Five ways to save Windows 8

Summary: Windows 8, like Vista before it, is on its way to the trash heap of PC history unless Microsoft makes some big changes as soon as possible.

Can the Windows 8 operating system be saved? In all seriousness, Microsoft should be asking itself this question.

WiliWindows
If Microsoft radically reworks Windows 8, this doesn't have to be its fate.
(Image: Screenshot by Steven J Vaughan-Nichols/ZDNet)

The numbers don't lie. Windows 8's market acceptance is continuing to fall behind Microsoft's last desktop operating system failure, Vista. Asus, which had been a big Windows 8 booster, is now reporting poor sales and Samsung has decided not to bother with launching a Windows 8 tablet in the lucrative German market.

Simply chopping prices drastically for Windows 8 and Office 2013 for mini-tablets isn't going to cut it. Neither Windows 8 nor its close relatives, Windows RT and Windows Phone 8, even appear on NetApplication's mobile and tablet usage reports for February 2013. Nor, do I think discount prices on Windows 8 for PCs would help much. There are also lots of cheap Windows 8 PCs and they're not selling well.

So what can Microsoft do to give Windows 8 a shot? Here are my proposals.

1. Dump Metro

The Windows 8 main interface is officially called "Microsoft Design Language" — but whatever its name, it is a failure on the desktop. Hard-core Windows fans will insist that it's not that hard to learn. My response is why should anyone have to learn something new to do the same old things? Metro, like other half-baked "innovative" interfaces, such as Linux's GNOME 3.x, is a solution in search of a problem.

Repeat after me Microsoft user interface designers: "The desktop is not the same thing as a tablet or a smartphone." Metro may work on the latter two, but it has no place on the former.

2. Bring back the Windows 7 Aero interface

Unlike Vista or Windows 8, people loved Windows 7. Why? While Aero was different from the XP interface, it was still familiar enough for users to be comfortable with, and, at the same time, it incorporated improvements. The Windows 8's Windows Explorer desktop just doesn't cut it.

While it doesn't have the radical changes of Metro, it's different enough to be annoying and, like Metro, it doesn't really add any improvements to the user experience. Why do you think programs like Stardock's Star8, which gives users a Start menu again, are so popular? I'll give you a hint: It's not because they love the old interface, it's because people are more comfortable with the Aero style desktop.

3. One desktop

So long as we're at it, let's make this new-model Windows 8 Aero desktop the one-and-only interface. I mean, seriously, why do we need two interfaces for one operating system? Is there some reason why we need to have the Internet Explorer (IE) 10 navigation bar on the Metro interface and on top in the desktop model?

It's not just the looks, though. Different applications work differently. For example, IE 10 comes with Adobe Flash built in. So you'd think you'd be able to see the same sites with IE no matter where you started it, wouldn't you? Wrong!

It turns out that IE 10, if you started IE 10 from Metro, will only show Flash if its site is on Microsoft's Compatibility View (CV) list. The same Flash-enabled web pages, however, will show up just fine if you started IE 10 from the desktop mode! Does Microsoft want to confuse the heck out of its users or what?

To quote IDC analyst Bob O'Donnell, "There were certain decisions that Microsoft made that were in retrospect flawed. Notably not allowing people to boot into desktop mode and taking away the start button. Those two things have come up consistently."

It's not like this is surprising news. Back when Windows 8 was brand new, interface guru Jakob Nielsen said that having two desktop available on one device was "a prescription for usability problems". That was not only because users have to remember where to go for which features, but because switching between two interfaces was more trouble than it was worth.

Exactly! To sum up, give us one interface and give it to us now!

4. Fix Windows' marketing

Repeat after me: Windows 8 is not Windows RT. Surface Pro is not Surface RT. Techie people already know that. You know who doesn't know that? Ordinary people. If I had a dime for every time I heard from my non-geeky friends about how Windows RT or Surface RT can't run their desktop apps, I'd be a rich man.

Windows RT, and Microsoft's hardware platform of choice for it, the Surface RT, is a limited subset of Windows. You can't run "normal" Windows applications on RT. You can only run some Metro apps on it. You can't use RT in Windows-centric businesses that rely on Active Directory.

RT, in short, is not really Windows. Give the operating system another name, paste another label on the Surface RT. Stop confusing your users!

5. Improve Windows 8 native apps

It's not like we expect Office 2013 for free on every Windows 8 PC, but have you really looked at Windows 8's native apps? There's Mail, which doesn't support Post Office Protocol (POP) or threaded messaging. The photo app doesn't include basic editing tools. And if Dropbox can automatically sync everything in a folder from my PC to the cloud and vice versa, why can't the SkyDrive app do the same thing?

Microsoft does seem to be working on improving Windows 8's native apps. And we might see some of them as soon as this month.

While that would be nice, it won't be enough. Microsoft must fundamentally change and improve Windows 8's look and feel — or watch Windows 8's market share continue to lag.

I have no love for Windows, but there actually is a lot to like in Windows 8. Microsoft's promises of better security may be hollow as ever, but Windows 8 is faster and more stable than Windows 7.

Two out of those three should have made Windows 8 the next "go to" Windows upgrade. If Microsoft swallows its pride and gives users a single, old-style interface that they can actually enjoy and use, Windows 8 may yet prove a winner.

If they don't? Well, they'd better plan on making Windows 7 easily available again — until they can get Windows Blue out the door, because they're not going to be selling a lot of Windows 8.

Related stories

Topics: Windows 8, Microsoft, PCs, Windows, Microsoft Surface

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

336 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • I agree.

    I totally agree, and wish that Microsoft had got it right from the start.
    remeeraz
    • 6th way to save windows 8

      ..Stop writing article on how to save Windows.

      Go on. Tell us again on how you hate Microsoft, The Surface and Office.
      gbouchard99@...
      • I personally made a late purchase

        of a Windows 7 laptop computer because I heard from early reviews that Win 8 was going to be a mess.

        I support MS, I certainly haven't purchased a Linux of Mac product in the last 20 - 30 years. But I heard that Win 8 was going to be a mess. I decided to get one of the last Win 7's and wait until things worked themselves out a bit. Maybe Win 9 will get my attention.

        It is interesting, until reading this article I was under the impression that a Win laptop, a Surface Pro and Surface RT could run the same software. Maybe it is because of all the marketing about Office. Seems like some deceptive marketing is going on as well.

        I have say to you, don't shoot the messenger. This thing seems like a dog. Both Apple and Google have developed separate OS's for laptop and mobile devices for a reason. Why does MS think it can unify both? It isn't the first time they tried. Remember Win CE - they thought that making portable devices (called PDA's at the time, rather than tablets) look exactly like the Windows desktop would cause extra sales. That didn't work out either - even though for the last 15 years they have made variants of Win CE. I think that is the answer - folks want and need different OS's and different Windowing systems on the desktop than they do on mobile devices.
        wiseoldbird
        • Surface Pro and RT both

          run the same Metro applications but RT will only run Office as a desktop application. The reason for this is Pro uses an Intel based processor and RT uses an ARM based processor. The Intel based won't run on the ARM unless rewritten for them. I was fully aware of that when the RT came out and chose a laptop instead to be able to run the older desktop apps.

          Apple and Google didn't try to merge apps although Google does in a way because they don't have 90% of the business work using their platform. I'm a software administrator for a payroll application and they are utilizing mobile apps because to GPS tracking. Managers are more and more mobile then ever before and MS is making so they can take their work with them.

          I purchased a Windows 8 laptop on Black Friday and I love it.
          Orlbuckeye76
          • You Have It Backwards

            RT will only run Office as a Metro app, not a desktop app. RT cannot nor will it ever run regular Windows desktop applications. Soon, Windows 8 on the desktop and Surface Pro will have the same limitation as RT. Microsoft intends to eliminate the old desktop mode completely in the future. Then, you're stuck with nothing but Metro apps. That's why so many of us refuse to buy Windows 8. Metro was a massive, gargantuan, enormous mistake. (The redundancy is for emphasis.)
            BillDem
          • No, you have it backwards

            Office runs on RT's desktop. It's the only application outside OS utilities like File Explorer that does.

            I think you're right that MS is trying to de-emphasize the desktop. But it will be a long, long time before it goes away, if ever.
            CageySee
          • Office RT is a desktop app

            I don't think you have used a Win RT tablet or you would have realised that office is not a metro/modern UI app.
            I have an Asus TF600 in front of me with Win RT and Office runs and looks almost exactly like it does on my x86 laptop.
            warboat
          • That's part of the problem

            It leads to more confusion for consumers as they see a desktop Office in WinRT, but no other desktop apps will run under WinRT, and how well does that version of Office as a desktop app really work with touch? I toyed with it a bit, and there were a few things that seemed to be touch oriented, but you're going to be much happier using the WinRT version of office with a keyboard and mouse/touchpad.

            The whole mess that is the Windows Family of Products is why MS is falling flat on it's face, mixed messages, poor marketing and a refusal to allow people to have it their way without having to install additional software from other sources (IE start menu replacements)

            Microsoft Flopped on this one, big time.
            trumanp@...
          • Windows desktop does not exist in RT

            What you are seeing is a Metro app designed to look like the old desktop app. It's smoke and mirrors which is fooling some poor souls into thinking RT is a "real Windows" machine. You have obviously been fooled, too. There is no desktop in Windows RT. You can't open half a dozen application windows. You can't run your supposed "desktop" Office along with 4 or 5 other desktop applications. This is because it's NOT a desktop application. It's a Metro app wearing a desktop MASK. I suppose you also believe there are thousands of miniature Obamas and Hillarys running around on Halloween?
            BillDem
          • hobsons choice

            have Apple restrict you to being little more than an "end user who doesn't want to understand their computer at all" to be baffled with conflicting and confusing versions of Linux where the support comes only from geeks - or have a nice interface you can fiddle with and change. I suspect many window 8 critics have never tried it, never found how easy it is to have it work the way you want it to and never experienced the extra speed and fluidity. I agree windows 7 was good though I had started to make it creak a little - I wasn't buying a new PC and got better performance from my existing one by installing windows 8 -I don't really believe it is good to stay in the past or even the present, we should always be looking to live in the future and embrace change - it nearly always leads to something good in the end
            cymru999
          • We live with Future technology as it is.

            My comment here is this. The future is only good if it makes my life easier. For example, I upgraded my 2011 iMac to Lion because it autosaves everything, the touch gestures were greatly improved so you could interact with a Mac like an Ipad, not to mention document versions which I find myself using alot.

            When Mountain Lion came out I tried it for several months and found that it was not useful. Yes it synced your Ipad with the computer wirelessly. So everything you did got transferred but other then that it was hardly worth my time. I used Windows 8 too and I did not see anything useful. Having a traditional desktop and the start menu is confusing as hell. IE still sucks hard compared to Google Chrome. You have to be a programmer to share anything across to the computer via Bluetooth., the mail app is obnoxious. I could go on but you get the point. The future is only worth while if it makes our lives easier.
            djnextgen
          • "or have a nice interface you can fiddle with and change"

            LMAO! From a design and usability standpoint, Windows 8 is a horrible interface, not a lovely one. Unless you like tiles that make your interface look like a slot machine and are a throwback to Windows Bob.
            johnukguy
        • That is utter nonsense.

          One can not be proud to go and buy something, that is behind its time. As Windows7 is OK right now (I'm writing this with still 7, because i will change my main PC shortly), i can tell you, as I'm running 8 on my portable PC, That 8 just behaves even more fluid and fine. And since I had to deliver lately some Windows8 PC's to people, who really just made upgrade from XP and are number crunchers and accountants, I Installed also free Classic shell add on, that lets you customize the behaviour of your Windows8 to look just like you ever wanted to, but were afraid to ask. And that is with more power, security, features... you name it. So i guess, you are not all that wise, buying old stuff.
          Andrej.G.
          • If you have to install an addon to make it work the way you want

            Then you, and Microsoft are missing the point. That the majority of users do not want this thing MS has foisted on us. Imagine in a years time, being in a help centre, and working out whether a customer has enabled a classic addon or is using Metro. Personally, I gave up on Metro after a painful morning of trying to make the mouse edge screen behaviour work inside a VM/RDP environment. Grrr!
            meski.oz@...
          • So I'm glad to see you don't have any add-ons, such as...

            So I'm glad to see you do not use any "add-ons" such as Norton, or McAfee or other anti-virus products. And you stay away from those anti-spyware products and third party disk defraggers, registry cleaners, etc.
            Or browsers such as Firefox and Chrome.
            It's great to be a 100% MS turnkey customer, isn't it?
            Claude Balloune
      • 6.1 way

        6.1 stop reading Zdnet. Zdnet has long left being an objective professional news source on technology. the site has become the equivalent of a Jr high school cafeteria
        6.1.2 think for your self.
        .
        Scatcatpdx
        • Problem is...

          People have a LOT to think about.

          YOU may be up on stuff that makes this page moot, but I GUARANTEE you, that most of us are not. Sure, we make our own DECISIONS, but it's a good thing, when you know where to go for first-level evaluations that can help you guide your decision process.

          If you think of zdnet readers as sheep, of course, then you will continue to think of us as sheep anyway...

          But as it happens, I'm just glad to see them agreeing with me that W8 is for the birds.
          Lightning Joe
          • Just my opinion

            People need to be up on this. Its 2013. The computer and the internet is not a fad anymore. I'm not saying computer programmer up on it I am just saying smart enough to if they have a problem they can look up an answer and follow step by step instructions. I know 70 year olds that can do this. The rest of the world has no excuse. Although I did meet a person who believed that if it is not an Iphone it is not a smart phone. Not kidding!
            djnextgen
        • 6.1

          well said
          mizieya@...
      • Yep...

        ...agreeing with SJVN is definitely proof of MS hatred. Even if the advice he gives MS is actually sound.

        Personally, I don't know if MS has to dump Metro, but it should probably be optional until people have had a chance to decide whether they like it. MS' ability to dictate to users has greatly diminished (good thing), and it would be wise for management to recognize that.
        John L. Ries