Linux is about to take over the desktop but not like you think it will

Linux is about to take over the desktop but not like you think it will

Summary: You'd better get ready for the personal computing, BYOD, and corporate computing revolution. Linux is coming to a desktop near you. But not like you think or had hoped. It's coming in the form of the Chrome OS on Chromebooks.

TOPICS: Google, Browser, Hardware

For years I've heard that year X is the year of the Linux desktop and I've always scoffed at it. I scoffed because it's ridiculous to think that Linux or Mac OS X or anything could supplant Windows on the desktop. That is until now. And don't get me wrong, it won't happen for at least another year in businesses but for personal computing and BYOD, it's already happening. The Linux that's taking over the desktop is called the Chrome OS and it will happen on the Chromebook device.

Yes, I know I write a lot about Chromebooks but they fascinate me. I'm kind of obsessed by them. I wish that I had been more receptive to them two years ago when I first saw one. But I guess there's a time and a place for everything. And it just wasn't my time yet.

But the business Chromebook revolution is about to happen and either you'll be part of it or you'll be left behind.

Fortunately, the learning curve isn't very steep. You can easily catch up. Chromebooks are easy to use.

For business, Chromebooks make sense because they're inexpensive, secure, and reliable. No moving parts is a very good thing.

But let's get back to the whole idea of subverting Windows with the ChromeOS. It's Linux and it's the desktop. 

The primary drivers behind this idea of desktop Windows displacement are:

  1. Interface - People don't like Windows 8.x.
  2. Price - People are tired of the constant hardware, software, and OS upgrade cycle.
  3. Security - People are tired of viruses, malware, and hacks.
  4. Loss - People are tired of losing data when a disk crashes or a device is stolen.
  5. Battery Life - Mobile users need longer battery life.
  6. Usability - More versatile than a tablet. Less cumbersome than a laptop.
  7. Browser-based - The future of software is SaaS.


I think that, for businesses, Windows 7 is the new XP because users don't want to make the switch to Windows 8.x. The transition from Windows 3.1 to Windows 95 was easier than the transition from Windows XP, Vista, 7 to Windows 8.x and there are some people who will never make that transition. I even gave up on Windows 8.x and went back to Windows 7 on the "floating" laptop that my wife and kids use as a community computer. It was frustrating for them and it's frustrating for me to use. Sorry Microsoft, I really tried. I hated it, I liked it, I even had a brief moment of Windows 8.x love, but now I'm back to "It's just too much trouble". I predict that businesses will go Chromebook before they go Windows 8.x. This might spell the end for Windows on the desktop. Unless Microsoft makes a big change in Windows 9.x or whatever they call it.


Do you ever feel like there's a conspiracy between hardware manufacturers and Microsoft? Each new OS has new features that require new hardware and new hardware requires a new OS. It's like changing from 8-track tapes and vinyl records to cassettes to CDs to MP3s. The only people who win are the ones who sell the stuff.

On that note about music (You have to admit it's been a while since I've gone off on a good tangential digression), the RIAA is so ready to sue people for swapping songs and downloading music but each time the format changed over the years, we never got any rebates, trade-ins, or discounts to upgrade our music to the next big thing. Or at least I didn't. Nope. Each time, it cost me hundreds or thousands of dollars to replace my collection in the next format. Now, I have hundreds of CDs lying around and no one even wants them anymore. The same goes for my hardware and software. The old stuff is just a loss.

I, personally, am tired of feeling pressured or forced to upgrade every two to three years because of the latest OS or the latest hardware. It's too expensive. It's time for the hardware revolution to benefit the consumer. The Chromebook will do that for us.


I write a lot about security too. I hate having to install antivirus software on everything, keep it updated, and hope it doesn't corrupt something in my OS that it thinks is a virus. I hate having to worry about keeping my systems patched because someone in a bookstore might scan and hack my system. I hate having to waste my time scanning for malware and updating the malware software. And I hate having to wonder what email beastie some friend of mine will innocently send me that will take hours or days to fix.

With a Chromebook, I can reboot or reset the whole thing and not have to worry about evil gremlins that lurk about. I'm tired of the irritation of having to remove Conduit Search because I chose to download a freeware utility. I think you get the point. I'm tired of fighting every security windmill that I encounter. I want an operating system and a device that's secure to use. It makes me happy to use ChromeOS for that reason alone.


Yes, I know I'm supposed to backup my files and I do. But there are a lot of people and businesses that don't—or they do, but then find that their backups are no good. It's happened to me more times than I can count. If you've kept up with my blog/column here, you know the stories of failed backups or having no backups.

It's a very common problem.

But with ChromeOS and a Chromebook, you have to store your files in the cloud. I know, the horrible cloud—the evil cloud that everyone hates. Well, I don't hate it. I like it because it gives me a backup that I didn't have before. I'm forced to use it. I'm OK with being forced to use it. 

Battery Life

Sure some laptops manufacturers have created laptops with longer battery lives but the tradeoff is weight and heat. The term laptop is really a misnomer. You probably can't keep one on your lap for very long.

My Acer C720 has a very long battery life. Eight hours long to be precise. Eight hours of untethered bliss. I can carry my C720 to any WiFi-enabled location and enjoy the feeling of only carrying that three pound wonder with me. It's funny that we have a local pizza joint here that sells a "3-pounder". I never thought of it as having the same weight as a Chromebook. But I ask you, what's better than using a three pound Chromebook while eating a pizza called the 3-pounder? I got nothing.

The point is that battery life is important to those of us who like to change locations with our computers. The longer the better. I love the idea of being able to work an entire day untethered, especially if I forget my power cord, which actually happened to me when I went to Austin last year for Spiceworld. I forgot my laptop power cord. I had to really just not use it at all because the power on it lasts for two hours if I'm lucky. Fortunately, I had my iPad in an iHome case that included a keyboard. Without that, I would have been wandering around with just an iPhone trying to write notes, check email, and play Angry Birds. I know, I know...First World Problem, there Ken.


The Chromebook is an extremely portable device. At only three pounds, a full keyboard, and a screen that rivals any laptop computer, there's just no competition for it on the usability scale. You can hook it up to external devices such as monitors, keyboards, mice, wired network connections, and more. You can't do that with a tablet.

And unless you like lugging around a standard laptop with a power cable, the Chromebook lightens your load. That's great for me because I'm usually also burdened with a DSLR camera, an extra lens or two, and maybe an extra camera or two in my camera bag. I don't need another eight or ten pounds of added weight hanging on me.

Plus, when I'm busy, I don't want to wait for my laptop to come on and I can't afford to just put it in sleep mode because that takes some power too. I also don't want to wait on a bunch of stuff to close or the OS to ask me to force applications to close. Just close already. Chromebooks are instant on, instant off.

Browser-based Everything

If you haven't heard, software as a service (SaaS) is kind of a big deal. Even Microsoft sees that writing on the wall with it's Office Online, Office 365, and webified Office applications. In fact, I'm using Word Online right now on my Chromebook. Awesome? Yes.

Between webified applications and virtual application solutions such as those from 2x Software and Citrix, there's no reason to use localized applications anymore.

Even Intuit has created an online version of Quickbooks, which was one of the last reasons why some people needed to stay on Windows or Mac systems. Well now's your chance to make the leap to web-based everything.

Frankly, I'm ready to see the ChromeOS and the Chromebook revolution. It's way overdue. When I spoke to folks from Acer a few days ago, I made the prediction to them that the Chromebooks for business revolution is about one year away—setting my sights on Fall 2015. Acer currently owns 51% of the retail Chromebook market. If I were to give someone business advice, I'd say "Gear up for the coming onslaught of business adoption of the Chromebook".

Although I made some clever suggestions and some wild guesses, Acer is playing its cards close and not letting anyone know what's to come but if I were a betting man, and I'm not, I'd say that they're going to manufacture tiered Chromebook offerings: A personal Chromebook, an education Chromebook, and a business Chromebook. And the differences will be in number of ports, screen size, and possibly a docking accessory for business use. They wouldn't throw me a crumb on anything upcoming and I'm just guessing here, but I think I'm pretty smart for an old country boy. Keep your eye on Acer in the next year*.

What do you think of my outline of Linux usurping Microsoft's hold on the desktop? Do you think the ChromeOS and Chromebooks can do it finally or is this another lame prediction from another myopic techno-journalist writer type? Talk back and let me know.

*Disclaimer: I don't own any Acer stock or hold any stake in Acer except for the many Acer products that I've bought over the years—all of them still operational, by the way.

Related Stories:

Topics: Google, Browser, Hardware


Kenneth 'Ken' Hess is a full-time Windows and Linux system administrator with 20 years of experience with Mac, Linux, UNIX, and Windows systems in large multi-data center environments.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Doubtful

    Sorry, the enterprise is largely entrenched in OS/X and Windows for a reason. The capabilities of Chrome OS rely nearly entirely on web access and has little to no support for printing, various storage options, etc. On top of all that, typically available space on these machines is largely null (8GB, 16GB options seem to be the norm). There are benefits to ChromeOS and Chromebooks, but their place isn't in the enterprise. And certainly not in most businesses. I could see them in some schools, but even then...the value proposition is quickly diminishing because Google's lackluster support system is virtually nonexistent.

    Let's also not forget that ChromeOS just can't do a lot of things that Windows and OS/X can. And whether you want to accept it or not legacy applications (desktop) do drive a lot of businesses. And when your power users (see: developers, designers, etc.) don't have the apps they need and next to no space...then it's a huge problem.

    On top of all that, from a traction standpoint, ChromeOS has been out since late 2010...and Chromebooks have been generally available since 2011. We're talking about a situation a lot like Windows Phone. Will ChromeOS ever become Windows? No, I don't think so. Google can only hope to turn into an OS/X in terms of marketshare (i.e. hovering between 4-7%). Because right now if you go by usage reports they're still under 1% of the market. And in 3-4 years of adoption...that is incredibly low.
    • If all businesses could run exclusively in the cloud,

      maybe it could make some inroads, but the fact of the matter is that many businesses don't.

      Add to that a corporation 100% beholden to the whims of Google?

      Yeah, no nervousness on anyone's part on that second one...
      • But Google promised to do no wrong.

        You can trust them...honestly :-)
        • Linux will bring a flood of OpenSSL holes to desktop users

          Careful, folks.
          • The holes will get patched, just like in windows OS's

          • All businesses are always online

            The first thing that I do when I go to work is log in. And not to my desktop but to our corporate network. Software which I deploy, I deploy over the corporate network to clusters of computers. When the network goes down, it's time for coffee. And that is true for everyone in the company except the cafeteria people. Saas has been here for at least 20 years now but behind corporate firewalls. With Sass SAs don't have to be sent to configure desktops. All corporations will embrace cheap, secure thin clients like the Chromebook and other thin clients as I am sure that Google will not be the only company in that market.
            Tim Jordan
          • SaaS

            That SaaS has to be powered by some in-house server and I don't think large corporations are ready to spend large sums of money replacing their Windows Servers with Linux servers that then need to be setup like webservers to run Chrome and online apps
          • I don't think you quite grasp it...

            You say that corporations are not ready to spend large sums of money replacing their current servers, but they won't have to replace them. With SaaS, it is only a question of whether or not the client side will run in the browser. The server can be running anything.

            For businesses challenge I see is turning all of their local client software into a SaaS platform. Until that happens to all their programs they can't make this change. Other than that I see this as a great solution for corporations, eliminating huge costs spent on security/AV and the results of viral infections, not to mention the need to have a large help desk staffed and a fleet of service techs all running around to get people's computers running, usually because of something an employee did to their machine.

            Are there any Chromebooks with a cellular connection? That would be my biggest concern - having access to my computer/data/programs when I am away from a LAN or WiFi and doing so at a reasonable cost. Even just being out and about in the local area I don't necessarily have a place where I can stop and access a Free WiFi. This is where I can see cities providing free ubiquitous 802.11ac WiFi. Those things in place would make the Chromebook way of doing things quite acceptable to the common man.
          • Online

            Your corporate network and Google's cloud are 2 very different things from your IT managements point of view. Sure, you might need an internet connection to get on the network but the server and storage are probably still hardware owned and maintained by your company rather than some third party service provider.
          • Ignorance is a virus when you spread it...

            It was already patched when you wrote that bullpucky.
            D Soup
          • not

            ignorance isnt spread. untruths my be told but those that wish or care to find out will.
        • What you miss ...

          What you are missing is that if the application is available as a SaaS it doesn't matter what platform the browser is running on. Yes, the Chromebook might make you somewhat dependent upon Google, although I am not quite sure how, but the fact is that you could slap any version of Linux on a like piece of hardware with Chrome, FireFox, Opera, or Safari being responsible for the client side activities. Not only does that not make you dependent upon Google, consider how much money corporations have to pay Microsoft for their Windows usage each year. What would happen to the bottom line of some of our largest corporations if a) they didn't have to pay for Windows licenses, b) they didn't have to pay for MicroSoft Office, c) no more files being lost by a failed hard drive or employees not backing up their work/data to the server, and d) they didn't have to pay all the over head in keeping Windows PC's ticking along - no viruses, no Pebkac errors, no employees sitting around for an hour or more waiting for Windows Automatic StartUp Repair to do its thing (and usually fail requiring a call to support for a new image). The potential savings for businesses far out-weigh the cost of turning your current applications into SaaS.
      • You make a very good point, William, regarding Google dependency.

        There are Federal rules in place for document storage and retention. I suspect that this would not be much of a problem to overcome using Google's cloud infrastructure but software and app dependency might be another matter.

        Another item to consider is the whole BYOD movement. Most persons might forget that it is not just the device that is important to the user in a BYOD environment but rather the whole software / hardware synergy a person needs to accomplish a specific work task.

        If a person can fulfill his workplace responsibilities using a BYOD Chromebook, than - OK. But if his co-worker can't or is less efficient using a Chromebook than his BYOD choice will be different.

        I don't see one device, such as a Chromebook, becoming the overwhelming dominate device in the work environment - ever!
        • Never say never

          but I don't see it in the short term, based on the companies I've worked with.
        • But therein lies the beauty

          kenosha77a says, "If a person can fulfill his workplace responsibilities using a BYOD Chromebook, than - OK. But if his co-worker can't or is less efficient using a Chromebook than his BYOD choice will be different."

          What you don't get is that SaaS as a platform opens it up to *ANY* device running a standards based browser, Chromebook, Windows machine, Linux, MacOS X, BeOS, OS/2 ... it doesn't matter. So Tom could BYOD his Chromebook, Jane could BYOD her MacBook, Terry/Teri could use the corporate supplied Windows machine, etc. Personally, I have no desire to BYOD to work. I don't want anyone thinking that I need to provide my own hardware to do my job. I'll use what the company gives me and if they don't give me what I need, I'll move to someone who will.
      • So instead you are 100% beholden to the whims of Microsoft.


        Forced upgrades. forced purchases. forced repurchases...
        • Hardly

          Sure, MS might want you to upgrade Win8.1 ... but it doesn't force you ... at least not immediately ... and technically, not ever. I mean, XP just went out of support after how many years of trusted service ... and folks can still keep using it, it's just not supported.

          More importantly, though, data that you create on a Windows or OSX device can be stored to corporate-owned devices -- either the laptop/desktop itself, or some centralized storage.

          And don't forget about apps that enterprises tend to need -- those apps tend to be Windows apps that have to be installed locally on the desktop/laptop. Sure, lots of those have moved to browser-based deployment, but many haven't yet. And even of those that have, many don't yet run in the cloud, so have to be hosted locally at the enterprise level, and many have specific requirements ... like a Windows or OSX OS.

          ChromeOS and ChromeBooks are interesting. Neat, even. But a replacement for a full-fledged desktop/laptop in the enterprise? Not in many (any?) that I've worked at.
          • Citrix

            It could well be that employees can use Citrix or other remote access app to access Windows based corporate applications and data or the corporate intranet and Chromebooks can fit that bill nicely if all that is needed is a thin-client. With data stored securely on servers rather than being stored on the device then security issues would be minimized.
          • yup

            Though Citrix isn't the only remote virtualization solution.
          • In which case...

            it doesn't make any difference, whether they are using a WinTerm or a ChromeBook, if they are going to be spending all day in a VDI...

            And the money saved on buying Chromebooks (Chromeboxes with decent sized monitors more likely), will still have to be spent on Citrix licences and a beefier backend.