NBN Co guidance: Govt can't handle the unvarnished truth

NBN Co guidance: Govt can't handle the unvarnished truth

Summary: The release of NBN Co's advice warning of significant challenges to its FttN NBN rollout has elicited a strong reaction from a minister who claims he wants the 'unvarnished truth'. What he forgets is that nature hates a vacuum — and so does the NBN debate.


It can come as no surprise that Malcolm Turnbull would be on the defensive after the publication of NBN Co's less than favourable assessment of his alternative fibre-to-the-node (FttN) NBN policy. Yet, even I was a little surprised at his office's reaction when I offered his office the right of reply before publication of the first of what will be many revelations about FttN.

He declined to comment for the record, but the first part of his representatives' response included a four-letter word that you wouldn't normally repeat in polite company. The second part, though, was interesting: "The only correct thing it says is that they're using FttN in other countries."

That was it. Out of an entire, complex, 154-page document on the NBN — part of the more-voluminous "Blue Book", which was prepared by many of the country's best technical experts to ease Turnbull's transition to his new position — that is all the new minister took away.

I guess we now know what he thinks of the more than 2,000 people (give or take a few hundred) who will be tasked with turning his FttN election policy into reality.

Out of an entire, complex, 154-page document on the NBN — part of the more-voluminous "Blue Book", which was prepared by many of the country's best technical experts to welcome Turnbull to his new position — that is all the new minister took away.

For your edification, this is exactly what the report had to say on that point:

VDSL2 with in-cabinet vectoring is proven and commercially available today, so there is no need to delay a deployment to wait for the technology to come online. A number of successful trials have been conducted since 2010, and the technology is being deployed on a commercial scale [by Alcatel-Lucent] in Austria and Belgium. NBN Co should deploy the best available xDSL technology in the FttN network from the start of the rollout.

In other words: VDSL2 works. We all know that. The report admits it, too, numerous times.

It's being rolled out in a few countries — by government-monopoly telcos. We also know that, too.

What Turnbull did not acknowledge is that the comments about those overseas rollouts were made in the context of a section advising that he is taking the wrong approach with his rollout. Any FttN rollout should not proceed in two separate tranches, the engineers warned, because it would "increase network rollout costs and end-user disruption".

Completion of even part of the first tranche of the FttN rollout is unlikely to happen by 2016, the report concludes. It also goes to great lengths to outline the 12 quite complex requirements that must be fulfilled in a very short timeframe — 18 months is nominated — if Turnbull's 2019 target is going to be met.

Some of these requirements will come as no surprise — the need to renegotiate the government's deal with Telstra is one big unknown, for example, as is the completion of an Australian VDSL2 trial and the follow-on planning that goes around that.

I've highlighted some of the challenges in the existing reports online, but there are numerous others that each merit close consideration. To ensure that they become part of the public discussion around the NBN, I'll be progressively publishing further extracts of the report so that nobody is left uninformed about the real challenges facing our new government in meeting its election promises.

There have been claims from Turnbull and others that the document I have is outdated, and that it is somehow the product of a biased Labor government determined to sink the Coalition's alternative. And, by extension, Turnbull argues that it's not worth the paper it's printed on.

This is false. The document was prepared during the pre-election caretaker period, and is a direct response to the then Department for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy (DBCDE)'s request for NBN Co to assist in the transition of preparatory documents for the incoming government.


It was prepared for the NBN Co board and goes into an extensive and, I might add, quite objective evaluation of FttN and the challenges the new government would face in implementing it. It is not anti-Turnbull, as he alleges; it is realistic, as I and others have always been, about the inherent difficulties in an FttN model and the danger of assuming that it is an easy transition.

This information is an important part of the public debate over the NBN, and it should be available so we can ensure that the new government is living up to its promise to do the responsible and effective thing by the public.

Turnbull has slammed the report as being a partisan attack, and that is to be expected. However, he refuses to follow his own call for the "unvarnished truth" around his NBN policy during the ongoing review, and has repeatedly blocked efforts for the release of his briefing documents.

So, they will have to be aired in other ways. Stay tuned.

Topics: NBN, Broadband, Government AU, Australia


Australia’s first-world economy relies on first-rate IT and telecommunications innovation. David Braue, an award-winning IT journalist and former Macworld editor, covers its challenges, successes and lessons learned as it uses ICT to assert its leadership in the developing Asia-Pacific region – and strengthen its reputation on the world stage.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Who is laughing now..

    Many people said (including the people of Whirlpool Forums), have said that FTTN is waste of tax payer money & will be delayed like the Labor's NBN, but at least Labor's NBN you got fibre mostly.

    The decision along with other decisions such as:

    * Not releasing the Blue Book.
    * Not accepting the risk of not gaining additional revenue due to no upper speeds.
    * Copper network in a disgrace.
    * Delays like the BT Network.

    1. http://www.theage.com.au/it-pro/government-it/confidential-briefing-nbn-unlikely-to-meet-coalitions-deadline-20131128-hv3tp.html

    2. http://www.zdnet.com/au/telstra-copper-network-an-absolute-disgrace-comms-union-7000023717/

    3. http://www.businessspectator.com.au/news/2013/11/15/technology/coalitions-fttn-network-unlikely-start-rolling-out-2015

    4. http://www.nao.org.uk/report/the-rural-broadband-programme/

    Mounting evidence, by of which exposed, that FTTN is not upto the job, and the copper network isn't either, this is wasteful use of Tax payer money (HINT UK Copper is better condition than ours)..

    Along with other breaking promises (Asylum Seekers, Qantas, Graincorp, Gonski, Budget Emergency, Transparency (that Turnbull said he will bring).

    Is a failer of the Australian Media, to objectively put it to the Australian people, rather than their own interests - serving the vested interests, that those such as Murdoch & USA on other matters such as the Trade Pacific Partnership, for their silence on the matter.

    Along with other issues that are currently happening around the liberal states including in Victoria, WA and in Queensland.

    When Tony Abbott said, "We are Open for Business", he means it.

    Wake up Australia.

  • Strange

    It seems that other news sites have taken Malcolms word as gospel rather than seeking out exactly where this document came from this is rather disappointing thanks for letting us know.
  • Common sense

    Thank you (zdnet) for publishing articles like this. This is the only place where I've actually read articles about NBN where common sense has been applied and some truth about the FTTN flaws has been broached. Looking forward to more articles, it's a shame your coverage doesn't reach out to more users (especially non IT-related users).
  • blah

    While I believe that the last Labor government appeared fairly incompetent, how much of that can be blamed on the politicians rather than the public servants?
    At the very least, they attempted (for the most part) to be transparent while Abbott (in particular) was a negative nancy at every opportunity.

    Now that the lovely Liberals have arrived back in power, they've proven that they're as bad of a bunch of liars as any other politician is, with no transparency, and a "Bend over and take it, Australia" attitude.

    Shall we assume that in a few weeks time that the TPP will be rushed through and then most of Australia will be relocated to another penal colony?
    • stupid lack of edit button :\

      *politicians are

      sorry for the lapse in grammar :(