IHS: Ultrabook shipments projected to fall short in 2012
Summary: Analysts have cut their projection for global Ultrabook shipments by more than 50 percent.
Ultrabook shipments could be in danger of falling short this year, according to the latest forecast from market intelligence firm IHS iSuppli.
Previously, IHS analysts predicted that 22 million units of Ultrabooks would ship by the end of 2012. That projection has now been revised down to just 10.3 million Ultrabooks shipped worldwide this year.
There's a chance that number could be improved upon as IHS expects more than half of the shipments for the entire year to come in the fourth quarter, but that still doesn't leave much room for improvement.
Craig Stice, a senior principal analyst for compute platforms at IHS, cited two primary reasons in the report as to why Ultrabook sales are going to disappoint: pricing and marketing.
So far, the PC industry has failed to create the kind of buzz and excitement among consumers that is required to propel ultrabooks into the mainstream. This is especially a problem amid all the hype surrounding media tablets and smartphones. When combined with other factors, including prohibitively high pricing, this means that ultrabook sales will not meet expectations in 2012.
This falls in line with another recent IHS report in which Stice explained how the "Wintel" alliance between Microsoft and Intel is now playing catch-up as the computer market is becoming dominated by smartphones and tablets rather than PCs.
Predictions for 2013 have been lowered as well. IHS now expects shipments to rise to 44 million in 2013, but that is down from the previous expectation of 61 million units. The figure below presents the IHS forecast for ultrabook shipments in 2012 and 2013.
If Ultrabook shipments don't meet expectations this year, the repercussions will be felt throughout the supply chain -- including the hard disk drive industry. IHS recently reported that HDD shipments will bounce back this year, but one of the contributing factors is supposed to be a surge in Ultrabook shipments during the fourth quarter.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
It was stupid to predict high ultrabook sales pre W8.
I have to agree with you on that opinion, Johnny Vegas
What, me worry?
No, there is absolutely no justification for this. Intel and Microsoft make their profits from volume. They get their cut of the pie which doesn't change radically whether the device costs the consumer $300 or $1,000. Ultrabooks were never going to be big volume sellers. This is a blip in their rear view mirror.
What Intel and MS DO need to worry about is the tablet market. The consumer is not switching from desktop / laptop to ultrabook. This is not the migration. Consumers are migrating to tablets and smartphones. If Microsoft and Intel can't grab a significant portion of that market, then they will have something very real to worry about. Ultrabooks? Pfft, they are meaningless.
YOU'RE A HYPOCRITE TODDY...
If people want a Macbook Air, they will never buy a plastic ripoff running the worst OS on earth!
Consumers are moving away from Desktop operating systems while on the go; and MS happens to have the most unreliable OS.
MS should focus on bringing apps to mobile operating systems, instead of trying to compete in a mobile world with a Desktop OS.
It seems that more and more people
I've realized recently how much I actually dislike laptops, for the cramped keyboard and especically the touchpads.
Buying an ultrabook in the dawn of Windows 8 is silly
Ultrabook is a marketing term
There have ALWAYS been niche laptops that have been smaller than the average. Ultrabooks have been around for at least 10 years, they simply didn't have a name. They have never sold in high numbers so I don't know why Intel thought that slapping a name on it would change anything.
Things will get even worse for ultrabooks when Windows 8 Pro tablets start coming out. Those that still need powerful laptops will get something bigger. Those that truly want a portable device with a full OS on it (not a crippled OS like Android, iOS, or RT) will get a tablet. Those that absolutely need an Apple logo will get the MacBook Air (an ultrabook in every single sense except for the name - again, a clone of what we had 10 years ago - Apple following the market yet again).
It is only going to get worse for this class of laptop, a class of laptop we've had for 10 years now.
I wouldn't call
A truck driver absolutely would call a car crippled
It is exactly like saying that.
But use whatever terminology you want, that really wasn't the point. Calling it "crippled" or "limited" or "trimmed" are just different ways of expressing the fact that these started as "full" OSs (Linux -> Android, OS X -> iOS, Windows 8 -> RT) but have had many capabilities removed because ARM processors simply can't handle those capabilities. It is a compromise that works well for 10s of millions of people but it is a compromise nonetheless.
For those not willing to live with that particular compromise, tablets running Windows 8 are a far superior mobile solution than ultrabook or MacBook Air. Non ultrabooks (and MacBook Pro) have gotten so small and light that those needing the power are FAR better off jumping straight to one of those models and skipping models like the MacBook Air that offer absolutely no benefits.
The article needs a little better analysis
The official ultra book spec calls for SSD drives, not traditional disk drives. why would anyone expect ultrabooks to drive HD sales?
Also, the headline is slightly wrong. Ultrabooks are falling short of the IHS forecast, but that was most likely a bogus forecast anyway not really grounded in reality.
Android > Windows
(Note I'm ignoring the fat profits that Microsoft and Intel are getting, though quite likely they will soon be 100% of the Windows PC business all in their own.)
Ultrabooks were just bad timing.
So why would consumers rush out to purchase $1000 Ultrabooks at this time when a $400 Notebook is perfectly sufficient? When a 2-3 year old Notebook is sufficient enough for most consumers computing needs today? And why would the market trust these OEMs and their $1000 PCs when they were pushing junk all these years (tarnishing their brands)? I wonder how DELL is doing these days?
Absolutely agree
It's simply trade-offs due to technology limitations
My notebook has 1920x1080 and a 1TB disk. 1366x768 and 256GB is a crippling sacrifice for lightness and bragging rights. But if the next ultra has 1600x900 and 500GB, I might move.
Fear of Windows 8
here
v=ravkyB0lHkQ