Over the past few weeks, I've been detailing my move from an independent Exchange hosting provider to Microsoft's Office 365 service. In my first two installments, I discussed Microsoft's surprisingly exceptional technical support for Office 365 and the questions of when you get the Good Microsoft and when you get the Bad Microsoft.
But, until now, I haven't explained why I chose to migrate to Office 365 and not Google Apps. I'll tell you this: it wasn't an easy choice, and for some surprising reasons.
I've been using Exchange since 2002, when I started the OutlookPower Web site. Prior to that, we were actually using the incredibly easy-to-administer Mac-based Eudora mail server, which ran on a Mac. But when ZATZ decided to add an Outlook-centric site, I thought it would be a good idea to eat our own dogfood. To become familiar with Outlook and Exchange, we moved from Eudora to Outlook.
By the way, this wasn't the first time I did the dogfood thing with our email environment. Way back in the mid-1990s, I was the editor of the print newsletter Insider for Lotus cc:Mail, produced by the Cobb Group, an ancestor company of ZDNet sister site TechRepublic.
Way back then, since I was editing a publication about cc:Mail, I decided to use it for the company mail server. That was a wacky experience. The cc:Mail environment ran on DOS (yes, I'm not kidding), and each piece of the mail server (the database, the incoming mail exchanger, the outgoing mail exchanger) needed to run on its own physical server box. It took four or five physical machines to run this one mail server. Talk about technology in need of virtual machines, eh?
So, jump forward to 2002 when I was now runing a site about Outlook. I decided I'd use Exchange. Exchange is a lot like chess: relatively simple to learn, but takes a lifetime to master. I didn't quite realize that at the time, so I set up an Exchange server, moved us all to Outlook, and was happy ... until the day it all went to crap.
My Exchange server blew up. Literally, the drive inside the server exploded into dust (literally).
Unfortunately, while I had lots of backups, I didn't know (or at least take seriously) the warnings about needing a second Exchange server on the network for Active Directory continuity, and when my sole Exchange server (and domain server) turned to dust, recovering it was a 13-day nightmare.
Long story long, after that, I decided I'd rather let an expert manage my Exchange server. An IT friend of mine recommended a regional hosting provider that he'd worked with for years and found reliable. They also had two additional benefits: $9.95 per month per users, and unlimited mail storage.
So I switched. Since then, I've been using this regional hosting provider for 11 years, quite happily.
Unfortunately, in the past six months or so, the company changed its business model (probably in response to Office 365), de-emphasizing Exchange and adding other hosting services.
My Exchange email flow reliability has begun to deteriorate.
Email is my income's killer app. I need to check it constantly to be responsive to projects I'm working on. Three hours of downtime is deadly. I could slip on something important or not respond to an urgent request. My hosting provider started to have mysterious outages. Then, their support site changed, and all the materials on the support site were unrelated to the sort of account I had. You get the idea.
It was time to look for another provider.
The case for Google
The case for Google was pretty simple. The two organizations I work most closely with, CBS Interactive and UC Berkeley, are both Google shops. I am in contact with my CBSi colleagues constantly — all day, every day — and I have some interaction or another with the University of California each day as well. The nonprofit I work with is also a Google grantee.
As part of my daily work, I often need to connect into CBSi or UC Berkeley files on Google Docs. I get sent links that require a Gmail account ID, and so forth. The case for Google is the theory was that if I moved fully into the Google world, then all this would become much more smooth.
It would also avoid the occasional problems of someone sending me a message directly to my never-checked Gmail account, instead of my main email account, since they'd be one and the same.
Another plus is that I rely constantly on Google Calendar. I've managed to make that application jump through some amazing hoops and have it customized in such a way that it's one of my most critical management applications. I use it not just for appointments, but for project management as well.
Google would be slightly less expensive, too. At $50/year per seat, it would cost us $100/year for my wife and me, vs. the $240/year we're spending now, or the $360/year that Office 365 would cost.
Some of that savings would be lost, because I use PowerPoint constantly for work, and I'd have to buy PowerPoint licenses no matter what. I'd probably also need Word, since I do a lot with collaborative review markup in Word. While we have a bunch of Office 2010 licenses, I'd probably need to buy at least two new Office licenses, at least sometime in the next few years.
But still, the idea of going all-Google, all-the-time was attractive.
Next, let me tell you the case for Office 365, and then I'll tell you about the big deal-breaker with Google that made the Google choice a really bad idea.
The case for Office 365
Let's start with the big one: we've been using Outlook for 11 years, we know it intimately, we're comfortable with it, it works, and all our data, rules, customizations, and more are Outlook-centric.
Some of you may not like Outlook, but I actually like using it more than Gmail. But, as a test, my wife set up a Gmail account for one of her hobbies, and used it to correspond with other hobbyist friends, and discovered that she just didn't like Gmail much, either.
So, from the personal preference point of view, Outlook still had a lead.
Then there's the whole Office thing. My wife and I each regularly use three copies of Office on the three machines each of us use (that's a total of six licenses). Although our current Office license would do for a while, I really wanted the latest PowerPoint (the merge-shapes feature was the big draw).
When you sign up for Office 365, you can get Web access to the Microsoft apps for a lower price, or five licenses per user for the real, desktop Office apps for $15/mo per user. Since this was only $5/month more than we were now paying just for email — and it also added SharePoint, Lync, and a variety of other services I'm not using now but probably will — it's actuallhy a pretty good deal.
Moving to Office 365 would be relatively straightforward since our existing Exchange environment could be migrated to the new one and all our accounts would pretty much stay the same.
Once moved to Office 365, life would remain essentially unchanged compared to the way we worked before migrating.
The cost case
There wasn't a huge cost difference. Office 365, for the plan I chose, would cost $120 more per year over what we spend now, for both of us together.
If we went to Google Apps, and then bought a home Office license, we'd save $40 a year over what we pay now. But since I use Office for business, I'd be uncomfortable with a home license to Office, so we'd wind up paying more — pretty much around the same as with the Office 365 plan.
The net-net was that the cost difference between the two plans was ultimately so negligible, it didn't factor into my decision at all.
The big factor, the really big factor, was the Google account problem. That's next...