Gartner: Windows 8 for desktop users is, in a word, "bad"
Summary: With just over three months until Windows 8 hits the store shelves and digital markets, research firm Gartner has just one, tiny word to describe the desktop version of the upcoming operating system.
Gartner has two things to say about Microsoft's upcoming operating system. Windows 8 on tablets: "I like this thing." Windows 8 on desktops: "In a word: Bad."
Ouch.

In a five-part review, Gartner's research director veteran Gunnar Berger runs through the latest offering from Microsoft and meticulously details his experiences.
Given the fact that Windows 8 will be available in both desktop and tablet versions -- the latter dubbed Windows 8 on ARM, or officially Windows RT -- he runs through in great detail what the consumer and enterprise user should expect in a break away from previous visual stylings of Windows.
There's no doubt Microsoft has invested a great deal in setting Windows up for the tablet environment -- albeit somewhat late to the party following both Apple and Google's long-standing position in market share rankings -- and it's paid off in terms of Gartner's view.
"I see Windows 8 as a great compromise with the end-user consumer," Berger said in part two. He noted in a previous piece that Windows 8 isn't a strict move to "enable the enterprise," but "a move to support the trend towards consumerization within the enterprise." In other words: Windows 8 is "aimed at end-user consumers, not IT departments, but this may not be a bad thing for Microsoft."
But the punch to Microsoft's kidneys comes later when Berger takes to the desktop.
It's all the things you've heard before: the menus are difficult to access with a mouse and keyboard and are hidden behind the invisible walls of screen edges -- and remote computing is a pain in the posterior, which in an enterprise setting is crucial for PC management and IT support.
"The decision to move to Windows 8 was a solid business decision to get into the tablet market," he says, but noting his expertise in enterprise desktops, he warns that, "Microsoft forgot about [keyboards and mice] when they designed Windows 8."
Breaking down the numbers, which is more important: Windows 8 satisfaction on tablets, or desktops?
IDC said the worldwide tablet market will rise by near 70 percent to 107.4 million in 2012, IDC says. It's worth noting the vast majority of these figures come from iPads and Android-powered tablets. Windows 8, despite having no current market share in the tablet, isn't expected to leave much of a mark. However, PC sales are expected to remain flat at around 87 million shipments in the third-quarter, says Gartner.
"We don't expect Windows-based tablets to necessarily take share from Apple and Android, but will grow the overall tablet market," said IDC research director Tom Mainelli last month.
It's fair to say that come the New Year, there will be a higher proportion of PCs that all but entirely run Windows than tablets running the upcoming operating system, thanks to the consumer boom around the holiday season. Therefore, there will be more desktop users of Windows 8 than tablet users, leaving a majority scratching their heads and confused as to why Microsoft would make such a desperate move to dump the desktop in favour of a tablet market share grab.
At least on the bright side, Microsoft will support Windows 7 until 2020. Thank your lucky stars for that.
Update on 24 July at 1:00 p.m. BST: The "bad" claims were retracted by Berger, and explained that the words were "taken out of context." You can read the PC Pro interview here, and ZDNet Ed Bott's comments on why Gartner should be taken with a pinch of salt.
Image credit: Simon Bisson/ZDNet.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
In a word: Usable
The better performance, resume times, improved task manager and native hyper-v are also huge pluses for me.
Why is remote computing a pain? I'm not getting that statement at all. If you're going to make a statement like that shouldn't you at least back it up with your experience or opinions as to why? I'm not even sure what that means... Does RDP or Citrix not work on Windows 8? Because both are functioning just fine on my installation.
Overall it seems entirely blown out of proportion. My wife, who is a firm believer in complaining about anything technology related that is different, had no problems adapting and never complained when I put it on her laptop. My daughter, who is 6 years old, had no trouble adapting. So why are technology "experts" having such a hard time adapting to a slightly revised interface? I think that's the better question to answer. End users seem to be adapting to it much easier than IT "Pros" who should be able to adapt to changing technology better than anyone else. Why no article on that?
Couldn't agree more
Personally, I don't mind having to scroll to the edge to show menus- it beats having ugly menus on my screen at all times. I actually think people will like having the live-tiles that update them with information that app/program provides without having to launch it. I think people will also really like that they can have nearly the exact same GUI across all their devices, if they so wish.
Any time someone gets a new OS, even from the same company, there is always some kind of a learning curve so I don't think the last big paragraph is fair. The majority of people use Android smartphones that have a totally different GUI than Windows XP or 7. I know plenty of people that use a Mac at home or work/school and a PC at the other place. For as tech illiterate as the average person can seem, they seem to do just fine for their own requirements learning a new GUI.
My point isn't the lack of a learning curve
Don't get me wrong, I saw it on the move from DOS to Windows 95. I knew many programmers and engineers that swore it would be the worst thing ever.
Here's how Real (non-tech) People Will Use Windows 8
I've seen those videos
I agree completely with LiquidLearner
And when Ellen Degeneres did a small piece on the dificulty of using
So did that video you linked to have a real point to it, beyond showing us someone who is afraid of a little change?
It's not the difficulty in adapting
If we are going to completely change it should be an improvement!!!
Using Windows 8 Without a Touch Screen
Using Windows 8 has not hurt my productivity in preparing the courses or presenting them.
Using the mouse, the Charms and the Windows key are getting to be second nature. Naturally it takes some time to totally forget the automatic clicks used in Windows 7 but hopefully I will make some of the keyboard shortcuts as automatic as the Ctrl+C and Ctrl+V have become.
And just in case you are wondering, I am a senior citizen and love chalenges. Learning new things keeps my brain active.
Remote Desktop
The performance improvements are great and might be Win8's "killer feature." I don't think the new UI is the killer feature. I miss Aero and the whole UI is drab and boring and disconcerting. The move to ALL CAPS menu bars is especially irksome.
It is a little difficult to use in Remote Desktop
Of course you missed the "consumer-friendly" part...
Although the consumer learning curve is not that bad, the rewards are null if you don't have a touch screen. Yep. I love the task manager and the new explorer, but let's face it, these could have been done without the interface overhaul.
Now lets imagine the increased IT support costs that will stem from supporting this new build, with negligible benefits. Add to that, that 2013 will surely be a recession year and you have a nightmare, where companies have a reduced budget and an increased support cost from BYOD users.
With that said, the big problem for Microsoft is that BYOD's that bring an iPad have 6 years of sprint (when they brought their iPhones) and Mac BYODs have an even greater advantage.
So Windows 8 BYOD's are gonna be odd-ball people which will fit in the same category as Mac users were on the enterprise on the 90's and 00's. In short, they will expect no support at all and lots of bashing not only from PC users but also iPad users.
Agreed
And then you get a "professional analyst" that says this doodoo? I don't get it. To me it seems like doesn't like change or wants to bum Apple or one of those companies
Windows 8 works fine for me
I thought Gartner wasn't to be believed?
Speculation killed so many markets, I'm surprised that these people still do it, or is it that they don't care about too much beyond their own speculations?
Bingo
Gartner also says
Funny that ZD-net selectively uses Gartner when it suits their bias... If you believe Gartner then believe ALL of Gartner.
Windows 8 is "bad" for desktops... Windows Phone will be a bigger player in mobile than Iphone before you know it...
Most people would look at the evidence and conclude exactly the opposite I would think.
I think Gartner is right
Though working with the Release Preview I've been able to completely avoid the Start Screen: Classic Shell is the answer. Once installed, it adds a Start Menu again to the desktop and have a configuration setting to login directly to the desktop, therefore completely avoiding the horrible Start Screen.
Why do you need to upgrade your PC?