NetSeer suffers hack, triggers Google malware warnings
Summary: UPDATE 4. One advertising network's corporate Web site suffered a hack and a malware injection attack this morning, which led to Google warning users worldwide to avoid 'infected' sites.
If you visited ZDNet earlier today and were warned by Google that you were entering a site with known malware, you weren't alone.
Internet advertising network NetSeer suffered a hack to its front-end Web site today that rippled across the Web sites of its advertising partners. The alerts warned visitors who were using the Chrome browser that the Web site they were visiting was a "known malware distributor."

A spokesperson for NetSeer confirmed the successful hacking attempt at around 5:30 a.m. PT, but noted that it did not affect its advertising network infrastructure.
The company is currently working with Google to rectify the situation.
A NetSeer spokesperson confirmed that its corporate network had been infected with malware, and Google subsequently added its domain to a list of malware-affected Websites. Because NetSeer's corporate site has the same domain name as its advertising network, Google triggered warnings on end-user machines warning users to avoid any Web page that happened to include an ad served from NetSeer's servers.
But, visitors to these Web pages were not at risk of being served up malware from the NetSeer advertising network, the company said.
"Our operations team went into all-hands-on-deck mode and we have successfully cleaned the site of the malware issue. We are also working with Google to do an expedited review of the site and remove the site from the malware impacted site-list so that browsing behavior can be restored for all users," a NetSeer spokesperson said.
The company said that it is currently in the process of notifying partners and customers.
Internet Explorer's SmartScreen filter—designed to mitigate such incidents for Windows users—did not block any Web pages, according to ZDNet's Ed Bott.
The Street, a known financial news site, said it has discontinued using Google advertisements "until the issue is resolved."
The New York Times was affected for a while, as was The Huffington Post among dozens of other high profile Web sites and news agencies. Some news outlets, notably The Guardian, tweeted their online following to warn that they were seeing issues, but there was no risk and they should ignore any warnings.
Hello, Chrome users. We're aware some of you are seeing malware warnings about Guardian articles. Please ignore; no risk.
— Guardian Tech (@guardiantech) February 4, 2013
Update at 1:50 p.m. ET: A NetSeer spokesperson said the company is "pleased to announce" that Google has removed the ad network from the list of sites impacted by malware.
Update at 5:15 p.m. ET: Unconfirmed reports suggest that the issues with NetSeer may have temporarily come back to haunt Chrome users. We've put in more questions to NetSeer and will update once we hear back.
IDG's Martyn Williams tweeted the following image of sister site CNET being blocked by Google Chrome. Here's the picture:

Update at 7:30 p.m. ET: A Google spokesperson said that while they do not comment on individual cases, "Safe Browsing is working as intended." They also noted in a blog post that explains how tricky it can be to clean a site of malware completely.
Update at 8:35 p.m. ET: A NetSeer spokesperson looped back to ZDNet with additional comment regarding further 'red warning' pages from Google Chrome users.
After we found and removed the infected files this morning, we were removed from the Google list of malware infected web sites. NetSeer was placed on the list a few hours later although we are unsure what triggered this second incident. We have been collaborating with Google throughout the day and they have been very responsive. As of approximately 4:00 p.m. PT (7:00 p.m. ET, I can confirm NetSeer is off the list. We are still investigating and cooperating with Google to ensure future continued compliance.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
I use NotScript in Google Chrome
At least I don't have to worry about malware infection. :)
Happy New Year!
......http://goo.gl/9Supo
yea - because linux has never been broken into
It's that kind of thinking that makes you just as dangerous as any unpatched windows box out there.
Penguins are bad for your health...
Then you have never used NoScript (Firefox)/Notscript (Chrome)
LOL
Nothing is as dangerous as an unpatched Windows box
Infect my Mac with Malware?
Which then brings me to the thought that I'm currently on a Windows machine using IE8 so I don't even see this alert and I am currently on ZDNet's site and have been intermittently this morning. Uh oh. LOL I better not click on any ads.
You're already infected
Chrome + Mac = Bulletproof?
To vouch for that...
Mac Is Unaffected By Malware
A final factor for this is that Macs are newer than PCs, and have not been that popular for long. So hackers have had less time to cook up malware for Macs than for PCs, which have been around for a while now.
No
Unix roots
better modularity for one.
Other sites affected on Sunday?
Google should be fined for this!
It is wrong to expect Google to determine what you should or should not see on the internet.
Anyone who uses Chrome is fooling them selves if they do not realize they are supporting a Google closed world view.
You should be fined.....
Aggressive WhatsamattaU?
People that have software to download for example hit that wall every time.
WHO IS COMPENSATING THEIR LOSSES?
So Mr. kpbpsw is in my opinion right - if you have a good virus protection that also includes the web - and is equipped with malware detection then I definitely need no browser to tell me this site is dangerous.
This warning is based on what?
In most cases its simply WRONG!
Because its Google I just trust it?
You are kidding me!
Chrome is miserable browser and worse than IE8. It even considers an iframe to a video on his own servers as risky - because it's not in the same domain. Check the error it throws - just ridiculous -
lrj2@... confuses the user with the user's machine obviously because he is also using degrading wording: that makes YOU just as dangerous ... I beg your pardon - any intelligence here at all?
Guess not.
Partial Omniscience
So, they were hacked. They admitted to it. And now they expect us to trust them when they say users were not at risk? This is like saying, "Someone broke into our house, but we know he did not leave anything behind." How do they know this?