Google charges $50 for $7.50 worth of storage in the Nexus 7
Summary: By removing a micro SD card slot from the Nexus 7, Google is in a position where -- like Apple with the iPad -- it can charge a premium for storage.
Research firm IHS iSuppli have carried out a teardown of Google's Nexus 7 Android tablet and estimated that the 8GB model --- retailing for $199 --- costs almost $160 to build. The 16GB model, which retails for $249, only costs an extra $7.50 to build.
The teardown also reveals how Google has taken a leaf out of Apple's book and realized that there's money to be made by charging a premium for extra storage.

- Click to view the "Best tablet for those who don't want an iPad" image gallery
- Click to view the "Microsoft Surface" image gallery
As a rule, Android devices have a micro-SD card slot that allows additional storage to be added. This slot is absent on the Nexus 7 and the teardown uncovers why Google decided to prevent users adding more storage at will: it's all down to profit.
In other words, if you want more storage, you end up paying an eye-watering $50 for $7.50 worth of storage. Compare this to a 32GB micro-SD card, which costs less than $20, and Google must be laughing.
Apple uses the same strategy with the iPad, which comes in 16GB, 32GB and 64GB models, with $100 price jump between each. However, it costs Apple less than $20 to bump the storage from 16GB to 32GB and about $35 to bump it from 32GB to 64GB.
Just as Apple does with the iPad, Google has adopted Apple’s strategy of charging a premium for higher storage capacities, and forces people’s hands by not offering a cheap storage expansion option via micro SD card.
This one tactic adds $42.50 to Google’s bottom line on each sale of the high-end Nexus 7.
The teardown reveals that the most expensive component of the Nexus 7 is the display and touchscreen, which cost $38 and $24 respectively. This is a significant saving compared to the display and touchscreen components that Apple uses in the iPad 3, which cost $87 and $40 respectively.

The teardown also highlights some of the major differences between Google Nexus 7 and Amazon's Kindle Fire. The inclusion of the far superior quad-core Nvidia Tegra processor compared to the OMAP 4430 dual-core chip found in the Kindle Fire adds $7.50 to the bill of materials.
Additional feature such as a higher-resolution display using in-plane switching (IPS) technology, a camera and an NFC chip come together to give the Nexus 7 a bill of materials that's $18 higher than Amazon's Android tablet.
iSuppli's teardown assessments only take into account the hardware and manufacturing costs, and ignore other expenses such as software, licensing, royalties or other expenditures.
An earlier teardown of the tablet by repair specialists iFixit found that the way Google designed the Nexus 7 made it far easier to take apart and repair than Apple's iPad 3.
Image source: IHS iSuppli, iFixit.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Expandable Memory
*takes out the popcorn*
No
+1
It should be half the price
One small difference:
There's price gouging, and there's not wanting to lose your shirt giving away electronics.
I can't really fault Google and Asus wanting to make $50 profit on a $250 device. They have to split this profit for one thing, and then there's marketing costs to be paid. It's not likely anyone is making much money on this thing at all.
While I would prefer a device with 16gb and an SD slot, I would be willing to pay more for this. If there is demand for that I think the market will supply it, and if you demand that you should wait for it and be prepared to pay what it's worth.
The N7 is one heck of a device and by far the best value for it's price, so complaining that you are getting "reamed" on the cost of storage is really looking a gift horse in the mouth and complaining the teeth aren't all made of gold.
Whoot
I will be ordering my N7 very shortly and at that price point, I love it in advance already.
We have to complain
Go for it.
BTW, the iPad2 is $399.
Free computers for everyone
Well hell....every computer manufacturer should follow this model then everyone will be happy....except investors i guess.
Every manufacturer...
Want or need?
Not The True Cost
Good for you.
That's not where their profit comes from
who cares?
Speak for yourself
Comparison
Apple offer no SD slot...people scream...but none available on Fire/Nexus.
Apple restrict you to App Store...people scream...but Fire is tied to Amazon and Nexus is tied to Play.
Lots of double standards here as though Apple, Amazon and Nexus are different. They each do their own thing and that is where the choice is. Choose Fire or iPad or Nexus but mark my words the business models are very similar.
Comparison?
Overpriced or your cheap?
Comparison?
You can use Play, Amazon App Store, Get Jar amongst others and you can sideload if you wish. You are not forced to use Play if you do not wish. There is no restriction on the Nexus 7.
"Apple refuse to allow Flash....people scream...but no Flash is available on Jellybean".
Google didn't refuse to allow Flash, adobe decided to pull their product from use on mobile devices so they could focus on HTML 5 development, Google cannot make Adobe develop for Android again. The situation with Apple was very different that was down to the decision of a pig headed autocrat.