Windows Phone 8 - A first look
Summary: Microsoft offers us the first real glimpse of the upcoming Windows Phone 8 platform.
Image 2 of 15

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Hey Apple
I know what you mean...
Foisting a ridiculous Mondrian interface on your hapless users does not make you hip (you know, Mondrian, the guy who invented art for stupid people to buy). Flooding the screen with a monochromatic color does not unify the graphic theme (especially when the colors are lipstick pink or babysh*t yellow!). Cutting off parts of the titles does not make you a designer (it does make it harder to read). As an *actual* designer, I will tell you right now: this interface will absolutely *disgust* most users within 6 months. I'm totally sick of it already and I just saw a few screen shots. From a visual as *well* as a functional design, this interface is a complete disaster. What looks "refreshing and new" to some reviewers will be horrible and tedious when you actually have to use it. This is truly the end of days for M$. Welcome to Applegeddon...
Well, kinda
Disgusted? Really?
The design's the thing...
I'm not "magically assuming" anything. I can simply look at it and tell it won't work well. My own career is actually as an interface designer, and I know from my own experience (which includes designing interfaces for Windows, Mac and now iPad apps) that there is no way that interface will be a smooth experience for the user. It is oversimplified, and monotonous while at the same time managing to be confusing, busy, garish and cluttered. The graphics of an interface are vital to helping the user along... the Metro interface appears to work *against* this goal.
One of the biggest problems with Metro is the color(s). While the user *initially* sees color from the backgrounds of all those little rectangles, the color is simply a flat color (no shading or texture, etc.). Eventually, after viewing these flat colors for awhile, your mind will tune them out, as they add nothing to your perceived information. So, after you tune out those flat colors, all you're left with is a white silhouette of an icon (reminiscent of the original old B&W Mac monitors... where you could use any color you wanted as long as it was black!). A white silhouette hardly counts as a color. So instead of having beautiful miniature works of art in 16 million colors (as they are on previous versions of Windows, Mac and iPad, etc.), we are forced back to the bad old computer graphics days when everything was monochromatic. Believe me, color not only sells... it also is a great way to identify things. Removing color just for the sake of style is counter-productive to any computer interface. That's why we have color now, instead of being stuck in the past with monochrome displays.
Design
Besides "Metro", one of the first places I noticed this backwards trend was in the front-end of Visual Studio 2012. Yuck! 2008 has a much more appealing GUI to me. Highly customizable and full of brilliant (and easy to understand) icon pictures. The 2012 version drops back into these ugly monochrome tools that are tough for my eyes to adapt to.
Fortunately since I develop mostly desktop applications I'm going to be able to sit most of this out. VS2008 (and my copy of Office 2003) are kept under lock and key. I've tested them both on Win8 and they both function perfectly. Fortunately nothing going on in the technology renders either of those tools (among others) irrelevant. You want to talk about "making do" with what you have. I'm going to seriously be doing that for awhile!
-Max
I LIKE
Love the stereotyping.
Activity dude with blue.
Same stale Microsoft, this isn't Toys 'R Us you know Mr MS. People are a lot more complex than say "lets pick my favorite color".