Microsoft's secret plan behind the TomTom suit?
Summary
Topics
Having established that Microsoft's "it's not about Linux" schtick is transparently wrong - the area covered by the FAT patents is pure Linux, unchanged by TomTom, so any Linux distro with FAT compatibility would qualify - we then get a post from Jeremy Allison, who's well versed in Microsoft's approach to open source.
You must read the whole thing yourself - but in brief, he says that Microsoft has been putting all its IP deals under NDA because the cross-licensing of patents is disallowed under Section 7 of GPL 2. Thus, anyone who signs is disallowed from distributing any of the Linux kernel - so Microsoft has them over a barrel.
This explains the secrecy behind all the deals - which, lest we forget, Microsoft is promoting as examples of open sharing - and is building up to a situation where Microsoft can detonate a huge improvised explosive device under Linux.
What might save things is if TomTom prevails, negating the relevant patents - and there are good reasons to think it would, if it can afford to fight. If it can't afford to fight, then things get just that little nastier. As Allison says:
"Tom Tom are the first company to publicly refuse to engage in this ugly little protection racket, and so they got sued. Had Tom Tom silently agreed to violate the GPL, as so many others have, then we'd only hear about a vague "patent cross licensing deal" just like the ones Microsoft announces with other companies.
Make no mistake, this is intended to force Tom Tom to violate the GPL, or change to Microsoft embedded software."
Rupert Goodwins' blog was originally posted on ZDNet.co.uk.
Talkback Most Recent of 85 Talkback(s)
-
Well, maybe it is time to draw a line in the sand. Maybe this is a good one
for SFLC, IBM, and other to get involved with. TomTom can not fight it alone, they will just have to switch to WinCE.
DonnieBoy5th Mar 2009 -
Why should they? This is a load of BS
It is odd that everyone has a different opinion of what is "really happening"; you have these people left and right pointing out the truth "as they see it", and in the end, it has not even made it to court, so no one really knows what it is all about except for Microsoft and TomTom.
So why should SFLC, IBM, and other to get involved if in the end it really is about Tom Tom infringing on patented IP?
I believe Rupert Goodwins' has no knowledge of what is going on, yet will write about it so as to earn a few talkback dollars, nothing more.
And the interesting thing about all this? That they are using Linux, GPL 2, where they can take freely of the Linux kernal, without having to release any advancement back to the community. Why?
Because that way they can infringe on others IP, without giving anyone the right to see it.
That is the real crime here.
GuidingLight5th Mar 2009 -
no....
Micro$oft baaaaaaaaaad, >drool
JoeMama_z5th Mar 2009 -
I recall a lot of people having opinions about SCO.
The vast majority believed SCO were lying through their teeth. It turns out they were right. Don't worry though, the real crime will come to light some day. And when it does dear GL, you may want to make yourself scarce.
kozmcrae5th Mar 2009 -
Reading the other blogs here
it sounds like Tom Tom doesn't want to license FAT32, which is in Linux, which is the IP of MS.
So GL and you may both be right, maybe the real crime has come to light allready, with Linux being the criminal?
AllKnowingAllSeeing5th Mar 2009 -
Who does want to license FAT?
Nobody! The only companies who have done so, if indeed there are any, were strong-armed like Microsoft is to doing with Tom Tom. Why would the whole World, essentially, tell Microsoft to stick it? If you answer correctly, you get a gold star.kozmcrae5th Mar 2009 -
I'll try
Because no-one wants to pay royalties or be sued for using a filesystem used commonly for almost 20 years which could have been written by a college student.
That the linux kernel has included the driver for the FATXX filesystems for many years, without being called up on it, might tick off some vendors of non-Microsoft devices.
Or no?
AndyCee6th Mar 2009 -
What about the MS "Covenant Not to Sue" ?
Not only did MS not enforce these FAT patents (which would make them unenforceable even if the patents were valid) but there was also the famous "Covenant Not to Sue" in which, IIRC, MS promised to give a free pass for the kinds of things that consumer electronics companies like TomTom, flash memory makers, and Linux distros use FAT and vFat for.
bswiss6th Mar 2009 -
You both (AndyCee & bswiss) get a gold star, good work.
Pithy the Elder, however, gets sent home with a note for his parents.kozmcrae6th Mar 2009 -
not so secret
M$ hopes that it will end with a settlement that would alow it to charge an IP tax on TomTom, and use the FUD to squeze other suckers.
M$ does not want a real lawsuit because it will get no money because Linux is free, or worse, would get the so called patents invalidated.
Linux Geek5th Mar 2009 -
RE: Microsoft's secret plan behind the TomTom suit?
Microsoft has trditionally bought and destroyed competition. Bill Gates is a low life thief!
WildWaldo5th Mar 2009 -
Very true
Hi started Microsoft by stealing code from his employer, and then selling it as his own.
akulkis6th Mar 2009 -
RE: Microsoft's secret plan behind the TomTom suit?
Bill Gates nad Microsoft intend to trash or own TomTom. I have nothing but contempt for Gates and Microsoft try to buy a computer without Vista crapware!WildWaldo5th Mar 2009 -
You can...
if you buy a Mac.
I can even buy a computer with Ubuntu pre-installed on it from the local computer store (OEM install version).
(and yes, I do use Ubuntu at home, and just helped my mother-in-law ditch MS-Vista for Ubuntu)
RogerDaryl5th Mar 2009 -
Yes. I do what is necessary to ensure Microsoft does not get my money.
I am the proud owner of 2 iMacs, a Dual G5 Tower, a MacBook Pro, 2 iPods, and an iPhone. Lots of money NOT going to Microsoft or their 'partners'. I also just bought a TomTom GO 730. I am supporting the fight against all things Microsoft.
Join me!!
No More Microsoft Software Ever!6th Mar 2009
Talkback - Tell Us What You Think
The best of ZDNet, delivered
ZDNet Newsletters
Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox
Facebook Activity
