Microsoft readies 'Mohoro' Windows desktop as a service

Summary: Microsoft is believed to be building a Windows Azure-hosted desktop virtualization service that could be available on a pay-per-use basis.

In yet another example of its growing emphasis on remaking itself as a devices and services company, Microsoft looks to be developing a pay-per-use "Windows desktop as a service" that will run on Windows Azure.

msdesktopvirtualizationstack

The desktop virtualization service, codenamed Mohoro, is in a very early development phase, from what I've heard from sources. I don't know the final launch target, but I wouldn't be surprised if it isn't until the second half of 2014.

Mohoro is a town located on the island of Grande Comore in the Comoros Islands in the Indian Ocean. Given that members of the Microsoft India Development Center may be playing a key role in Mohoro's development, according to my sources, the codename choice seems appropriate.

Microsoft owns the Mohoro.com and Mohoro.Net domain names.

Mohoro, like another Windows service, Windows Intune, is a product of Microsoft's Server and Tools unit, I hear. Windows Intune is still not yet hosted on Windows Azure (as far as I know), but supposedly the plan is to move it to Azure at some point. Windows Intune already does make use of Windows Azure Active Directory as its directory and authentication service.

The same way that Windows Intune is the cloud complement to System Center, Mohoro seems to be the cloud version of Remote Desktop/Remote App. 

This is like "Remote App as a hosted service," said one of my contacts. It could be for companies who want thin clients or to run legacy apps on new PCs. Right now, companies have to have their own servers in the equation to do this, but "with Mohoro, you click a few buttons, deploy your apps, use Intune to push out configuration to all of your company's devices, and you're done," my contact added. 

Microsoft currently offers multiple ways for users to access their Windows desktops remotely via different virtualization technologies and products.

The aforementioned Remote App/Remote Desktop allows Windows users to connect to a remote Windows PC and access resources from it. On the Windows RT front, given that operating system's restrictions on use of almost any existing Win32 applications, Remote Desktop provides a way for users to continue to use apps they already have on new hardware like the Microsoft Surface RT. Licensing of Remote Desktop and Remote Desktop Services is complex, however, and requires access to server infrastructure on the back-end.

Currently, it is not possible under Microsoft's licensing terms to run Windows client in virtual machines hosted on Windows Azure. (The new Azure VMs do allow users to run Windows Server or Linux Server in the new Azure virtual machines.) 

It's also worth noting that Microsoft does not allow partners to provide delivery of a hosted version of Windows 7 as a client or to access Office as a service on Windows 7, as Microsoft officials made clear after squabbles last year with OnLive over its Desktop and Desktop Plus services.

I've asked Microsoft officials for comment on Mohoro. No word back so far. 

Update: A Microsoft spokesperson said the company would not comment on "rumors/speculation."

Topics: Cloud, Windows

About

Mary Jo has covered the tech industry for more than 25 years for a variety of publications and Web sites, and is a frequent guest on radio, TV and podcasts, speaking about all things Microsoft-related. She is the author of Microsoft 2.0: How Microsoft plans to stay relevant in the post-Gates era (John Wiley & Sons, 2008).

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

21 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Interesting

    It won't be long until you are able to sit at a random computer, log into your Microsoft account, and your personal desktop appears.
    Jeff Kibuule
  • I sell a desktop application . . . .

    How do I get users of these virtual desktop computers to have my application installed on the them when they boot up? Then, of course, I'm going to want a check from Microsoft every month based on how much usage of my app there was. MSFT can keep 20%.
    FDanconia
    • I think (/guess) that the model is...

      That a user's Azure-hosted remote desktop is "his computer". Your app gets installed on it in whatever manner it would be installed on a physical machine (an actual install or a push via AD and group policy or whatever). You get license revenue from that virtual computer the same way you'd get it from a physical computer. My guess is that Microsoft doesn't get a cut (other than the license fees from the whole Azure/Windows/Magic setup).

      Now, if you are an ISV targeting this world, their may be an advantage for you to make your app install/work really well with whichever one of the alphabet soup of remoting/virtualization technologies it is based on.
      Flydog57
  • What would you log onto it from?

    I can (and do) run a remote desktop (Win Server) through one of my jobs. Lots of programs and some persistent storage space are provided, so no matter which machine I am sitting at, I can RD in and get my work desktop. However, I am usually (actually, always) sitting at a Windows PC. I *could* use a Mac, but, as far as cost, that doesn't help me any.

    What is MS suggesting I be sitting at when I run a virtual desktop? Will they be making a thin-client OS to go with this?
    x I'm tc
    • maybe they want you to buy google chrome

      *cough* *cough*
      G3niusOwl
      • as long as you keep paying your monthly subscription fee

        they will be fine
        vpupkin
        • When a lot of people use chromebooks and it becomes a viable

          competitor i wonder who would pay a subscription fee to MS?
          G3niusOwl
    • They want you to use it from your iPad or your chrome book or...

      Your android tablet or your xbox or your windows 8 machine that won't run your crappy internet explorer 6 apps or ....

      Pretty much anywhere.
      mrefuman
      • Big deal

        This would really represent a fundamental change to the way MS does business, though, don't you think? It would essentially be an endorsement of all these "dumb" OSes.

        This would be a really big change for them.

        On the other hand, if they encourage you to get there through a Windows machine, then they could conceivably sell a whole lot of people Windows twice.
        x I'm tc
    • A very cheap box running Windows RT

      Or any other cheap, thin, RDP client???
      Flydog57
    • but do not you need to run vpn first?

      Otherwise how do you provide the address of your work desk top from 'any pc'?
      ForeverSPb
    • Thin Clients and others...

      Companies utilizing Windows RT devices, iOS and Android tablets... anything capable of running a Remote Desktop client.

      Or better yet, users working from home but you don't want to buy them company equipment and don't want to directly support their personal equipment.
      GoodThings2Life
  • Marketware

    "Very early development phase" does not justify the "readies" headline. It seems that since Microsoft stopped pre-announcing products by a couple of years the tech blogs have taken up the mantle in there place.
    curph
  • Overuse of Azure Name for Marketing

    The consistent use of Azure to somehow pump up a product is bringing back memories of the overuse of .Net about a dozen years ago. It became meaningless after a while and in the end it hurt the products painted with the term.
    curph
  • 2nd half of 2014?

    I'm going to bet general availability by this Christmas. Lots of competition out there and no time to waste.
    IT Al
  • Hmmm

    A Windows 8 touch screen desktop running in Virtual mode. Interesting. I wonder how much network bandwidth this is going to need. LOL
    BruinB88
    • Not as much as you think...

      I can already remote desktop over two broadband connections to my mom's Surface Pro and use touch on my Surface Pro to do things. It's very smooth.
      GoodThings2Life
  • This is a big deal

    Cloud-hosted OS and apps is about the only way to deal with the BYOD trend, and when combined with Intune and Office 365, this will be a popular offering with SMBs, especially if Microsoft prices it aggressively to get the ball rolling.
    YukioCowboy
  • desktop as a service

    "it is not possible under Microsoft's licensing terms to run Windows client in virtual machines hosted on Windows Azure."

    You will still have to get a full copy of windows for the "thin client", then rent your cloud desktop per month from azure.
    DrWong
    • Not necessarily...

      ...we don't know any official licensing terms, but moreover, I'm thinking this is more intended to work with Remote Desktop clients running on iOS, Android, and Windows RT. Think about businesses lending an olive branch to BYOD users.
      GoodThings2Life