New signs point to Microsoft releasing Outlook for Windows RT this year

Summary: It's increasing looking like those with ARM-based Windows devices might get the option to put Microsoft's Outlook RT on them, after all.

Back in January 2013, there was talk that Microsoft was considering releasing a version of its Outlook mail client for Windows RT. It looks like talk is advancing into likelihood.

surfaceRT

According to Windows SuperSite's Paul Thurrott, Outlook RT is being tested outside of Microsoft now, not just internally as it was a couple of months ago. 

Thurrott also said he heard that Microsoft delayed releasing Outlook RT due to a firmware issue in ARM that was triggering crashes. I had heard scuttlebutt that excessive battery usage might be at fault, but nothing confirmable.

One of my sources said that Outlook RT has turned into a "top enterprise request," so the Office team had decided it should move forward and commercialize the port of Outlook to ARM. (I'm not so sure how many enterprises are really using Windows RT devices at this point, but I've heard Microsoft plans to increase its business-focused marketing push for Surface RTs and other Windows RT devices.)

This same source said all of the Office apps -- not just the core Word, Excel, PowerPoint and OneNote -- have been ported to ARM already. Once the initial work was done to shift to the ARM compiler, the task of porting the apps to ARM was less arduous, given the fact that huge chunks of each app is shared code. This shared code was developed by the Modern Office Experience (MOX) team and is known as  MSO (Modern Shared Office?), my source said.  MSO supposedly implements huge amounts of shared code for the office apps -- all the file access code, registry access, graphics, interfaces, etc.  (Update: The MOX work has to do with Metro-Style Office, not ARM. At least right now, the Outlook RT app is believed to be a Desktop, not a Metro Style one. My mistake.)

"In short, these (Office) apps have been runable on ARM for a long time," my source claimed.

If it is released commercially, Outlook RT would run on Microsoft's ARM-based Surface RT devices, as well as any/all other ARM-based Windows RT tablets and PCs. It would likely be positioned as a complement, not a replacement to, the built-in Windows Mail client on Windows 8 and Windows RT PCs. Currently, Microsoft doesn't include Outlook as part of the Office Home & Student 2013 RT suite that it bundles with the Windows RT operating system. Only Word RT, Excel RT, PowerPoint RT and OneNote RT are included.

It's worth noting these four apps are Desktop apps, not "Metro-Style"/Windows Store apps, but Microsoft is working on Metro-Style complements to all four, which it is expected to roll out this fall as part of its Gemini effort.

The Office team is not commenting on Gemini or Outlook RT.

I recently heard from one of my own sources that Outlook RT might be released this fall, possibly in conjunction with the Windows 8.1 (Blue) and/or the Office "Gemini" updates. However, if Microsoft opted to deliver Outlook RT earlier -- maybe as part of an update to the Office 365 consumer and business subscription offerings -- it could even come to market sooner.

As Thurrott noted, the most likely way Outlook RT would probably be rolled out is as a paid subscription offering. And once this happens -- again, if/when it does -- the road for Microsoft to roll out some kind of an Office for iPad via a similar subscription model should be cleared (at least to some degree). Microsoft would still have to come to some kind of agreement with Apple over exactly how this would be sold if any code is to be made available via Apple's App Store. 

Previous leaks about Office for iPad have pointed to Microsoft releasing only Word, Excel, PowerPoint and OneNote apps for iOS; Outlook hasn't been mentioned (to date.) If Outlook is to be delivered for iPad someday, one would assume Microsoft wouldn't want to deliver it on the iPad before it delivers it on RT. That would be counter to Microsoft's usual position of "first and best on Windows." But it's a new Microsoft these days, so never say never....

Topics: Unified Comms, Microsoft, Tablets, ARM, PCs, Microsoft Surface, Windows 8

About

Mary Jo has covered the tech industry for more than 25 years for a variety of publications and Web sites, and is a frequent guest on radio, TV and podcasts, speaking about all things Microsoft-related. She is the author of Microsoft 2.0: How Microsoft plans to stay relevant in the post-Gates era (John Wiley & Sons, 2008).

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

50 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • New signs point to RT being a bargain bin flop

    .
    toddbottom7
    • Desperate, Tim cook apologizes to Chinese, ipads are binned.

      .
      Owllll1net
      • NONZEALOT has meltdown, nukes himself

        No proof to your statement, as usual total stupidity from the loser.

        http://www.windows8enterprise.com/2013/03/19/march-updates-make-surface-rt-fail-to-wake-up-from-sleep/

        Awwww poor Nonzealot....no matter how many alters you can't save RT from its fate.
        toddbottom7
        • toddbottom7...you should have included William Farrel as well as he

          opened his mouth and spoke.
          Over and Out
          • The three stooges!

            Bozo's get a life all three of you!
            martin_js
          • Need to join this conversation...

            I am in, make that 5 stooges!
            mil7
    • New signs point to cloggeddbottom7 posts being a bargain bin flop

      He opened his mouth and spoke.
      William Farrel
      • Hey Willie baby..Surface RT is a fail because of Metro's Flashing Tiles

        and so will Outlook if it has those stupid flashing tiles.......

        Surface & flashing tiles is geered for someone that has a Fisher Price mind set.
        Over and Out
        • Of course! We should all get iPads then!

          I mean, it's got all those wonderful apps right?

          There's the USB app, the Adobe flash app, the HDMI app...

          (Long story short, you're a pathetic troll. Your View is wrong, go troll somewhere else.)
          ForeverCookie
          • Can we not...

            Hate the tiles interface without somebody immediately saying that we love/own iPads?

            I personally wouldn’t buy an iPad, but then again I wouldn’t buy a Surface either…I may be tempted by one of the Samsung devices through, but so far I haven’t.

            But I still hate tiles though...
            mil7
        • So what. I don't own any tablets.

          But if appears to bother you a good bit, CB7 that Outlook is coming to the Surface RT.

          Me, I don't own any tablets, so it's really not important to me. For you on the other hand, you're obsessing over MS and the Surface yet again. You sure do talk about it far more then I (or many others) do, and act as though it's some big deal to all of us.

          It seems to have you pretty worried, and that's enough for me to enjoy.
          William Farrel
        • ***Stares at metro start menu....

          ...Waits for them to "Flash".................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Nothing yet..................................................................................................................................................................................
          mrefuman
    • Lonely ZDnet Stalker...

      Is it pain full being this mad at someone you have never met?
      mrefuman
  • While they're at it...

    ... they need to change their mind on the lack of domain support on Windows RT as well. Without that, it's not going to work for a ton of businesses. I'm aware of InTune, but that software isn't universally out there. Domain join would make it much easier to integrate.
    JHoff80
    • It solves no practicle purpose while we have PRO

      to make RT join a domain there will go lot of development into it again..making it a heavy system again and since it does not run legacy apps anyway its better the way it is. Intune provides an easy integration with configuration manager 2012 and that results into a single solution to manager both domain joined pro devices and also the RT devices.

      the considerations for customer are also easy this way. those who want to manage RT they know what solution they need without heavy infrastructure changes
      dugbug11
      • Sure it does...

        How about just the fact that InTune costs additional money that a company might not want to pay? Pretty much every (Windows-based) medium sized business and larger already has a Active Directory server. The fact that it can't run legacy code (which, for the record, it can with a hack), is going to be irrelevant.

        It actually wouldn't take too much development and additional code; most of it is already there. As an example, you can already make Group Policy Client work on Windows RT just by enabling it in Services.

        Sure, if a company is keeping up to date on all of the newest Microsoft software, they might already have InTune and it's a great solution. However, for companies that don't have InTune, many might not want to lay out the addition expense. So in the real world connecting to a domain (again, the setup that companies usually already have for all of their other PCs) is still going to be important for a while.
        JHoff80
        • check the new licensing model

          the per user licensing model gives freedom to install ConfigMgr or Intune or maybe both. you can manager up to a given number of devices for a user by using the seamless solution. so in any case an organization need a management solution and it's there at no separate cost for intune
          dugbug11
          • check this out

            http://www.zdnet.com/windows-intune-wave-d-tooled-up-for-byod-7000012157/
            dugbug11
    • Domain Join would probably cut battery life

      Think about all the domain goop that needs to be running in the background. The whole Windows RT philosophy is to use the battery as parsimoniously as possible.

      Being able to manage the device centrally is more important than being having uses get at domain resources. That's why the InTune solution exists the way it is (as far as I can tell)
      Flydog57
  • Outlook RT on Surface will be great.

    Enterprise customers require something more powerful than the current mail client.
    Owllll1net