Five reasons why Windows 8 has failed
Summary: The numbers are in and they don't lie. Windows 8 market adoption numbers are well behind Microsoft's greatest previous operating system failure, Vista.
Windows fans will whine, but Net Applications' desktop operating systems numbers don't lie. Windows 8's pathetic user adoption numbers can't even keep up with Vista's lousy numbers.

The numbers speak for themselves. Vista, universally acknowledged as a failure, actually had significantly better adoption numbers than Windows 8. At similar points in their roll-outs, Vista had a desktop market share of 4.52% compared to Windows 8's share of 2.67%. Underlining just how poorly Windows 8's adoption has gone, Vista didn't even have the advantage of holiday season sales to boost its numbers. Tablets--and not Surface RT tablets--were what people bought last December, not Windows 8 PCs.

Windows 8's failure is actually greater than it appears. The tablet and phone markets in 2007 were next to non-existent. Now, in a market where NPD expects tablets to out sell notebooks by year's end, neither Windows 8 nor its cousins Windows RT and Windows Phone 8 even appear on NetApplication's mobile and tablet reports for February 2013. How bad is that? Android 1.6, with is tiny 0.02% of the market, does make the list.
I predicted that Windows 8 would be dead on arrival last year, but it's flopping even more than I thought it would be. So, why has Windows 8 been such a failure? Here's my list:
1. Metro, aka Modern: An ugly, useless interface.
I said it before, I'll say it again: Metro, or whatever you want to call it, may make an OK tablet interface, but it's ugly and useless on the desktop. It requires users to forget everything they ever learned about Windows and learn an entirely new way of doing things for no real reason. To quote a popularly held opinion, Metro is "awful."
True, you can use a more traditional Windows interface, but you know what would have been a lot better? If Microsoft had just kept the Windows 7 Aero interface for the desktop version of Windows 8 and give up this idea that the Metro touch-friendly interface is for every device.
2. Windows 8 brought nothing innovative to the desktop.
Can you tell me one new thing that Windows 8 brought to the desktop that was truly innovative? Exciting? Engaging? I can't. Windows 8 is faster than Windows 7, but that's about it -- and that dual interface mess makes it slower for practical purposes.
3. Developers hate it.
I said all along programmers wouldn't like throwing out their hard-won .NET, Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) and Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF) expertise to work natively on Windows 8. I was right. Gabe Newell, co-founder and managing director of video game company Valve, said it best: "Windows 8 is a catastrophe for everyone in the PC space." He then started moving his Steam game empire to Linux.
4. Legacy Windows 7 users aren't moving.
We saw this happen before with Vista and XP. Then, as now, the new operating system -- Vista -- was not better than the old operating system -- XP -- so very few people moved to it. We're seeing it again now.
In addition, in an economy that's still not moving forward quickly, who really wants to move from tried-and-true Windows 7 to new, expensive Windows 8 PCs? As Sterne Agee analyst Shaw Wu observed, the $500 to $1200 price tags slapped on Windows 8 hardware makes it "uncompetitive" in a world where people want iPads and Android tablets.
5. Tablet, smartphone, and desktop competition.
If you are going to buy a new computing device in 2013, chances are it's going to be an Apple iPad, an inexpensive Android tablet, or a Chromebook. The PC desktop isn't dead, but it's not very profitable either -- and Windows 8 isn't helping PC sales.
Microsoft has to know this. If Microsoft does indeed start selling, or rather renting, Microsoft Office for iPad, you'll know they've seen the light. Microsoft's future then will not lie in operating system and application sales, but in services.
And Windows 8? Like Vista before it, Microsoft will re-release an older version of Windows, Windows 7 this time instead of XP, and start talking about wonderful Windows Blue, the next version of Windows, will be.
Related Stories:
- Windows 8's desktop share grows to 2.6 percent in February
- Analyst: Windows 8 hardware 'overpriced' and offers 'no clear benefit in switching from iOS or Android'
- Amazon's top selling laptop doesn't run Windows or Mac OS, it runs Linux
- Was Sinofsky fired for Microsoft's sins?
- Five Reasons why Windows 8 will be dead on arrival
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
MS already owns the desktop
Why?
That's always the story...
It may well tank
I don't understand
A further point that seems to allude writers is that W8 was offered for the first few months at a price that was a fraction of the cost of Vista when it was released and yet still the sales of W8 are less than those of Vista.
PRO was discounted, not HOME
If the upgrade had been Win 7 Home => Win 8 Home, I probably would have only bought one copy, for the laptop that had Vista.
I have a feeling that a lot of the tech-oriented folks who wanted the extra under-the-hood bells and whistles of Pro upgraded not for 8 but for Pro. That also has to be taken into account when comparing adoption rates.
This is a stupid argument. What you are essentially
The tiles interface has been around for more than a year
I agree, but it is more than that
There are those of us who know how to use it, but still don't like it! All too often I see someone making a comment that they don't like W8 only to be told by someone else that that is because they don't know how to use it. GARBAGE! It quite possible to know how to use something and yet still not like using it. As a basic example, I have many friends who know how to ride a bike, people who are quite competent to ride a bike if forced to do so, but that doesn't mean that they like bike riding (and they don't). W8 uses a paradigm that many simply do not like, albeit that there are many who do like it. W8 might have sold 60 million or more licences, but tells only part of the story . . . how many of them are actually happy using it?
The crow that tried to walk like a swan?
Buying a license is not usage
Instead, I bought three Win7 and one Vista Dell computers (two lappies, two desktops), because it was cheaper to buy the machines, than to buy the OS. Then bought four XP Pro OS, two retail and two System Builder.
I can't be the only one with this strategy, because the XP Pro OS are now almost sold out.
XP will remain strong
Given the herdbound mentality and problems of Adobe and Java, however, internetting with XP will become problemmatic (and already has). So you 'wrap around' the internet surfing problem with either Linux or Windows 7. Also certain other things like DVD writing, Moviemaker 6.0 (not Live moviemaker), are better done via Win7 and at times, Linux. The latter I put on a stick, so don't need the hassle of dual boot and a sudden crash in my bootloader, when Linux programs update.
Linux is no panacea. Ubuntu is awful, even worse than Windows 8 except prettier. But Linux has some real good 'buddy' functions for aiding XP.
WInXP Problematic?
By "problematic"....
XP Support
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/endofsupport.aspx
Re: By "problematic"....
What I meant by problemmatic
Finally, all kinds of BSODs occur now when I'm watching video on Amazon, which weren't occurring before. Each error message is different, there's no real problem in the hardware or software. So it's obviously programming changes vendors are making, in light of the OS change MS has made.
Handwriting is on the wall. So now I only go online with XP to download email to Outlook Express, and use Win7 for my other stuff. Granted, I've not yet tested whether one of my other XP machines will work better (which never had Adobe 11 or Chrome crashes). So that testing might alter my claims in the first two paragraphs.
That won't last.
Win XP Maintenance by Microsoft
Re: WInXP Problematic?