Superhumans, dead worlds, and the fate of the universe in pictures
Summary: Forget your Facebook timeline, see what's in store for humanity and the universe in the near and far future.
Image 1 of 30

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change releases its Fifth Assessment Report which concludes that humanity is on a path to self destruction and is rapidly running out of time. Despite these warnings, and a broad scientific consensus, much of the public remains skeptical about global warming. Get more details at FutureTimeline.net.
Photo credit: FutureTimeline.net
Supporting post: Massive timeline of future history (photos)
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Why The Public Remains Skeptical
RE: Superhumans, dead worlds, and the fate of the universe in pictures
Gee, you haven't been outside lately have you?
RE: Superhumans, dead worlds, and the fate of the universe in pictures
Nothing that has happened thus far with regard to climate change is anything you could perceive "by going outside." The changes are very subtle.
RE: Superhumans, dead worlds, and the fate of the universe in pictures
RE: Superhumans, dead worlds, and the fate of the universe in pictures
RE: Superhumans, dead worlds, and the fate of the universe in pictures
...yes, yes-- it's all a conspiracy -- you're an intelligent fellow, read between the lines. The south western U.S. is returning to desert, Manhattan size pieces of ice separate from the Antarctica with regularity, increasing ocean water levels are encroaching on low lying areas, decreasing salinity within the Atlantic ocean affecting gulf stream circulation and European climate, widespread and unprecedented forest fires in both the U.S and Europe, increased solar activity coupled with increased industrial CO2 accumulations, that our slowly disappearing forests mentioned above, are less able to sequester, carbonic acid acidification of oceans affecting pH sensitive flora and fauna. All of these are well documented and characterize the notion of a 'tipping point'.
I do read
Yes, earth's climate is changing, it's always been changing. This is just like there have always been solar and lunar eclipses and religious figures and kings have used them to control their subjects.
RE: Superhumans, dead worlds, and the fate of the universe in pictures
RE: Superhumans, dead worlds, and the fate of the universe in pictures
RE: Superhumans, dead worlds, and the fate of the universe in pictures
Ever hear of the 'Monty Hall Dilemma'? A simple example of (most) peoples intuition and logic being dead wrong.
Three doors; A, B, C.
Behind one door is a car, the other two have goats.
Pick a door (say A).
Monty opens door C to show you it has goat.
Monty offers to let you stay with door A, or switch to door B.
What do you do? What are the odds of winning if you stay on door A? What are the odds if you switch to door B?
(answer at the end of the post) :)
Is climate change real? Is it man-made?
The majority of credible information, from credible, seemingly unbiased sources across a plethora of fields, say it is likely to be true. Yes there is contrary opinion. Is there money to made? Of course. Just as there is money to be made by those denying it. The question is, what is the best course of action when facing this possible threat?
A. Do nothing.
B. Do something.
Go with A?:
1. If it turns out to NOT be a threat, A is a good choice. Doesn't cost us anything and life goes on. But we'd be betting our lives and future.
2. If it is a threat, A is a bad choice. We're screwed.
Go with B?:
3. If it is a NOT a threat, B is a neutral choice. If we take mitigating steps, those steps might obscure whether it was a threat or not. We may never know for sure. In that scenario then yes, it cost money and effort, but we will be essentially taking out insurance against that threat. With (hopefully) the side-effect of improving our world. And likely with huge new economic developments.
4. If it is threat, B is a good choice. We take steps to save ourselves.
So A is either very risky or we're screwed. B is positive either way. Logically, I'd go with B.
Speaking of logic...
When Monty offers you the choice to switch, DO IT!
Statistically, switching gives you a 2/3rds chance of winning the car. Staying with your original choice is a 1/3 chance of winning the car.
The odds are NOT 50/50.
At this point, the vast majority of people are going to disagree with me. That's OK. :)
Look it up. Google "Monty Hall Dilemma".
RE: Superhumans, dead worlds, and the fate of the universe in pictures
99% of Scientists say Global Warming is real.
50% of all politicians say it isn't.
Who are you going to believe, half the politicians, or all of the scientists? I'm going with the scientists.
RE: Superhumans, dead worlds, and the fate of the universe in pictures
Every religion has its end of the world story, including
Earth's biosphere is safe
Frankly, the human race needs a judicious pruning. If nature does it for us, then we won't have to worry about any moral or ethical problems with our doing it.
True
Human population is expected hit 7 billion later this month. It took thousands of years for population to hit 1 billion and it now takes less than a generation to add a billion.
Humans have gotten too good at manipulating the environment, protecting ourselves from our natural predators and we have been too successful in reproduction.
I also prefer nature to trim back the population of humans, the thought of one person or one group deciding who and how many should live is repugnant.
RE: Superhumans, dead worlds, and the fate of the universe in pictures
Nature doesn't take the kinder or gentler approach. So why would you actually prefer that? Given that we already have the technology to limit population growth (birth control), wouldn't it be less brutal if we just found the right social formula for actually using it more widespread?
gary
RE: Superhumans, dead worlds, and the fate of the universe in pictures
RE: Superhumans, dead worlds, and the fate of the universe in pictures
in some circumstances parasites kill the host
it's possible humans will kill the earth.
then again, maybe we can save ourselves through technology. No-one has a crystal ball, but it doesn't feel right or sustainable to be pouring the crap out that we do pour out. Make up your own minds.
RE: Superhumans, dead worlds, and the fate of the universe in pictures