IBM accused of mainframe monopoly

IBM accused of mainframe monopoly

Summary: A small US company has filed a complaint with the European Commission, accusing IBM of abusing its position in the European mainframe market

SHARE:
TOPICS: Servers
1

A complaint alleging that IBM has abused its position in the European mainframe market was filed with the European Commission on Tuesday.

The complaint from T3, a small US supplier of mainframes, said IBM has "a history of abusing its monopoly power in the mainframe industry", according to a statement from T3.

IBM is accused of engaging in a range of anti-competitive actions, including "preventing the sales of competing mainframe hardware products by tying the sale of its operating system to its mainframe hardware". IBM is further accused of "withholding patent licences and certain intellectual property to the detriment of mainframe customers".

In its statement, T3 said it sold IBM mainframes but then moved into selling its own products, the Liberty line of mainframes, first developed by Amdahl Corporation, which itself is now part of Fujitsu.

In 2007, US software maker Platform Solutions filed a complaint with the Commission, alleging that IBM abused market dominance by refusing to supply interface information for mainframe computers or to license others to use its software. The action was dropped when IBM acquired Platform Solutions in July 2008. That move sparked fears from the Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) that it would lead to IBM dominating the mainframe market.

CCIA president Ed Black said at the time that the move "sucks the life out of the [mainframe] market leaving little prospects for anything but complete domination by IBM".

An IBM spokesperson told ZDNet UK on Tuesday: "As IBM has not seen any complaint, it is inappropriate to comment on specifics relating thereto." ZDNet UK has sought comment from T3, but had not received any at the time of writing.

Topic: Servers

About

Colin Barker is based in London and is Senior Reporter for ZDNet. He has been writing about the IT business for some 30-plus years. He still enjoys it.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

1 comment
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Where is ICL when you need it!

    If the UK government had got behind ICL like the US government did IBM, then the situation would not have occured as the non US would have gone for the better UK systems. Don't confuse Fujitsu with the old ICL as they would not have been involved, although I must admit some of the problems came about by ICL reverting to the "old school tie" style of company management.
    Yellowcave-9fde3