PCs learn new tricks, but can tablet/notebook hybrids rescue Windows 8?
Summary: What does a PC maker do when the PC market is shrinking and demand for tablets is exploding? One option is to design hybrid PCs, which can switch from conventional PC to tablet and back again. In this post, I look at clever hybrid devices from Samsung, Dell, and HP.
No, the PC industry isn’t vanishing anytime soon. But it has reached a level of maturity where year-over-year growth in sales has stalled, and most new purchases are replacements.
Devices that we traditionally think of as PCs - towers, all-in-ones, and clamshell-style laptops with a keyboard and pointing device - are still selling by the hundreds of millions every year. After decades of steady growth, however, those numbers are now declining year over year, as consumers (and to a lesser extent businesses) choose tablets and smartphones as secondary devices instead of buying an additional PC.
See also:
- Is the brilliant, quirky, flawed Surface Pro right for you?
- My 60 days with the Surface RT
- What's behind the slump in PC sales? Can the industry turn around?
- Can Microsoft pull its tablet technology together?
The net effect? The overall population of computing devices is expanding tremendously, with the mix shifting toward devices that are more mobile and require less management.
That’s the environment into which Microsoft released Windows 8 last fall. In a world where mobility is king, the single most important feature is the ability to work well as a tablet, when a touchscreen is the only input device. For this new generation, Microsoft and its partners are betting you want that same device to work as a PC when conventional input devices (and maybe a large monitor) are available.
It’s a bold attempt to redefine the PC. These new hybrid devices have the innards of a conventional PC, making them compatible with existing software and peripherals, while still being capable of acting like tablets.
Microsoft’s vision of this dual-purpose device is the Surface Pro, which can go from tablet to full-strength PC with a click of its innovative keyboard/cover combos. But it’s not the only competitor in this new hybrid category.
Last September, at the giant IFA tradeshow in Berlin, I saw three hybrid devices from three of the world’s largest PC OEMs. Each one tries to tackle the same problem as the Surface Pro, with very different design decisions. For the past month, I’ve been using the final, production versions of these three machines in real-world work settings.
Here are the contenders:
- Samsung’s ATIV Smart PC Pro 700T looks like a slightly clunky, generic black Ultrabook at first blush. Until you detach its keyboard base, that is, and it turns into a sleek and powerful tablet with better battery life than a Surface Pro.
- The Dell XPS 12 is a premium Ultrabook, exquisitely engineered and more powerful than many desktop PCs. It can also transform into a tablet with a quick flip. It’s a large, not-so-light tablet with modest battery life. But does that matter?
- HP’s Envy X2 isn’t the most powerful portable PC you will ever find. But if long battery life is tops on your wish list, you might not care. This Atom-powered hybrid is thinner than an iPad, and it can do real work all day, all night, and well into another day.
To some extent, the fate of all of these devices is tied to Windows 8. If you're put off by Windows 8's landscape orientation, or if it doesn't have the apps you like, or if you're already heavily invested in another platform, these devices could be too little or too late or both.
But Microsoft and its PC-making partners hope that there are enough PC loyalists out there who are ready for a Windows-powered tablet that's also a PC.
In this post, I look at each of these devices with an emphasis on the overall experience. Does the tablet-to-PC-and-back-again transition work? Are they mobile enough? Are they simple enough? Can any of these devices deliver the Holy Grail of portable computing: a single device that handles work and play without unnecessary compromises?
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
When Ed Bott talks about rescuing Windows 8...
Hmmm...
Economists are still arguing if we are in or out of a recession, headed back into one, etc. If the Windows XP device I bought for $350 nearly a decade ago is still running, how can I justify spending $400+ or more on a device that realistically isn't that much of an upgrade? This isn't like 20 years ago when I would see a considerable performance improvement from an older system. Right now, the biggest improvement people will really see is with SSDs and those are only on higher end models that people aren't buying in volume.
Yes, we are all tech fans that visit this website. Yes, we can justify spending the money. This would be no different than your wife spending $200 on a pair of shoes she's going to wear just to her friends wedding. People are less willing to spend money on things that don't have a need for these days. A look at the most popular mobile apps shows that the public is mostly interested in social media, time waster games, email, and watching videos on youtube. An older system does this just fine. I bet if we had the return of $199-249 devices that more would buy Windows 8 devices.
I just saw a stat that over 50% of tablet shipments last quarter were under 8" models. That implies people want cheap. And that's a growing market, too. That also implies the 8"+ market (aka iPads and many others) is technically shrinking given just a couple years ago that was the only option and therefore had virtually 100% of the share.
hybrids
besides the excessive use of battery
Duck is an animal hybrid, it swims, flies and walks, plus does none of these things well
hybrids
besides the excessive use of battery
Duck is an animal hybrid, it swims, flies and walks, but does none of these things well
Ducks
Ducks are highly successful and while they may not fly like an Eagle, swim like a Porpoise or walk like a Cheetah, it's type is proven beyond doubt and will certainly be around for the long haul, contrary to many of the "portable" devices being discussed here, moreover they have a cuteness and lovability factor which is completely off the scale - something only Apple has considered thus far . . .
Win8 Hybrids are significant breakthrough (not RT)
As such a user, I am wonderfully surprised at how well Win8 works on my current "hybrid" -- and Asus VivoTab Smart. This thing kicks android in the mouth in the ability to load/use my main Windows programs that I've come to know and love as well as have a very slick "touch interface" on both the desktop and the "metro interface." True, as we all know, the Win app market cannot compare with Android or Apple Store/Marketplaces, (and maybe it never will), but it's a hybrid that does all things very, very well. In my experience, this is a "breakthrough" that is significant for, at least, Window users.
I disagree
Can I play Call of Duty on it or run AutoCAD. No. But that is not why I bought it.
Plus, no matter what...
Ducks
Whichever iWindroid product suits YOUR needs is the right one for you.
All this insecurity about who ‘wins’ is really worthless rhetoric, haters will hate because they don’t want to b changed. Zealots will swallow whatever because they don’t want to be changed…
I can’t see how Win8 needs to be saved from anything. Viva la choice!
hybrids
Ducks
Only if you're talking ones with
People seem to not understand...
With something like a Surface Pro I can use it as a desktop by connecting a monitor and a Bluetooth keyboard and mouse. Or I can use it as a full-powered laptop. Or I can use it as a consumption oriented tablet.
A laptop can be a desktop and a laptop, but not a tablet. An iPad or Android tablet can only consume content, they can't be full powered desktops or laptops.
So in my mind, the jack-of-all-trades strength of a hybrid is far better than the specialized, and limiting, strengths of desktops, laptops, or tablets.
but it's delicious
save windows
The problem with windows 8 is that it is a compromised OS. It's root is the desktop but it's been partially reoriented as a portable device OS. On my surface it shines, on my production pc....well, I don't even want to take the risk.
We have benchmark Win 8 on many technical aspect and it won over Win 7 on almost every rest we have made. So technically it is better, the problem is Metro. It doesn't have its place on a Dual screen, programmer's PC that is setup to work visual studio, Sql Management Studio and PhotoShop. For that, the desktop is what we need and being annoyed by Metro is a nonsense.
I truly appreciate all the effort Ms have done to create a touch oriented Windows but they should have made it separate sku. Windows 8 desktop should be one product, windows touch another. Metro apps should work on both but the should only work as standard windows on windows 8 desktop edition.
If that happens, I will definitely install windows 8 on all my PCs because it is a superior OS overall.
Metro as an option
A program called Classic Shell
That is a bandaid on a gunshot wound.
I don't want my gadgets to be the entire user interface to my desktop. I want gadgets, but I want them tucked along the edge of one monitor at the same time I have all of my apps open across all three monitors.
Bottom line: Windows 8 cripples desktop PCs, even if you run in desktop mode all the time and use a hack app to make it more like Windows 7.
Microsoft removed gadgets and are
Yes I have gadgets on my Windows 7 machine like network stats, temp (local and where is was born) processor and graphics card stat which basically are for show and when I reallu need info I go to task manager.
And yet, MS created them...
How is that an improvement?