Jelly: Does anyone understand it?

Jelly: Does anyone understand it?

Summary: Has the startup scene in San Francisco just gone over the proverbial hipster edge at this point? The latest effort from Biz Stone would suggest so.


Las Vegas isn't the only metropolis where major tech announcements are being made this week.

Back in the startup epicenter of San Francisco, Twitter co-founder Biz Stone and his team finally pulled back the curtain on a new project that has been shrouded in secrecy for some time now.

Say hello to Jelly.

But beyond the name and the cute logo (which coincidentally looks fairly similar to the new one recently unveiled on the revamped SmartPlanet), I was fairly speechless after reading over the introduction blog post -- twice -- on Tuesday morning.

That's because I just didn't get it.

With the tag line "Let's Help Each Other," the blog post initally summed the platform up as "kinda like using a conventional search engine in that you ask it stuff and it returns answers."

On the team page, the company founders said they based the brand on a jellyfish because "it has a loose network of nerves that act as a 'brain' similar to the way we envision loosely distributed networks of people coordinating via Jelly to help each other."

Jelly is also described as to have three key features: tie-ins for the user's existing social networks, "paying it forward" (or resting on the hope that a friend of a friend might have an answer), and being able to post questions with images. Based on the screenshots, it also looks like there is an SMS element too.


After my initial perusal of the site, the only thing I was able to glean is that this is a prettier, possibly more social version of Quora or even sites like Yahoo Answers. ZDNet's Charlie Osborne suggested to me that it could be construed as a hyper-local version of Google, at least to some degree.

Thus, I pinged the Jelly team on Tuesday morning to see if I could get some more answers and clarification beyond what was available on the website.

Jelly hasn't offered any response yet.

Still, I have the nagging suspicion, maybe even fear for the sake of the employees at Jelly, that this might be another case of a hyped-up social media product from a well-established tech entrepreneur with a huge hit already behind him.

For further evidence, just look at Napster co-founder and Facebook's first president Sean Parker and that turbulent Airtime debut back in 2012.

Before I get a bunch of angry emails, comments and Tweets (which will happen regardless, I know), I want to make it clear that I'm not an automatic naysayer when it comes to new social media products.

For reference I signed up for Twitter back in early 2008, immediately defending the purpose and use of it to many friends and former graduate school colleagues -- many of whom all use the micro-blogging service very actively now. I've also been a big fan of Pinterest since word of mouth about the digital scrapbooking site spread like wildfire in 2011.

(I'll admit that it took me a full year after first hearing about Facebook in 2004 to sign up as I was still attached to Friendster at the time, but hey, we all make mistakes.)

But this one still stumps me, much like how Path did -- and look at the way that social network is going. The Path concept even at least makes sense for people who really want to keep a lid on the things they share. But in this day and digital age, that thought process doesn't apply to a lot of people beyond celebrities and other public figures who might want to shun Facebook for something more secretive.

Nevertheless, this won't stop me from at least trying out Jelly. I did the same with Vine, which also made sense up front without much explanation -- although I'll admit I dropped that one like a hot potato as soon as Instagram added video to its repertoire.

To get started with Jelly, I'll have to think of a question first. But off the top of my head, I think my first question is going to be if anyone understands Jelly in the first place.

Jelly is available for free now on iOS and Android devices.

Screenshots via Jelly

Topics: Social Enterprise, Apps, Mobility, Start-Ups, Tech Industry

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Google is doomed

    Google is doomed. Google Search has stagnated while the web has moved on with the rise of the social web and websites using Ajax rather than traditional hyperlinks.

    Google Search is a sitting duck, waiting for the next big thing in search to kill it, probably with a social dimension. But Jelly is not that next big thing! Perhaps it will come from the guys behind Facebook if not the ones behind Twitter...
    Tim Acheson
  • I do understand and I don't want it.

    The last thing I need is my least informed friends sending me questions which could have been answered by a proper Google search in a few seconds. As for answers, these kind of peer consulting services often come up with spectacularly wrong answers, as anyone who has given up on clicking Yahoo Answers in search results will tell you. So, was this article a news report, a blog or advertising? That, I don't understand.
  • Jelly: Does anyone understand it?

    From what I can tell it looks like a social network to ask your friends to identify what is in a picture.
    • @ Loverock.Davidson: That's how I see it too and it sounds useful

      Google has Google Goggles I guess but that works using an algorithm to recognise photos and give answers.

      Jelly lets you ask your friends and crucially strangers what a photo is of. You can't do that on Facebook, Google+ easily.
      • Actually I was wrong, Forward is just Andrioid's Share feature

        * Jelly seems to let you take a picture and ask "your friends", which is the same as Facebook but people tend to already have friends on Facebook.
        * Forward isn't forwarding to other Jelly users (which would actually be useful) but on Android at least it just opens Android's Share feature to forward it to SMS/Facebook etc...

        The only advantage over Facebook is you can circle a picture. Big Deal!
  • Jelly

    The problem with Jelly is that you have to trust your friends to be able to answer your questions. How many times when you were in school did you see one person working and the others leeching. and the more esoteric StackOverflow are more better suited.
  • "Jelly: Does anyone understand it?"

    Jelly: Does anyone really care? There...fixed it for you.

    Just one more asinine addition to this social networking crap.
  • you can be sure the google's worried about this big time

    homing in on google territory? my guess is that google will buy their way out of this problem like they do with every threat.
  • Not sure of the need...

    If I thought a friend could answer a question why wouldn't I email them directly or post it on Facebook? (Interesting that there's a FB logo on the screenshot...)

    I'm more likely to Google a question and get an answer immediately rather than wait for a friend to answer it. Granted, it doesn't work that easily with pictures, but I've done searches with a description of an image and then scroll through the returned images.
  • Reminds me of Aardvark