Oracle to buy Sun for $7.4bn

Oracle to buy Sun for $7.4bn

Summary: The enterprise software company will buy server specialist Sun at a share price of $9.50, the companies have announced

TOPICS: Networking

Business software leader Oracle is to buy server and software maker Sun, the two companies announced on Monday.

In a joint statement, Oracle said the transaction was valued at approximately $7.4bn (£5.1bn), or $5.6bn net of Sun's cash and debt. Sun's stock will be bought at $9.50 in cash per share. The deal has been unanimously approved by Sun's board, but still needs to be approved by Sun's shareholders and financial regulators, the companies said.

The deal means Oracle will be taking over Java, the language and software that underpins Oracle Fusion Middleware. In their announcement, the companies said that Java is "the most important software Oracle has ever acquired".

The enterprise application specialist also picks up the Solaris operating system, described by the companies as the "leading" platform for Oracle's database products. Oracle will now be able to optimise its database for the high-end features of Solaris, the companies said. "In our opinion, the Solaris operating system is by the far the best Unix technology available in the market," Larry Ellison, Oracle's chief executive, said in a conference call after the announcement on Monday.

The companies also moved to reassure customers about their stance on Linux, saying Oracle is as committed as ever to Linux and other open platforms, and will continue to support and enhance its strong industry partnerships.

Ellison underlined the integration benefits to customers of the deal. "Oracle will be the only company that can engineer an integrated system — applications to disk — where all the pieces fit and work together so customers do not have to do it themselves," he said in the statement.

Sun chairman Scott McNealy, noting that Oracle and Sun have been partners for more than 20 years, said in the statement: "This combination is a natural evolution of our relationship and will be an industry-defining event."

At the start of April, Sun reportedly rejected a buyout offer from IBM, which apparently made a formal bid of $9.40 per share or less.

Read this


Leader: Oracle's Sun day creates new world for enterprise

Oracle's acquisition of Sun raises many questions. The most pressing is: what happens to old partners?…

Read more

In Monday's conference call, Oracle president Safra Catz claimed Oracle has a track record of integrating acquisitions very rapidly, and said this time will be no different. "We will combine the software assets quickly after closing," she said.

Gartner analyst Andy Butler said that while his reaction to the deal was more positive than negative, the announcement does raise a number of questions regarding the survival of Sun's hardware lines. The Santa Clara, California-based company sells servers based on its own Sparc chips, x86 servers based on Intel and AMD chips, and StorageTek storage, among other hardware products "Sun's revenue stream has always remained very dependent upon hardware revenues," Butler said.

The analyst suggested that the IBM's failed takeover bid for Sun would have created potential for overlap and conflict at the hardware level.

He noted that just because Oracle is not in the hardware business, it doesn't mean all Sun's hardware lines of business will survive. "Existing customers need to show some caution from a hardware perspective — there is no product clash, but that doesn't guarantee that, in 12 or 24 months' time, all the hardware lines of business will remain current and viable," Butler said

Oracle has partnerships with server hardware makers other than Sun, such as IBM and Dell. Butler said he did not believe the deal would end or have a severe impact on those relationships. However, he added that if Oracle's enthusiasm for Solaris gets stronger, that could have a bearing on how much effort HP or IBM puts into Solaris support on their x86 servers, and how much Sun puts into support of other Unix operating systems.

"Users of other Unix operating systems will want a degree of clarity from Oracle," Butler said, adding that said it would be very interesting to see how Oracle positions its database products with Sun's lower-level MySQL database software.

Topic: Networking

David Meyer

About David Meyer

David Meyer is a freelance technology journalist. He fell into journalism when he realised his musical career wouldn't pay the bills. David's main focus is on communications, as well as internet technologies, regulation and mobile devices.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • ...erm, what about MySQL, Open Office?

    Am I the only person to be concerned about a large corp owning it's leading, open source competitor?!

    And Open Office?!

    Open sourcing Solaris made Sun worthy of such ownership. Just because Oracle supports Linux, doesn't mean that this deal can be classed as good for open source at this early stage.
  • This is bad news for Sun customers

    Any Sun hardware customer may now have further doubts about being a Sun customer as Oracle is not interested in hardware unless it is prepared to upset it relationship's with IBM, DELL, HP etc.

    Oracle will probably try and sell SPARC to Fujitsu and drop x86 products all together.

    What happens to open source products such as Java/JavaFX, Open Solaris, Open Office, Netbeans etc., is anybody's guess.

    Hopefully Java/JavaFX will be allowed to become an independent body like IBM did with Eclispe, only time will tell.

    Solaris/Open Solaris is a great product and I hope that it does not disappear into the Sunset!
  • Not so bad.

    MySQL is reasonably safe as it has already been forked. Makes me wonder if someone knew which way the wind was blowing and jumped ship early.

    I'm not sure of the status of Open Office, but I'm not aware of Oracle having a competing commercial product, and if it were to look like they intended to quietly just let it fall behind, I would again expect others to take it up (although I'm not sure what the license conditions are)