Microsoft's 'Blue' wave is coming to more than just Windows
Summary: Blue isn't just the codename of the next version of Windows. It also is the codename for updates to Windows Phone, Windows Server and Windows Services, I'm hearing.
As we've known for a few months, the Windows client team at Microsoft is working on its first "feature-pack" update for Windows 8, supposedly due this summer/fall, which is codenamed "Blue."

But it turns out Blue isn't a Windows thing only, according to one very accurate tipster of mine who doesn't want to be identified.
Blue also is the way Microsoft is referring to the next substantial platform update for Windows Phone, the Windows Services (like SkyDrive, Hotmail, etc.), and Windows Server, according to my source. In other words, Blue is a wave of product refreshes which are not expected to arrive exactly all on the same day, but which are meant to be released more or less around the same time.
Before these various Blues come to market, there will continue to be minor fixes, firmware updates and new features added to Windows 8, Windows RT, Windows Services and Windows Phone. On the phone side of the house, for example, the first minor update, codenamed Portico, already has made its way out to a number of Windows Phone users.
Blue represents a major change in how Microsoft builds, deploys and markets software and services. To date, many Microsoft teams like Windows, Windows Live and Windows Server have been focused on delivering major platform updates every two to three years. The challenge is to get them to pivot around yearly platform updates, the first of which will hit as part of the Blue wave.
On the Windows side, the changes required to make this happen will be especially far reaching and pronounced. Instead of RTMing a new version of Windows once every three or so years, and then hoping/praying OEMs can get the final bits tested and preloaded on new hardware a few months later, Microsoft is going to try to push Blue out to users far more quickly, possibly via the Windows Store, my contact said.
There's still no word on specific new features coming to any of the Blue wave of products and services. But tweaks to the user experience, new dev-platform related bits, as well as new versions of Internet Explorer, Mail, Calendar, Bing and other integrated apps are likely to figure into the Blue picture, my source said. Blue will include some kernel and driver-level updates which could help with battery life and overall performance, according to my source, but backward compatibility with Windows 8 and Windows Phone 8 seem to be a priority.
I know there are still some Blue doubters out there, but Charon at Ma-Config.com found a recent mention of Blue in a member of the Windows team's LinkedIn profile:

Windows 9 is still seemingly on the roadmap, too, by the way, but it's not clear when Microsoft intends to deliver it. Charon also found a LinkedIn poster mentioning his work on Windows 9 recently:

For the time being, as executives like Windows Chief Financial Officer Tami Reller have said repeatedly, Microsoft envisions Windows 8 as something more than a one-season wonder. (Reller has said Microsoft considers Windows 8 a product "of multiple selling seasons.") That makes more sense if you think about Blue -- and Lilac and Fuchsia or whatever Blue's successors are codenamed -- as updates to Windows 8, rather than as Windows 9, 10, and beyond.
I very, very seldom post a single-sourced rumor. But go ahead and Tracour this Blue update. I'm feeling pretty solid on this one.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Mary Jo, thank you very much.
Google Wave
Google Wave
As a enterprise server set up, sure it would have been neat, being able to embed widgets into a message for things like maps, and note taking. But I figure it went too close to email territory where the main audience is the group of people already using email.
Why does MS continue to silo WP8 apps?
Hopefully Blue will do more to unify the app store and bring more conformity between phone and tablet user experience.
But on the other hand...
They put their device developers at a further disadvantage by siloing the app stores.
See.. It goes both ways... :-)
Who will be first to let the same apps to run on all three device types?
Ubuntu.
Yep, Ubuntu plans to do it this year,
With good reason. Since Extremadura in 2005, Linux has taken off as the OS of choice in poorer countries. Huge populations, all of them needing to some extent to connect their people in order to progress into the 21st century at a far more rapid pace than the West had to do. It's a trend since WWII, and you can empathize with it. We in the West are getting progressively lazy, and so we farm out our work to the cheaper labor, who needs to become tech-savvy to catch up. And they have, in record numbers. Linux being big in enterprise, they learned Linux. So the 20-somethings now, have experience in Linux, not MS. So what will they buy? Linux. So where does that leave MS? In a quandry.
As of last week, I began installing Linux on a stick to learn it (Mint 13 and Fedora 17 work on a stick well; their other versions, or other Linus distros don't work well). Now you know why. I hate Win8, and the latest distros are hard to distinguish from Win8's interface. Ubuntu in particular, has the same strategy and goals as stated by MS. To prove that, just view Ubuntu's own video on its upcoming phone.
The sad thing is, MS alienated its installed customer base by doing this, solely because it FORCES a very different desktop on the user, from what he had before. They could have stuck to the old style with an OPTION to do the new one, or at least give the user a way to revert to the old desktop. Why they didn't do that, is beyond me. Bad move. Hope whatever Windows Blue becomes, will solve this extreme loss of goodwill.
More about Ubuntu
Well...
I hope that Blue is the final coming together of all the little pieces that currently don't perfectly align. I want to be able to make an app that can be deployed to WP8 or RT (on a tablet or desktop) without creating two separate apps.
And of course I want the store to be unified...MS could let 'legacy' WP apps run in the snapped state on Windows 8/RT for example.
Windows Start Screen doesn't support Desktop programs either :-|
They're two different things and it's madness Windows 8 Start Screen doesn't support Windows Phone apps from the Windows Store too. It would give Windows tablets particularly a massive boost, so badly needed.
I Remember the other "Blue"?
Good joke
Windows 8 is fantastic!
I use the Windows 8 classic interface - it has a full function Start button and boots directly into the Windows Classic user interface every time - all I had to do was add the free Classic Shell utility; it took less than 5 minutes to download, install, and configure. Just a few reasons why Windows 8 and an overall OS is better than Windows 7:
* Windows 8 is all of Win 7 Ultimate plus:
* Much faster system boot time
* Much faster app start-up time
* Native USB 3.0 driver support
* Far improved Task Manager
* Improved Windows classic UI refinements
* The vast majority of my apps worked fined when I upgraded my tablet from Win 7 to Win 8
* Major 2D graphic acceleration over Win 7 (Direct2D + DirectX 11.1)
* Higher PCMark7 performance benchmarks in almost all categories
* Higher performance for SATA 6GB/s R/W SSDs (upwards of a 30 MB/s gain)
To condemn Windows 8 only because you don't like its new Metro user interface is like cutting off your nose to spite your face - just ignore Metro. All of the critics of Windows 8 are simply demonstrating their technical incompetence and inability to separate fat from fiction.
I had the very first IBM PC1 and have been building systems and developing software for over 30 years. I have many systems and many OSs. I am currently building a high end X79 i7 system now. Windows 8 is going on it along with Classic Shell. Anyone want to provide a credible argument, other than the "I hate Metro and there is no Start button" arguments which I've already debunked, why I should instead use Windows 7?
Regards,
Mike
correction:
Meant to say:
"Sure, the new Metro user interface for a traditional Windows desktop user sucks, but I never ever see or use it and you don't have to either (by installing any of many utilities such as Classic Shell, Start8, or any of a dozen or more others)."
Buyers are voting with their feet
Tsunami please..
Blue should bring back power user features
?
Store apps
Store apps are not (at this stage at least) intended for productivity/work really. That's why the desktop is still there.
In a few years the vast majority will be perfectly serviced with single tasking. Most people already run a single application in full screen most of the time anyway.
Or you can run the "Toolbox" app.