For Apple, the iOS 6 Map Flap is just a mere speed bump
Summary: The miserable iOS 6 Maps rollout has given Apple a dose of reality orientation and badly-needed humility -- when arrogance has been the company's operating principle. But at the end of the day, Cupertino will prevail.

September 19, 2012. A day that will live in infamy. It was the day that everyone who owned an Apple iOS device and who wanted to upgrade to the latest version of the mobile operating system hit the "Upgrade" button, and found out after their next reboot that their devices were de-Googlefied.
Google Maps in iOS was no more.
This wouldn't have been an issue if Apple's own mapping and geolocation services were anywhere near as extensive or as accurate as Google's. But they aren't. The new Maps software has been lambasted by the media as well as the company's die-hard fans and it has been a public relations disaster for the company.
Apple's CEO, Tim Cook, has issued a public apology, and has stated that the company "fell short on its commitment... to make world-class products that deliver the best experience possible" to its customers.
Is iOS 6 Maps a Cupertino speedbump? Yes. Has it given Apple a dose of reality orientation and given it a badly-needed dose of humility when arrogance has been its operating principle? Definitely.
Is the company going to stop selling iDevices like hotcakes and provide a wide opening for its competitors to knock it down to irrelevance?
Hell no.
With the release of iOS 6 and the Map Flap, the company's ability to innovate has been brought into question.
When we talk about Apple’s mobile operating system, we really have to think about it in the context of entire products, and that is because the company enjoys a level of vertical integration with hardware that is essentially unparalleled in the entire industry.
For Apple, iOS is the software that drives their mobile hardware and to which they have an exclusive and is tuned specifically to run on their custom-designed microelectronics. Nobody else can do any kind of value-add on top of it. That’s just the way it is.
So to compare it to something like Android which is designed to run on a much, much more diverse pool of hardware, which is then in turn further modified to meet OEM and carrier requirements which try in almost a futile attempt to differentiate from each other to make one smartphone or tablet stand out from the rest of the pack is a bit unfair.
There is no question that from a holistic device plus software standpoint that Apple is driving all of the innovation in the mobile industry with their products. The iPad 3 and the iPhone 5 have the displays and the SoC’s and the industrial design to beat and by far have the most compelling and innovative apps being developed for them.
Right now, not a single vendor can match what Apple is doing with mobile devices as a whole, no matter how you read into the rhetoric from the respective platform evangelists.
What we’ve learned from the Map Flap is that there are things that Apple does extremely well and there are things that they don’t. Clearly, the company has a deficiency when it comes to geolocation and geospatial services, and it was absolutely a major tactical error for the company to extricate itself from its Map data relationship with Google a year early.
However, Apple does have one thing which gives it a huge advantage, and that it has over 100 billion dollars in cash. That pretty much gives them the power to buy any properties it needs or sign multi-year partnerships with Google’s competitors (Think Yahoo! and Microsoft Bing!) to boost its geolocation services and search portfolio or fill any other services gaps by hiring people with the subject matter expertise that it needs to build their own.
Ramping up software development to fill these gaps takes a lot of effort and money, but when you have the financial resources to fund several Manhattan Projects at once, you can make these problems go away relatively quickly, although I think it may take two or three years for Apple to reach parity with Google on the geolocation services front.
Can Apple safely remove Google integration throughout iOS going forward without annoying customers?
What the company faces is the very real possibility of having to let Google Maps back in as a dedicated app and to provide unrestricted access to Google’s Map APIs. And by the same token, Google would be utterly stupid to reserve the Maps software and services strictly to Android and not take advantage of the huge iOS customer base for their various services offerings, as the company’s CEO, Eric Schmidt recently intimated.
So how does iOS currently stack up to Android and Microsoft's Windows Phone in terms of innovation and raw capabilities?
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Is cross-product platform integration a killer app?
I would not count Google out yet
Apple is cutting and pasting some features of iOS and OSx back and forth, but it isn't really making a unified system. Just sharing some features. iOS is just to far locked down compared to OSx for any true convergence to occur without large changes.
Microsoft took the plunge with windows8 to make a unified kernal across all its devices. It has a lot of promise and if it succeeds Apple will most likely follow suit.
On Operating Systems
Android is too, based on UNIX OS. So there is nothing "great" in "Google doing filesystem access", because filesystem access is trivial on UNIX. It's a given. What Apple does however, providing APIs for (file system) objects access is innovation.
Same about multiple users. Trivial on UNIX. etc.
What Apple has done in what everyone should have done years ago and what it seems Microsoft is trying to do now. Have one base OS underneath, and provide different packaging of APIs and UIs for different form factors and usages.
It seems people forget fast. Few years ago, Apple published white papers on the design of the iPhone. The key focus there was what *not* to include, not what to add.
All that matters is what is
The difference between android and apple however is that Android already has file system access and is willing to let users engage in it.
While apple might be able to integrate something into iOS it isn't in apples nature to give users any control in iOS. OSx and iOS might both be unix, but they are still miles apart in terms of being a unified system. From interface, systems to hardware they are very far apart. All I am saying is that it will not be quick, easy or painless. Apple will have to make real choices of which style of OS will take the lead.
A bit over the top
Something caught my eye on page one... "There is no question that from a holistic device plus software standpoint that Apple is driving all of the innovation in the mobile industry with their products."
For smartphones, this was true a couple of years back. Not today. I am seeing across the board that the majority of expectation regarding the iPhone revolves around what Android has, not what iOS has. The statement that iPhone is driving is waxing poetic.
Now add the tablet space. What are the hot topics? 7" form factor, Surface, and the nifty keypad cover from MS. The iPad is selling well and influencing, but driving? Starting to look more like coasting.......
A second item....
Not sure where or on what devices you are using and across what apps. Between an iPad 2 on iOS6 and a Nexus7 on JB, i have yet to see a single crash on the N7 while the iPad has has several app crashes and a couple of device crashes. Maybe it is because it is an iPad2.
Either way, my experiences regarding an N7 on JB and an iPad on iOS6 is remarkedly dissimilar from your. Like we hear, "your mileage may vary".
Sluggish keystrokes
Remember Apple's legendary autocorrect errors that are the subject of countless comic web sites. What about iPhone 4's short circuited antenna problem?
The only thing unusual about the Apple Maps problem is the way people are acting as if it were a first.
A Final Point
So you end up with a PC OS on a smartphone or a smartphone OS on a PC. If it is a hybrid, it is either one, the other, or a crippled OS. I suppose it could be a bloated does both kind of OS but I think defeats its purpose.
OS's that can seamlessly interact. I am talking about a many to many relationship. (iOS to OSX is a one to one). That should be the end goal. At this time, the only place I am seeing this is Google Services.
I disagree but for a slightly differnt reason...
I have to believe (I'm certain) that if Jobs was still at the helm it would never have happened. That does not bode well for Apple or it's users.
100% agreed.
You got it.
I've Said It Before
You mean Microsoft?
You wish.
The hypocrisy is astounding. The Android mantra of 'choice is good' is suddenly 'stupid' if Apple does just that?
Once again, thanks for raising Apple's profile with incessant trolling and numbskull thinking. Apple owns you all - and you don't even know it.
"Ios6Maps works far more often than you all would care to realise. "
So you must agree
Arrogance
As a long-time Mac and Apple advocate, I can say that "arrogance" is not a word that springs to mind when I use one of the company's products. It doesn't pretend I'm stupid, it doesn't ask me one too many times if I really wanted to do that and, functionality-wise, it's just about perfect for me. In fact, it is the straightforward, easy and elegant interface that makes Apple what it is, the company that makes technology people *want* to use. That isn't arrogance, it's smart, and it's why Apple is the biggest company in the world now.
Not really the biggest
Look at Google's price x outstanding shares, or Facebook price x outstanding shares and you can easily see that these "values" don't necessary represent any kind of physical assets that could be chopped up and sold to equal the "value".
There are companies that have more revenue each year than Apple, there are companies that have more employees than Apple, there are companies that have more physical assets than Apple.
All the rest is just perception, not factual reality.
I just wish I could have purchase 1000 shares of Apple, Microsoft, Intel, etc during each of their IPO's and had the discipline to keep it this long....
Speed bump?
Most Tech Writers Out of Touch