madison

Torvalds abandons KDE for Gnome

David Meyer ZDNet.co.uk | January 27, 2009 4:50 AM PST

Summary

Ticked off at the latest revamp of KDE - a "disaster" and "half-baked" - Linux progenitor Linus Torvalds has switched to Gnome.
Ticked off at the latest revamp of KDE, Linux progenitor Linus Torvalds has switched to Gnome. Apparently he thought KDE 4.0 was a "disaster" and "half-baked". Harsh words indeed.

In an interview with Computerworld, Torvalds said "break everything" probably wasn't the best idea.

Torvalds said, "I got the update through Fedora and there was a mismatch from KDE 3 to KDE 4.0. The desktop was not as functional and it was just a bad experience for me. I'll revisit it when I reinstall the next machine which tends to be every six to eight months."

"The Gnome people are talking about doing major surgery so it could also go the other way."

Ooh, fickle! He does, however, refrain from proclaiming 2009 as the year of Linux...

Talkback Most Recent of 85 Talkback(s)

  • The kids will be switching in droves
    Now that Linus has switched, will be interesting to see the new Gnome users that have abandoned KDE. For me however, I knew KDE sucked before Linus figured it out.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    LandonAB
    27th Jan 2009
  • I agree ...
    ... being a relative newcomer to Ubuntu Linux (1 year), I tried KDE, but found it too alien. Gnome may not have all the built-in features of KDE, but it is, at least for now, a more comfortable, logical interface. I hope the folks working on Gnome keep this in mind and don't get too wild.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Tony R.
    27th Jan 2009
  • Upgrade woes
    If I interpret what Linus said correctly, he upgraded an existing KDE 3.5 desktop to a KDE 4 desktop. I strongly suspect that most problems he encountered, wouldn't have happened if he had done a clean install of KDE 4.

    I am a Gnome user myself (I love the simple and easy Gnome desktop!), but this criticism of KDE is too harsh.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    pjotr123
    27th Jan 2009
  • Poor Linus
    I strongly suspect that most problems he encountered, wouldn't have happened if he had done a clean install of KDE 4.

    Poor guy must not know what he's doing when it comes to Linux, eh? devil
    ZDNet Gravatar
    MGP2
    27th Jan 2009
  • ZDNet Gravatar
    NonZealot
    27th Jan 2009
  • You guys are funny.
    Linus chose to switch from KDE to Gnome. He also could have chosen Xfce or Fluxbox or a half dozen other desktops without changing his underlying distro. How many desktops do you have to choose from in Windows 7: The Linux Killer!!? Or do you just learn to like what you get from Microsoft?
    ZDNet Gravatar
    kozmcrae
    27th Jan 2009
  • If we didn't like it....
    If we didn't like it then we'd switch. Duh.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    mikefarinha
    27th Jan 2009
  • You'd switch to Linux?
    Or does Windows have many different desktop managers to choose from? I'm not sure what you would switch too, an abacus? It would be a lot more stable than Windows.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    kozmcrae
    28th Jan 2009
  • Sure
    KDE, Gnome, and more than a few others. Try facts, rather than ill-advised, elitist rhetoric.

    Someday some of you are going to figure out the OS is nothing more than a means to an end. Windoze, Linsux, Muc - doesn't matter - they've all got good and bad in their DNA - they have to, they're created by people. Duh!
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Dr. John
    28th Jan 2009
  • You suspect wrongly
    I strongly suspect that most problems he encountered, wouldn't have happened if he had done a clean install of KDE 4.

    No, KDE4 really just sucks. It was shipped out feature-incomplete, to name the most obvious problem. Apparently they decided to imitate Microsoft and have the users do the primary debugging.

    Fortunately, there's nothing stopping anyone from sticking with KDE3 until they get the ugly out of 4. That's what I'm doing.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Yagotta B. Kidding
    27th Jan 2009
  • 3.5 raised our expectations
    KDE 3.5 had everything a 2D desktop could possibly offer. But when KDE 4.0 went to a 3D widget based system it had to start all over from scratch. Even now, KDE 4.1.4 is still in the alpha stage if you were to compare it to KDE 3.5.10. There are some good ideas in there, but for those who are used to the things you get in 3.5 it is still subpar.

    I still like KDE applications, so I stick with KDE because of that. But the loss of Torvalds' endorsement could increase Gnome's momentum, which has been increasing as of late. So KDE had better get their ship in order pretty quickly.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Michael Kelly
    27th Jan 2009
  • I was thinking about going the opposite direction..
    ...due to the entanglement of Mono in Gnome. I just won't support it unless MS ports the thing themselves.

    The thing that holds me back however is that I just can't get with the look of KDE. Version 4 seems to be nice and glossy but its still just too big and wasteful of space to me.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    storm14k
    27th Jan 2009
  • I don't understand
    The thing that holds me back however is that I just can't get with the look of KDE. Version 4 seems to be nice and glossy but its still just too big and wasteful of space to me.

    Could you explain that?
    KDE has so many knobs that I'm having trouble imagining a desktop setup it can't do.
    Not that it doesn't have issues, but lack of configurability has never really been one of them.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Yagotta B. Kidding
    27th Jan 2009
  • What KDE are you referring to?
    KDE 3.5.x and KDE 4.1 are completely different desktops.

    KDE and Gnome have always been very different. But they have both taken off on different trajectories lately. KDE is trying to add more utility, at least it has in the past. Gnome is improving the user experience by removing utility. If you don't like "so many knobs" on your desktop then remove as many as you like. If you want more knobs in Gnome, well you might have to hunt them down. I use KDE 3.5.x but I've used Gnome in the past and recently while installing Ubuntu on some machines. If I really really wanted to use Gnome for some reason, I'd dress up KDE to look like it (which can be done). I don't know why Linus didn't just stay with KDE 3.5.x. Maybe he was bored?
    ZDNet Gravatar
    kozmcrae
    27th Jan 2009
  • RE: Torvalds abandons KDE for Gnome
    What is the point of a 3D desktop? Another triumph of style over substance.

    Full install vs. upgrade? If an update don't work, its proof the new system is flawed, especially if "throw everything away and build this new house of cards and it'll work OK" (for awhile!) is the "solution". Microsoft is as bad as anybody here.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    wkulecz
    27th Jan 2009

Talkback - Tell Us What You Think

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity