and support since then.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • First Results - SightSpeed

    Excellent report, and nice to hear that the technical support is up to scratch. Looking forward to the next instalment!
    Charles McLellan
  • First Results - SightSpeed

    J.A. -- thanks for your thorough report about your experience with SightSpeed. One note -- you mention that you would like to choose a "medium" video display mode. You can, in fact, easily do this -- you can select "video only" mode (while in call, you will see that choice), which enables you to stretch the video display as big or small as you would like it and move it anywhere on your desktop. Hope this helps.

    Peter Csathy
    SightSpeed Inc.
  • First Results - SightSpeed

    Nice detailed information.
    From what you say the 'conservative approach' maybe to ensure new to VideoIM user don't get too lost or confused with options.
    Yet saying that maybe an expert/pro version for experienced users would be more suited in some cases.
  • First Results - SightSpeed


    Thanks for the additional information about video display, that will be very useful for me. In fact, I had been using video only mode, but it didn't occur to me that I could resize the window - I guess that shows that we are "conditioned" by previous experiences.


    Yes, in my opinion that is what SightSpeed is trying to do, and based on my previous experience it is a good idea. There are a lot of potentially complicated issues that have to be handled by a video IM program, and the questions and answers aren't always obvious. The worst part, though is when the program "gets it wrong", or makes a wrong assumption - suddenly it is doing something that the user doesn't undertand, didn't ask for, and didn't get any warning about. As for an expert/pro version, I haven't seen the need for one yet, so far it looks to me like they have struck a pretty good balance, but it is still early days for me...


    It's not really "detailed" yet, I glossed over a few things, as some have already noticed, and left out a few others that I wanted to mention but didn't have the time or space. I'm writing a "tech talk" followup right now, I hope to post it tomorrow. There are a lot of technical "good" things about SightSpeed, and one or two things I would like to see improved or changed (but maybe I just don't know enough yet).

    Thanks for the comments.