Lies, damned lies and telco stupidity
Summary: Earlier this month, Telstra put out a press release trumpeting that it's come up with a new phone coaching service to help people who are "bamboozled" by their mobiles. Another excellent example of wrong-headed thinking from the mobile industry.
Earlier this month, Telstra put out a press release trumpeting that it's come up with a new phone coaching service to help people who are "bamboozled" by their mobiles. Another excellent example of wrong-headed thinking from the mobile industry.
On the surface, it's a nice idea. You can't get your mobile working — go ask those nice people from Telstra to help you fix it.
But take a step back for a minute. What sort of company would think to sell a product that's so complex — so unworkable to the average Joe — that they need to get coaching before they can use it?
If reports are correct, Telstra is the type of telco that would chuck its toys out of the pram and lose the iPhone because Apple wouldn't put some Sensis content on the device. Why can't it then exert some pressure on Nokia, or RIM, or whoever else to make their software easier to work?
Surely the emphasis should be on the tech companies to make products that are easy to use, not on customers to work out how to puzzle their way through devices that are more like Rubik's Cubes than smartphones.
For all telcos' talk of putting the customer first, they clearly don't, as things like this show. More evidence, were it needed: Telstra call centres.
Apparently, if I have a query, I can ring up and talk to someone between 9am and 5pm, Monday to Friday. Guess what? I'm at work then. I've got better things to do between 9 and 5 than listen to the crappy hold music. I'm at work. My employer pays me to work during that time. If I could take a break at any time for a personal phone call, I'd chat to one of my friends, not to a call centre worker.
If I could choose how to waste 15 minutes of my work day, I think just staring into space and seeing how long I could go between blinks would be better than hanging on the telephone waiting for my "valued call" to get to the head of the Telstra queue.
Try it the other way around, Telstra. How about your call centre worker takes 15 minutes or more out of their day to ring an aunt in Canberra, rather than getting on with their work. I'd imagine that would go down like a poo sandwich, no?
The same goes for you, Internode (note: your hold music sounds like the end of the world happening in 1983), and anyone else that thinks customer service should only be available during working hours. Look around you, my telco friends, the world has moved on and you're looking rather superannuated by refusing to move with it.
And while we're on the subject of telco irrationalities, let me also question a number of hoary old chestnuts that Telstra insists on peddling — via their drill instructor cum trained one-man-manure-distributor, communications head Phil Burgess — a man who was, I believe, once introduced to the facts. The meeting clearly didn't go well and they've agreed to part ways ever since.
Burgess often accuses the ACCC of using the UK's regulator's pricing for the unbundled local loop and simply converting it to an Australia dollar figure to get its pricing models for the Australian market. This has been dispelled as manure of the highest order repeatedly, but why let facts get in the way of some pointless regulator bashing?
Does anyone genuinely think that that's how the ACCC works? If that was their methodology, then I'm surprised they'd have the necessary cognisance to work a calculator. Surely if they were that out and out stupider-than-a-piece-of-toast barely sentient, they wouldn't be able to get their pants on unassisted, let alone hold down a job at the ACCC.
My favourite recent Burgess-ism however — aside from the geographically retarded "I didn't even know Iceland had people" (my aching sides!) — was that the UK broadband regime is a "disaster" that the ACCC shouldn't be allowed to let Australia to mimic its teeth-grinding awfulness.
Oh yes. During my time in the UK, I wept at the sheer horror of the freely available broadband subscriptions without up or download caps. I fell to the floor pulling out my hair as I handed over the monstrous sum of five pounds a month for my connection. I begged friends and relatives to put me out of my misery as I saw the incumbent undergo operational separation and still remain profitable while broadband prices fell across the board.
If Dante had a seventh circle of broadband hell, then this is surely it.
I now look forward to the screeds of talkback below accusing me of Telstra bashing. Yawn. For the record, let me say this: I was a customer of Telstra for a long time and I have found its service the shining example of adequacy. That said, I am also a journalist and duty bound to point out bollocks where I see it. And right now, there's more bollocks at Telstra than there is at a nudist camp.
And WiMax. Why all this holy war talk? I'm surprised at the sheer amount of hot air that got spouted about WiMax during the brief time that it looked like it would emerge as a major telecoms standard in Australia before it plummeted like a concrete kestrel.
The fact is that WiMax is a niche technology. The GSM evolution path, which leads to various iterations of HSPA and on to LTE, doesn't feature WiMax. Billions of people and all of the big name carriers have put their faith in GSM, not WiMax.
Technologically, WiMax may be the complete balls-out all-round last mile winner, but mobile operators have placed their bets elsewhere. In countries where telecoms infrastructure is not so ubiquitous or where WiMax has sopped up government cash like Amy Winehouse does chemicals, the technology has a chance.
Everywhere else (née Australia), chances are its going to the wireless equivalent of the old, toothless fella smoking a pipe in the corner of the pub telling everyone how he could have been someone important, before falling asleep and dribbling down his moth-eaten shirt.
I'd like to have seen WiMax get a run out and see what it could do, but it's just not going to happen, so all those Telstra execs' who spent last year bashing WiMax just ended up wasting their time. It's a feeling Telstra must be achingly familiar with after all those fruitless court cases.
Still, at least it brings them closer to their customers: anyone who's tried to get hold of a Telstra call centre worker on the weekend is all too accustomed to wasting their time.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Article of the day - ROFL!
Sydney?
on the money
Who pulls the strings?
Jo, I understand you hunger to be seen as a hard hitting, fierce and knowledgeable reporting journalist but you must learn that insult is the lowest form of wit and is, in fact, a direct reflection on the writers intelligence.
Jo considering the recent questioning in Canberra of another high profile female, could I respectfully inquire your husbands ( If you have the good fortune to be married) occupation and employment company. LOL.
Strings? More like journo bashing from a Telstra stooge
Lies, damned lies and telco stupidity
for Telstra from 2000-2007 back then our job was based on the best possible outcome for the customer,
Since 2004, telstra has outsourced all consumer mobile calls, to an international company based in melbourne but owned by vodaphone in the uk , We used to take calls 24/7 every day and every public holdays and weekends, But since Sol and Phil arrived its not about customer service, its about selling products, ask the Telstra staff who get brow beaten when they dont make thier sales targets. And now the last payments of the T3 are due, Telstra now becomes a privately owned company no longer accountable to the people or the government, and its all about $$$. You cringe at the big 4 banks wait and see what the big T does.
Anti Telstra Rant!!
Jo You might aswell go to whingepool with the other whingers with your "Today Tonight" Joournalism!!
I expected better from this site!!!
Lies, damned lies and telco stupidity
Lies, damned lies and telco stupidity
One day Telstra will decide it is a competitor in the market (rather than "we are the best so we will charge what we like") and actually provide competition and customer service. We can only hope for that day.
RTFM - over 99% don't
There are haeps of small businesses that offer "read the manual for you" services because society is forgetting how to do this - or outsources it because it takes too much time.
Think about how often you ask somebody to show you how something works instead of reading the manual yourself or working it out by trial and error.
And the old argument of - they sold me a dumb phone doesn't hold water - you bought it - you should be able to use it.
Whilst I am more than happy to bash Telstra - this issue is about the end user - buying a tool they can't use or is not appropriate for their use.
All the telco's have a range of phones from dumb, big button models to hyper-speed time machines.
What this highlights is the inability of consumers to research, decide and buy what they need instead of accepting anything a salesperson tells them.
Not So Sure
And while we are talking about simple phones, Nokia used to have a straight forward easy to use menu system that has now been replaced (on Next G) with the Standard Telstra menu that all the phones sold on the Next G network have. It takes about 5 days of going through all the menus to find the option you are looking for. That to me is utterly stupid that Telstra force suppliers to change their menu systems that have worked so well and often mean't the difference between phones. I used to by Nokia because even with same specs you know the menu system.
And another example of Telstra customer service at its best is turning on internation roaming on all Next G mobiles without consulting the customers! The best bit is if you had any blocks on premium sercies etc the change meant they where now allowed again and you the customer had to request the block to be put back in place. Tell me how that is good customer service!
anti telstra rant
And since it's an opinion piece, your comparison of Jo's blog to TT's 'news' is more degrading to TT than this publication.
You might as well go to telstra's next AGM to hang out with Sydney Lawrence with your Telstra shareholder opinions.
I expect better from the general population.
Customers?
Telstra changing Nokia's menu?
Also, again you are plain wrong on international roaming, it's off by default on all Telstra connections. You obviously don't know what you're talking about, and are just rambling. As for bias, I work for Telstra, and still can try to write facts.
loser
mmm internode?
More Anti Telstra rant
I thought better of this site!!
PS I am not a shareholder!!!
nice post Simon
Great
The worst pain in the rectum when phoning these idiots is, to me, the Muzak they play. Can't there be an option to just TURN IT OFF? To much for these geniuses at Telstra, I'm sure.
No but you post anonymously
You post anonymously