Microsoft's 'Xbox TV' aspirations put it on a collision course with Apple and Google
Summary: Reports suggest that Microsoft is planning a new assault on the living room with an Xbox-branded set-top box, but players such as Apple and Google are unlikely to give up without a fight.
Rumor is that Microsoft is planning to leverage the Xbox brand in order to build set-top box that will offer a low-cost alternative to its full gaming console.
According to The Verge, the set-top box "will run on the core components of Windows 8 and support casual gaming titles rather than full Xbox games typically found on a dedicated console."
In other words, it's an Xbox, but in name only.
Microsoft's Xbox brand remains relatively strong, with some 70 million Xbox 360 consoles sold since its release back in November 2005, and commanding the top spot in the console charts for months -- but it's by no means an outright success. Released only a year later, Sony sold a similar number of PlayStation 3 consoles, while Nintendo has managed to shift almost 100 million Wii consoles.
But compared to the almost 400 million iPhones and iPads in circulation, it's a mere drop in the ocean.
The living room is becoming the new battleground for technology companies. Microsoft, Google and Apple are all eyeing the space, but so far not making a huge amount of progress. The $99 Apple TV set-top box is, in Cupertino's own words, a "hobby project", and while Google is dabbling with smart TVs, set-top boxes, an alternative to Apple's AirPlay streaming standard, and a (now-defunct) Nexus Q streaming device, none of this has had the desired impact.
The living room is a tough market to break into, with even established players -- such as Sony -- hemorrhaging money. Kit that people hook up to their TVs remains no-where near as exciting as tablets and smartphones and e-readers, and as such these gadget manufacturers having a hard time gaining significant traction.
Microsoft is hoping that by combining gaming with home entertainment, and packaging this in a brand that people already know, that it might be in with a chance. It's certainly a novel idea, and depending on a number of factors -- namely the price -- it could be one that ultimately succeeds.
But, Apple and Google have invested heavily in this area and are unlikely to step aside as give up ground to Microsoft. Now that smartphones and tablets have become mainstream, the big players are looking for the next opportunity, and right now that opening seems to be focused around the television. This is where the next consumer electronic battle will be fought.
It's not the first time that there have been rumors that Microsoft was going to expand the Xbox brand. There's been talk of an Xbox tablet for some time now, although no hardware has yet materialized.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Nah
Apple TV is s pretty weak device that was fairly well organized until the last update.
Roku is an anomaly of sorts.
Nintendo TVii is a wild card.
Basically, Google TV offers the best option for complete integration at the moment.
Google TV is not ready, Xbox TV is
What led you to this conclusion?
Simple
My brother has a Roku and that is a different animal.
We have a Wii U and the TVii isn't on it yet.
Apple TV does little more than act as a front end for iTunes.
Google TV is a pass through device with a web backbone. It integrates seamlessly with your Cable Box, DVR, Streaming Services (Vudu, Crackle, Netflix, Google, and Amazon), and it clearly has a vision others lack! Oh yeah and you can throw Bluray integration in there as well if you get the Sony model (Which I have).
Believe me, Google TV 3 will roll out shortly and it will include Miracast as well as being based on the more stable ICS or Jellybean builds.
I know the system was flaky but, 2.0 improved that a lot and 3.0 is supposed to be the release that puts it over the top with the possibility of Google Now being built in.
Bad decisions
Microsoft made an iPhone rival called Kin (Dead)
Microsoft made an iPad rival called Surface (Not doing well according to Microsoft)
Now they want to build an Apple TV rival?
Microsoft should put more effort into their software (to make it better than it has been), and stop trying to compete with Apple's hardware.
We really don't know how the surface is doing
Xbox TV is in a different league to Apple TV and Google TV
Comparing with lame Apple TV or Google Tv does not do justice to Microsoft's market-leading entertainment platform.
What led you to this conclusion?
Did you infer that by comparing sales of 70mm Xbox units to over 400mm iOS devices?
Maybe by the fact that Mac is actually adding market share, while PC is dropping like a rock and PC manufacturers are dropping their PC lines?
Or was it from the fact that iOS has unseated all others as the leading gaming platform in the world?
Or maybe you're believing the press releases put out by the desperate MS Marketing department?
Re:...conclusion?
Why you compare iOS devices vs XBox? If we had a more close comparison (since the XBox is a lot more than than the Apple TV) it would be the 5m Apple TV's vs the 70m XBox devices.
"Maybe by the fact that Mac is actually adding market share, while PC is dropping like a rock and PC manufacturers are dropping their PC lines? "
Since I cannot post links, here are some lines from an Apple Insider article regarding Mac sales,
"U.S. Mac sales in October were down 16 percent year over year, according to the latest data from NPD Group. But Gene Munster of Piper Jaffray noted that Mac sales have exceeded NPD figures by an average of 12 percentage points in the last three quarters, which suggests, overall Mac sales were down just 4 percent year over year.
Munster's estimates call for Mac sales to be down 7 percent year over year in the December quarter, which would be 4.8 million total units.
The NPD figures suggest Mac sales were down 40 percent when compared to September. That's a normal seasonal trend as back-to-school sales end, Munster said."
So it's so nice neither in the Apple world with Mac sales. BTW, interesting that Apple like to compare to all PC makers, while avoid specific ones, like Lenovo. Here are some information from PC World regarding Lenovo,
"During the company’s fiscal second quarter ending on Sept. 30, Lenovo reported that its PC shipments grew year-over year by 10.3 percent. During the quarter, the Chinese company was named the world’s largest PC vendor by research firm Gartner. "
"In its fiscal first quarter, Lenovo reported 30 percent year-on-year growth in net profit. Last year, the company saw profit growth almost doubling year-over-year in some quarters."
"Or was it from the fact that iOS has unseated all others as the leading gaming platform in the world?"
Any links to support that? Or are you thinking that because games are being played in iOS it's automatically a gaming platform? It that was the case, then Windows 7 would be far ahead with more than 600m. Thats a number larger than all iOS devices sold.
Seriously?
really?
Another stupid idea?
These add on boxes from whomever are just pointless, doomed to fail stopgap measures. Why the heck would I pay for an external box running the core of Windows 8 to do casual gaming? With Android (or iOS for that matter) I could play the same games on my phone, tablet and TV, seamlessly switching from one device to another. How will MS compete with that using Xbox and Windows 8?
About $100
LOL
My android tablet plugs in to my HDTV with HDMI and runs films in 1080p and games/apps really well, but the novelty of having apps on my TV lasted 10 minutes, graphics not as good as xbox and miles away from my PC. Because you can't plug your iphone/ipad in to the TV, you will have to buy a $2000 TV so you can have your apps on it.
I watch TV/digital content on my TV (from PC, XBOX(Netflix, BBC iplayer etc), and my £50 network media player for 1080p DTS MKV's and avi's from my NAS Drive), Microsoft and Apple will not be selling me a new box.
I play games on my pc/xbox, through my monitor, with DVI and HDMI connection, so no messing with cables as always plugged in, and I can still have the TV on.
Angry birds and browsing, and all other apps I use on my tablet.
Just because you can converge technology doesn't mean it benefits anyone, or enhances your experience.
All of the technology I use in my living room, 42 inch 1080p TV, PC, Xbox, surround sound system, tablet and media player cost me less than 1 Apple TV will probably cost.
Smart Devices = Stupid Users.
I would rather have 5 screen in my living room for 5 devices, than try and cram 5 devices in to one screen.
Wrong.
So wrong. You can connect an iPad to a TV in a few different ways. One with an HDMI adapter cable. This adapter will allow you to mirror whatever is on the screen of your iPad 4, iPad mini, iPhone 5, and iPod touch (5th generation) with Lightning connector - including apps, websites, photos, video, slideshows, and more — on your HDMI-equipped TV.
Another way which is the best way imo is purchasing an AppleTV for $99. That way you can stream or mirror wirelessly whatever app, games, content on your iOS device to you TV. It doesn't get any better than Airplay.
http://www.apple.com/airplay/
It Is About Time...
With this possible addition, it would fill this void, assuming they understand they key point here: CHEAP.
If this device has a decent UX, HDMI output, can be a "PlayTo" target and is really affordable, it can be a winner.
Adrien, your fruit-flavoured pom-poms are showing...
Interestingly, I walk around the office and see many people with iPods, iPhones, or iPads (me, included). Yep. I see the same thing in the streets. I ask these people if they have an XBox in their back pocket, and for some reason they look at me stragely. I wonder why that is.
It doesn't take a leap to see why iPods and iPhones would outsell a console, just the same as a desktop computer system. Most families will have one, maybe two XBoxes (we have none, but we have a Wii and a PS3 in the house, and there's an XBox in my office), but we have two smartphones (both Android), and four iPods (two Touches, a shuffle and a nano). One is considered a "family" device, one is considered a "personal" device.
As others have mentioned, Apple does make a far more comparable device to the XBox, however I guess you would have had a hard time trumping up Apple's success in that market, wouldn't you? You, sir, are the Apple ying to Steven J's Linux Yang. Be proud, and keep up the dubious cheerleading - lest someone mistake you for a real journalist!
Microsoft should stick with making a GOOD OS.
oh and I forgot to mention.
Apple is leveraging iOS, Microsoft is trying to leverage XBox
The issue I see with this strategy is the audience that's buying XBox and PlayStations are not exactly the casual gaming types, they are serious gamers. Not the same market. And when compared to the almost 400 million iPhones and iPads in the wild, XBox are a niche market. Add to that, majority of XBox users probably couldn't care less about using their XBox as a media box for their TV (movies, TVs, Apps etc). They may stand a better chance with this rumored casual Box but we shall see how well its managed.
The key to the living-room imo is the devices everyone have in their hands right now (smart phones, tablets). That's why I see Apple succeeding in the market, they already have the advantage in the smart phone and tablet market (casual market which the TV falls under). My iPad is already my smart TV, whenever I need to view something on the big screen I simply push it over via Airplay.
Xbox Microsoft Points Generator
Video tutorial: bit.ly\W9gml4
Website: bit.ly\UWkHXX