NBN preps wireless towers, locals rebel

NBN preps wireless towers, locals rebel

Summary: As the NBN Co begins to lodge its planning applications for towers for its long-term evolution (LTE) fixed wireless network, the company is already facing backlash from local residents.

SHARE:
TOPICS: NBN, Broadband
12

As the NBN Co begins to lodge its planning applications for towers for its long-term evolution (LTE) fixed wireless network, the company is already facing backlash from local residents.

In November and December last year, contractors acting on behalf of the NBN Co began lodging a number of applications for the erection of towers in the initial launch sites in areas surrounding Geraldton in Western Australia, Toowoomba in Queensland, Tamworth in New South Wales, Ballarat in Victoria and Darwin in the Northern Territory.

Ericsson scored the $1.1 billion contract to build the LTE network for the NBN Co, and has dished out the construction work to Visionstream.

According to one planning application submitted to Toowoomba Council, the NBN Co is looking to build 40-metre towers at an estimated cost of $200,000 each. Each tower will have three panel antennas that are no more than 2.8 metres in length and one parabolic antenna. Each site will have three outdoor cabinets to house equipment and an additional equipment shelter for air-conditioning equipment. The towers will be surrounded by a 2.5m-high fence, and the total area of the site is estimated to be 60m².

Construction for the towers are estimated to take 10 weeks.

Aps Pty Ltd has applied to Tamworth Council on behalf of the NBN Co for a facility in Moore Creek, while the NBN Co is the sole applicant for a development in Linthorpe in Queensland.

Hepburn Shire Council in Northern Victoria received two applications from the NBN Co; one for the construction of a 25-metre tower on top of a building in North Melbourne situated north west of the Melbourne CBD, and south-west of the national broadband network first release site of Brunswick.

The second application for a tower in Smeaton has run into controversy already. The local paper The Courier reported yesterday that a couple who own a property situated next to the tower's proposed location oppose the construction because of health concerns.

The NBN Co had reportedly originally approached the couple to house the tower on their land for $8000 a year, but the company was turned away.

Local opposition to the construction of towers is an issue faced by all mobile telecommunications companies, and construction of new towers could potentially be delayed if private members Bills currently before parliament from Independent MP Andrew Wilkie and Greens Senator Bob Brown are successful in forcing stricter planning controls on tower construction.

The NBN Co will avoid building new towers where it can, instead opting to co-locate into towers with available space. The NBN Co has estimated it will need to either co-locate or build 2300 towers to cover the 500,000 premises for the fixed wireless roll-out.

The first sites for the fixed wireless network are set to go live later this year, and this portion of the network roll-out is scheduled to be completed by 2015.

Topics: NBN, Broadband

About

Armed with a degree in Computer Science and a Masters in Journalism, Josh keeps a close eye on the telecommunications industry, the National Broadband Network, and all the goings on in government IT.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

12 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Just imagine the screams if the NBN was to be implemented as fixed wireless and there were towers going up everywhere.
    anonymous
    • The weird thing is that the presence of towers in North Melbourne and Brunswick suggests that maybe they *will* be doing fixed wireless everywhere. Though obviously not on the scale needed if it were wireless for everyone. I can't imagine who in the Brunswick footprint would ever not be able to get fibre... it's a truly bizarre place to bother putting in wireless infrastructure.
      anonymous
      • From the description, the North Melbourne tower is probably on the Telstra Exchange. It might be backhaul. Smeaton seems somewhat hilly, so it might have LOS to the city.
        myne-819b4
        • Smeaton is a hell of a long way away from North Melbourne. Smeaton is actually on the outskirts of Ballarat, so the backhaul for Smeaton would be through Ballarat which already has decent fiber backhaul to Melbourne which is just over 100kms away.
          ethoscraig
          • It comes down to line of sight, not distance.
            myne-819b4
          • Yup, and the area being so hilly, there would literally need to be dozens of towers to provide line of site to North Melbourne. Not too cost effective at all when you could just use one or two towers to get line of site back to Ballarat which has perfectly adequate fiber backhaul to Melbourne.
            ethoscraig
  • All the anti-NBN crusaders will have two towers in their front and two in their back yards, surely?
    Beta-9f71a
  • These are probably the same pack of whingers who complain that they get no reception as well. Hypocrites!
    wakieAU
  • Health concerns? The only "Health Concerns" that have ever been provided by the world health organisation were swifty discounted immediately after.

    And im sure if it was the coalitions "wireless" nbn alternative, they'd be able to get towers up easily. Or not.
    Master_T[RG]
    • To be fair, even though no "health concerns" have been proven, I'd still be slightly uncomfortable if I had one of these right next to my house.

      But yes, an all wireless NBN would NEVER be able to have enough towers.
      anonymous
      • I'd love one next to my house.

        Id get excellent reception for my new wireless NBN Internet connection.

        Plus I'd get paid $8000 a year.

        Win Win!
        ethoscraig
        • Agree with your optimism, but have you ever checked your phone reception while standing close/next to a mobile tower? Optimal reception (depending on the frequency) would likely be achieved a couple doors down :)
          serf