No need for UN to take over internet, says EU digital chief Kroes

No need for UN to take over internet, says EU digital chief Kroes

Summary: Neelie Kroes has told ZDNet that she does not favour changing the way the internet is governed, although she added that there was a case for hearing out governments who want a greater say.

SHARE:
TOPICS: Security, EU
5

EU digital commissioner Neelie Kroes opposes handing control of the internet over to the UN's telecommunications agency, she said on Friday.

The past months have seen widespread controversy over the idea of giving the International Telecommunications Agency (ITU) more control over the internet — a proposal that has been made by countries such as Russia and China.

Neelie Kroes
Neelie Kroes has told ZDNet that she does not favour changing the way the internet is governed. Image credit: David Meyer

Speaking to ZDNet in Berlin, Kroes said there may be a case for governments having more say in the way the internet is run, but — even if this were to happen — it would not necessitate giving the ITU more power.

"Of course there are voices saying it would be better with the UN [but] I'm not in favour of the line that, if you have a problem, you can only solve it in a new structure," Kroes said, adding that it was first worth examining the calls for more government input.

"I still think that the remarks that are made [about giving governments a greater voice] can be included in a solution within the structure of today," she said. "I'm not aware that that can't be done, so I'm not willing to [favour] a new structure."

A real threat?

The ITU already has a hand in managing aspects the internet, for example promoting IPv6 awareness and coordinating international cybersecurity efforts.

The current storm surrounding the ITU's role is related to the revision of the agency's international telecommunications regulations (ITRs), a treaty that was set up in 1988 before the existence of the web.

As is the case with such policy revisions, various parties have made proposals — an ISP body, for instance, created a stir when it proposed banning net neutrality around the world.

Leaked drafts of the updated treaty — which is still far from finalised — show how countries such as Russia and Arab states are trying to make ITU internet recommendations binding on national telecoms authorities. Countries such as the US are resisting.

The key functions of the internet that are in question here are naming, numbering, addressing and identification. Many of these are currently carried out by ICANN, which is based in the US but independent, IANA, and national and regional agencies.

It is questionable as to how much the ITU actually wants to assume this kind of control.

Last June, Russian premier Vladimir Putin said in a meeting with ITU chief Hamadoun Toure: "We are thankful to you for the ideas that you have proposed for discussion. One of them is establishing international control over the internet using the monitoring and supervisory capabilities of the International Telecommunication Union."

However, when the US Congress decried the supposed ITU takeover plans earlier this month, Toure responded by saying it was "unfortunate that the Congress is spending so much valuable time on something that isn't even on the table". He said there was "no single reference to Internet governance in the preparation document".

Topics: Security, EU

David Meyer

About David Meyer

David Meyer is a freelance technology journalist. He fell into journalism when he realised his musical career wouldn't pay the bills. David's main focus is on communications, as well as internet technologies, regulation and mobile devices.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

5 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • umm

    quote, "Of course there are voices saying it would be better with the UN..."

    What are they smoking?
    Vapur9
    • They're smoking

      Authoritariansm.

      You can be sure that Russia and China don't have the interhnet's best interests at heart.
      dsf3g
  • The UN....

    needs to stop trying to ruin, err run, everything. If anything they should look in to disolving because they are the greatest waste of money on the planet.
    Test Subject
  • And I Thought AT&T and Verizon Were Bad...

    If there ever were three societies more hell bent for leather on censoring the Internet and neutering net neutrality than AT&T and Verizon, I couldn't imagine it. They are the most closed minded, thought controlling, and human rights abusing entities on the planet (save Korea, who would prefer its people use only slide rules and tin cans with strings), and they are the driving force for "international control" of the Internet. Can anyone spell T-H-O-U-G-H-T P-O-L-I-C-E?

    Even more frightening is the weak tea response of Commissioner Kroes who is leading the defense for all of us:

    "I still think that the remarks that are made [about giving governments a greater voice] can be included in a solution within the structure of today," she said. "I'm not aware that that can't be done, so I'm not willing to [favour] a new structure."

    All she opposes is losing the opportunity to be one of the new masters, NOT the proposition that they should give governments a greater voice in exercising control.
    dksmidtx
  • Here's what I think should happen, FWIW

    The US should get out of the UN, the UN should be evicted from US soil, and any US citizen found giving any material support to the UN after that should be tried, convicted and executed for treason. End of story.
    Rodo1